Title: Electricity Portfolios: RDD
1Electricity Portfolios RDDD/Policy Linkages
- Or There Must Be Some Way Outta Here - J.
Hendrix/R. Zimmerman - Terry Surles
- Hawaii Natural Energy Institute
- October 9, 2007
2Everyone is not entitled to an opinion. If they
lack knowledge, they do not deserve to have an
opinion.
Sir Winston Churchill
3Everybody wants to get into da act!
Jimmy Durante
4 Partnerships Critical For Addressing Overarching
Issues Facing U.S. Energy Infrastructure
Electricity System Issues
Environment Quality Life cycle analyses
Grid Modernization Renewable and DG Peak
Demand Grid Stability
Global Climate Change
Energy Security Oil from grumpy nations,
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Environment Quality
None Of These Issues Can Be Resolved Without
Partnerships
5EIAs Annual Energy Outlook Projections
6World Electricity Consumption
Natural Gas 25
Nuclear12
Natural Gas 18
Coal 37
Nuclear 16
Renewables19
Renewables 20
Oil 7
Coal 38
Oil 8
61 Growth
2001 161 Quads
2025 259 Quads
Worldwide electricity consumption is projected to
grow at an average annual rate of 2.3 between
2001 - 2025
Source IEO2004, Table 16
7U.S. Electricity Consumption
Renewables9
Natural Gas 16
Renewables 9
Coal 55
Natural Gas 14
Coal 53
Nuclear18
Nuclear 21
33 Growth
Oil 2
Oil 3
2005
2025
Source AEO2006, Table 8
8Electricity Generation by Source 2003
Hawaii
United States
Sources HECO and KIUC RPS Reports, FERC Form 1
or Annual Reports to PUC, and IPP reports to US
EIA
Source USEIA
9US Petroleum Imports Rise Inexorably - And at
80/bbl
Source EIA
10Incremental ME Crude Production
11Drivers of Climate Change Its Getting Worse
- Annual fossil CO2 emissions increased from an
average of 6.4 GtC per year in the 1990s, to 7.2
GtC per year in 2000-2005 - CO2 radiative forcing increased by 20 from 1995
to 2005, the largest in any decade in at least
the last 200 years (since the start of the
Industrial Era) -
12Global mean temperatures are rising faster with
time
Period Rate Years ?/decade
13(No Transcript)
14Technology is a Key Significant Advances Needed
to Achieve the Base Case
where todays technology will take us
- 2100
- 75 of electricity non-fossil
- End-use efficiency increases 1/yr
- 2050
- Electric generation 67 efficient
- Passenger vehicles average 50mpg
Stabilization pathway
1300 GT C
Where more advanced versions of current
technologies will take us
480 GT C
Path we need to be on to stabilize atmospheric
CO2
To stabilize at 550ppm, Carbon/GDP must be lt10
of todays by 2100
15Carbon Management No Silver Bullet, Need to
Track Life Cycles
Carbon Management
Decarbonization CO2 Btu
Sequestration
Efficiency
CO2 atm CO2 emitted
lt
lt
lt
Btu GDP
- Regional Partnerships
- Capture/storage
- End-use Technologies
- Demand response
161 Billion Tonnes Carbon per Year Each (And We
Emit 7.2 GT)
Source R. Socolow, Stanford H2 Workshop, 2003
17End-Use Energy Efficiency
18Annual Rate of Change in Energy/GDP for the
United States Similar to voluntary US goals
International Energy Agency (IEA) and EIA
(Energy Information Agency)
2
- 2.7
- 3.4
Average - 0.7
1
0
1984
1989
1994
1981
1982
1983
1985
1986
1987
1988
1990
1991
1992
1993
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
-1
-2
-3
-4
IEA data
EIA data
-5
-6
19United States Refrigerator Use (Actual) and
Estimated Household Standby Use v. Time
2000
Estimated Standby
1800
Power (per house)
1600
1400
Refrigerator Use per
1978 Cal Standard
Unit
1200
1987 Cal Standard
Average Energy Use per Unit Sold (kWh per year)
1000
1980 Cal Standard
800
1990 Federal
600
Standard
400
1993 Federal
Standard
2001 Federal
200
Standard
0
1947
1949
1951
1953
1955
1957
1959
1961
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
20Electricity Generating Capacity for 150 Million
Refrigerators Freezers in the US
60
50
40
30
GW
capacity saved
capacity needed
20
10
0
at 1974 efficiency
at 2001 efficiency
21Focus Needs to be on Buildings Huge Opportunities
Buildings use 71 of electricity
Wash 5
Cooking 5
Computers 1
Electronics 5
Other 4
Industry 33
Buildings 39
Refrigeration 9
21
Heating 32
Cooling 10
Transportation 28
Water Heat 13
Lights 12
18
Other 10
Cooking 2
Computers 3
Lights 28
Residential
Refrigeration 4
Ventilation 7
Commercial
Office Equip 7
Heating 16
Water Heat 7
Cooling 13
Source 2004 Buildings Energy Databook with SEDS
distributed to all end-uses
22Moving Toward Zero Energy Homes
Building-Integrated Photovoltaics
- Homes that are highly energy efficient and
produce all their own energyannually - Todays marketable ZEHcut utility bills at least
50 using EE renewable energy - Tomorrows ZEHEnergy savings of 50-70 plus
30-50 on-site renewable energy - Integrate/optimize best components for whole
house design by climate zone
2359 Elect. Bill Savings
24ZEH Design Leads to Reduced Peak Demand
4.5
Average 2003 New Home
4
3.5
3
2.5
Demand (kW/home)
2
1.5
1
0.5
Super Peak
Peak
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Hour
25Technology Goal Make Decision-Making Easier for
Consumers
- Choices that reduce energy use while addressing
non-energy issues that Joe Bagadonitz cares
about. - Design Choices Ducts in conditioned space
- Operational Choices 1. Classroom lighting system
with high efficiency uplighting and downlighting,
occupancy sensing, and daylighting control (lower
property taxes) - Technology Choices Residential Table Lamp
(CEC/EPA) (Est.. savings potential226M over the
next 10 years based on 113 savings/fixture and
20,000 fixtures/yr) - Ventilation Technologies and Standards Identify
opportunities for improving T24 for energy
efficiency and state of the art knowledge about
maintaining healthy indoor environments. (Est.
savings is 35MW assuming 59,000 new RCs by
increasing technology efficiency by 20 in the
next 10 yrs
26Colored Cool Roof Project
Available now
In development
- Concrete tile
- Composition
27 Demand Response in Residential Commercial
Buildings Reduction in Peak Demand Allows for
Reduced Power Plant Construction
Cost of Avoided Load 100-200 per kW
Price/Proxy/Curtailment Signal1
Communicating Thermostat ?502
Load Data1
Interval Meter ?1001
1. Utility responsible for signal,
communications, meter, and load data. 2. Builder
responsible for communicating thermostat.
28Program Priority for Energy Intensive Industries
that Impact the Economy, Employment and the
Environment
29RENEWABLE ENERGY
30World Energy Supply andthe Role of Renewable
Energy
Source OECD/IEA, 2004
31U.S. Energy Consumption andthe Role of
Renewable Energy
Source Energy Information Administration,
Annual Energy Outlook 2006, Table D4
32Renewable Electricity Overview
U.S. Electric Power Industry Net Generation, 2005
Solar 1
Wind 19
Geothermal 15
Biomass 65
Total 4,055 Billion KWh Electric Utility Plants
63 Independent Power Producers Combined
Heat and Power Plants 37.0
33What is Possible for Renewable Electricity
Renewable Energy Expected From State Standards
Total Estimated Solar Capacity Driven by State
RPS Set-Asides
(assuming full compliance with mandates)
2010 400 MW to 500 MW 2015 1,200 MW to 1,400
MW 2020 2,800 MW to 3,200 MW 2030 3,700 MW to
4,300 MW
Western Governors Association 2015 Goal
- Clean Energy 30,000 MW
- Solar 8,000 MW
- Wind 5,000 to 9,000 MW
- Geothermal 5,600 MW
- Energy Efficiency 40,000 MW
34Wind
- Status
- 11,603 MW
- Cost 4-6/kWh (unsubsidized)
- Potential
- 3/kWh (onshore) by 2012
- 5/kWh (offshore) by 2012
- Research Thrusts
- Low-wind speed turbines
- Advanced power electronics
- Technology transfer to ocean-based systems
Source U.S. Department of Energy
35Growth of Wind Energy Capacity Worldwide
Jan 2007 Cumulative MW 71,476 Rest of World
11,043 North America 13,054 U.S.
11,603MW Canada 1,451MW Europe
47,379
MW Installed
Sources BTM Consult Aps, March 2005
Windpower Monthly, January 2007 NREL
Estimate for 2007
36(No Transcript)
37GE WindEnergy 3.6 MW Turbine
Arklow Banks Windfarm The Irish Sea
Photo R. Thresher
38Sizes and Applications
- Small (?10 kW)
- Homes (Grid
- connected)
- Farms
- Remote Applications
- (e.g. battery changing, water pumping, telecom
sites, icemaking)
- Intermediate
- (10-500 kW)
- Village Power
- Hybrid Systems
- Distributed Power
- Large (500 kW 6 MW)
- Central Station Wind Farms
- Distributed Power
- Offshore Wind Generation
- Stations
39(No Transcript)
40SolarPhotovoltaics and Concentrating Solar Power
- Status in U.S.
- PV
- 526 MW
- Cost 18-23/kWh
- CSP
- 355 MW
- Cost 12/kWh
- Potential
- PV
- 11-18/kWh by 2010
- 5-10 /kWh by 2015
- CSP
- 8.5 /kWh by 2010
- 6 /kWh by 2015
Source U.S. Department of Energy, IEA Updated
November 8, 2006
41(No Transcript)
4240
Multijunction ConcentratorsThree-junction
(2-terminal, monolithic)Two-junction
(2-terminal, monolithic)
Best Research-Cell Efficiencies
Boeing- Spectrolab
NREL (inverted, semi- mismatched)
36
Spectrolab
Japan Energy
32
NREL/ Spectrolab
NREL
NREL
28
UNSW
UNSW
24
UNSW
Spire
UNSW
NREL Cu(In,Ga)Se2 14x concentration
UNSW
Stanford
Spire
FhG-ISE
Efficiency ()
UNSW
ARCO
Georgia Tech
20
Sharp
Georgia Tech
Westing- house
NREL
Varian
NREL
NREL
NREL
AstroPower (small area)
NREL
NREL (CdTe/CIS)
16
NREL
UniversitySo. Florida
No. Carolina State University
NREL
Univ. Stuttgart (45µm thin-film transfer)
NREL
Euro-CIS
Sharp ( large area)
Boeing
United Solar
ARCO
Solarex
Boeing
Kodak
12
Boeing
PFL
AMETEK
Photon Energy
Matsushita
United Solar
Kaneka (2µm on glass)
Kodak
Boeing
Solarex
8
Monosolar
RCA
Boeing
University of Maine
4
RCA
RCA
RCA
RCA
RCA
RCA
0
2000
1995
1990
1985
1980
1975
2005
43(No Transcript)
44CSP Technologies
- Dispatchable Central Station Power
- Parabolic trough
- Power tower
- Non-Dispatchable Central Station or Distributed
Power - Dish/Engine
- Concentrating PV
45(No Transcript)
46Geothermal Energy
47Geothermal Energy Increasingly Competitive
1980 10-16 cents/kWh
2007 5-8 cents/kWh
- Improved technology
- Reduced drilling costs
- Expanding resource base
2011 Goal Less than 5 cents/kWh (prior to budget
reductions)
Current Power Purchase Agreements are about 6 to
6.5 /kWh
48(No Transcript)
49Biomass Energy
Poplars
Wood chips
Switch grass
Fats and Oils
Municipal solid waste
Corn Stover
50Well-to-Wheels Analysis Biofuel System
51Biomass/Biofuels Status
- Biopower
- Grid-connected capacity
- 9700 MW direct combustion
- 400 MW co-firing
- Biopower electricity prices generally range from
8-12/kWh - Biofuels
- Biodiesel 30 million gallons (2004)
- Corn ethanol
- 81 commercial plants
- 3.4 billion gallons (2004)
- 1.22/gal
- Cellulosic ethanol
- 2.49/gal
- Not commercially available
Rated at 21 MW and providing the San Francisco
Bay Area with baseload capacity, the Tracy
Biomass Plant uses wood residues discarded from
agricultural and industrial operations.
- World biomass electricity capacity (2004) 36 GW
- World biofuels production capacity (2004)
ethanol 32 billion l/yr biodiesel 2.2 billion
l/yr - Source Worldwatch Institute
52Brazilthe Saudi Arabia of biofuelsis currently
the only country that truly has a large, viable
industry Although the US ethanol market is
also sizable.
/bbl
53Previous Slide Noted Lack of Profitability
Heres Another Version
Source EIA
54Future of Liquid Biofuels Scott Turns
Presentation Next Week
- For ethanol production to reach its full
potential it must use feedstocks beyond food. - US Department of Energy studies found that the
potential annual production of cellulose for fuel
use was 1.3 billion tons - This is enough for 350 billion liters of ethanol
- 30 of projected US gasoline consumption on an
energy basis - Research today is focused on producing ethanol
and other fuels from cellulose - Bio-Diesel may offer best hope for Hawaii
- Current national work focused on soy
- Potential for Hawaii with tropical oils
-
55Wave Technology Examples
Point Absorbers
OPT PowerBuoy
Overtopping Wave Dragon
Attenuator OPD Pelamis
56Ocean Tidal Current Technology
Verdant Horizontal Axis East River, NY
Hydro Open Center Turbine Gulf Stream
Gorlov Helical Vertical Axis Merrimack River,
Underwater Electric Kite Merrimack River,
Lunar Energy, Rotech Tidal Turbine
MCT SeaFlow Experimental Test
57Ocean Renewable Device Types
- 81 wave, tidal, OTEC, and salinity devices in
development worldwide - 2x industry growth from 2003 to 2006
- Only 14 full scale devices deployed at sea.
- Only 3 in the USA
Ocean Energy Device Types ()
58What is Possible for Renewable Electricity
Renewable Electricity Impact on Total U.S.
Electricity
kWhr
28 of kWhr by 2030
(in Billions)
Ocean 1
Geothermal 8
CSP 3
PV 13
Wind 35
DER 9
Buildings Efficiency 31
59Renewable and Other Distributed Energy on the Grid
- Systems RDD Required
- Technical Standards and Testing
- Power Conversion and Conditioning
- Protection and Load Control
- Communications
- Metering
- Training and Education
- Modeling and Simulation
Bulk Power
Substation
Distribution System
Transmission System
sensors
Load Management
Communication RDD Information Flow, Data
Management, Monitor/Control
Interconnection
Combined Heat Power
Distributed Generation
60Barriers to DG (Renewable) Implementation
- Potential for negative (stability and
intermittency) grid impacts - Utility resistance
- overly strict interconnection requirements
- high grid-access charges (stranded cost recovery)
- Permitting headaches aesthetic issues
- High standby/spinning reserve power costs for
utility - Capital constraints
- Performance risk and guarantees
61Impact of Renewables on Grid Stability Big
Island Challenges
622.0 Performance Analysis (PSLF)One-hour
Validation on April 3, 2007
Frequency
Time (seconds)
Apollo Output Power (disturbance)
Time (seconds)
Following slide
63Storage Applications Throughout the Electrical
System
64Multiple Storage Technologies for Varied
Applications
65NUCLEAR
66Nuclear Should Remain an OptionBUT
- Cost
- Waste disposal
- Health and safety
- Proliferation
67U.S. electricity production costs
1995-2005 (averages in 2005 cents per
kilowatt-hour)
68Generation III solid nuclear power plant
economics
- Strong safety record
- High average capacity factor
- 90 in 2005
- Decreasing production costs
- 30 percent in the last ten years
- 1.72 cents/KWH
- Performance excellence through power uprates
- Gain of 4,183 MWe
- Renewals continue
- 48 complete
- 38 filed or announced
- Life after 60?
69Generation III building a new generation of
nuclear power plants
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission is accepting
applications for design certifications and
operating licenses - Gen III designs
- Nuclear Power 2010 launched by Department of
Energy in 2002 - Reduces technical, regulatory and institutional
barriers to building new plants - Shares costs between government and private
industry to meet future energy needs - EPACT 2005 enacted federal risk insurance,
production tax credits and loan guarantees for
low emission technologies
70Generation IV developing advanced nuclear
energy systems
Switzerland
U.S.A.
Russia
South Africa
South Korea
Canada
France
China
Japan
Euratom
- Governments sponsoring RD necessary to establish
the viability of next generation nuclear energy
systems - Requirements/challenges
- U.S. focus is on very high temperature reactor
(VHTR) for process heat and hydrogen, and sodium
cooled fast reactor (SFR) for actinide burning - System arrangements for SFR and VHTR were signed
last year - Project arrangement for SFR advanced fuels signed
this year - Numerous other project arrangements nearing
signature - Significant benefit to investment from
international collaboration
71Globalizing the benefits of nuclear energy a
closed fuel cycle is necessary
- As nuclear expands, a greater number of nations
could develop their own fuel cycle facilities - Waste disposal, proliferation, and recycling
waste will be the major issue for expansion of
nuclear energy - Uranium resources could be strained in future
A global partnership and advanced recycling
technologies are needed to ensure that nuclear
energy expands safely and securely
72COAL
73Challenges for Advanced Coal Technologies
Domestic Resource Vs. Climate Change
- High perceived risk given limited commercial
history - Limited current market for IGCC
- Cost and reliability concerns
- Extent / timing of new environmental regulations
uncertain (e.g. CO2) - Cost / risk sharing incentives lacking
- Advanced coal versus conventional coal
- gt40 GW (100 units) of U.S. planned additions
have been announced at present, nearly all
conventional pulverized coal - At 1,000/kW this represents gt40 billion in new
investment in coal power - Advanced technologies not being selected
- Industrial infrastructure not robust
- Technology selection and design guidance needed
74Integrated Technology Systems
- The ultimate Clean Coal Program Goal is to
integrate the RD technologies into high
efficiency, near-zero emission coal based
energy-plexes. Key systems for integration
include Multi-Pollutant controls and IGCC
systems. - The ultimate manifestation of the integrated
system goal is the FutureGen project, which seeks
to integrate high efficiency IGCC power
production with hydrogen production and carbon
sequestration.
75Critical RD TechnologiesTurbine Systems
- RD Focus
- Development of advanced gas turbines to burn
hydrogen, leading to near-zero emissions is one
key to the development of fully integrated
zero-emission coal-based systems. - Design of new combustors and controls is being
pursued for hydrogen turbines. High hydrogen
concentrations create high NOx emissions due to
poorer heat transfer characteristics and hotter
flame temperatures. - New turbines for serving oxy-combustor systems
that produce higher pressure and temperature
gases, also result in easily-separable water and
carbon dioxide emissions
76Critical RD TechnologiesFuel Cells
- RD Focus
- The low-cost SECA fuel cell systems goal is to
reduce the capital cost of fuel cell modules by a
factor of ten by 2010. At this price, fuel cells
could compete with gas turbines and diesel
gen-sets and gain widespread market acceptance. - SECA approach is to develop 3 to 10 kW modules
that can be mass-produced, and coupled to create
Distributed Generation, stationary, and small
central power stations. - Additional goals include a 60 efficiency, design
life of 40,000 hours 3,000 hour maintenance
interval and near-zero emissions. - Solid Oxide fuel cells operate at 800C, making
integration with thermal units (micro-turbines)
more practical. Best potential for distributed
Combined Heat and Power systems
77Carbon Sequestration An answer for continued
use of domestic energy resources
- Two major challenges for economically viable,
environmentally acceptable CCS - Lower cost capture currently up to 35 cost
penalty on PVC systems - Reducing uncertainty of storage permanence,
safety, etc. - Need to resolve both to gain acceptance to keep
coal as option and hedge bets on Integrated
Gasification/Combined Cycle (IGCC) coal-fired
power plants
78Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships Validat
ion Phase Field Tests
Injecting between 750 525,000 tons of CO2
- Representing
- gt400 Organizations
- 40 States
- 4 Canadian Provinces
- 3 Indian Nations
- 34 cost share
Big Sky
PCOR
MRCSP
MGSC
WESTCARB
Field Test Type
Southwest
Southeast
Oil bearing (9)
Gas bearing (1)
Saline formation (10)
Coal seam (5)
Terrestrial (11)
79Coal Plant CO2 Emissions and CO2 Storage Capacity
3,700,000
200,000,000
/\/\/\/\
This represents 1,990 years of US storage and
40,800 years of world storage at current CO2
emissions levels.
80Sleipner Project, North Sea
- 1996 to present
- 1 Mt CO2 injection/yr
- Seismic monitoring
Picture compliments of Statoil and LBNL
81Weyburn CO2-EOR and Storage Project
- 2000 to present
- 2.7 Mt/year CO2 injection
- CO2 from the Dakota Gasification Plant in the
U.S.
Photos and map courtesy of PTRC, Encana, and LBNL
82In Salah Gas Project
Gas Processing and CO2 Separation Facility
In Salah Gas Project - Krechba, Algeria Gas
Purification - Amine Extraction 1 Mt/year CO2
Injection Operations Commence - June, 2004
Slide courtesy of BP and LBNL
83Biggest Risks Have Been Identified
- Leakage through poor quality or aging injection
well completions - Leakage up abandoned wells
- Leakage due to inadequate caprock
characterization - Inconsistent or inadequate monitoring
Maturation of the technology and improved
regulations have mitigated most of these
problems for the industrial analogues
84Temporal Evolution of Trapping Mechanisms
Storage security should increase with time at an
effective storage site.
Theoretical and experimental studies are needed
to confirm this hypothesis.
85Implications of Longer-Term Monitoring - Who Has
the Liability?
- 1000 year period (Yucca-lite?)
- Repeat seismic surveys every 10 years
- 10 increase in cost over and above other CCS
costs - Non-financial issues
- Responsibility for monitoring
- Oversight and record keeping
- Responsibility for remediation
86Looking Forward Integration of Transportation
and Electricity
- Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Integration of
transportation and electricity sectors can
provide solutions
87Maintaining a Balanced Technology Portfolio
- More efficient use of energy is the best way to
reduce all pollution - Fossil fuels will continue to dominate energy mix
- Renewables will become more viable
- Distributed energy resources can develop a
viable, potentially significant economic niche - Nuclear power must remain an option
88Integration of RDDD Initiatives Need to
Connect Basic, Development, Applied Activities
with Public Policies
Basic and Applied Research
Fundamental Understanding
Technical Needs
Pilot and Demonstration Projects
Fundamental Understanding
Technology
Industrial Scale Projects
89New Regulations and Policies Can Provide
Incentives to Bridge the Valley of Death
New Energy Idea
Proof of Concept
Self Sustaining Market
Technology Development
International Market
Valley of Death
90HNEI Linking RD and Public Policy to
Commercialization Process
Institutional Issues Regulations Incentives
Government