Multiple Spanning Trees - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Multiple Spanning Trees

Description:

05/21/2001 St. Louis Interim. 05/21/2001. IEEE 802.1s - St. Louis Interim ... All MST ports are forcefully blocked. Till agreement on IST Master is reached ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: cis947
Learn more at: https://www.ieee802.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Multiple Spanning Trees


1
Multiple Spanning Trees
IEEE 802.1s
05/21/2001 St. Louis Interim
  • Shyam Kaluve (skaluve_at_cisco.com)

2
Common Spanning Tree (Now)
Root
3
Common Spanning Tree (802.1s)
4
Typical Deployment
  • A standalone 802.1s network
  • Old SST bridges in access layer
  • CST root in MST backbone
  • MSTs must not be affected by CST

5
MST Super Bridge
6
Single Bridge vs Super Bridge
  • Switch fabric - MST instances
  • Fabric structure is internal to the bridge - MST
    structure must be internal
  • Fabric operation independent of CST- So should
    be MST operation
  • Sync/ReRoot are atomic- Should propagate a cut
    in all MSTs
  • Bridge ID,Message Age are different

7
Single Bridge vs Super Bridge
R
Path Costs are not accurate
8
Single Bridge vs Super Bridge
R
A
B
C
9
MST Region
  • Transitive closure of MST bridges
  • Either this MST Bridge is the only member of the
    MST Region
  • Or this MST bridge is interconnected by an
    internal LAN to one or more MST bridges having
    the same Region Config

10
Internal LAN
  • LAN L is internal to a bridge B if the
    designated bridge D for L also has the same
    Region Configuration as B

Thanks to Mick
11
MST Region
12
ISTP
  • Holds Super Bridge together
  • Distributes CST info
  • Conveys MST Region Config
  • Identifies boundaries
  • Conveys Sync/ReRoot of Super Bridge

13
Super Sync
14
Super Sync
  • All MST ports are forcefully blocked
  • Till agreement on IST Master is reached
  • Request for Super Sync is propagated to
    downstream bridges in IST
  • May result in partial Super Sync that reverses
    direction

15
Partial Super Sync
16
MSTP
  • Current 7 component priority vector
  • Alters M-trees unnecessarily
  • Results in instability every time CST priority
    changes
  • Convergence follows CST convergence
  • Either requires more space or propagates
    inconsistent CST info

17
MSTP
  • Operates the Super Bridges internal switch fabric
  • Regular 4 component priority vector is sufficient
  • Totally unaffected by CST changes in a single
    802.1s cloud

18
Boundary Ports
  • All M-ports are edge ports
  • IST port state overrides M-ports
  • IST Root/Designated ? MST Designated
  • IST Alternate ? MST Overridden
  • IST Backup ? MST Designated/Alternate
  • ISTMST ? CST

19
Rapid Transition
At the boundary
  • If IST port is root port and becomes forwarding
  • Or if IST port is Designated and gets an
    agreement

- then set agreement for all M-ports
20
ISTP
  • Include CST Designated Bridge and Port ID to make
    an 8 component vector
  • C-Root, C-Cost, C-Bridge, C-Port, I-Master,
    I-Cost, I-Bridge, I-Port
  • Introduce IST Flags to indicate SuperSyncRequest

21
Independence From CST
  • MST instances can use totally different algorithm
  • Change in Super Bridges root port does not
    necessarily cause a Super Sync
  • Separate hello-timer, forward-delay, max-age
    within the region (?)

22
Conclusion
  • ISTP makes the Super Bridge
  • Identifies boundaries
  • Overrides MST ports at boundary
  • Triggers and Propagates Super Sync
  • May optionally carry some VLANs
  • Carries Region-Config and M-records
  • MSTP is a much simplified 802.1w

23
Multiple Spanning Trees
IEEE 802.1s
05/21/2001 St. Louis Interim
  • Shyam Kaluve (skaluve_at_cisco.com)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com