TopicChapter 5 Market structure and imperfect competition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

TopicChapter 5 Market structure and imperfect competition

Description:

How this output compares with that in a competitive industry ... i.e .some entry barriers are deliberately erected by incumbent firms: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Peter647
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TopicChapter 5 Market structure and imperfect competition


1
Topic/Chapter 5Market structure and imperfect
competition
Business EconomicsFor School of Management
StudentsSpring Semester 2008
2
Topic/Chapter 5Market structure and imperfect
competition
  • Will cover
  • 5.1 Pure Monopoly
  • 5.2 Imperfect competition and market structure

3
5.1 Pure MonopolyLearning outcomes
  • By the end of this section, you should
    understand
  • How a monopolist chooses output
  • How this output compares with that in a
    competitive industry
  • How a monopolists ability to price discriminate
    affects output and profits

4
Monopoly
  • A monopolist
  • is the sole supplier of an industrys product
  • and the only potential supplier
  • is protected by some form of barrier to entry
  • faces the market demand curve directly
  • Unlike under perfect competition, MR is always
    below AR
  • i.e. MR is below the demand curve.
  • Monopoly power is measured by price minus
    marginal cost
  • P-MC

5
Profit Maximization by a Monopolist
Profits are maximized where MC MR at Q1P1.
In this position, AR is greater than AC so the
firm makes profits above the opportunity cost
of capital
A
Entry barriers prevent new firms joining
the industry.
6
Comparing Monopoly with Perfect Competition
  • Monopoly compared with perfect competition
    implies
  • higher price
  • lower output

7
Comparing Monopoly with Perfect Competition
(continued)
  • Does the consumer always lose from monopoly?
  • Among other things, this depends on whether the
    monopolist faces the same cost structure
  • Arguably the monopolist has an incentive to
    undertake RD in order to improve technology and
    reduce costs
  • i.e. To make greater, permanent long run profits
  • Whereas a competitive firm only makes temporary
    economic profits so the incentive is less.
  • Argued by some that if you take a dynamic longer
    term perspective monopolists might result in
    lower prices and greater output.

8
Patents
  • Most Western economies operate a patent system
  • Inventors of new processes acquire a temporary
    legal monopoly for a fixed period
  • By temporarily excluding entry and imitation, the
    patent laws increase the incentive to conduct RD
    without establishing a monopoly in the long run
  • Over the patent life the inventor gets a higher
    price and makes profits
  • Eventually the patent expires and competition
    from other firms leads to higher output and lower
    prices

9
Discriminating Monopoly
  • Suppose a monopolist supplies two separate groups
    of customers
  • with differing elasticities of demand
  • e.g. business travellers may be less sensitive to
    air fare levels than tourists
  • The monopolist may increase profits by charging
    higher prices to the businessmen than to
    tourists.
  • Discrimination is more likely to be possible for
    goods that cannot be resold
  • e.g. dental treatment

10
Perfect Price Discrimination
  • A monopolist will charge price P1
  • under perfect price discrimination each customer
    pays what its worth to them
  • the highest bidder pays E and the next highest
    bidder a little less and so on
  • So perfectly price discriminating monopolist
    produces at C where MCDD (which is now MR)

Price
E
MC
A
P1
C
B
DD
MR
Output
Q1
11
5.2 Imperfect competition and market structure
Learning outcomes
  • By the end of this section, you should
    understand
  • Imperfect competition and market power
  • How differences in cost and demand affect market
    structure
  • Monopolistic competition
  • The tension between collusion and competition
    within a cartel
  • Oligopoly and interdependence
  • Games
  • Commitment and credibility
  • Why there is little market power in a contestable
    market
  • Innocent entry barriers and strategic entry
    barriers

12
The Range of Market Structure
  • Perfect competition and monopoly are extreme
    forms of market structure
  • firms operating between these extremes facing
    imperfect competition
  • two examples of imperfect competition are
  • oligopoly, and
  • monopolistic competition

13
Most markets fall between the two extremes of
monopoly and perfect competition
  • An imperfectly competitive firm
  • would like to sell more at the going price
  • faces a downward-sloping demand curve
  • recognises its output price depends on the
    quantity of goods produced and sold

14
Imperfect Competition
  • An oligopoly
  • an industry with a few producers
  • each recognizing that its own price depends both
    on its own actions and those of its rivals.
  • In an industry with monopolistic competition
  • there are many sellers producing products that
    are close substitutes for one another
  • each firm has only limited ability to influence
    its output price.

15
Market Structure
16
Why Market Structures Differ
  • Minimum efficient scale MES of operation of a
    firm is the lowest output at which its LAC
    bottoms out
  • when MES is small in an industry there is room
    for many firms
  • when MES is relative large compared to the entire
    market there is only room for a few firms
  • when MES is as large as the entire market there
    is only room for one firm
  • A natural monopoly enjoys sufficient scale
    economies to have no fear of entry by others.

17
Monopolistic Competition
  • Characteristics
  • many firms
  • no barriers to entry
  • product differentiation
  • so the firm faces a downward-sloping demand curve
  • Few economies of scale.
  • The absence of entry barriers means that profits
    are competed away

18
Long Run Equilibrium inMonopolistic Competition
Price, cost
  • Price LAC
  • each firms demand curve is tangent to the LAC
  • No economic profits in the long run

LMC
LAC
P
DD
MR
Output
q
19
Oligopoly
  • A market with a few sellers
  • The essence of an oligopolistic industry is the
    need for each firm to consider how its own
    actions affect the decisions of its relatively
    few competitors.
  • Oligopoly may be characterized by collusion or by
    non-co-operation

20
Collusion and Cartels
  • COLLUSION
  • an explicit or implicit agreement between
    existing firms to avoid or limit competition with
    one another
  • CARTEL
  • is a situation in which formal agreements between
    firms are legally permitted
  • e.g. OPEC

21
The Kinked Demand Curve - 1
Consider how a firm may perceive its demand
curve under oligopoly.
It can observe the current price and output,
but must try to anticipate rival reactions to
any price change.
22
The Kinked Demand Curve - 2
The firm may expect rivals to respond if it
reduces its price, as this will be seen as an
aggressive move
so demand in response to a price reduction is
likely to be relatively inelastic
The demand curve will be steep below P0.
23
The Kinked Demand Curve - 3
but for a price increase rivals are less likely
to react,
so demand may be relatively elastic above P0
so the firm perceives that it faces a
kinked demand curve.
24
The Kinked Demand Curve - 4
Given this perception, the firm sees that revenue
will fall whether price is increased or decreased,
so the best strategy is to keep price at P0.
MC2
Price will tend to be stable, even in the face of
an increase in marginal cost.
MC3
MR
MC1
Or a decrease in marginal cost.
MR
25
The Kinked Demand Curve - 5Summary
  • An oligopolist who increases price will not be
    matched by competitors
  • An oligopolist who reduces price will be matched
    by competitors
  • the kink means that MC can change without
    affecting price

26
Game Theory Some Key Terms
  • Game
  • a situation in which intelligent decisions are
    necessarily interdependent
  • Strategy
  • a game plan describing how the player will act or
    move in every conceivable situation
  • Dominant strategy
  • where a players best strategy is independent of
    those chosen by others
  • Nash Equilibrium
  • where each player chooses the best strategy,
    given the strategies chosen by other players

27
The Prisoners Dilemma Game
Consider two firms in a duopoly each with a
choice of producing high or low output
28
The Prisoners Dilemma
  • Each firm has a dominant strategy to produce high
  • so they make 1 unit profit each
  • but they would both be better off producing low
  • as long as they can be sure that the other firm
    also produces low.
  • So collusion can bring mutual benefits
  • But there is incentive for each firm to cheat
  • Illustrates the tension between collusion and
    competition

29
Competition vs. Collusion
  • Each firm must decide whether to co-operate or
    compete
  • cartels survive when members enter into binding
    commitments
  • A commitment is an arrangement, entered into
    voluntarily, that restricts ones future actions
  • to maintain agreements there must be a credible
    threat of punishment for cheaters
  • A credible threat is one that, after the fact, it
    is still optimal to carry out

30
Entry and Potential Competition
  • So far we have focussed upon imperfect
    competition between existing firms
  • But potential competition from new entrants is
    also important
  • Look at three cases
  • Where entry is easy
  • (Contestable markets)
  • Where entry is difficult and
  • (Innocent entry barriers)
  • Where entry is difficult by design.
  • (Strategic Entry deterrence)

31
Contestable Markets
  • A contestable market is characterized by free
    entry and free exit
  • no sunk costs
  • allows hit-and-run entry
  • Contestability may constrain incumbent firms from
    exploiting their market power.

32
Innocent Entry Barriers
  • An innocent entry barrier is one made by nature
  • Absolute cost advantages, where incumbent firms
    have lower cost curves than entrants may be
    innocent
  • If it takes time to learn the business,
    incumbents have lower costs in the short run.
  • Scale economies are another innocent entry
    barrier
  • i.e. Where MES is large relative to market size

33
Strategic Entry Deterrence
  • Strategic entry deterrence is behaviour by
    incumbent firms to make entry less likely
  • i.e .some entry barriers are deliberately erected
    by incumbent firms
  • threat of predatory pricing
  • spare capacity
  • advertising and RD
  • product proliferation
  • Actions that effectively enforce sunk costs on
    potential entrants
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com