MAGNETARS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

MAGNETARS

Description:

MAGNETARS. Ultra-Strong Magnetic Fields producing Gamma Ray flashes and ... impossible by Magnetic forces which are feeble compared to gravity or pressure. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: prakashar
Category:
Tags: magnetars | feeble

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MAGNETARS


1
MAGNETARS
  • Ultra-Strong Magnetic Fields producing Gamma Ray
    flashes and Persistent X-rays.

2
Scheme of the Presentation
  • Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGR) Bursts Events.
  • Phenomenological Burst Theory.
  • Magnetic Field in the Magnetar Model.
  • Requiring and Making the Magnetic Field Work.
  • Year of Magnetar breakthrough 1998.
  • Modeling the X-Ray emission.
  • Population Information.

3
A Fantastic Start
  • SGR 180620 (January 7, 1979) 0.25 sec. pulse of
    soft gamma rays measured by Venera spacecraft.
  • SGR 052666 (March 5, 1979) Extremely bright
    spike peaking at 1045 ergs-s-1 followed by
    3min. train of coherent 8 sec. pulsation,
    quasi-exponential flux decay.
  • SGR 190014 (March, 1979) 3 bursts in two days
    and quiet for nearly two decades.
  • These events were considered variants of the
    usual GRBs until intense reactivation of SGR
    1806-20 in 1983.

4
Characteristics of SGR
  • The emission of Soft Gamma rays (Hard X-rays)
    the repetition of Bursts distinguishes them from
    GRB.
  • Energy radiated 107 1012 Lsun though in a
    different band. 103 104 more energetic than
    other galactic burst sources (BH-XRT, XRB, Novae
    etc.).
  • Burst activity lasts 1000 yrs. Youngest few
    detected, probably millions undetected in our
    galaxy.
  • Supernovae/GRB are one shot events more powerful
    than SGR, mostly extra-galactic.
  • March 5, SGR event briefly brighter than a
    Supernova.

5
Brightest SGR and its phenomenological
implications.
  • The March 5, SGR 052666 burst sent the detectors
    aboard some 5 space-crafts and ISEE (pointed
    away) off-scale. Einstein XRT registered a
    strong signal.
  • Hard pulse of Gamma Rays lasting 0.2s, followed
    by 3mins. fainter soft-tail of gamma rays with
    a cycle period of 8.0s observed in many
    detectors.
  • Light curve of the March 5th event, as recorded
    by gamma-ray detectors aboard the Venera 12 space
    probe. (From E.P. Mazets et al., 1979, Nature
    282, p. 587.)

6
  • Burst repeated 18 times with more time between
    consecutive re-activation and fainter than the
    first giant-flare.
  • Timing Location information of burst detection
    from various satellites/spacecrafts pointed to a
    source covered by a SNR N49 in the LMC.
  • X-ray map of N49 in LMC from ROSAT. White box
    calculated location of the march 5, 1979. The
    point source near the centre of the white box is
    the SGR. ?
  • Intrinsic Brightness recalculated to 1012
    Lsun.

7
(No Transcript)
8
MAGNETAR MAGNETIC FIELD
  • Neutron Star magnetic fields.
  • From Pulsar observations, the pulsation periods
    show a slow increase over time suggesting
    spin-down.
  • Reason for spin down The rotating dipole
    magnetic field emits EM waves as do the charged
    particles following the field lines sending out
    energy and causing spin-down.

9
The Creation of Magnetic Field.
  • Starting with a very hot neutron star, the dense
    fluid of neutrons roils and churns to help
    carry out heat. These convection currents depend
    on the electron density in this nuclear fluid
    too.
  • Ultra dense neutron star fluid - good conductor
    -gt Charged electrons carry electric current,
    trapped magnetic field lines follow convection
    current.
  • Dynamo Action Requires a fast rotating star
    with the embedded electric current and dragged
    magnetic fields. Similar to earth and sun. Ideal
    efficiency can generate 1016G.
  • On cooling, convection -gt Dynamo stops (t 10-20
    s)

10
(No Transcript)
11
  • Built-up magnetic field can remain trapped in the
    heavy, stratified liquid of neutrons and protons.
  • Conclusion Pulsars were neutron stars with
    failed large-scale dynamos. The initial spins
    were not fast enough for magnetic field build-up.
  • (Crab Pinitial 10ms not enough for LS dynamo)
  • Succeeding Dynamo.
  • Neutron stars with gt 200 rps., dynamo action
    buids up magnetic field fast and strong.
  • Efficient removal of rotational energy for high
    magnetic fields. Magnetars quickly spin-down to
    low speeds but trap the high B field.

12
Magnetar model basics
  • Radio pulsars slowly loses its rotational energy
    passively facilitated by magnetic fields.
  • Rotational Energy being lesser in a Magnetar,
    Magnetic field can directly cause energy output.
    Stellar material (Crust/interior) pushed around
    by magnetic field releasing energy ( 10000
    yrs.)

13
  • Ref. Duncan and Thompson, Ap.J. 392, L(9),
    M.N.R.A.S. 275, 255
  • A strong magnetic field allows quick spin
    dissipation by magnetic waves, magnetic
    vibrations and exterior field twists.
  • Neutrino Rocket-effect causes high proper and
    spin velocities.

14
Trapped Fireballs
  • Brightness/Hardness of SGR activity Pure
    explosion of energy fireball powered by a
    magnetic flare.
  • Negligible baryons but ubiquitous e- e pairs.
    Baryons steal energy for motion.
  • Dispensed fireball Residual hot gas of charged
    leptons trapped to strong magnetic field.
  • Inside fireball Particles gyrate along B lines,
    gamma/X rays passing across field lines are
    scattered, more pair creation. Photon dissipation
    from fireball surface, photon from annihilation
    and particle bombardment on star surface.

15
Fireball Evolution Verification
  • Fireball loses energy from outer layer photon
    escape, more annihilation favored causing photon
    emission -gt Shrinking fireball as layers empty
    out.
  • Explains the diminishing flux of March5
    light-curve. Fireball rotating with star every
    8sec., Brightness vary according to orientation
    of fireball, steady shrinking lead to dimming.
    Complete evaporation of fireball in about 3 mins.
  • Magnetic field needs to be strong enough for
    charge confinement. X-ray measurement of soft
    tail summed over the 3min. duration gives total
    energy in trapped gas. Energy of particles
    indicate required field for confinement.

16
Subsequent Progress
  • FFWD 1998 Observation of 7.5s pulsation in X-ray
    emission for SGR 1806-20 interpreted as rotation
    of hotspots on the magnetar Calculation of
    field strength from braking 8 x 1014 Gauss.
  • Detection of 5.16s pulsation in SGR 190014, B
    5 x 1014G.
  • Aug.1998 Giant flaring on SGR 190014 exceeding
    flaring of 1979 in apparent brightness. Saturated
    7 different detectors. Recorded well by KONUS,
    Beppo-SAX, GR detector aboard Ulysses. RXTE
    caught strong signal pointing the other direction.

17
August 27, Giant Flare
  • Very similar to March 5 giant flaring Initial
    Hard spike followed by soft oscillating tail.
  • Regular 5.16 second oscillation.
  • A closer source hence bright. Complete
    termination of the flare recorded at 380 seconds
    past its activation -gt Complete Fireball
    evaporation.
  • Cooling Hot-Spots on surface to fade away
    shifting to lower energies.

18
  • Details in the light-curve
  • - Emergence of strong four-peaked pattern after
    about 40 seconds.
  • Persistence of the four-peak pattern for rest of
    the flare with 5.16 second period.
  • Inference Complicated geometry of the magnetic
    field regions near the star surface, exposed
    after the outer, smoother zones have cleared.

19
(No Transcript)
20
Magnetic Twist induced X-Ray emission
  • Compression of crust material impossible by
    Magnetic forces which are feeble compared to
    gravity or pressure. Shearing horizontal
    movements more favorable. Incompressibility from
    degeneracy pressure, shear-ability from weaker
    electrostatic restoring forces of lattice.
  • Tendency of Magnetic field towards low energy
    configuration causes strong magnetic forces on
    crust. Drifting magnetic field lines stress
    from interior.
  • Result Twisting of Magnetic field lines anchored
    to the crust. Amperes law-current induction,
    electron-positrons along field lines, current
    loops and impacting the photon or star emit
    X-rays as observed in SGR and AXP.

21
(No Transcript)
22
Population information
  • Predictions about Magnetars
  • A dozen known SGR and AXP in Milky way in LMC
    with periods 5-12sec. High spin down implies
    younger population lt 10000 yrs old.
  • 10 Magnetars younger than 10,000yrs
  • gt Formation rate of 1 per 1000 yrs. (probably
    higher)
  • From SNR associations, Birthrate 1 per 100
    yrs.
  • Even a 1 per 300 yrs brithrate implies a
    population of 30 million magnetars for the 10b
    year old galaxy.

23
  • Dead Magnetars X-ray dark and burst/flare quiet.
    Not powered by magnetic dissipation.
  • Location depends on initial recoil velocities
    drifted to halo for large kicks as in present
    SGRs.
  • Theory suggests strong residual magnetism
    helpful for detection of it sweeps up ISM
    material, though requires high velocities. Not
    too hopeful.
  • Rare episode of reactivation possible due to
    gradually gathered magnetic instabilities but
    rarity hinders chance of detection.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com