CLAMS AND ARMOR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

CLAMS AND ARMOR

Description:

CLAMS AND ARMOR WERE THEY CASUALTIES OF THE WAR ON THE BEACHES – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: denni59
Category:
Tags: and | armor | clams | ewr

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CLAMS AND ARMOR


1
CLAMS AND ARMOR WERE THEY CASUALTIES OF THE WAR
ON THE BEACHES??
  • Dennis C. Lees
  • Littoral Ecological Environmental Services
  • William B. Driskell
  • 24 January 2007

Funded by the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee
Council
2
ADMIRAL WANTS TO WATER BLAST OILED BEACHES!!!
Adm. Paul Yost, U. S. Coast Guard, calls for
massive, high-pressure, hot-water blasting of the
beaches, even if it kills everything!! Im
here to fight a war!! In contrast, scientists
said there is little scientific knowledge on what
happens when hot water is used to clean shores
like those of the Sound. Anchorage Daily News
(4/15/1989)
3
So We Assaulted the Beaches
4
  • Short History
  • NOAA Shoreline Treatment Effects Study - 1990-96
  • Infaunal data from geographically limited studies
    indicated negative effects at Treated sites
  • Sediment Effects
  • Impoverished infaunal assemblages, esp.
    long-lived clams
  • Time-series data suggested recovery was very slow
  • Objectives of the present study
  • Assess persistence and generality of depressed
    condition of clam assemblages in mixed-soft
    sediments at Treated sites.
  • Assess relationship between sediment
    characteristics and depressed condition of clam
    assemblages in mixed-soft sediments.

5
Alternative Hypotheses
  • Sediments -- Concentrations of fines and organic
    matter are depressed at Treated sites.
  • N, S, and H -- Higher at Reference sites.
  • Short-lived, nestling, pioneering species -- More
    at Treated sites in infaunal samples.
  • All large clams -- Fewer at Treated sites

6
Sampling Design Methods
  • 40 sites - 36 Random 4 Historic Sites
  • 16 Oiled but Unwashed (Reference) sites and 20
    Oiled and Washed (Treated) sites
  • 4 Old NOAA sites to assess consistency from
    earlier study
  • At Each Site
  • Five 10-cm core samples for clams and infauna
  • Three 1/16 m2 excavation samples for larger clams
  • 1 composite sediment sample for grain size, TOC
    TKN

7
Sampling Locations
8
Typical Pocket Beaches
9
SL01
10
KN554B
11
Common Clams in Excavations
Common Clams in Excavations
Papermate sp.
12
Mean Number of Clams per m2 in Reference and
Treated Samples
13
Functional Ramifications of Treatment Effects
  • Larger long-lived clams are important prey items
    for sea otters.
  • Excavation samples provide a better
    representation of prey-sized clams.
  • Large long-lived clams in excavations were gt65
    less abundant at Treated sites.
  • Ergo, Treated sites are only a third as capable
    of supporting sea otters.

14
Mean Densities of Adult and Juvenile Clams in
Samples
15
So What Caused The Difference in Abundance and
The Lag In Recovery?
  • At Least Four Possibilities
  • Changes in sediment characteristics from beach
    washing?? (Our initial prediction)
  • Differences in exposure among sites??
  • Possible hydrocarbon contamination?? (Discarded
    during proposal stage)
  • Other effects of the cleanup??
  • Possible Confounding Effect
  • Distance from the Gulf of Alaska??

16
Distance from the Gulf of Alaska?
17
Comparison of Sediment Variables
18
Exposure Large Hardshell Clams?
19
Exposure and Small Clams?
20
Summary for Exposure Patterns
Juvenile and small clams that live at the surface
suffer from increased exposure at Treated sites
but not at Reference sites. The larger clams that
burrow at least 5 cm into the sediment benefit
from exposure at Reference sites but show no
response at Treated sites. This suggests a
physical difference.
21
Paradox - Comparison of PGS and TKN in PWS and
Shelf Sediments
22
Comparison of Sand and TKN in PWS and Shelf
Sediments
23
Distinctively Different Sedimentary Habitat
  • Armored sediments (Hayes Michel, 1999)
  • Markedly Different Paradigm
  • Patterns in fines and organics differ markedly
    from traditional patterns
  • Biota differs from the traditional predictions
    based on median grain size
  • Widespread habitat - many gravel habitats - Cook
    Inlet, Katmai, Kenai Fjords, southern California,
    prob. British Isles, intertidal and subtidal

24
ArmoringProcess
Concentration and organization (imbrication or
shingling) of coarse fraction at surface due to
erosion and reworking and sequestration of fines
and organics as well as animals (and oil) below
the surface.
and cleaning
From Hayes Michel 1999
25
Example of Armored Beach
CH08
26
Highly Armored Beach
27
Armoring in Progress in Crab Bay
Shells of clams uplifted by the 1964 Earthquake
being Exhumed by armoring process About 8 of
sediment has been lost 42 years in progress
28
Consequence of Armoring
  • Geological
  • Concentration and organization of coarse
    fractions at sediments surface
  • Elevated concentrations of fines and organics
    below surface
  • Increased sediment stability
  • Biological
  • Protection of recruiting animals from natural
    disturbance by wave action and currents
    (resuspension of juveniles)
  • Increased post-recruitment survival to sub-adult
    stages
  • Reduced predation for sub-adults and adults
  • Development of rich, long-lived, burrowing
    assemblages richer than predicted by traditional
    grain-size concepts

29
Conclusions
  • Abundance of long-lived clams was substantially
    lower at Treated sites than at Reference sites
    following the cleanup.
  • Because beach washing disrupted the organization
    of the armored layer (cobble/pebble matrix),
    post-recruitment survival is lower on treated
    beaches.
  • Consequently, density of clams in the size range
    utilized by sea otters remained gt65 lower on
    Treated beaches than on the Reference beaches in
    2002.
  • Armored sediments in PWS exemplify a sedimentary
    habitat in which sediment components and the
    biota function in substantially different ways
    from those in traditionally described sediments.
  • High-pressure washing has serious and long-term
    biological consequences to the infauna and
    sediment stability!!

30
AND YES, CLAMS AND ARMOR WERE A CASUALTY OF THE
WAR!!
31
Acknowledgements
Our sponsor, the EVOS Trustee Council Dr. Sarah
Gerken - UAA Ms. Carrie Holba at ARLIS Dr. Jon
Houghton - Pentec/Hart Crowser David and Annette
Janka - R/V Auklet Terry Kennedy and staff -
Cordova Air Kathleen Lees Dr. Alan Mearns Gary
Shigenaka - NOAA Dr. Les Williams - Integral
Consulting
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com