Journalism 614: Setting the Stage PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 24
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Journalism 614: Setting the Stage


1
Journalism 614Setting the Stage
2
Krugmans 1965 Thesis
  • Advertising does not change attitudes it changes
    perceptions of what should matter when buying.
  • Speaking against the limited effects paradigm in
    mass communication, which focused on news and
    electoral campaigns changing political attitudes
  • His speculation has been borne out, and found to
    help explain behavior of consumers and citizens
  • Has quietly become the most cited article in
    Public Opinion Quarterly, a leading journal

3
Consumers and Citizens
  • Effects of advertising on consumer behavior well
    documented at the same time that news effects on
    public opinion was questioned.
  • He called into question the assumptions of the
    dominant paradigm - Model of influence is wrong
  • Evidence of low involvement effects
  • Little defensive reaction in low involvement
    conditions - nature of effect on opinion is
    fundamentally different that expected

4
Example of Nazi Germany
  • Propaganda Model - Hitlers propaganda machine
    did not increase anti-Semitic attitudes but
    brought already existing anti-Semitic attitudes
    into more prominent use for defining the everyday
    world
  • Shifted the frame of reference
  • Change in low involvement perceptions
  • Conventional model focus to much on attitudes
  • For many, politics is low involvement too!

5
Conceptualizing Public Opinion
  • Ways of thinking about public opinion
  • Public opinion as the expression of views
  • Central to decision making in democracy
  • Public opinion as rationality
  • Public opinion as a tool of social integration
  • Central to social harmony in communities
  • But also a tool for social control

6
Public Opinion and Democracy
  • U.S. system of government based on representative
    democracy
  • How do elected leaders connect with people?
  • Beyond elections every 2, 4 or 6 years
  • Must learn what the people they represent want?

7
Connections Between Politicians and the Public
Political Leaders
Contact mechanisms -press conferences -press
releases -websites -speeches
Perceptual mechanisms -personal contact -reading
mail/email -public opinion polls -perceptions of
opinion
Contact Mechanisms -letters/email -personal
contact -feedback to mass media -opinion polls
Perceptual mechanisms -media coverage -personal
contact -environ. surveillance
Public
8
Relationship to governance
  • Public opinion is one key to legitimacy
  • Legitimacy to be in power
  • Legitimacy to make policy/decisions
  • Sources of power behind policy
  • Coercion (force over public)
  • Consent (public support)
  • Consent
  • Key in democratic societies
  • Public opinion is essential element of consent

9
Power of Public Opinion
  • P.O. may be more powerful than voting
  • Benjamin Ginsbergs argument
  • Voting is formalized, channeled behavior
  • Ordered and not threatening to the political
    order
  • Reaffirms the status quo
  • Expression of opinion is high-risk
  • Tiananmen Square Standing up to government
  • Environmental Activism Standing up to
    corporations
  • More of a threat toward institutions than voting

10
Need systems to monitor opinion
  • Politicians may over-estimate its importance
  • Decision-making out of fear
  • Consequences of ignoring public opinion unclear
  • E.g., Vietnam War
  • Initial fear of coming out against the war
  • Critics become vocal as they sense shift in
    opinion

11
P.O. Participatory Democracy
  • Normative orientation Ideal system
  • what should be
  • Enlightened participation
  • Marketplace of ideas
  • Finding the truth through public discourse
  • Town meetings
  • soliciting input of citizen opinions
  • Should democracies seek to maximize
  • Citizen participation?
  • Input into decision-making?
  • Direct democracy?

12
What if Public is Ignorant?
  • Surveys demonstrate public ignorance
  • In 1986, a majority of Americans didnt know the
    name of the Soviet leader (Mikhail Gorbachev)
  • 1992 UMass Report
  • 86 could name Bush family dog (Millie)
  • 89 know Murphy Brown was character criticized by
    Dan Quayle
  • 15 knew Bush and Clinton support death penalty
  • 5 knew both support cuts in capital gains tax
  • More people could identify Judge who ran the
    Peoples Court on TV than name a single Supreme
    Court Justice

13
More Evidence
  • 22 of Americans believe Saddam Hussein helped
    plan and support the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks
  • 24 believe several of the hijackers were Iraqis
  • 41 say Saddam had strong links to al Qaida.
  • -Harris Poll
  • PIPA (Program on International Policy Attitudes)
    study finds FOX News viewers were the most
    misinformed about facts.
  • CPI (Center for Public Integrity) study finds 935
    Falsehoods in Pre-War Claims by Members of Bush
    Administration

14
Are the Mass Media to Blame?
  • Surveys show
  • Public knowledge constant for 50 years
  • Media have expanded tremendously
  • More television networks, more news programs,
    etc.
  • Paradox
  • More media, yet no more knowledge
  • More distortion and manipulation?

15
Direct or Representative Democracy?
  • Philosophical origins
  • Representative democracy Plato
  • Direct democracy Aristotle
  • Walter Lippman vs. John Dewey
  • Lippman Ordinary citizens incapable of rational
    decision-making
  • Dewey Importance of creating opportunities for
    citizens to participate
  • Schools should build democratic skills

16
Representative Democracy
  • Do we insulate decision-makers?
  • Problem of direct democracy
  • E.g, would people support necessary taxation?
  • E.g., voting on school bond issues
  • Who should determine what is best for society?
  • Representative democracy
  • Elect leaders we trust to make decisions

17
Tyranny of the Majority
  • James Madison concern
  • Tyranny of the majority
  • A rationale for representative democracy
  • Concern for the suppression of minority views
  • Representative democracy as insulation
  • Enlightened leaders as an alternative to direct
    democracys dictatorship by the majority
  • Avoids problem of winner take all politics
  • Encourages negotiated policy/compromise

18
Can Leaders Become Too Concerned?
  • Restoring the tyranny of the majority
  • Governing by public opinion polls
  • Do politicians or corporations
  • Choose issues according to polls?
  • Alter positions according to polls?
  • Silence themselves if views are unpopular?
  • The never-ending campaign
  • Leading with an eye on approval ratings
  • Would politicians wag the dog to engage in
    conflicts to benefit from the rally-round-the-fla
    g effect?

19
Factors Elevating Public Opinion
  • 1. Expansion of mass media
  • Greater interaction between politicians and
    public
  • 2. Growth of public opinion measurement
  • Greater visibility of public opinion
  • 3. Decline of Party Identification
  • Less predictable voting patters
  • 4. Rise of independent voters
  • Larger proportion of swing voters
  • 5. Decline of voter turnout
  • Mobilizing voters more difficult

20
Power of Ignorant Opinion?
  • If public opinion has become more important
  • If the population lacks important knowledge
  • Does the influence of public opinion lead to
    poor decision-making?
  • What can be done?
  • Deliberative polls?

21
Fishkins Deliberative Public Opinion Poll
  • Randomly sampled citizens brought in
  • Read information and listen to experts
  • Meet in groups for discussion
  • Survey questions measure their responses
  • Poll data then represents
  • Opinions of informed citizens
  • Overcomes problem of ignorant public
  • Opinions take into account opinions of others
  • Deliberative forum televised to expand exposure

22
Problems with Deliberative Polls
  • Motivating people to participate
  • National Issues Convention (1996) had low rates
  • What information to provide them with?
  • What experts will speak to them?
  • Language barriers in light of diversity
  • Group think norms and conformity pressure
  • Did participation make a difference?
  • People are hesitant to change opinions

23
Collective Decisions
  • Just because individuals seem ill-prepared to
    make policy decisions
  • Doesnt mean collective decisions arent wise
  • They may also be able to select politicians who
    make informed decisions

24
The Normative Context
  • Sets the stage for normative context of class
  • Artificial distinction between consumers and
    citizens - they are the same people!
  • The importance of understanding opinion as
    expression and a social force
  • The balance between representative and direct
    democracy in relation to government and policy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com