Detecting%20Critical%20Nodes%20for%20MANET%20IDS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Detecting%20Critical%20Nodes%20for%20MANET%20IDS

Description:

Can only directly monitor neighbouring nodes (within radio range) ... Emulator, not a simulator. Management software for real nodes ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: webC
Learn more at: http://web.cs.wpi.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Detecting%20Critical%20Nodes%20for%20MANET%20IDS


1
Detecting Critical Nodes for MANET IDS
  • A Karygiannis, E Antonakakis, and A
    Apostolopoulos
  • Presented by Sarah Casey

1
2
MANET Intrusion Detection Challenges
  • No Central Authority or Administration
  • Can only directly monitor neighbouring nodes
    (within radio range)
  • Mobility allows malicious nodes to enter and
    leave the network at will

2
3
Additional Challenges
  • Dynamic topology
  • No trust relationships between nodes
  • Little incentive for collaboration

3
4
Re-Routing
  • Often possible
  • Densely populated or highly mobile
  • Easier than trying to monitor nodes and paths

4
5
Critical Nodes
  • Any node whose failure or malicious behaviour
    disconnects or significantly degrades the
    performance of the network

5
6
Critical Node Detection
  • Step 1 Disable all links but one
  • Step 2 Attempt to ping node under test
  • Step 3 Restore original routing
  • Iterate for all possible links except the link to
    the node under test. If another path exists, the
    node is not critical.

7
mLab
  • Emulator, not a simulator
  • Management software for real nodes
  • Allows dynamic topology changes without physical
    node movement
  • http//csrc.nist.gov/manet/mLab

8
Emulation Environment
  • 12 nodes total
  • 10 ARM, 2 x86
  • topology changes every 5-10 min
  • Detailed test conditions, ..., and test results
    can be found on our project web site - no URL
    provided

9
Critical Test vs Watchdog Monitoring
  • CPU Usage
  • Watchdog - 60-70
  • mCritical - lt 1

10
Critical Test vs Watchdog Monitoring
  • Initial Memory
  • Watchdog - 450KB
  • mCritical - 125KB
  • mCritical keeps tables of outgoing and incoming
    packet headers
  • Track links and routes

11
Critical Test vs Watchdog Monitoring
  • Additional Packet Loss
  • Watchdog - 0
  • mCritical - 2-4
  • Additional packet loss occurs when manipulating
    routing table during test

12
Conclusions
  • Light weight alternative to full IDS monitoring
    on all nodes
  • No cooperation from, or security association
    with, other nodes required
  • If re-routing is possible, do it If not, time to
    employ (limited) monitoring

12
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com