Corporate Leadership Council: Advocacy Agenda

1
Corporate Leadership CouncilAdvocacy Agenda

• February 22, 2009

2
Introduction
3
CLC Topic Areas
3001 Jay Arnold Digital Globe John
Auble ESRI Marten Hogeweg Fugro EarthData
Inc. Louis Demargne Michael Baker Jr.,
Inc. Malcolm Adkins Craig Neidig
(USGS) NAVTEQ Skip Parker North West
Group Tim Crago Sanborn Map Company
John Copple Surdex Corporation Craig
Molander
Imagery FTN
Transport FTN
Surdex Sanborn North West Group Fugro
EarthData Digital Globe 3001
NAVTEQ
FTNRetrospective
Michael Baker
21st CenturyTechnology
ESRI
4
Imagery For The Nation
5

• North West Group

6
IFTN How will we get it done?

• Not a simple task but what exactly is it?
• The 2006 NAIP program (peak year) covered 70 of
  the United States. Acquisition season from May
  through September. 1m 2m states.
• Achieved with a mix of partially committed
  sensors/cameras both film and digital. In total,
  approximately 20 sensors used.
• With a reasonable ramp up and commitment, the
  assets, infrastructure and staff can be put in
  place.

7
IFTN How will we get it done?

• An area in excess of 3.5M mi2, would require
  15-25 fully dedicated sensors. Depends on
  regional timing, resolutions, priorities,
  competition with other acquisition. Primary 1m
  product would need to be acquired with digital
  sensors (product diversity, turnaround time).
• Currently 40 large format sensors in the USA
  (DMC, UltraCam, ADS), of which 34 are
  commercially available.
• Each acquisition set is a 3.5M-4.5M investment
  (aircraft, sensor, infrastructure) with a 6 month
  lead time to put in place. Industry has been
  investing heavily in new aircraft, sensors and
  infrastructure. Tens of millions to date.
• It can be achieved and industry is ready now.

8

• 3001

9
Imagery For The Nation
The Vision The nation will have a sustainable and
flexible digital imagery program that meets the
needs of local, state, regional, tribal
and federal agencies.
10
IFTN and Elevation Data IFTN Key Points

• The Program
• USDA NAIP
• Annual 1-M imagery for all states except HI
  (3-Yr) AK
• Typically leaf-on, natural color
• USGS
• Alaska 1-M imagery every 5 years
• For 50 of land mass for all other states, 1-foot
  imagery every 3 years (6-in buy-up option)
• States may buy-up other 50
• Alaska 1-ft for densely populated areas
• Typically leaf-off, natural color

11
IFTN and Elevation Data IFTN Key Points

• Program Cost
• Approximately 100 million per year (todays
  dollars).
• Nationally, it will save more than 100 million
  in the first 10-year cycle through contracting
  for larger areas, reducing the number of
  duplicate programs, eliminating certain overhead
  costs, and providing a return on investment that
  is achieved through the application of uniform
  standards.

12
IFTN and Elevation Data IFTN Key Points

• Geospatial Accuracy
• 1-M 25 at 95 NSSDA
• 1-Ft 5 at 95 NSSDA
• 6-In 2.5 at 95 NSSDA
• So. 1-ft and 6-in require a good digital
  elevation model (DEM) surface to generate the
  orthophotos
• So. What about elevation data?

13
IFTN and Elevation Data Current Future
Processes
FIVE PROCESSES 1. Requirements Assessment 2.
Project Management 3. Data acquisition and
production 4. Quality Assurance/Quality Control
(QA/QC) 5. Archive and Distribution

• Current State Operations

14
Imagery For The Nation USDA NAIP 1-M Imagery
True Color View From RGB Imagery, Oklahoma 2008
15
Imagery For The Nation USDA NAIP 1-M Imagery
True Color View From Four-band Imagery, Vermont
2008
16
Imagery For The Nation USDA NAIP 1-M Imagery
Color Infrared View From Four-band Imagery, Rhode
Island 2008
17
Imagery For The Nation USACE/DHS 1-Foot Imagery
True Color View From RGB Imagery, New Orleans 2005
18
Imagery For The Nation Local NORPC 6-Inch
Imagery
True Color View From RGB Imagery, New Orleans 2005
19
IFTN and Elevation Data Technical Coordination

• Technical considerations for IFTN
• Imagery sensor selection
• DEMs to be used
• Survey control
• Color balancing
• File formats and compression
• Coordinate system(s)
• Flying season
• QA/QC
• Distribution

20

• Surdex Corporation

21
Advocacy on the Hill

• Be consistent with terminology
• Be prepared for confusion!
• Generally, avoid deep technical discussions
• Staff generally does not have deep understanding
  of geospatial
• For Congressional members/staff
• Try to find a connection with their state
• Stress multi-agency initiatives
• FGDC/NGAC/NDOP efforts
• Private government jobs will be saved/created
• Research committee involvement

22
These Are Not Just Pretty Pictures

• Accessible to the public via government-sponsored
  web sites
• No licensing restrictions
• Full, raw data content
• Accuracy, quality, etc can be vouched for by a
  government organization

23
These Are Not Just Pretty Pictures

• Usages
• Infrastructure planning and design
• Parcel mapping
• Natural resources assessment
• Conservation monitoring
• Impervious surface mapping
• 911 base information
• Urban planning/urban growth
• Etc.

24
Dont Be Afraid

• To ask for proactive support
• The flaming advocates on the Hill are not fully
  in place
• Desperately need sponsors
• To ask for funding support
• To ask for appropriate legislation support

25
Finally

• Report back to Outreach Committee
• Who was visited
• Level of receptivity
• Help determine/suggest follow-up
• Follow-up with a thank-you letter

26
Elevation For The Nation-an update
John Copple Sanborn Map Company
27
Elevation

• Elevation for the Nation is created
• Executive Summary of the National Academies
  report.
• Floodplain maps serve as the basis for
  determining whether homes or buildings require
  flood insurance under the National Flood
  Insurance Program run by the Federal Emergency
  Management Agency (FEMA). Under a funded mandate
  from Congress, FEMA is modernizing floodplain
  maps to better serve the program. To do so,
  however, FEMA needs land surface elevation data
  that are about ten times more accurate than data
  currently available for most of the nation. New,
  high-accuracy digital elevation data should be
  collected nationwide using laser measurements
  from aircraft (lidar technology). The new data
  should be input into the National Elevation
  Dataset that the U.S. Geological Survey maintains
  for use in support of flood map modernization and
  other applications.
• In a paper published in 1998, the National
  Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA)
  estimated the benefits of such a dataset to be
  worth about 2.5 billion for such diverse
  applications as precision farming,
  stormwatermanagement, transportation planning,
  and disaster preparedness.

28
Elevation NSGIC Recommendation

• RECOMMENDATION 1 The newly established USGS
  Lidar Advisory Committee should be implemented as
  soon as possible and take ownership of this
  initiative under the guidance of the Federal
  Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). It should also
  include members of other stakeholder
  organizations in an advisory role which could be
  accomplished through the National Geospatial
  Advisory Committee (NGAC).
• RECOMMENDATION 2 This initiative should
  consider rebranding its name to Elevation for
  the Nation or some similar name and embrace the
  NSGIC lifecycle elements. Clearly the entire
  geospatial industry (government and the private
  sector) is interested in digital elevation data
  products and needs access to improved products.
• RECOMMENDATION 3 A complete needs assessment
  must be accomplished that incorporates the
  business needs for all levels of government as
  this program continues to develop.

29
Elevation NSGIC Recommendation

• RECOMMENDATION 4 The NLMI program should be
  based on technical requirements and not focused
  on a particular technology. Multiple technologies
  should be employed as appropriate (and cost
  effective) to meet the technical requirements.
• RECOMMENDATION 5 Organizers of the NLMI should
  revisit their decision to build new technologies
  versus using existing industry capabilities. It
  may be beneficial to do this with the organizers
  of IFTN and representatives of commercial
  photogrammetric businesses. The decision should
  be made on a cost benefit analysis of various
  alternatives, particularly as they relate to the
  multiple uses desired by supporters of the NLMI.
  This may allow a faster program start and garner
  industry support. The options in the following
  slide were discussed by David J. Harding of NASA
  GSFC at the 2008 National LiDAR Mapping
  Initiative meeting.

30
Lidar Provides a Wealth of Information for
National Applications FGDC meeting Dec. 16,2008
31
Applications for The National Map- FGDC Dec.
16,2008
Lidar
Hydrology
Elevation Structures
Contours Land Cover
Orthoimagery
32
USGS Lidar Advisory Committee- FGDC meeting Dec.
2009

• Interdisciplinary USGS representation
  (co-chaired by Greg Snyder and George Lee)
• Newly formed - kickoff workshop Oct. 2008
• Reviewed Bureau lidar activities
• Uncovered many more USGS applications
• Set priorities requirements assessment,
  standards, need for national strategy
• Initial stakeholder outreach to AASG, NSGIC,
  MAPPS, ASPRS, and now FGDC
• Members

33
Action Plan Phase 1, FY2009

• Enhance Bureau lidar coordination
• Develop draft USGS lidar guidelines in
  consultation with ASPRS and others
• Assess USGS lidar information needs
• Create stakeholder communication plan and conduct
  preliminary outreach
• Expand lidar data archiving and distribution
  through the USGS Lidar Information Coordination
  and Knowledge (CLICK) facility
• Outline steps for developing a National Lidar
  strategy (Phase 2)

34
Action Plan Phase 2, Beginning FY2010

• Formulate an operational National Lidar strategy
• Assess key national requirements for lidar
  derived information, leverage existing work
• Step-up engagement with Federal, State, local
  agencies, non-governmental organizations,
  industry
• Evaluate lidar technology options and trades
  (feasibility, repeatability, cost, benefits,
  etc.)
• Recommend design options for operational
  National Lidar
• Outline funding strategies

35
Notes from the latest NDEP Meeting

• Report from USGS Lidar Advisory Committee
• George Lee and Greg Snyder (co-chair the Lidar
  Advisory Committee) talked us through an
  informative presentation that can be accessed at
  
• ftp//edcftp.cr.usgs.gov/pub/edcuser/gesch/outgoi
  ng/NDEP/
• The committee has developed and significantly
  expanded the National Lidar concept
• -The committee has developed and significantly
  expanded the National Lidar concept.Draft USGS
  Lidar Standard
• -Karl Heidemann talked about the value of a
  standard promoting common data handling
  practices.
• -The draft standard, in its current form, was
  developed using input from all USGS Lidar data
  users and stakeholders.
• -Once all standing comments have been
  incorporated, the resulting draft will then be
  submitted to the NDEP and ASPRS lidar
  subcommittee for further comment.
• -The short term goal is to develop this draft
  standard in the official USGS standard. The long
  term goal is to proceed in securing FGDC/ASPRS
  adoption as well.
• -Karl mentioned that ASPRS is looking at
  developing a Lidar standard from an applications
  point of view (if your application is X, then
  your Lidar specification for acquisition should
  be Y).

36
Industry input - Time Frame

• Assumptions
• Todays lidar technology
• 1.4-2 Meter post spacing
• 15 cm. vertical accuracy
• 2 ft. contours possible
• Generic aircraft - 1 sensor
• 125knts. 180knts
• 6,000 9000 ft AGL
• 80 sq. miles per hour 640 sq.miles per day
• 2,959,059 sq miles/640 4624 days
• 270 day duty cycle per plane 17 aircraft to
  collect in a year x 2 for risk 34

37
Elevation for the Nation

• Industry believes the capability exists to
  execute a program.
• NSGIC recommended a plan be developed USGS
  working towards one
• As noted specifications, etc. have not been
  developed, in process
• Meanwhile state programs continue to move
  forward.

38
Leveraging IFTN for Additional Products/Services

• Louis Demargne Fugro EarthData

39
Leveraging IFTN for Additional Products/Services

• IFTN opportunity for state and local
  governments to acquire additional and/or upgraded
  geospatial data layers at reduced cost
• Additional products broaden the range of
  applications, therefore increased value of the
  IFTN investment
• Opportunity to support NSDI goals standardized
  framework data layers across states

40
Leveraging IFTN for Additional Products/Services

• Additional and upgrade datasets include
• Higher resolution imagery (6-inch)
• Color IR imagery
• Thematic maps (LU/LC, impervious surfaces, etc.)
• Other NSDI framework data layers (topo, hydro,
  transportation, etc.)

41
Leveraging IFTN for Additional Products/Services

• Cost analysis for 6-inch orthos upgrade
• County ABC
• Wants to obtain 6-inch orthos over 500 square
  miles
• Would normally pay 200 / square mile 100,000
• State XYZ to be acquired under IFTN
• 1-foot orthos over entire state at 120 / square
  mile
• Translates to 60,000 for county ABC

42
Leveraging IFTN for Additional Products/Services

• Cost analysis for 6-inch orthos upgrade -
  conclusion
• County ABC can obtain 6-inch county-wide for
  40,000 60 savings
• More departments benefit from the data
• State and IFTN obtain 6-inch imagery for price of
  1-foot
• If adjacent counties get involved, price per
  square mile will drop some more

43
Leveraging IFTN for Additional Products/Services

• How to contract for additional data and upgrades
• Work with your local USGS liaison
• Build business case of why you need
  data/upgrades, establish MOU
• Get buy-in, support from counties and
  municipalities
• Try to obtain blocks of adjacent jurisdictions
• USGS liaison will work with IFTN program manager
  and private contractor to include new specs into
  existing SOW

44
Leveraging IFTN for Additional Products/Services
45
Leveraging IFTN for Additional Products/Services

• Example 2008 Boston Metro Area Mapping
• MassGIS looking to acquire statewide orthos
• USGS planning to acquire 1-foot orthos of Boston
  metro area through Dewberrys GPSC contract
• In less than 2 months, MassGIS and USGS liaison
  set up MOUs with 30 of local municipalities and
  one utility company
• Local municipalities obtained 6-inch orthos for
  5,000 to 10,000

46

• John Auble
• DigitalGlobe

47
Location Reference Today

• Becoming a ubiquitous requirement for the
  professional, consumer and business application
• We are more and more location aware as a community

• It is a value-added component for applications
  and devices - - in your hand and in the field

48
911 Needs Aerial Data and it Needs to be Fresh

• Novak added aerial photographs are used in flood
  plain mapping and the conservation of open space,
  among other activities. Without updated aerial
  maps, Wyoming County is using data collected
  several years ago.That data has been used in an
  ongoing county-wide project to replace rural
  route addresses with street names and numbers,
  911 addressing coordinator Chas Mead said.Not
  having up-to-date data affects numerous parts of
  the countys government, including
  planning.Mapping is a sound principle of any
  program we have, county planner Paul Weilage
  said. The planning department would use the data
  for numerous things.At the assessment office,
  aerial maps are used to help calculate acreage,
  among other things. Brown said having updated
  data would make assessments more accurate,
  including Clean and Green. Clean and Green
  provides tax benefits for agricultural and forest
  land.With natural gas drilling developing in
  the area, it is important to have an exact
  account of Clean and Green properties, Brown
  said.Having current aerial mapping data can
  also help 911 locate properties and
  driveways.We need to have aerial data, Mead
  said. 911 needs aerial data and it needs to be
  relatively fresh.

Aerial mapping delay has Wyoming County on
hold Published Saturday, January 31, 2009 406
AM EST JOSH MROZINSKI
49
GeoLocation Reference Tomorrow
- A Geographic Landscape for Presenting and
Analyzing Information - 60-80 of web pages
have geographically relevant information on
them - The Real World becomes a frame on
which to present information

• The Mobile Internet is fast becoming the new
  geographic interface and Location is the
  starting point

50
Increasingly, Imagery Part of the Location
Experience

• Visual context reference
• Improved overall user experience
• Increased confidence and security

• Visual reference across borders, languages and
  landscapes
• Simplifies marine navigation
• Vector-less navigation for outdoor environments

51
Next Generation Perspective with Intelligent
Pixels
52
Delivering Value to the GeoWebThe Benefits of
Integrating Real-World Perspective

• Create the most usable interactive mapping
  experience possible.
• Empower business users by placing geospatial data
  into a real world context.
• Improve map data by reconciling locations with
  imagery
• Deliver currency, with centralized, continuously
  updated high-resolution imagery.

IDC Briefing, CTIA Wireless 2008
53
Advanced Image Provisioning
54
Capture Capacity is Not the Problem
55
WorldView1 2008 Images
56
We Must Continue to Innovate Our Business Models

• IFTN helps the economics of government by
  organizing single largest buying group
• Reliance on acquiring imagery as a service drives
  higher prices and increases time to market
• Is IFTN responding to an historical commercial
  imagery industry or the emerging industry?
• Will the innovators we need to emerge in the
  commercial world flock to IFTN, or will they view
  it as another TIGER?

57
Question Period
3001 Jay Arnold Digital Globe John
Auble ESRI Marten Hogeweg Fugro EarthData
Inc. Louis Demargne Michael Baker Jr.,
Inc. Malcolm Adkins Craig Neidig
(USGS) NAVTEQ Skip Parker North West
Group Tim Crago Sanborn Map Company
John Copple Surdex Corporation Craig
Molander
Imagery FTN
Transport FTN
Surdex Sanborn North West Group Fugro
EarthData Digital Globe 3001
NAVTEQ
FTNRetrospective
Michael Baker
21st CenturyTechnology
ESRI
58
Transportation For The Nation
Skip ParkerNAVTEQ
59
Geospatial Data Navigation and Routing
60
The Landscape for Transportation

• Transportation Trends
• Financial Trends
• States have had Large Budget deficits
• The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
• Funding /National Vision
• Transportation Network Trends
• Freight volumes growing faster than passenger
• Increasing congestion
• Aging Infrastructure leads to increasing
  maintenance costs
• Need for improved safety
• Data consistency and regular, coordinated
  maintenance across jurisdictions
• GIS Trends
• State have good geometry and addressing
• Community, energy and environmental impacts
• Disaster and emergency response

61
Its a Delicate Balancing Act
Adding transportation attributes
61
62
The Transportation Solutions

• Transportation Solutions
• Financial Solutions
• Public / Private partnerships
• Federal Programs to invest in technology and
  infrastructure
• Advertising Models
• Transportation Network Solutions
• Invest in technology to help reduce congestion
• Add Navigation and Routing attributes to current
  data
• Invest in new ITS projects California Mobile
  Millennium
• Safety ADAS and traffic information
• Standards for Navigation attributes
• GIS Solutions
• Update datasets with navigable attributes
• Government Green Fleet Initiative

63
Routing and Navigation Basics

• Optimize route based on specified criteria
• Shortest time to destination
• Shortest distance
• Truck legal and feasible route (hazmat?)
• Minimum acute maneuvers
• Maximize highway time
• Minimum cost (tolls, fuel, )

• New criteria emerging
• Shortest time based on historical traffic
• Green route fuel economy and reduced
  emissions
• Evacuations, disaster-affected infrastructure
• Dynamic Data current flow, incidents

64
Routing Attributes

• Network topography
• One-way streets
• Turn restrictions, legal and physical
• Speed limits (for time calculations)
• Historical Speeds
• Function Class (routing through neighborhoods?)
• Stoplights, exits
• Real Time traffic incident and flow
• Transport attributes hazmat
• 200 other attributes

65
New Content Requires New Ways of Collecting Data
Field Vehicles Equipped with Inertial Measurement
Units
65
66
ADAS Key Map Attributes

• ADAS Geometry
• Curvature
• Height/Slope
• Speed Limits
• Lane Markings
• Number of Lanes
• Ramp Locations

67
Many ADAS Applications are Enhanced or Enabled
68
Benefits of Transportation Attributes

• Predictive Cruise Control
• Acceleration in anticipation of a hill and
• deceleration in anticipation of the crest
• Maintains highest gear longer and
• prevents wasted energy - 2 - 5
• Smart Transmission
• Optimal gear selection at all points along the
  path for maximum operational efficiency
• Operates in the presence of hills as well as
  curves - 3 - 6
• Hybrid Powertrain Management
• Anticipation of hills and charging opportunities
  for extended use of electric motor
• Green Route
• Selection of route for least energy use, not
  minimum time

69
Truck Stability Enhancement Rollover Prevention

• Speed warning or governing options limit lateral
  Gs
• Knowledge of curvature, bank, coefficient of
  friction
• Use current weight to advise driver of maximum
  speed for approaching curve
• Alert driver or fleet center of poor performance

70
Green Route

• Shortest Distance (Map)

• Least Time (Map Speed Limits Traffic)

• Alternative Driver-Selectable Route Preferences

• Least Energy (Map Speed Limits Traffic
  Topography)

Start
Destination
71
It is real FAST!
72
Local, Regional, and National Context

• Consistency if you build it in for one area, it
  must work everywhere
• Counties
• States
• Other jurisdictions
• Differing legal restrictions, conventions
• Visible signs
• Laws
• Standards

73
Organizational Structure

• Best to collect data at the source where
  available
• Where are the one-ways
• Where are the stoplights
• Public private partnership
• Optimal mix of public/private
• Ex Expensive lidar surveys for flood plain
  mapping
• Parcel data for point addressing
• Postal files
• Change notification
• Integrate USDOT National Transportation
  Atlas Databases

74
Next mobile highway sensor Nokia Phones

• Nokia and NAVTEQ are launching community
  enhanced traffic
• Two coordinated programs
• Contract with US Department of Transportation,
  Caltrans, and Univ. of California
• Advanced technology development
• Special focus on ensuring privacy
• Commercial deployment
• Alpha and beta tests in Q4 2008
• Commercial launch in Q1 2009

75
Advertising Models
Advertising Placement
Along a Route
POI Search

• Start of a Route

Coffee time
Calling
Click to Route
Click to Call
Click to Save
75
75
76
Benefits from National Transportation Data

• Spread the cost
• Accuracy and quality
• Thoroughness, breadth and depth
• Change notification and change detection
• Standards
• Information metadata
• Infrastructure inventory

77
Barriers

• Jurisdictional sharing
• Incentives
• Privacy
• Lack of standards
• Need your involvement

78
Benefits of Transportation For The Nation

• Financial Benefits
• Increase the use and value to your statewide data
• Take advantage of new transportation funding
• Drive standards across the country
• New Models for collaboration
• Transportation Network Benefits
• Provide public service to reduce congestion
• Consistent and complete navigation attributes
• Drive safety and security with dynamic content
• GIS Solutions
• Help with the Green Government Initiative

79
79
80
National Transportation Atlas Database

The National Transportation Atlas Databases 2008
(NTAD2008) is a set of nationwide geographic
databases of transportation facilities,
transportation networks, and associated
infrastructure. These datasets include spatial
information for transportation modal networks and
intermodal terminals, as well as the related
attribute information for these features.
Metadata documentation, as prescribed by the
Federal Geographic Data Committee, is also
provided for each database. The data on this DVD
support research, analysis, and decision-making
across all modes of transportation. They are most
useful at the national level, but have major
applications at regional, state, and local scales
throughout the transportation community.
81
Technology For The 21st Century
82
Information Sharing and Access

• Marten Hogeweg

83
Information Sharing Common Theme

• Imagery for the Nation
• implement a sustained national program for the
  collection, maintenance, distribution and archive
  of aerial imagery
• Parcel Mapping
• encourage development, cost sharing,
  coordination, and integration across federal,
  state and local cadastral activities
• Partnership Funding
• project focuses on ways to build and improve the
  existing geospatial data infrastructure that are
  necessary to effectively discover, access, share,
  manage and use digital geographic data
• Transportation for the Nation
• development of a comprehensive and collaborative
  nationwide Transportation GIS program
• Technology for the 21st Century
• Successful GIT depends on a robust, professional
  infrastructure and strong IT management to
  improve accessibility.

84
Information Sharing To Support Decision-making
Use
Author/Analyze
Discover
Visualization
Production Workflow
Tasking
Products and Services
Program
Serve
Analysis
Mission Critical Applications
DataCollection
85
You Are Creating Multi-scale High Quality Maps
86
You Are Sharing Your Geospatial Information
http//resources.esri.com/arcgisdesktop/index.cfm?
facontenttabUS_State_Maps
87
We Support Discovery of Resources

• Central resource for easily accessing, storing,
  and sharing content
• Includes a library of maps that the entire SDI
  community can work with.
• Search geographic information, sign up for an
  account, sign in, and utilize communities/groups

http//www.arcgisonline.com
http//www.esri.com/gisportal
88
You Can Author, Serve, and Share Your Work
Share with others GeoPortals
Serve with ArcGIS Server
Use with ArcGIS Desktop/Explorer/Web/
Standards-based, Open, Interoperable
89
Services Architectures for SDI Are Available

• OGC CS-W
• Z39.50
• UDDI
• Service Monitoring

• Server Caching
• High Performance
• Thematic Base Maps
• Integrated content

• Defunct bridges
• Derive elevation
• Query National Grid
• Derive Elevation Profile
• Delineate Watershed Boundary
• Avian Flue Cluster Analysis
• Earthquake Prediction
• Hurricane Path Prediction

• OGC WMS, WFS, WCSKML
• REST, SOAP
• GeoRSS, CAP

• Authentication
• Access Control
• Thesaurus
• Order Processing

http//www.esri.com/technology_trends/server_gis/g
eospatial_soa.html
90
(No Transcript)
91
(No Transcript)
92
(No Transcript)
93
(No Transcript)
94
(No Transcript)
95
How Can You Support the Recovery Act?

• Reference Data
• Base maps
• Your State Data
• Data from Census Bureau, USGS, USDA,
• Operational Layers
• Geospatial Analyses
• Integration across levels of government
• Integration of reference and operational data
• Spatio-temporal relationships
• Visualization and Reporting for non-GIS Users
• More than dots on a map

96
For The Nation Initiatives In-place
97
Retrospective on West Virginia Street Address
Mapping Board

• Malcolm Adkins Michael Baker Jr., Inc. Craig
  Neidig USGS Geospatial Liaison for WV

Craig was formerly the WV GIS Coordinator and
WVSAMB Chairman while employed at the state and
prior to employment at USGS. The views and
opinions expressed in this presentation are not
 necessarily those of  the USGS.
98
WVSAMB Project Components
99
WVSAMB Splash Page with Status Map
100
Imagery For The Nation In-place
101
Transportation For The Nation In-place
102
Address For The Nation In-place
103
Parcels For The Nation In-place
104
West Virginia Future Initiatives
105
Question Period
3001 Jay Arnold Digital Globe John
Auble ESRI Marten Hogeweg Fugro EarthData
Inc. Louis Demargne Michael Baker Jr.,
Inc. Malcolm Adkins Craig Neidig
(USGS) NAVTEQ Skip Parker North West
Group Tim Crago Sanborn Map Company
John Copple Surdex Corporation Craig
Molander
Imagery FTN
Transport FTN
Surdex Sanborn North West Group Fugro
EarthData Digital Globe 3001
NAVTEQ
FTNRetrospective
Michael Baker
21st CenturyTechnology
ESRI