Title: Website:
1Regional Power SystemPlanning and Investment
- Richard Sedano and Richard Cowart
- NEDRI
- February 11, 2003
2Demand Side Solutions Have Value
- But there are barriers
- Solving Structural Barriers to Demand Response
- Involves addressing planning and investment
practices - Also removes some barriers affecting energy
efficiency and distributed generation
3Priorities and Realities
- Electric Market is Regional
- Public Policy Involved, Just a Matter of When
- Potential to improve investment decisions or slow
them down - Resource Parity Assures Least Cost
4Objectives
- Market oriented decisions with competitive forces
at work - Cost causation has merit
- Socialization granted only after passing a test
- Cost recovery mechanisms comparable for all
resource solutions
5Symptoms of Regional Electric Market Problems
- Lack of timely transmission line proposals
- Generation construction that causes congestion
- Lack of connection between electricity investment
decisions and environmental implications - Lack of consideration of customer resources to
solve grid problems - Lack of co-ordination of investment plans by
monopoly and competitive companies
6System Planning Recommendations
- Regional cooperative endeavor by states
- RSAC
- Continuing regional planning process
- Driven by system needs
- All solutions available
7Regional StateAdvisory Council
- Recommendation 1 Create a regional entity for
power system planning as a joint endeavor of the
six New England states and ISO-New England. - Regional screen on public policy
- Work in partnership with ISO
- Planning can support many policy implementation
tasks - Cost of wholesale market
- Governance punted
Will States Really Do This?
8Regional Power System Planning Process
- Recommendation 2 Conduct a continuing Regional
Power System Planning process to identify system
needs and alternative strategies to meet them. - Cyclical
- Transparent
- System needs treated over time
- Maximum planning horizon
- Maintain responsiveness to emergent conditions
- Improve public confidence
9ComprehensiveSolution Set
- Recommendation 3 The Regional Power System
Planning process should evaluate on an
even-handed basis a wide range of feasible
solutions to emerging problems, including
investments in generation, transmission, and
demand-side options. - Regardless of the planning process, all
reasonable solutions should be considered and
evaluated similarly - Candidate solutions come from competitive and
regulated entities - State regulation would have to support solutions
coming from regulated entities - Implementing a solution affects the economics of
the others
10System Investment Recommendations
- Market oriented investments preferred
- State authority remains
- Cost causation is appropriate
- Socialization is appropriate for some
reliability-oriented investments - Efficient Reliability Standard should apply
- Resource parity
- Least cost standard
- Cost recovery comparability
11(4) Market-based and State-based responses
- Recommendation 4 Leave investment and siting
decisions in the hands of market participants and
state regulators wherever possible, assigning
cost responsibility to those who create the need
for system upgrades, and those who benefit from
them. - After grid problems and potential solutions are
identified in the system planning process, these
results should be posted publicly so that market
participants can consider what actions they might
take within the existing market structure to meet
emerging needs. Wherever possible, RSAC should
permit market-based and state-based responses to
emerge. - ltNBText on cost allocation deletedgt
- Public, regional intervention to promote or pay
for grid solutions should be taken only where it
is evident that adequate resolution is not
forthcoming in the market, or that the investment
in question is one that, as a matter of equity,
ought to be undertaken by grid managers with cost
recovery imposed through tariffs.
12(5) Efficient Reliability Test
- Recommendation 5
- ISO-New England, NEPOOL, and FERC should apply an
Efficient Reliability test, based on principles
of least-cost analysis and resource parity, when
considering proposals to socialize the costs of
system improvements through wholesale rules and
transmission tariffs.
13(5a)Two principles
- Resource parity Energy efficiency, load
management, demand-side bidding, and distributed
resources in addition to traditional generation
and transmission resources -- are all potentially
cost-effective means of meeting reliability needs
identified by system operators and power pool
managers. NEDRI recommends that when socialized
cost recovery is sought, that demand-side
resources be treated comparably to supply-side
and wires options both in analysis and in access
to funding. - Least-cost standard A principal criterion for
selecting a solution that is qualified to receive
socialized support should be whether it is the
lowest-cost, reasonably available solution to an
unmet system need, considered on a total cost
basis.
14(5b) Screening proposals to socialize grid costs
- NEDRI recommends that NEPOOL, ISO-New England,
and FERC adopt the following standard as a means
of screening proposals to socialize grid
enhancements - Before socializing the costs of a proposed
reliability-enhancing investment through tariff,
uplift, or other cost-sharing requirement, ISO-NE
(and FERC) should require the applicant to
demonstrate - (1) That the relevant market is fully open to
demand-side as well as supply-side resources - (2) That the proposed investment is the lowest
cost, reasonably-available means to correct a
remaining market failure and - (3) That benefits from the investment will be
widespread, and thus appropriate for support
through broad-based funding.
15(6) Comparable cost recovery opportunities
- Recommendation 6 Ensure comparable cost recovery
opportunities for transmission and
non-transmission resource solutions - Whether a grid problem is resolved through a
transmission or non-transmission solution, or a
combination of them, the solution should qualify
for cost recovery through transmission tariffs or
wholesale uplift charges on the same basis.
16Possible Roles of the Multi-State Entity
- Transmission Siting Advice
- Regional Resource Adequacy
- Congestion Monitoring
- Market Power Monitoring
- Gas Supply Co-ordination
- Environmental Issue Integration
- Technical Potential Assessments
- Innovative Solutions Advice
- Public Benefits Co-ordination
17RTEP Process Flow with observations
Need longer horizon
Opportunity to engage more rings of interested
people
Meetings throughout region are good
Public Policy input is inconsistent, not reliable
Unequal treatment for cost recovery among
resources is too large a barrier to get best
choices
Non-transmission alternatives not permitted to
compete (planning, cost recovery) here unclear
how any distributed resource options are
considered
Declaration of appropriate projects lacks weight
Queueing remains a problem
No effect on state decision-making on pricing,
metering, siting, distributed resources