GP Engagement Events - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

GP Engagement Events

Description:

N3 the new NHS network: 15,500 connections. NHSMail: 200,000 users ... practices now involved single supplier trials across Gateshead and Isle of Wight ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: kead2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GP Engagement Events


1
GP Engagement Events
  • Progress to date and issues

2
Overview
  • What has been achieved?
  • What is happening now?
  • What is coming?
  • Issues on which we want your views

3
What has been achieved?
  • QMAS and QoF payments
  • N3 the new NHS network 15,500 connections
  • NHSMail 200,000 users
  • Smart cards issued and used
  • Patient Demographic Service

4
Choose and Book
  • 10,000 bookings a day
  • 61,000 last week
  • 25 of first referrals to OPD
  • Moved into another phase
  • User groups
  • End user communications
  • Updates

5
ETP
  • Over 4 million ETP prescriptions- messaging
    securely 5 of the total volume
  • 85 Community pharmacists registered for smart
    cards
  • 1710 practices enabled and half are actively
    using ETP ie 880 practices

6
GP2GP
  • 35 practices now involved single supplier trials
    across Gateshead and Isle of Wight
  • Croydon mixed economy due to start in January
  • Attachments flowing with native document
    management systems
  • Speeding up roll out end of year up to 500
    practices being recruited

7
IMT Directed Enhanced Service
  • 70 million over 2 years
  • To encourage engagement with IT developments and
    Data Fit for Sharing
  • Provides a contractual framework for the first
    time
  • Enhanced services are voluntary
  • Support training for all users

8
Components of the IMT DES
  • Four Parts
  • Plan 40p/patient
  • Data Accreditation 44p/patient
  • EPS/addresses 27p/patient
  • hosted system 22p/patient

9
Hot issues on which we want your views
  • GPSoC
  • Summary Care Record
  • Explicit or implicit consent
  • Validation of summaries
  • Detailed Care Records
  • Sealed envelopes

10
1. GP Systems of Choice (GPSoC)
11
GPSoC Maturity Model
Level Minimum Functionality 0 QMAS, RFA99 and
Level 1 IG Compliance 1 QMAS, Choose and Book
and PDS and ETP version 1 2 Level 1 plus ETP
version 2 3 Level 2 plus GP2GP 4 Level 3 plus
fully hosted solution to CfH specification 5 Level
4 plus PSIS, SNOMED CT, Clinical Spine
Applications, the NHS CFH Diagnostic Requests and
Reports (Order Comms) and Provision of Care
6 Level 5 plus fully integrated to the NHS CRS
Level 4 integrated solution
12
Retaining Practices Existing System
  • GPSoC aims to fund the annual service charge for
    and upgrades to a practices existing system
  • Annual planning round to agree scope and number
    of upgrades with suppliers and PCTs
  • Upgrades for individual practices agreed based on
    a detailed 3 month planning horizon
  • Risk and VFM checkpoint where data migration
    required for system upgrade

13
System Compliance
  • CAP-GP introduced as replacement for RFA 99
    currently being piloted
  • Status of existing systems none currently
    higher than GPSoC Level 1
  • Greater Transparency through publication of
  • Compliance status
  • Development roadmaps
  • Progress through testing regime

14
1. GP Systems of Choice (GPSoC)
  • QUESTIONS
  • Does this plan seem reasonable to you?
  • Will it allow you to develop your practice IT?

15
2. Summary Care Record
16
Understanding the record
  • The clinical encounter record
  • Detailed Care Record (local)
  • Detailed Care Record Summary Care Record
  • (shared) including
  • Pathway of Care Healthspace

17
Understanding the record
  • Summary Care Record used on first contact and as
    foundation to avoid repetition
  • HealthSpace patient access
  • Detailed Care Record shared for coordinated care,
    especially pathways of care

18
Ensuring confidentiality and access
  • Role Based Access Control (RBAC)
  • Legitimate Relationships
  • Audit and alerts
  • Professional and contractual controls
  • Physical Security

19
Explicit or Implicit Consent?
  • Explicit consent
  • no summary care record until the patient has
    checked their summary and agreed
  • Supported by BMA/GPC/RCGP
  • Significant workload for general practices
  • Lag until summaries available
  • Was used and abandoned in Alberta, Canada

20
Explicit or Implicit Consent?
  • Implicit consent
  • Public information campaign
  • Then uploading of limited (problems, scripts,
    allergies) summary care record from all who
    havent opted out
  • When patient attends, opportunity to check
    contents
  • Still large workload for general practices
  • Model used in Hampshire, Wirral and Scotland

21
Current Practice
  • Implicit consent (opt out) model used in
    Hampshire, Wirral and Scotland and in France
  • In Scotland and Hampshire, a legitimate clinician
    can only see the record after asking the patient
    Consent to View.

22
Accurate records
  • Joint act of publication
  • Data accreditation
  • Verification
  • Incremental growth in data to shared space

23
2. Summary Care Record
  • QUESTIONS
  • What are your views on the best way of handling
    patient consent to sharing?
  • How can general practice best handle the
    validation of summaries?
  • Should we ask for Consent to View?

24
3. Detailed Care Record
25
Patients rights participation
  • Opt out of Summary Care Record
  • Edit Summary Care Record
  • Comment on and add to Summary Care Record
    (Healthspace)
  • Sealed envelopes

26
Sealed Envelopes - Some Basic Assumptions
  • Clinicians work in teams/work groups
  • Confidential information needs to be shared and
    protected within the team
  • Secrets not seen by administrative roles unless
    local customisation redefines for particular
    roles and with appropriate training

27
Sealed Envelopes - Two levels of sensitivity
proposed
  • Sensitive level
  • Extra sensitive invisible level that is locked
    down and not available outside the clinical
    team/workgroup
  • There are potentially significant clinical
    implications to choosing the extra sensitive
    level of which the patient needs to be aware
  • The choice will be the patients in discussion
    with their clinician

28
3. Detailed Care Record
  • QUESTION
  • Does this method for protecting sensitive
    information seem appropriate?

29
REMINDER OF OUR QUESTIONS
  • GPSoC
  • Does this plan seem reasonable to you?
  • Will it allow you to develop your practice IT?
  • Summary Care Record
  • What are your views on the best way of handling
    patient consent to sharing?
  • How can general practice best handle the
    validation of summaries?
  • Should we ask for Consent to View?
  • Detailed Care Record
  • Does the sealed envelopes proposal for protecting
    sensitive information seem appropriate?

30
GP Engagement Events
  • Progress to date and issues
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com