Entropic uncertainty relations for anticommuting observables - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Entropic uncertainty relations for anticommuting observables

Description:

Entropic uncertainty relations for anti-commuting observables. Stephanie Wehner ... Collision entropy H2 (PX) = - log j2 X PX (j)2. Each measurement. Set of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: stephani204
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Entropic uncertainty relations for anticommuting observables


1
Entropic uncertainty relations for anti-commuting
observables
  • Stephanie Wehner
  • Joint work with Andreas Winter

2
Outline
  • Uncertainty Relations
  • What are they?
  • What is known?
  • A meta-uncertainty relation
  • Clifford algebra
  • Characterizing quantum states
  • Strong uncertainty relations
  • .. for the collision entropy
  • for the Shannon entropy
  • Relation to BB84
  • Open questions

3
The setting
1
PX(1)
2
½
PX(2)

Xk
PX(k)
k
Yk
Shannon entropy H(PX) - ?j2 X PX(j) log PX(j)
Collision entropy H2 (PX) - log ? j2 X PX (j)2
4
What are uncertainty relations?
  • Each measurement
  • Set of possible outcomes X
  • Measuring a state distribution PX over X
  • Historic uncertainty relations bound variance
  • And depend on state to be measured!
  • Entropic uncertainty relations
    (Byalynicki-Birula, Mycielski
    CMP75, Deutsch PRL83)
  • Only depend on chosen properties!
  • Goal for any state, give a lower bound for

?
5
Entropic uncertainty relations
  • Example for two outcomes X 0,1 and Y 0,1
  • No entropy for one, means maximal entropy for the
    other!
  • Maximally incompatible!
  • But, what characterizes incompatible
    measurements?
  • Find such measurements
  • Minimize over states

6
So, why they are interesting?
  • Physics
  • Quantum cryptography
  • Quantum key distribution
  • Quantum cryptography in the bounded storage
    model security based on uncertainty relations!
  • Non-local games (interactive proof systems with
    entanglement)

7
Outline
  • Uncertainty Relations
  • What are they?
  • What is known?
  • A meta-uncertainty relation
  • Clifford algebra
  • Characterizing quantum states
  • Strong uncertainty relations
  • .. for the collision entropy
  • for the Shannon entropy
  • Relation to BB84
  • Open questions

8
Known results 2 measurements
  • Two measurements (MaassenUffink, PRL89)
  • A a1gt,,adgt and B b1gt,,bdgt
  • ½ (H(A½) H(B½)) - log c(A,B)
  • c(A,B) maxltabgt agt 2 A, bgt 2 B
  • H(A½) -? Tr(ajgtltaj½) log Tr(ajgtltaj½)
  • Maximal if overlaps are all equal and

9
Known results 2 measurements
  • Maximized if the two bases are mutually unbiased
  • Intuition If we measure any element of one basis
    in the other, all outcomes are equally likely.

10
Known results many measurements
  • All mutually unbiased bases (Sanchez,PLA 93)
  • Random (Hayden,Leung,Shor,Winter,CMP04)
  • How about more than two measurements?
  • Maybe chosing them to be mutually unbiased is
    good enough?
  • NO! (Ballester, W, PRA07)

For d2 2/3
11
Goal
  • What characterizes maximally incompatible
    measurements?
  • Find measurements for which we get strong
    uncertainty relations
  • Here for two outcome measurements
  • Need anti-commutation!

12
Outline
  • Uncertainty Relations
  • What are they?
  • What is known?
  • A meta-uncertainty relation
  • Clifford algebra
  • Characterizing quantum states
  • Strong uncertainty relations
  • .. for the collision entropy
  • for the Shannon entropy
  • Relation to BB84
  • Open questions

13
What is Clifford algebra?
  • Algebra generated by
  • Generators 1,,N
  • For all pairs i,j i j j i 0
  • For each i 2 I
  • View 1,..,N as basis vectors for an
    N-dimensional real vector space.
  • Vector a (a1,,aN) ?j aj j

14
Matrix representation
  • For j 1,,n
  • 2j Y (j-1) Z I (n-j)
  • 2j-1 Y (j-1) X I (n-j)
  • For 2 (d2)
  • 1 X, 2 Z
  • Represented N2n basis vectors with 2n 2n
    matrices
  • To recall
  • a 2 R2n is a vector a ? aj j
  • a is also a 2n 2n matrix
  • Two matrices anti-commute iff vectors are
    orthogonal!

15
Rotating the basis
  • If the original vectors generated a Clifford
    algebra, so do the new ones
  • inner products are preserved
  • ..and thus all anti-commutation relations!

16
Outline
  • Uncertainty Relations
  • What are they?
  • What is known?
  • A meta-uncertainty relation
  • Clifford algebra
  • Characterizing quantum states
  • Strong uncertainty relations
  • .. for the collision entropy
  • for the Shannon entropy
  • Relation to BB84
  • Open questions

17
Basis for dxd matrices
  • Generators also give a basis for matrices with

18
Basis rotations on matrices
  • Given a matrix
  • .. then basis elements transform as vectors

Can extend this to include the final term! 2n1
dimensional real vector space!
19
Tool 1 Rotation
  • Given a matrix
  • Can rotate ? gj j onto 1
  • R½Ry (1/d)(I v(?i gi 2i) 1 ?j lt k gjk j
    k.)

20
Tool 2 Sign flips
  • Given a matrix
  • ½ (1/d)(I v(?i gi 2i) 1 gjk j
    k .)
  • Can find unitary Fj which maps
  • j ! -j
  • k ! k for k ? j
  • Fj ½ Fj y (1/d)(I v(?i gi 2i) 1 - gjk j
    k.)

21
When is a matrix ? a valid state?
  • To minimize over states ?, we often want to
    parametrize them
  • But what conditions do the coefficients need to
    satisfy such that ? is a state?

OK!
???
22
The Bloch sphere d2

When is ½ a quantum state? (½ 0)
Difficult for d gt 2!
23
Generalized Bloch sphere
  • Given state ½ (1/d) (I ?i gi i ?i,k gik
    ik )
  • Rotate onto 1
  • R ½ Ry (1/d) (I v(?i gi 2i) 1 ?i,k gik i
    k )
  • Dephase
  • Fj j Fjy -j and Fj k Fjy k
  • Dj (1/2) (½ Fj ½ Fjy)
  • Iterate for all j 2 2,,N
  • Left with ½ (1/d) (I v(?i gi 2) 1)
  • Must have I (v?i gi 2) 1 -I, hence ?i gi 2
    1

24
Generalized Bloch sphere
  • For any quantum state ½ in d2n and K 2n1
    observables j

25
Outline
  • Uncertainty Relations
  • What are they?
  • What is known?
  • A meta-uncertainty relation
  • Clifford algebra
  • Characterizing quantum states
  • Strong uncertainty relations
  • .. for the collision entropy
  • for the Shannon entropy
  • Relation to BB84
  • Open questions

26
Matrix representation
Measurements we will consider!
  • Algebra generated by
  • Generators 1,,N
  • For all pairs i,j i j j i 0
  • For each i 2 I
  • Two eigenvalues /- 1 j j 0 - j 1

27
Why may this be a good choice?
  • Similarly unbiased
  • Observing 0 or 1 has equal probability
    when measuring with a different observable.

28
Collision entropy
  • For d2n and K 2n1 observables j

29
Outline
  • Uncertainty Relations
  • What are they?
  • What is known?
  • A meta-uncertainty relation
  • Clifford algebra
  • Characterizing quantum states
  • Strong uncertainty relations
  • .. for the collision entropy
  • for the Shannon entropy
  • Relation to BB84
  • Open questions

30
Shannon entropy
  • For d2n and K 2n1 observables j
  • Rewrite as before and use meta-uncertainty
    relation
  • Maximally strong Maximum uncertainty for all
    measurements except one!

31
Outline
  • Uncertainty Relations
  • What are they?
  • What is known?
  • A meta-uncertainty relation
  • Clifford algebra
  • Characterizing quantum states
  • Strong uncertainty relations
  • .. for the collision entropy
  • for the Shannon entropy
  • Relation to BB84
  • Open questions

32
Relation to BB84
  • Encode a bit into the positive or negative
    eigenspace of these operators.
  • Choose operator at random
  • Task determine bit without knowing operator
  • BB84 scenario
  • Alice picks x 2 R 0,1 and b 2 R ,
  • Sends xgtb to Bob
  • Extension
  • Alice picks x 2 R 0,1, and b 2 R 1,N
  • Sends b x to Bob

Previous uncertainty relations for MUBs (BB84
states) in d2 follow as a special case!
33
Applications
  • Could implement 1-k oblivious transfer protocols
    in the bounded storage model. (Damgard, Fehr,
    Renner, Salvail, Schaffner, CRYPTO 07)
  • Same for the noisy storage model (but no direct
    proof)
  • Relatively easy to implement in practice.

34
Open questions
  • For two-outcome measurements, anti-commutation is
    enough!
  • Optimal uncertainty relations for Shannon entropy
  • Near optimal uncertainty relations for collision
    entropy
  • Strong uncertainty relations for more then two
    outcome measurements?
  • Other applications?
  • Small state within a large state!
  • Non-local games need the same operators to
    implement quantum XOR-games
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com