Christopher C' Obropta, Ph'D', P'E' Water Resources Extension Specialist Rutgers Cooperative Extensi - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Christopher C' Obropta, Ph'D', P'E' Water Resources Extension Specialist Rutgers Cooperative Extensi

Description:

Christopher C' Obropta, Ph'D', P'E' Water Resources Extension Specialist Rutgers Cooperative Extensi – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Obro
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Christopher C' Obropta, Ph'D', P'E' Water Resources Extension Specialist Rutgers Cooperative Extensi


1
Christopher C. Obropta, Ph.D., P.E.Water
Resources Extension SpecialistRutgers
Cooperative ExtensionPhone 732-932-4917E-mail
obropta_at_envsci.rutgers.edu
2
New Jersey Surface Water Quality Standards for
Phosphorus (N.J.A.C. 79B-1.14(c)) Numeric
Criteria
  • Lakes Phosphorus as total P shall not exceed
    0.05 mg/l in any lake, pond or reservoir, or in a
    tributary at the point where it enters such
    bodies of water, except where watershed or
    site-specific criteria are developed pursuant to
    N.J.A.C. 79B-1.5(g)3.
  • Streams Phosphorus as total P shall not exceed
    0.1 mg/l in any stream, unless it can be
    demonstrated that total P is not the limiting
    nutrient and will not otherwise render the waters
    unsuitable for the designated uses.

3
New Jersey Surface Water Quality Standards for
Phosphorus (N.J.A.C. 79B-1.5(g)2) Narrative
Criteria
  • Except as due to natural conditions, nutrients
    shall not be allowed in concentrations that cause
    objectionable algal densities, nuisance aquatic
    vegetation, abnormal diurnal fluctuations in
    dissolve oxygen or pH, changes to the composition
    of aquatic ecosystems, or otherwise render the
    waters for the designated uses.
  • The Department shall establish water quality
    based effluent limits for nutrients, in addition
    to or more stringent that, the effluent standard
    is N.J.A.C. 79-5.7, as necessary to meet water
    quality criteria.
  • Activities resulting in the nonpoint discharge of
    nutrients shall implement the best management
    practices determined by the Department to be
    necessary to protect the existing or designated
    uses.

4
Nuisance Aquatic Vegetation?
5
Lets Start with the Clean Water Act
6
Clean Water Act Objective
  • It is a national goal that the discharge of
    pollutants into the navigable waters be
    eliminated by 1985.
  • TMDL focused on protection of surface water
    resources
  • streams
  • reservoirs
  • estuaries
  • The ultimate goal of the TMDL process is to meet
    the water quality standards and ultimately
    improve habitat in a watershed.

7
Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)
8
  • What is a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)?
  • A TMDL is a quantitative assessment of water
    quality problems, contributing sources, and load
    reductions or control actions needed to restore
    and protect individual water bodies.
  • What is the Process?
  • 1. Identify Quality Limited Waters (303d List)
  • 2. Establish Priority Waters/Watersheds
  • 3. Develop TMDLs
  • 4. Implement the water quality improvement for
    each segment
  • 5. Assess water quality improvement for each
    segment

9
TMDL Components
  • Problem Statement A description of the water
    body/watershed setting, beneficial use
    impairments of concern, and pollutants or
    stressors causing the impairment
  • Numeric Target(s) For each stressor addressed
    in the TMDL, appropriate measurable indicators
    and associated numeric target(s) based on numeric
    or narrative water quality standards which
    express the target or desired condition for
    designated beneficial uses of water.
  • Source Analysis An assessment of relative
    contributions of pollutant or stressor sources or
    causes to the use impairment and extent of needed
    discharge reductions/controls.
  • Loading Capacity Estimate An estimate of the
    assimilative capacity of the water body for the
    pollutant(s) of concern.

10
More TMDL Components
  • Allocations Allocation of allowable loads or
    load reductions among different sources of
    concern, providing an adequate margin of safety.
    These allocations are usually expressed as
    wasteload allocations to point sources and load
    allocations to nonpoint sources. Allocations can
    be expressed in terms of mass loads or other
    appropriate measures. The TMDL equals the sum of
    allocations and cannot exceed the loading
    capacity.
  • Monitoring Plan (for Phased Approach) Plan to
    monitor effectiveness of TMDL and schedule for
    reviewing and (if necessary) revising TMDL and
    associated implementation elements.
  • Implementation Elements Description of best
    management practices, point source controls or
    other actions necessary to implement TMDL.
    Usually a plan describing how and when necessary
    controls/ restoration actions will be
    accomplished, and who is responsible for
    implementation.

11
EPA TMDL Equation
State water quality standard for the pollutant
given the streams designated beneficial use
TMDL development phase
12
Loading Capacity Analysis
  • Typically, a model is used to determine the load
    capacity of the waterway based upon the physical
    conditions of the waterway and the numerical
    target of the surface water quality standard.
  • Reckhow for lakes an empirical model that
    relates annual phosphorus load and steady-state
    in-lake concentration of total phosphorus a
    function of area of lake and inflow to the lake.
  • QUAL2E, WASP, BASINS for rivers
  • Result is pounds or kilograms of phosphorus per
    year (e.g., Total Phosphorus TMDL for Davidsons
    Mill Lake 690 kg/yr)

13
Source Analysis Potential Sources
  • Point Sources - Wastewater Treatment Plants
  • Nonpoint Sources
  • Stormwater Runoff from Various Land Uses
  • Failing Septic Systems
  • Wildlife/Pet Waste
  • Atmospheric Deposition
  • Sediment Recycling

14
Assessing Existing NPS Loads
  • Measure pollutant loads of stormwater runoff
    costly and time consuming
  • Calculate loads using literature values for
    pollutant loading export coefficients how do
    you know these coefficients are appropriate for
    your watersheds land use?

15
Typical Model Values
16
NPS Sources of Phosphorus Loads
17
TMDL Allocations
18
Implementation Elements
Best Management Practices BMPs Vegetative
Buffers
19
Implementation Elements
Best Management Practices BMPs Bioretention
Systems
20
Implementation Elements
Best Management Practices BMPs Treatment
Wetlands
21
Here are the Issues with TMDLs
22
Some Issues with Loading Capacity Analysis
  • Are there sufficient data to calibrate and
  • verify these models ?
  • Are the models appropriate for use to
  • evaluate New Jerseys waterways?

23
Some Issues with Source Assessment
  • Are the literature values for pollutant
  • loading export coefficients from various
  • land uses appropriate for NJ ?
  • Should there be different coefficients for
  • North and South Jersey ?
  • Should agriculture land use be further
  • divided into different types of agriculture ?
  • Do other sources need to further
  • evaluated such as wildlife, groundwater
  • sources, and failing septic systems ?

24
Some Issues with Implementation
  • Best Management Practices BMPs
  • How effective are they at removing pollutants?
  • Does this effectiveness decrease with time?
  • Is the one size fits all approach
    appropriate?
  • What is the cost benefit of these BMPs?

25
Other Thoughts on TMDL
  • Are there opportunities for pollutant trading
    between point and nonpoint sources?
  • Does the farmers Comprehensive Nutrient
    Management Plan (CNMP) protect the farmer from
    being regulated under the TMDL process?
  • Point Sources are easy, they have permits, but
    how do we get nonpoint sources to comply with the
    required TMDL reductions?

26
What role can Rutgers play in the TMDL Process?
  • Education
  • Research
  • Outreach
  • Providing solutions to these complex problems
    based upon good science and disseminating these
    solutions to the stakeholders of New Jersey

27
Christopher C. Obropta, Ph.D., P.E.Water
Resources Extension SpecialistRutgers
Cooperative ExtensionPhone 732-932-4917E-mail
obropta_at_envsci.rutgers.edu
28
Components of an Environmental Soil P Test
Ref http//www.soil.ncsu.edu/sera17/
29
Phosphorus Index
  • P indexing procedure that could identify soils,
    landforms, and management practices with the
    potential for unfavorable impacts on water bodies
    because of P losses from agricultural soils.
  • Based upon five risk factors
  • Soil Erosion
  • Soil Runoff Class
  • Distance from Surface Water
  • Phosphorus Soil Test
  • Method of Application

30
Phosphorus Index
  • P indexing procedure that could identify soils,
    landforms, and management practices with the
    potential for unfavorable impacts on water bodies
    because of P losses from agricultural soils.
  • Based upon five risk factors
  • Soil Erosion
  • Soil Runoff Class
  • Distance from Surface Water
  • Phosphorus Soil Test
  • Method of Application
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com