Title: Journalism 614: Setting the Stage
1Journalism 614Setting the Stage
2Krugmans 1965 Thesis
- Advertising does not change attitudes it changes
perceptions of what should matter when buying. - Speaking against the limited effects paradigm in
mass communication, which focused on news and
electoral campaigns changing political attitudes - His speculation has been borne out, and found to
help explain behavior of consumers and citizens - Has quietly become the most cited article in
Public Opinion Quarterly, a leading journal
3Consumers and Citizens
- Effects of advertising on consumer behavior well
documented at the same time that news effects on
public opinion was questioned. - He called into question the assumptions of the
dominant paradigm - Model of influence is wrong - Evidence of low involvement effects
- Little defensive reaction in low involvement
conditions - nature of effect on opinion is
fundamentally different that expected
4Example of Nazi Germany
- Propaganda Model - Hitlers propaganda machine
did not increase anti-Semitic attitudes but
brought already existing anti-Semitic attitudes
into more prominent use for defining the everyday
world - Shifted the frame of reference
- Change in low involvement perceptions
- Conventional model focus to much on attitudes
- For many, politics is low involvement too!
5Conceptualizing Public Opinion
- Ways of thinking about public opinion
- Public opinion as the expression of views
- Central to decision making in democracy
- Public opinion as rationality
- Public opinion as a tool of social integration
- Central to social harmony in communities
- But also a tool for social control
6Public Opinion and Democracy
- U.S. system of government based on representative
democracy - How do elected leaders connect with people?
- Beyond elections every 2, 4 or 6 years
- Must learn what the people they represent want?
7Connections Between Politicians and the Public
Political Leaders
Contact mechanisms -press conferences -press
releases -websites -speeches
Perceptual mechanisms -personal contact -reading
mail/email -public opinion polls -perceptions of
opinion
Contact Mechanisms -letters/email -personal
contact -feedback to mass media -opinion polls
Perceptual mechanisms -media coverage -personal
contact -environ. surveillance
Public
8Relationship to governance
- Public opinion is one key to legitimacy
- Legitimacy to be in power
- Legitimacy to make policy/decisions
- Sources of power behind policy
- Coercion (force over public)
- Consent (public support)
- Consent
- Key in democratic societies
- Public opinion is essential element of consent
9Power of Public Opinion
- P.O. may be more powerful than voting
- Benjamin Ginsbergs argument
- Voting is formalized, channeled behavior
- Ordered and not threatening to the political
order - Reaffirms the status quo
- Expression of opinion is high-risk
- Tiananmen Square Standing up to government
- Environmental Activism Standing up to
corporations - More of a threat toward institutions than voting
10Need systems to monitor opinion
- Politicians may over-estimate its importance
- Decision-making out of fear
- Consequences of ignoring public opinion unclear
- E.g., Vietnam War
- Initial fear of coming out against the war
- Critics become vocal as they sense shift in
opinion
11P.O. Participatory Democracy
- Normative orientation Ideal system
- what should be
- Enlightened participation
- Marketplace of ideas
- Finding the truth through public discourse
- Town meetings
- soliciting input of citizen opinions
- Should democracies seek to maximize
- Citizen participation?
- Input into decision-making?
- Direct democracy?
12What if Public is Ignorant?
- Surveys demonstrate public ignorance
- In 1986, a majority of Americans didnt know the
name of the Soviet leader (Mikhail Gorbachev) - 1992 UMass Report
- 86 could name Bush family dog (Millie)
- 89 know Murphy Brown was character criticized by
Dan Quayle - 15 knew Bush and Clinton support death penalty
- 5 knew both support cuts in capital gains tax
- More people could identify Judge who ran the
Peoples Court on TV than name a single Supreme
Court Justice
13More Evidence
- 22 of Americans believe Saddam Hussein helped
plan and support the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks - 24 believe several of the hijackers were Iraqis
- 41 say Saddam had strong links to al Qaida.
- -Harris Poll
- PIPA (Program on International Policy Attitudes)
study finds FOX News viewers were the most
misinformed about facts. - CPI (Center for Public Integrity) study finds 935
Falsehoods in Pre-War Claims by Members of Bush
Administration
14Are the Mass Media to Blame?
- Surveys show
- Public knowledge constant for 50 years
- Media have expanded tremendously
- More television networks, more news programs,
etc. - Paradox
- More media, yet no more knowledge
- More distortion and manipulation?
15Direct or Representative Democracy?
- Philosophical origins
- Representative democracy Plato
- Direct democracy Aristotle
- Walter Lippman vs. John Dewey
- Lippman Ordinary citizens incapable of rational
decision-making - Dewey Importance of creating opportunities for
citizens to participate - Schools should build democratic skills
16Representative Democracy
- Do we insulate decision-makers?
- Problem of direct democracy
- E.g, would people support necessary taxation?
- E.g., voting on school bond issues
- Who should determine what is best for society?
- Representative democracy
- Elect leaders we trust to make decisions
17Tyranny of the Majority
- James Madison concern
- Tyranny of the majority
- A rationale for representative democracy
- Concern for the suppression of minority views
- Representative democracy as insulation
- Enlightened leaders as an alternative to direct
democracys dictatorship by the majority - Avoids problem of winner take all politics
- Encourages negotiated policy/compromise
18Can Leaders Become Too Concerned?
- Restoring the tyranny of the majority
- Governing by public opinion polls
- Do politicians or corporations
- Choose issues according to polls?
- Alter positions according to polls?
- Silence themselves if views are unpopular?
- The never-ending campaign
- Leading with an eye on approval ratings
- Would politicians wag the dog to engage in
conflicts to benefit from the rally-round-the-fla
g effect?
19Factors Elevating Public Opinion
- 1. Expansion of mass media
- Greater interaction between politicians and
public - 2. Growth of public opinion measurement
- Greater visibility of public opinion
- 3. Decline of Party Identification
- Less predictable voting patters
- 4. Rise of independent voters
- Larger proportion of swing voters
- 5. Decline of voter turnout
- Mobilizing voters more difficult
20Power of Ignorant Opinion?
- If public opinion has become more important
- If the population lacks important knowledge
- Does the influence of public opinion lead to
poor decision-making? - What can be done?
- Deliberative polls?
21Fishkins Deliberative Public Opinion Poll
- Randomly sampled citizens brought in
- Read information and listen to experts
- Meet in groups for discussion
- Survey questions measure their responses
- Poll data then represents
- Opinions of informed citizens
- Overcomes problem of ignorant public
- Opinions take into account opinions of others
- Deliberative forum televised to expand exposure
22Problems with Deliberative Polls
- Motivating people to participate
- National Issues Convention (1996) had low rates
- What information to provide them with?
- What experts will speak to them?
- Language barriers in light of diversity
- Group think norms and conformity pressure
- Did participation make a difference?
- People are hesitant to change opinions
23Collective Decisions
- Just because individuals seem ill-prepared to
make policy decisions - Doesnt mean collective decisions arent wise
- They may also be able to select politicians who
make informed decisions
24The Normative Context
- Sets the stage for normative context of class
- Artificial distinction between consumers and
citizens - they are the same people! - The importance of understanding opinion as
expression and a social force - The balance between representative and direct
democracy in relation to government and policy