Agile Experience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Agile Experience

Description:

How do agile practices structure and mediate the experience of individuals developing software? ... teams that clicked,' gelled,' really worked together' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: rogerb60
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Agile Experience


1
Agile Experience
  • communication and collaboration in agile software
    development teams

Elizabeth Whitworth 7th September, 2006
2
Research quest?on
  • What is the experience of being in an agile
    software development team?

3
Research quest?on
How do agile practices structure and mediate the
experience of individuals developing software?
What are the socio-psychological
characteristics surrounding agile practices and
individuals within a software development team?
4
Study data
  • 18 one-on-one interviews
  • agile software development literature and
    community interaction

5
Content of interviews
  • cohesive vs. non-cohesive teams
  • agile vs. non-agile teams
  • personal experiences and/or team activity
  • project characteristics

6
Grounded theory
  • theory generation
  • line-by-line coding
  • memoing and analysis of data
  • results of study
  • high level understanding
  • confirmation from participants

7
Cohesive teamwork
  • strong feelings of excitement
  • teams that clicked,gelled,really worked
    together

agile methodologies were seen to support team
cohesiveness more so than traditional software
development methodologies
8
Agile practices
  • the planning game
  • continuous integration
  • iterative development and delivery

9
Agile practices
  • daily stand-ups
  • information radiators
  • shared team rooms
  • pairing

10
Ease speed
  • Agile culture
  • openness, honesty
  • ? transparent environment
  • trust, respect
  • ? action-based culture
  • whole team involvement and availability
  • ? frequent interaction and immersion

11
Collective activity
  • Buy-in to shared team goals
  • provide the most business value to the customer
    in the least amount of time

12
Collective activity
  • prioritization chunking of activity
  • development around working software
  • ? ? ? ? ? ?
  • reduce cognitive load
  • importance and immediacy
  • discipline and rigor
  • clear measures of success

13
holistic awareness understanding
  • of team
  • of project
  • of product
  • Context-rich information exchange and activity

14
holistic awareness understanding
  • team
  • familiarity and understanding
  • observe and refine working relationships
  • project
  • involvement and interest
  • helping and support
  • product
  • purpose and meaning
  • opportunistic action and collaboration

15
Whole team awareness feedback
  • constant feedback
  • whole team awareness and understanding
  • commitment towards team goals
  • frequent and noticeable progress
  • for example
  • highly visible information radiators
  • daily or weekly team meetings

16
Whole team awareness feedback
  • whole team agreement, approval, and action
  • frequent and informal team interactions
  • ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
  • social accountability and responsibility
  • recognition and appreciation
  • support and motivation
  • shared team goals
  • self-regulating teams

17
Conclusion
  • detailed and transparent planning and activity
  • certainty in the project environment
  • social accountability and support
  • Holistic understanding and competence
  • security and control
  • investment and involvement
  • pride and ownership
  • balance of structure and freedom
  • individual freedom and initiative
  • ability to assess relative importance of goals

18
Next steps
  • further investigation
  • observational studies
  • psychological literature
  • areas for future study
  • critical success factors
  • negative phenomena
  • agile practices
  • application
  • non-traditional contexts

19
Quest?ons
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Conceptual framework
  • Teamworking
  • Self-regulating, self-managing,
    high-performance

sociotechnical systems theory the study of the
relationships and inter-relationships between the
social and technical parts of any system. -
Coakes (2000)
systems thinking holistic, emergent effects,
dynamics of regulation
24
Study focus the agile system
  • This study involved the agile system made up of
    individuals, agile technology, and the group as a
    whole

Particularly the relationships between system
entities interdependencies emergent effects,
such as flow feedback and feedforward
mechanisms effects of technology
25
Interview data
  • 18 interviews
  • five developers, three interaction designers,
    five project managers, two agile coaches, three
    developers/project managers
  • Recruited at conferences, and through contacts in
    the agile software development community
  • 5 members of the same software development team
  • Software development community
  • agile software development conferences and
    workshops
  • practitioner literature (print and online )
  • online correspondence

26
Conducting interviews
  • Example Questions (initial)
  • Could you pick a software development team that
    you found particularly enjoyable or exciting to
    work in and describe it to me?
  • Could you describe the physical space the team
    was in?
  • What was the experience of working in such a
    team?
  • Did you feel that being in the same room
    effected your interactions with your team-mates?
    How so?
  • Example Questions (later)
  • Did you feel like you were part of the team?
    Why/why not?
  • Did you feel that you were able to approach your
    team members to ask for help? Why/why not?
  • How was responsibility divided among team
    members? How did you ensure that everything that
    needed to get done got done?

27
Coding
  • Coding occurred line-by-line and provided a means
    of comparison across diverse participant
    experiences
  • Common themes were extracted as categories and
    explored across situations/participants

28
Theoretical categories
  • Theoretical categories and related properties and
    dimensions were developed based on codes and
    memos
  • Diversity of data in this study, and complex
    nature of interactions made it difficult to
    define a core category about which to construct a
    comprehensive theory

29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
extra notes - awareness
  • Details?

32
extra notes - conclusion
  • Success, progress and change
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com