Helman - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Helman

Description:

Avril Stedeford - Facing Death 1984. Consulting in UK General Practice ... WHAT has happened? WHY has it happened? Why to ME? Why NOW? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: alexl57
Category:
Tags: happened | helman | in | what

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Helman


1
Consultation Models
The Second Termers
2
Why the consultation?
  • Pivotal to everything we do as GPs
  • Gives insight into doctor-patient relationship
  • Likely to feature in every module of the exam
  • Leads to better patient understanding, better
    concordance, fewer complaints

3
  • Poor communication about illness causes more
    suffering than any other problem except
    unrelieved pain.
  • Avril Stedeford - Facing Death 1984

4
Consulting in UK General Practice
  • Average length of 7.5 minutes
  • Fastest in Europe
  • We will each do 200,000 during out careers

5
Why model the consultation?
  • We subconsciously make models for anything we do
    regularly
  • By studying other peoples models we can develop
    our own
  • Helps us understand patients perspective
  • Make us safer and more thorough

6
Hospital Model
  • History
  • Examination
  • Investigations
  • Diagnosis
  • Management plan
  • Follow-up

7
  • What if we cannot make a diagnosis?
  • What if a patient doesnt like the management
    plan?
  • What if the patient has hidden agenda?
  • What if the patients concerns are not addressed?

8
Dr. Roger Karl Neighbour
  • President of RCGP
  • The Inner Consultation 1984
  • 5 checkpoints

9
  • Connecting
  • Summarising
  • Safety netting
  • Handing over
  • Housekeeping

10
Connecting
  • Building rapport
  • Identify patients views, beliefs and experiences

11
Summarising
  • Explaining back to the patient what they have
    told you.
  • Allows for correction, development of
    ideas/understanding
  • Useful tool if things are not going well

12
Handing over
  • Agreeing on a management plan
  • Giving ownership and responsibility of that
    management plan to the patient

13
Safety-netting
  • Considering what if?
  • Can take form of follow-up, what to do if problem
    continues, referral.
  • For benefit of patient and the Dr.

14
Housekeeping
  • The Dr recognising the importance of looking
    after oneself.
  • Coffee, going for a walk, check score in the
    cricket.

15
Neighbours model
  • Pros
  • Good for acute problems
  • Recognises importance of Dr looking after himself
  • Empowers patient
  • Cons
  • Dr centred

16
Helmans Folk Model
  • 1981
  • Medical Anthropologist
  • Patients form a theory based on their
  • Experience
  • Imagination
  • Peer group views

17
Helmans Folk Model
  • WHAT has happened?
  • WHY has it happened?
  • Why to ME?
  • Why NOW?
  • What would happen if NOTHING DONE about it?
  • What should I DO ABOUT IT or whom should I
    consult?

18
Helmans Folk Model
  • Pros
  • Very patient centred
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Cons
  • Time
  • Hard to apply to certain situations e.g. severe
    mental health, elderly, emergencies.

19
Transactional Analysis
  • 1964 Eric Berne
  • Parent
  • Critical or caring
  • Adult
  • Logical
  • Child
  • dependent

20
Transactional Analysis
  • Pros
  • Important to be aware of role
  • Attempt to break patterns of behaviour
  • Cons
  • Not always relevant

21
Stott Davis
  • 1979
  • 4 areas can be systematically explored each time
    a patient consults

22
Stott Davis
  • Management of the PRESENTING PROBLEM
  • Modification of HEALTH SEEKING BEHAVIOURS
  • Management of CONTINUING PROBLEMS
  • Opportunistic HEALTH PROMOTION

23
Stott Davis
  • Pros
  • QOF
  • Long term benefits of modifying behaviour
  • Cons
  • May miss psychological problems
  • No account of patients health beliefs

24
Pendleton et al
  • 1984, 2003
  • 7 tasks

25
Pendleton et al
  • DEFINE the reason for attendance
  • Consider OTHER PROBLEMS
  • With the patient chose an APPROPRIATE ACTION for
    each problem

26
Pendleton et al
  • Achieve a SHARED UNDERSTANDING of the problems
    with the pt
  • INVOLVE the pt in management decisions
    encourage to TAKE RESPONSIBILITY
  • Use TIME RESOURCES appropriately
  • ESTABLISH or maintain a RELATIONSHIP with the pt

27
PENDLETON
  • Define the reason for the patients attendance,
    including
  • Nature and history of problem
  • Their aetiology
  • Ideas concerns and expectations
  • Effects of the problem
  • Consider other problems
  • Continuing problems
  • At risk problems
  • With the patient, to choose an appropriate action
    for each problem.
  • To achieve a shared understanding of the problems
    with the patient.
  • To involve the patient in the management and
    encourage him to accept appropriate
    responsibility
  • To use time and resources appropriately
  • In the consultation
  • In the long term
  • To establish or maintain a relationship with the
    patient which helps to achieve the other tasks

28
Pendleton et al
  • Pros
  • Pt centred
  • Ideas, concerns, expectations
  • Encourages pt responsibility
  • Basis for summative assessment videos
  • Cons
  • Emergencies

29
In summary
  • Numerous models
  • Apply to different consultations
  • Important to know NEIGHBOUR PENDLETON plus one
    other
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com