Energy Revolution: Policies for a Sustainable Future - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Energy Revolution: Policies for a Sustainable Future

Description:

... mechanisms that aim to allow greenhouse gas emission ... Founder and Director of Southwest Energy Efficiency Project. Author/Co-author of four books ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:26
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: tt864
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Energy Revolution: Policies for a Sustainable Future


1
Energy Revolution Policies for a Sustainable
Future
  • Chapter 7 International Policies and
    Institutions
  • Author Howard Geller
  • Summary by Alvin Tran
  • Critique by Gene Park

2
Summary Outline
  • International Clean Energy Cooperation
  • Fostering Clean Energy Innovation in Developing
    Countries
  • Bilateral Assistance, the Global Environmental
    Facility, and the United Nations
  • Multilateral Development Banks
  • The Climate Treaty
  • Enhancing International Technology and Policy
    Cooperation

3
International Clean Energy Cooperation
  • International cooperation in research,
    development, and demonstration (RDD) on new
    energy technologies can balance resources and
    increase the pace of technological innovation
    among countries.
  • The worldwide energy technology cooperation is
    controlled by the International Energy Agency
    (IEA). Established in 1973 because of the oil
    crisis and has 26 member countries from Europe,
    North America, and the Pacific Region.
  • IEAs main goal is to promote the effective
    operation of international energy markets as well
    as maintaining a system for coping with oil
    supply disruptions.
  • IEA hosts the Climate Technology Initiative,
    which helps developing countries with the
    adoption of new energy technology and practices.
    Unfortunately their budget is quite small.
  • International Clean Energy Cooperation faces
    challenges because countries are focused in
    promoting their own industries rather than
    supporting manufacturing and distribution of
    clean energy technologies in other nation.

4
Fostering Clean Energy Innovation in Developing
Countries
  • Developing countries have features that enable
    them to be leaders in the transition to a clean
    energy future.
  • Plentiful renewable energy resources
  • Growing industrial, transport, buildings, and
    power infrastructures.
  • As developing countries progress economically and
    socially, there is the potential to leapfrog over
    the inefficient, fossil fuel-based, and polluting
    energy production found in industrialized
    nations.
  • Policies that encourage energy technology
    innovation and leadership in developing countries
    include
  • RDD emphasizes clean energy supply and use
    technology innovation
  • Development of new industries and introduction of
    new technologies through international joint
    ventures and other technology transfer mechanism.
  • Adopting and enforcing strong energy efficiency
    and environmental standards so that new
    infrastructure is state-of-the-art rather than
    technologically outdated.
  • Technology transfer between industrialized and
    developing countries can be an important
    component of clean energy development worldwide.
  • Investment by private companies represents a
    large and growing share of total financial flows
    to developing countries.
  • He suggested using women to produce and sale
    energy efficiency and renewable energy
    technologies in developing countries.

5
Bilateral Assistance, the Global Environmental
Facility, and the United Nations
  • Most industrialized countries support clean
    energy development and deployment in Third World
    countries through their bilateral assistance
    programs.
  • Bilateral energy assistance is not always
    helpful. The distinction between development
    assistance and export promotion is often blurred.
  • Authors Suggestion Donor-supported programs
    need to be carefully designed and driven by local
    technological, socioeconomic, and institutional
    needs. Donor support should contribute to a
    long-term strategy to build sustainable markets
    for clean energy technologies in developing
    countries. Developing countries should insist on
    these conditions when negotiating projects with
    potential funders.
  • The Global Environmental Facility (GEF) was
    created with funding from industrialized nations
    to help developing countries implement global
    environmental treaties.
  • GEF projects are implemented by the World Bank,
    the United Nations Development Programme, and the
    United Nations Environment Programme.
  • Some GEF projects help to leverage larger-scale
    loans from the World Bank for energy efficiency
    and renewable energy development.
  • GEF is moving away from funding discrete
    technology-oriented projects and is increasing
    support for efforts aimed at removing market
    barriers and establishing self-sustaining energy
    efficiency and renewable energy markets in
    developing countries.

6
Bilateral Assistance, the Global Environmental
Facility, and the United Nations Cont.
  • The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
    promotes innovative energy policies and funds
    capacity building, training activities, and
    feasibility studies in developing countries.
  • Its overall objective is to foster human
    development through greater energy efficiency,
    renewable energy use, and introduction of other
    modern, clean energy technologies.
  • The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
    hosts a Collaborating Centre on Energy and
    Environment.
  • The Centre focuses on helping developing
    countries integrate environmental considerations
    into energy planning and policy making.

7
Multilateral Development Banks
  • The World Bank and regional development banks
    (known collectively as the multilateral
    development banks, or MDBs) are important lenders
    for energy projects in developing and transition
    countries
  • In the past very little financing went to energy
    efficiency or smaller-scale renewable energy
    projects.
  • Recently the development banks have begun to
    improve on this record. The World Bank
    indicating that between 1994 and 1998 it approved
    1.2 billion in loans for end-use energy
    efficiency projects, efficiency improvements in
    district heating system, and nontraditional
    renewable energy projects.
  • The World Bank approved 17 projects with
    renewable energy components totaling about 700
    million between 1992 and 1999, and the Global
    Environment Facility provided 230 million in
    grants for these projects.
  • The Author suggested that the World Bank and
    other MDBs could do more to encourage a clean
    energy revolution in developing countries.
  • MDBs could allocated all of their resources to
    energy efficiency, renewable energy, and natural
    gas projects.
  • If developing countries prefer conventional
    energy technologies, project developers could
    obtain financing from commercial banks or other
    sources of capital

8
The Climate Treaty
  • The United Nations Framework Convention on
    Climate Change was adopted by over 150 nations at
    the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 1992.
  • It was ratified by the United States and other
    countries, and entered into force in 1994.
  • The ultimate objective of the Convention is to
    stabilize the concentration of greenhouse gases
    in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent
    dangerous interference with the worlds climate.
  • The Climate Change Convention include a
    nonbinding provision that industrialized
    countries attempt to return their greenhouse gas
    emission to 1990 levels by the end of 2000.
  • Understanding the devastating impact of global
    warming during the 90s, nations came together to
    negotiate the Kyoto Protocol to the Climate
    Change Convention.
  • The Kyoto Protocol established concrete and
    binding emissions reduction targets for the Annex
    I nations starting in the period from 2008 to
    2012.
  • The target for all Annex I countries is a 5.2
    percent reduction relative to emissions in 1990
  • In early 2001, the Bush Administration announced
    that the U.S. will not ratify the Kyoto Protocol
    even though they are responsible for 25 - 30 of
    current CO2 emissions. They later announced an
    alternative CO2 emissions reduction strategy in
    early 2002, but this strategy appeal for
    voluntary action and was widely criticized.
  • The Kyoto Protocol includes flexible mechanisms
    that aim to allow greenhouse gas emission
    reductions to take place and emissions reductions
    targets to be met at the lowest overall cost.
    But it is this that limits the effectiveness of
    the Protocol due to the so-called hot air trading
    allowance

9
The Climate Treaty
  • Joint Implementation
  • Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol allows joint
    implementation (JI) between Annex I nations that
    have fixed emissions limits. This provision
    allows Western nations to invest in and receive
    emissions credits from energy efficiency projects
    in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union.
  • Western nations can also purchase excess
    emissions credits that the transition countries
    will have due to their economic contraction since
    1990 (hot air trading).
  • Clean Development Mechanism
  • Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol provides for a
    Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) that allows
    parties in Western nations to receive emission
    credits for investing in projects that reduce
    greenhouse gas emission in non-Annex I countries,
    as long as the project advance sustainable
    development within the host country.
  • Implications of the U.S. Withdrawal
  • Without the U.S. participation in the Kyoto
    Protocol, studies show that Annex I countries
    would reduce their emission by 3 percent between
    2008 and 2012, compared to 17 percent annual
    reduction with the United States included
  • One hope is that when other nations move ahead
    with Kyoto Protocol implementation in spite of
    the U.S. withdrawal, it will increase pressure
    for the U.S. to act responsibly and join other
    nations in limiting the risk of potentially
    catastrophic climate change.

10
Enhancing International Technology and Policy
Cooperation
  • There are a number of limitations to the current
    set of activities and institutions
  • The IEA is not a truly global agency because
    developing countries and other nonmember are not
    involved in defining the goals or setting the
    priorities of the IEA. The IEA only has about 10
    staff and a relatively modest budget devoted to
    promoting greater energy efficiency and renewable
    energy use.
  • United Nations has energy programs scattered
    throughout a number of its agencies. No
    individual United Nations agency has a critical
    mass or strong mandate to advance a clean energy
    transition.
  • The GEF is helping developing countries acquire
    and build sustainable markets for clean energy
    technologies. But GEF has been criticized for
    being too closely linked to and dominated by the
    World Bank. They prefer the GEF to be an
    organization operating under the Climate Change
    Convention
  • Bilateral assistance is often self-serving and/or
    driven by political concerns. Their assistance
    is uncoordinated and frequently not responsive to
    the need of developing countries

11
Enhancing International Technology and Policy
Cooperation Cont.
  • International Energy Efficiency and Renewable
    Energy Agency (IEEREA)
  • provide support and strengthen national and
    private sector initiatives through technology and
    policy cooperation, capacity building, and so on.
  • serves as a forum for discussing and negotiating
    global energy efficiency and renewable energy
    targets on an ongoing basis. But it would not
    substitute for national, state, and local action.
  • should be form from the combined efforts of the
    large number of bilateral and multilateral
    organization working on clean energy development
    today. The IEEREA could be assigned a primary
    role for clean energy technology cooperation
    under the United Nation Framework Convention on
    Climate Change.
  • Initial funding and staff for the IEEREA could
    come from combining some or all of the programs
    listed here. Additional funding could be obtain
    by having a small carbon tax in all OECD nations
    could generate substantial new resources ( a tax
    of just .10 per metric ton of carbon would
    generate about 400 million per year). An IEEREA
    could also be funded by having nations pledge a
    portion of savings to governments from reducing
    subsidies for conventional fossil fuel and
    nuclear energy.
  • A well-funded IEEREA need a headquarter, but it
    could also have branches on each continent.
    These branches could coordinate activities in
    their region, working closely with individual
    countries.

12
Conclusion
  • Current international efforts supporting a clean
    energy transition worldwide are fragmented and
    suffer from a number of problems. There is not
    one single institution that can lead the
    transition. The author suggests that a new
    institution is needed. One that is truly global
    in nature and has a clear mandate to nurture a
    clean energy transition. He proposed the IEEREA
    Agency to lead the world in this energy
    revolution.

13
Critique
  • Chapter 7 International Policies and
    Institutions

14
Objectives
  • Authors Background
  • Sources
  • Overall Article
  • Authors idea for an international energy agency

15
Authors Background
  • Education
  • M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Princeton
    University
  • PhD in Energy Policy from University of Sao Paulo
  • Executive Director of American Council for an
    Energy Efficient Economy (1981-2001)
  • Founder and Director of Southwest Energy
    Efficiency Project
  • Author/Co-author of four books

16
Sources
  • Number 36
  • Dates 1995-2002
  • Majority (67) are recent
  • Data Presentation
  • Tables used are clear
  • No graphs

17
Overall Article
  • Logical Organization
  • Current institutions and policies
  • Pros and cons of each
  • Idea for international energy agency
  • Examples given to support each major claim
  • Brazils ethanol fuel program
  • Chinas more efficient power plants

18
Suggested Solution
  • Vague Ideas
  • No firm solutions given, not enough detail
  • How implement ideas?
  • Policies need to be customized
  • Flat quotas wont work for every country
  • Social, economic issues
  • Regulation Enforcement

19
Gellers Idea
  • Energy Tax
  • Does it matter if energy source is renewable?
  • How to separate between renewable/non-renewable
    energy?
  • Financially disadvantaged people may cut back on
    important energy usage

20
Conclusion
  • Well-organized chapter
  • Ideas supported by examples
  • Authors energy agency idea is not specific enough

21
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com