Title: Social Policy V Housing
1Social Policy VHousing
- Dariusz Stanko, Ph.D.
- Department of Social Insurance
- www.sgh.waw.pl/katedry/kus
2Aims of housing policy - UK example (Barr)
- A decent home for every family at a price within
their means. - A fairer choice between owning a home and renting
one. - Fairness between one citizen and another in
giving and receiving help towards housing costs. - A better balance between investment in new houses
and the improvement and repair of older houses. - Housing costs should be a reasonably stable
element in family finances. - Increased scope for mobility in housing.
- A reasonable degree of priority in access for
people in housing need who in the past have found
themselves at the end of the queue. - The necessity to safeguard the independence of
tenants. - The necessity to ensure that the housing needs of
groups such as frail elderly people, the
disabled, and the handicapped are met.
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
3- This presentation is based on the book The
Economics of the Welfare State by Nicholas Barr,
3rd ed., Standford University Press, Chapter 14.
4Types of aims in housing policy
- I. Based on efficiency (economic aspect)
- the size and quality of the housing stock (partly
aim no. 4)(Fig. Efficiency in the housing
market) - tenure neutrality (aim no. 2)
- mobility (aim no. 6)
- II. Based on horizontal equity (distributional
aspect) - minimum standards (equality of costs) (aims no.
1, 8) - equality of opportunity (aims no. 1, 2, 7, 9)
- III. Based on vertical equity. Once decided I.
and II., the question is how to finance the
housing. (aims no.1, 3, 5)
Source Based on Barr (1997 chapter 14).
5Efficiency in the housing market (Barr, 1998 364)
Back
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
6Tenure neutrality buying vs renting
- Buying
- Flow of housing services R1, R2, , RN (net of
maintenance cost), constant rate of preference r.
Present value of benefits PVB
If RtR, then
Buy only if R/rgt P, P purchase price. Buy the
house outright or to take a loan. Mortgage
present value of cost PVC, interest i
If N is large and i and P are constant, then
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
7Tenure neutrality buying vs renting (2)
Introducing two behavioural assumptions 1)
market for housing is competitive for both
purchase (so PVBP) and rental (so RRc,
competitive market rent). 2) the capital market
is perfect, thus ir In result
? RciP. It means that there is an economic
relationship between the market rent Rc and the
purchase price P (i.e. between the flow and the
stock prices).
and ir ? PVC P. It means that the cost of
borrowing and the purchase price are equal and a
rational individual is indifferent between taking
out a mortgage or making an outright purchase.
Secondly, from
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
8Tenure neutrality (3)
- In practice there are uncertainties about future
rates of inflation (unstable real interests and
house prices, discrimination with regard to
access to capital market loans). - So, the choice between buying and renting is not
that obvious or stable.
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
9Mobility
- Fixed location of housing. The housing market
should be sufficiently flexible to prevent
persistent excess demand. - Problems for the labour market, wages,
inequality, economic growth of the region. - Typical problem in Poland plus infrastructure
issue.
Source Based on Barr (1997 chapter 14).
10Horizontal equity
- Equality of opportunity as an access to housing
of at least some minimum standard - access to adequate housing generally (obj. 1,7,
9) - access to different tenures (obj. 2)
- Minimum standards
- efficiency grounds (imperfect information,
externalities) - equity grounds (information and power
systematically correlated with income protection
of children)
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
11Vertical equity
- Barr Once the efficient quantity/quality of
housing and its equitable distribution have been
decided, the remaining question is how housing
should be financed).
- Vertical equity can be achieved via
- reduction of prices ? efficiency grounds for
subsidy or public production - increase of means (cash transfers) ? if none of
the above
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
12The simple theory of the housing market(Barr,
1997 chapter 14)
- Durability of housing
- consumption of housing services on daily basis
- yet the production (stock) long-term.
- therefore slow changes in demand (UK 2 p.y.,
Poland 0,9-1 p.y.)
A simple stock-adjustment model of the housing
market
Source Barr (1997 368).
13Theoretical arguments for intervention
efficiency
- Assumption about perfect information
- size, location OK (surveyors) technical issues
less OK but still less complicated that
healthcare - information about prices infrequent
shopping, heterogeneous commodity (realtors,
estate agents) - knowledge about the future (insurance),
relationship between buying and renting (risk to
landlords) - State should regulate only minimum standards for
the surveying and valuation professions and for
house-insurance policies
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
14Theoretical arguments for intervention
efficiency (2)
- Assumption about perfect competition
- sharp changes in prices yet no problem with
efficiency only with equity, no major
violations of the market mechanism but - market failures can occur with regard to
- equal power assumption (landlord monopoly
power) home implies transferring personal
belongings, improvement of the house, learning
the area and making friends ? increase in the
marginal value of the house to the individual - perfect capital markets lending only to the
safest clients - The state can regulate via a tribunal and via
public provision of loan finance or loan
guarantees.
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
15Theoretical arguments for intervention
efficiency (3)
- Existence of externalities
- safety, sanitation reasons (regulations or
subventions to the maintenance of building
standards) - spatial externalities (market Coase 1960
theorem if law assigns unambiguous and
enforceable property laws, small number of
actors Pigovian taxes or zoning and planning
control) - related to the above the slum process
(improvement grants or planning control), private
vs social discount rate - public goods (parks) regulation through
planning control - increasing returns to scale (amenities sewers,
drains, water, distribution of gas, electricity)
regulation requiring each property to have a
provision of these services - Features of housing durability, heterogeneous
commodity, capital asset, indivisibilities,
transaction costs for moving.
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
16Theoretical arguments for intervention equity
- Horizontal equity
- access to housing
- access to capital markets (imperfections as
higher burden on the lower socioeconomic groups)
public loans or guarantees - perfect information and equal power subsidies
to prices or incomes, regulation - Vertical equity income redistribution or direct
transfers of housing - benefits in kind due to bad consumption
- self-interest of the rich good housing
improves the health and productivity of the
workers and prevents social unrest (merit-good
argument)
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
17Possible ways of intervention in the housing
market
- Pure market provision likely to be inefficient
and inequitable. Proponents of a free market
provision Hayek and Friedman. - Mixed public/private provision
- regulation on the S side (minimum standards,
planning of land use, regulation of professional
standards for surveyors and valuers, regulation
of landlords rent controls) - finance public provision of loans and loan
guarantees limited cases of price subsidies
Source Barr (1997 chapter 14).
18The effect of rent control on the quality of
housing
The rent control incentives for lowering
quality of housing but it may not prevent excess
demand.
Source Barr (1997 388).
19Rent prices in the UK
Source http//www.communities.gov.uk/housing/hous
ingresearch/housingstatistics/housingstatisticsby/
rentslettings/livetables/
20Housing market in the UK
Source http//www.communities.gov.uk/housing/hous
ingresearch/housingstatistics/housingstatisticsby/
householdestimates/livetables-households/
21Housing market in Poland(Rocznik Statystyczny
GUS 2007 42-43)
Growth of the market 107 thousand flats (2008,
I-IX), 133,7 (2007), 115,3 (2006), 114,1 (2005),
108,1 (2004).