Overcoming Obstacles to Partnering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Overcoming Obstacles to Partnering

Description:

Overcoming Obstacles to Partnering. Fond du Lac and CenRAP. Introduction. The 1999 Regional Haze Rule called for the creation of Regional Planning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: itep68I
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Overcoming Obstacles to Partnering


1
Overcoming Obstacles to Partnering
  • Fond du Lac and CenRAP

2
Introduction
  • The 1999 Regional Haze Rule called for the
    creation of Regional Planning Organizations, or
    RPOs, where states and tribes would come
    together to address regional haze.
  • The Central Regional Air Planning Association is
    an offshoot of CenSARA, an organization of nine
    midwestern state air agencies, including
    Minnesota, where FdL is located.
  • When CenRAP was created as a sister agency to
    CenSARA, tribes wanted to be included.

3
Obstacles
  • States were not used to working with tribes and
    went ahead and started writing bylaws, with the
    intent of bringing tribes in later.
  • Tribes in the nine-state areas wanted to be
    involved from the on-set.
  • Some CenRAP states were not very enthusiastic
    about including tribes, or didnt understand why
    tribes wanted to be included.
  • Broad geographic areas covered in this region
    includes a broad array of political and cultural
    views.
  • The original draft by-laws had very limited
    tribal representation.

4
Why Did Tribes Want to Be Involved?
  • RPOs were seen as the wave of the future and
    tribes wanted to be included from the start.
  • Visibility can be an important cultural value.
  • The same pollutants that influence visibility
    affect health.
  • Getting involved in this group could lead to
    great contacts for tribes to utilize.
  • Promotes state/tribal relations.

5
How did Tribes Overcome Obstacles?
  • Going to the funding source (EPA) and reminding
    them of their trust responsibility.
  • Once tribes were in the meetings, we needed to
    prove ourselves. We did this by reminding the
    states what we had to offer, showing up
    consistently (even though this is not always
    easy), taking on tasks, serving as co-chairs of
    working groups, and working professionally with
    the states.
  • It helped that there was a deadline for regional
    haze SIPs. Issues of representation had to be
    settled so the group could move forward.

6
Outcomes
  • Tribes gained nine seats on the policy oversight
    group (POG), same as the states.
  • Partnerships were formed between states and
    tribes for monitoring.
  • Tribes hold the Vice-President and
    Secretary/Treasurer positions on the POG.
  • Both states and tribes participate together on
    the POG, Steering Committee, and workgroups.
  • Work was completed with only legislative delays.
  • State/tribal work continues..

7
Partnerships Formed
  • Both states and tribes have attended CenRAP
    training in data management.
  • Both attended Blue Skyways and Smoke Management
    sessions.
  • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and MN tribes
    have a permitting notification agreement for air,
    and one in the works for water.
  • Cherokee and Sac and Fox Nations are filling
    important monitoring gaps.
  • States have come to learn about our
    funding/staffing issues.
  • Valuable contacts have been made between states,
    tribes, FLMs, EPA, CenRAP, etc.

8
Working Professionally
  • Show that we are here not solely to shoot things
    down nor to rubber stamp we are here to get
    things done the best way possible.
  • We are willing to learn and also have much to
    teach.
  • Work within the regulatory framework.
  • Let others know that we care about the same
    issues.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com