BPL Interference: Fact or Fiction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

BPL Interference: Fact or Fiction

Description:

A System that Enables Delivery of High Speed 'BroadBand' Data Over Medium and ... Extractor Receives PLC signal, Wireless to/from Users. Very-low latency ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:83
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: mani95
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: BPL Interference: Fact or Fiction


1
BPL Interference Fact or Fiction?
  • Barry Malowanchuk P.Eng.
  • Sr. Communications Engineer
  • Manitoba Hydro
  • 2005 UTC Region 5 Conference
  • April 20, 2005
  • Fergus Falls, Minnesota

2
BPL Interference Fact or Fiction?
  • What is BPL Why is It Significant?
  • Technical Specifications?
  • Is There Interference or Not?
  • Will Emission Limits Prevent it?
  • Is BPL in Your Future?

3
What is BroadBand Over PowerLine?
  • A System that Enables Delivery of High Speed
    BroadBand Data Over Medium and Low Voltage
    Power Lines
  • There are at Least Four (4) Distinct
    Manufacturers Offering Ways to Do This ..
  • ..and So Far There is No Industry Standard

4
Basis of European Technology
5
Basis of North American Technology
6
BPL 3-Architectural Configurations
7
Amperion (NA)Architecture
Falcon/Griffin overhead PLC
Substation
Transformer
Internet
FIBRE or COPPER
Connection to Internet
Transformer
Lynx underground PLC
8
Amperion Connect Products
Griffin
Lynx
Overhead Wire Mount
Underground
Overhead Pole Mount
9
Amperion Unit Functional Descriptions
  • Injector Receives Wireless, Launches PLC signal
  • Repeater Receives PLC signal, Transmits PLC to
    next
  • Repeater,
    Wireless to/from Users
  • Extractor Receives PLC signal, Wireless to/from
    Users
  • Very-low latency
  • Repeatable over extended distances
  • Single segments up to 2500 ft on Good Lines
  • Up to 24 Mbps throughput

10
Amperion Deployment Pictures
Antenna on Street Light
Couplers in Transformer
Lynx Injector
Mast Antenna
Griffin
11
Why Bother With BPL?
  • 75 of Canadians Have Internet Access
  • 48 of Canadian Home Users have a BroadBand
    Connection (21 in U.S.A., and 5 in Europe
  • Thus 30 of ALL Canadians Have a BroadBand Home
    Internet Connection
  • Why Not More?......
  • Large Areas of Population are Un-Served

12
Why Bother With BPL?
  • The Power Grid has Universal Coverage
  • Provides 3rd Home Service Alternative to DSL and
    Cable
  • Potentially Lower Cost Service
  • Opportunity to Serve Unserved Areas
  • Once installed BPL provides a Network for Utility
    Services

13
What Are Utility Services?
  • Customer Interface
  • Automatic Meter Reading
  • Service Connect/ Disconnect
  • Intelligent Home Services
  • Distribution Automation
  • Operational Diagnostic Data
  • Mobile Data to Work Force

14
BPL Technical Properties
  • Many/ Most BPL Modems Use Orthogonal Frequency
    Domain Modulation (OFDM)
  • Typical BPL OFDM Modem Characteristics
  • 45 Mbps using 1,280 Distinct Carriers
  • Adaptive Bit Rate per Carrier Depending on
    Channel S/N Conditions
  • Spectrum Usable from 1.7 to gt80 MHz
  • Only 10 MHz of Bandwidth used per Modem

15
Typical OFDM Modem Spectra
16
BPL Technical Properties Contd
  • Transmit and Receive Spectra Will be Shared or
    Split in an OFDM Modem
  • Modems at Repeater Stations Must use Time
    Division Multiplexing or Frequency Changes to
    Avoid Interference
  • Thus the Spectrum Use may be Double that of a
    Single Modem
  • Next Generation Devices _at_ 200 Mbps Available in
    2005 - No Details

17
BPL Radio Interference Problem?
  • BPL Signal is Digital...Broadband Noise
  • Can Travel by Conduction /or Radiation
  • Power Wires on MV Lines are Spaced by a
    Significant Distance..Radiation
  • Power Wires on LV Lines are Twisted and often
    Buried Coaxial.Shielded?
  • Radio Interference is Very Controversial and the
    Subject of Much Lobbying Some Field Testing

18
Is There Interference or Not?
  • Thus the Fear of Interference is Unfounded,
    Despite Opponents Rhetoric that BPL is a
    Pandoras Box of Unprecedented Proportions.
  • Brett Kilbourne UTC Fall 2003

19
Is There Interference or Not?
  • The Commission proposes Rules requiring BPL
    devices to employ adaptive interference
    mitigation techniques to prevent harmful
    interference to existing users, such as public
    safety and amateur radio operators.
  • FCC News Release, February 12, 2004

20
Is There Interference or Not?
  • The Commissions Overarching Objective Create a
    Regulatory Environment Hospitable to BPL without
    Degrading Existing Services
  • Clearly the Commission Believes the Potential for
    Interference Exists

21
Will Emission Limits Prevent it?
  • The Consensus is that the Existing Part 15
    rules Do Adequately Protect licensees from BPL
    operations.
  • Brett Kilbourne UTC Fall 2003

22
Will Emission Limits Prevent it?
  • These Guidelines will ensure that Emission
    Measurements for these systems are made in a
    Consistent Manner.
  • It does Not Propose Any Changes to Existing
    applicable Emission Limits.
  • FCC News Release, February 12, 2004

23
Will Emission Limits Prevent it?
  • However the Commission Proposed Techniques to
    Mitigate Interference to existing users
    ..including
  • Cessation of Operations altogether,
  • Dynamic Reduction of Transmit Power,
  • And/or Avoid operating on Specific Frequencies to
    Prevent Harmful Interference
  • FCC News Release, February 12, 2004

24
Will Emission Limits Prevent it?
  • Need to Look at RF Environment as a Whole
  • Existing Interference Environment/ Background
    Noise
  • Urban Rural are Dramatically Different
  • Physical Proximity of BPL to Users
  • Nature of BPL Implementation
  • Set Appropriate Interference Temperature

25
Example of Existing Interference Environment/
Background Noise

26
Will Emission Limits Prevent it?
  • The Consensus is that Emission Limits Greatly
    Exceed (gt20 dB) the User Background Noise levels
  • This Means that Operation Within Limits Can
    Cause Severe Interference
  • How Can That Be?

27
Will Emission Limits Prevent it?
  • Emission Limits Provide a Convenient Measure to
    Evaluate Equipment Performance
  • Emission Limits Were Developed for an Analog
    World..Before Broadband !
  • When Emissions were a Narrow Spike of Energy on
    One (1) or 2 Frequencies
  • Not a WALL of Closely Spaced Spikes that FILL the
    Spectrum

28
BPL Interference Mitigation Techniques
  • Cessation of Operations Altogether!
  • Dynamic Reduction of Transmit Power?
  • Practical but Undesirable
  • Avoid Operating on Specific Frequencies to
    Prevent Harmful Interference
  • Practical with OFDM Frequency Hopping Modems
  • Potentially Limiting of Data Bandwidth Capability
  • Careful Planning of Spectrum Use Will Be
    Required

29
BPL Interference Mitigation Techniques
  • Avoid Operating on Specific Frequencies to
    Prevent Harmful Interference
  • Successfully Demonstrated by HomePlug in Europe
    USA
  • Recently Demonstrated by a BPL OFDM Modem User/
    Manufacturer
  • The Technology Can/ Does Work Around Interference
    !

30
BPL Mitigation Techniques Selective Avoidance
31
BPL Mitigation Techniques
  • Newer Technology is Much Better than Even 3 years
    Ago , When Many Foreign Trials Were Conducted in
    Netherlands, Finland, Austria Japan.
  • BPL Receivers Now Operate With Much Lower
    Signal Levels
  • Able to Reduce Transmitter Powers
  • Interference Should Be Manageable !

32
Co-Operation Between Combatants?
  • NTIA Issues April 27/04 Phase 1 Report
  • Reports Interference Potential Well Removed From
    Lines Because of Line Discontinuities
  • Interference to Commercial Aircraft
  • Need to Refine Measurement Procedures
  • A Number of Technical Recommendations Including
    Balanced Injection Filters/ Traps
  • Phase II Report to Look at Interference Via
    Ionospheric Propagation of BPL Signals

33
Co-Operation Between Combatants?
  • Obviously Much Lobbying by UTC, PLCA,
    Manufacturers on One Side
  • National Association for Amateur Radio (ARRL)
    with 163,000 Members Lobbying on the Other Side
  • Clearly the FCC has Recognized the Potential for
    Interference and Wants to Find a Compromise

34
Co-Operation Between Combatants?
  • The Technology Exists to Mitigate Interference
  • There has Already Been SOME Good Cooperation
    between Utilities, Manufacturers and the Present
    Spectrum Users
  • Clearly the Time has Come for All Parties to Work
    Together Before Utilities Deploy Systems !

35
Is BPL in Your Future?
  • Absolutely HUGE Interest by US Canadian Federal
    Local Governments
  • Strong Interest by Utility Commercial
    Telecommunications Distribution
  • Strong Desire for Distribution Automation
    Communications

36
Is BPL in Your Future?
  • There are Many Technology Trials
  • There are Very Few Commercial Deployments
  • The Recent Talk Suggests that Business Case Must
    Include Utility Applications
  • Coming to Your Utility in a Small Town Near You ?

37
BPL Interference Fact or Fiction?
  • What is BPL Why is It Significant?
  • Technical Specifications?
  • Is There Interference or Not?
  • Will Emission Limits Prevent it?
  • Is BPL in Your Future?
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com