Mercy Killing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Mercy Killing

Description:

Her parents fought Florida law to keep the tube in with hope that she would one day ... the feeding tube: 'since the mid-eighties many ethicists and physicians ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1494
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: mitch73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Mercy Killing


1
Mercy Killing
  • Theme What the Bible says about euthanasia. 1
    Samuel 311-6

2
Introduction
  • While Mrs. Schiavos life hung in the balance
  • Her former husband (practically speaking) wanted
    to move on and remove the feeding tube.
  • Her parents fought Florida law to keep the tube
    in with hope that she would one day recover.

3
Introduction
  • The disagreement between family members brought
    Mrs. Schiavos medical dilemma to the forefount
    of America.
  • The Florida court system (up to the state supreme
    court) adjudicated over her case.
  • Federal politicians stepped into the debate over
    her life and death.
  • Medical doctors bound to their Hippocratic Oath
    were also bound to court orders to remove
    Terris feeding tube.

4
Introduction
  • The question Christians have, including and
    beyond this case what are we to believe?
    regarding euthanasia.
  • Biblically, we do have guidance over the
    questions of life, death, and the preservation of
    life.
  • There are instances of euthanasia in the Bible.
  • Gods word, however, does not deal with the
    intricacies that blend the natural and artificial
    means of preserving life.

5
Introduction
  • In this lesson is we shall look at
  • The mindset of our society as it pertains to our
    subject matter euthanasia.
  • Dilemmas that have resulted due to extraordinary
    medical means of keeping a person alive.
  • Look at what Gods word has revealed regarding
    this subject matter.
  • Biblical application that harmonizes with and
    within Gods revelation.

6
The Mindset of Our (American) Society
  • We live in a time where the average life span in
    American continues to increase each year.1
  • In 1930 the average life expectancy for combined
    gender and races in the U.S. was 59.7 years.
  • In 2001 that number steadily climbed to 77.2
    years.

7
The Mindset of Our (American) Society
  • Simultaneously, there have been numerous modern
    advances in the science and medical fields that
    correlate to our longer life spans.
  • In 1947 the first person was saved by means of
    defibrillation.2
  • Since then millions of lives have been saved by
    this one devise.
  • This has allowed people to go on living years
    beyond what would have other wise ended in
    shorter lives.

8
The Mindset of Our (American) Society
  • Various vaccinations have been used to stem the
    onset of various plagues.
  • Smallpox eradicated in 1980.3
  • Fewer than 500 people with polio worldwide in
    2001.4
  • Many children and adults have been able to live
    much longer through additional medicinal
    breakthroughs.
  • Other advanced surgical procedures and medicines
    have allowed us to live longer radiation, chemo
    therapy, dialysis, laser surgeries, etc.

9
The Mindset of Our (American) Society
  • Interwoven with medical and scientific advances
    has been the evolution of our societys belief as
    it pertains to quality of life.
  • Today, the thought of a nice and peaceful death
    permeates into our societal belief system.
  • Conversely, the thought of pain and suffering in
    the transition from life to death is undesirable
    at the very least (it is natural to want to live
    our final years in peace).

10
The Mindset of Our (American) Society
  • Societys belief as it pertains to quality of
    life. (cont.)
  • It is the combination of longer life and medical
    advances that has evolved our belief system into
    a more tolerant view regarding mercy killing,
    or more technically, euthanasia.

11
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Euthanasia is commonly known as mercy killing.
  • Technically, the word comes from the Greek root
    word that translates as good death but more
    strictly translated as easy death.
  • It is the action of hastening death of a person
    who is seriously or terminally ill or injured to
    bring relief to the individual.

12
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Two distinguishing types of euthanasia
  • Passive Euthanasia - a refusal to use life
    sustaining medical equipment to prolong life
    where there is no (medically) prospect of
    recovery.
  • Active Euthanasia - taking purposeful action to
    end a persons life, in a sense it is an aided
    suicide.

13
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Other related terms to understand
  • Medical Treatment regarding the feeding tube
    since the mid-eighties many ethicists and
    physicians have realized that tube feeding is an
    intrusive medical treatment much like ventilator
    or dialysis5

14
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Comatose A coma is a profound state of
    unconsciousness. Patients are alive but unable to
    move or respond to their environment. There are
    several levels of coma and patients may, or may
    not, progress through them. The responsiveness of
    the brain lessens as the coma deepens and when it
    becomes more profound, normal body reflexes are
    lost and the patient no longer responds even to
    pain.6

15
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Minimally Conscious State (MCS) MCS is
    characterized by inconsistent but clearly
    discernible behavioral evidence of consciousness
    and can be distinguished from coma and VS by
    documenting the presence of specific behavioral
    features not found in either of these conditions.
    Patients may evolve to MCS from coma or VS after
    acute brain injury. MCS may also result from
    degenerative or congenital nervous system
    disorders.7

16
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Vegetative State (VS) A condition in which the
    individual is unconscious with little or no hope
    of regaining consciousness. The body may move,
    and the eyes may be open, but as far as can be
    determined, the person cannot think or respond.8
  • PVS Persistent Vegetative State An ongoing
    vegetative state.

17
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Coma is also to be distinguished from the PVS
    which may follow it. This is a condition in which
    the individual has lost cognitive neurological
    function and awareness of the environment but
    does have non-cognitive function and a preserved
    sleep-wake cycle. Spontaneous movements may occur
    and the eyes may open in response to external
    stimuli, but the patient does not speak or obey
    commands. Patients in a vegetative state may
    appear somewhat normal. They may occasionally
    grimace, cry, or laugh.9

18
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Purpose of understanding these terms
  • To be able to distinguish the circumstances and
    intent that co-exist with ones life.
  • A person might receive a feeding tube for an
    individual whose mouth, trachea or another area
    of the body which does not allow the person to
    chew and/or swallow food.
  • Another person might receive a feeding tube due
    to the patient being in a vegetative state.

19
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Purpose of understanding these terms
  • To be able to distinguish the circumstances and
    intent that co-exist with ones life. (cont.)
  • The intent for the first patient is to provide
    life support while the person nurses back to
    health.
  • The intent for the second person is to provide
    life support with the slim hope that the
    patient regains consciousness.

20
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Purpose of understanding these terms (cont.)
  • To be able to distinguish the circumstances and
    intent that co-exist with ones life.
  • The intent for the first patient is to provide
    life support while the person nurses back to
    health.
  • The intent for the second person is to provide
    life support with the slim hope that the
    patient regains consciousness.

21
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • Purpose of understanding these terms (cont.)
  • It is the latter circumstance (or others similar
    to it) that makes decisions difficult.
  • In both cases the intent is to save life.
  • The reason for removing life support (whether a
    respirator or feeding tube) is not to destroy
    life, but to realize there is no hope for life
    and thus discontinue artificial means of
    sustaining life.

22
Defining/Understanding Terms
  • By understanding the terms used, we can better
    understand why
  • There is a difference between active and
    passive euthanasia.
  • Philosophical, moral, ethical, and practical
    distinguish between both types of euthanasia.

23
Dilemmas Surrounding Mercy Killing
  • The double edged sword the combination of long
    life with extreme measures by which man is kept
    alive.
  • We (man) desire the ever improving means by which
    life can be prolonged or saved.
  • However, we have come to a point that we can
    artificially keep someone alive for years.
  • Thus, the very means by which we keep a person
    alive is what has brought about our dilemma
    regarding the subject of euthanasia.

24
Dilemmas Surrounding Mercy Killing
  • Dilemmas we ethically face
  • Extended comatose state with no perceived
    possibility of consciousness.
  • Vegetative State (or PVS) with no perceived
    possibility of recovery.
  • Someone who is terminal, but is conscious and in
    severe pain.
  • For some maybe even Christians this is a
    real dilemma.

25
Dilemmas Surrounding Mercy Killing
  • Ethical questions
  • Is it right to actively end another persons
    life?
  • Who has authority to judge what is a good cause
    for ending another persons life?
  • Are we to respect the one who wishes to be
    taken off life support, when they are alive (in a
    cognitive or conscious state)?

26
Dilemmas Surrounding Mercy Killing
  • Ethical questions (cont.)
  • The debate whether or not the end justify the
    means.
  • The end peaceful/easy death.
  • The means euthanasia.

27
What the Bible Reveals Regarding Euthanasia
  • Explicitly, the Bible does not deal specifically
    with euthanasia. There is no thou shalt not
    commit euthanasia.
  • The Bible, however, inherently reveals
    information along with principles that guide us
    into making conclusions.
  • These biblical conclusions lay the foundation for
    what a Christian believes by faith.

28
What the Bible Reveals Regarding Euthanasia
  • Gods will concerning life and death.
  • God is the giver and taker of life. Job 121 2
    Ki. 201-6 2 Sam. 1214-15
  • As a result man strives to uphold what God
    established.
  • This is exemplified by the Good Samaritan. Lk.
    1030-37

29
What the Bible Reveals Regarding Euthanasia
  • Gods will concerning life and death.
  • Thus, the taking of life (which God has
    established) must be in harmony with His will
  • Shedding of innocent blood is sin. Gen. 96 Ex.
    2013
  • The vengeance of a person who practices evil,
    however, is acceptable before God. Rom. 131-4

30
What the Bible Reveals Regarding Euthanasia
  • Gods will concerning euthanasia.
  • Mercy killing in biblical times was limited
    to what would now termed active euthanasia.
  • Sauls death asked his armor bearer to kill him
    another claimed to end Sauls life. 2 Sam.
    16-10
  • Abimelechs death asking another to end his
    life. Judges 952-54

31
What the Bible Reveals Regarding Euthanasia
  • Gods will concerning euthanasia. (cont.)
  • In both cases, the men wanted to control their
    own fate and (arguably) had another to provide
    them an easy death.
  • This form of euthanasia is condemned and
    equivalent to murder.

32
What the Bible Reveals Regarding Euthanasia
  • Some definite conclusions.
  • Active euthanasia is against Gods will
  • The person has the ability to continue living
    (whether in peace or struggle)
  • Yet, whether it is the wish of the patient or
    not, active euthanasia involves the direct end of
    another persons life that would otherwise
    continue to live.

33
What the Bible Reveals Regarding Euthanasia
  • Some definite conclusions. (cont.)
  • Passive euthanasia is not against Gods will.
  • As noted earlier in this lesson all means to keep
    a person alive (artificially) continues while
    there is hope for recovery.
  • There comes a point when this hope is perceivably
    lost and the artificial means to keep the patient
    alive is discontinued.

34
Conclusion
  • As can be seen by this lesson, there are many who
    continue to debate how we view life and death.
  • While man will continue to debate, Christians
    will seek the Lord for His word and guidance to
    make decisions based upon faith.
  • In the case of euthanasia Gods word (inherently)
    condemns active euthanasia while man is
    authorized to exercise his personal wisdom to
    come to a decision regarding passive euthanasia.

35
Footnotes
  • National Center for Health Statistics, National
    Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 52, no. 3, Sept.
    18, 2003
  • http//efimov.wustl.edu/defibrillation/history/def
    ibrillation_history.htm
  • http//www.endofpolio.org/timeline/timeline_1980.h
    tml
  • http//www.endofpolio.org/timeline/timeline_2001.h
    tml

36
Footnotes
  • http//www.courttv.com/talk/chat_transcripts/2005/
    0324schiavo-debate.html
  • http//encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/comatose
  • http//www.neurology.org/cgi/content/abstract/58/3
    /349
  • http//www.setnlegalservices.org/glossary.htm
  • http//encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/comatoseCont
    rasts_to_other_conditions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com