Fort Hays State University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Fort Hays State University

Description:

DATA COLLECTION POINTS: KSDE Professional Program Standard 7 & 9 Knowledge ... ability to integrate across and within content fields to enrich the curriculum, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: ambr67
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Fort Hays State University


1
Fort Hays State University
FHSU Performance Assessment
Topics
  • Background of FHSU Performance Assessment
  • The FHSU Performance Assessment
  • Course Development and Training

2
FHSU Performance Assessment Assignment
  • COURSE TASK 3 FHSU PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
  • DATA COLLECTION POINTS KSDE Professional
    Program Standard 7 9 Knowledge Performance,
    KSDE Professional Program Standard 11 Knowledge
    KSDE Professional Program Standard 13
    Performance KSDE Elementary Education Program
    Standard 7 Knowledge Performance FHSU
    Conceptual Framework Goal I, II, III, Goal IV,
    Goal V, Goal VI, Goal VII

3
FHSU Performance Assessment Assignment
  • Construct and deliver an instructional unit with
    a minimum of 5 lessons using the Teacher Work
    Sample Design. The purpose of this task is to
    evaluate the degree of impact the candidate has
    on elementary student learning.

4
The FHSU Performance Assessment Measures the
Ability To
  • Construct and deliver an instructional unit
  • Construct challenging and meaningful
    assessments
  • Adapt instruction to meet student needs
  • Measure learning gains and achievement
  • Analyze and reflect on teaching decision and
    results

5
New NCATE Standards
Provide evidence of the impact of candidate
performance on PK-12 student learning.
6
The Goals of Our Work.
  • Connect the performance of candidates to PK-12
    student learning
  • Assess candidate performance relative to
    national, state, and institutional standards
  • Framework for candidate professional development
  • Opportunities for self-assessment and reflection

7
General Structure of the FHSU Performance
Assessment
  • Contextual Information Learning Environment
    Adaptations
  • Learning Goals and Objectives
  • Instructional Design and Implementation
  • Demonstration of Integration Skills
  • Analysis of Classroom Learning Environment
  • Analysis of Assessment Procedures
  • Reflection and Self Evaluation

8
Contextual Information and Learning Environment
Adaptations
FHSU Performance Assessment Standard 1
  • Educational Purposes
  • The candidate understands how individuals
    learn, understands child and adolescent
    development, demonstrates knowledge of
    appropriate adaptations, and has the ability to
    provide instructional strategies that afford
    learning opportunities for all learners.
  • (KSDE Standards 2 and 3)
  • Measurement Purpose
  • Provide information about candidates awareness
    of contextual factors and ultimately data to
    examine their ability to function as a
    professional in a diverse setting.

9
Standard 1 Contextual Info. Learning Env.
Adaptations
  • Contextual Factors/Adaptation Chart Description
  • Environment (District/community/classroom)
  • Ethnic, Cultural, and Gender Make-up
  • Socio-Economic Status (SES) Make-up
  • Students with Special Needs
  • Students Developmental Characteristics/
    Understands Child and Adolescent Development
  • Demonstrates Knowledge of Appropriate Adaptations

10
Learning Goals and Objectives
FHSU Performance Assessment Standard 2
  • Educational Purposes
  • The candidate plans effective instruction based
    upon knowledge of all students, subject matter,
    curriculum outcomes, reading instruction needs,
    knowledge of parents, community and agencies to
    support all students learning and well-being.
  • (KSDE Standards 7 and 10)
  • Measurement Purpose
  • Aid in interpretation of gain scores (i.e.,
    what kind of learning does the gain score
    represent, type and concentration)

11
Standard 2 - Learning Goals Objectives
State/District Standards/District Goal
  • Subject Matter Knowledge Objectives
  • Skills/Performance/Applications Objectives
  • Reasoning Ability Objectives
  • Developmentally Appropriate Given Classroom
    Context
  • Aligned with State/District Standards

12
Instructional Design and Implementation
FHSU Performance Assessment Standard 3
  • Educational Purposes
  • The candidate understands and uses a variety of
    appropriate instructional strategies, including
    those that represent a wide range of
    technological tools, to develop various kinds of
    students learning including critical thinking,
    problem solving, reading, and subject matter
    knowledge.
  • (KSDE Standards 4 and 12)
  • Measurement Purposes
  • Examine relationship between gain scores
    teaching approaches

13
Standard 3 Instructional Design Implementation
  • Aligned with Unit Learning Goals and Learning
    Objectives
  • Progressively Sequenced
  • Adaptations are Made for Special Needs Students
  • Context Data is Used in Instructional Decisions
  • Multiple Learning Strategies
  • Provide and Adapt Instructional Strategies
  • Active Inquiry and Learner Centeredness
  • Reading Instruction Modifications
  • Technology
  • Knowledge of Factors in the Students Environment
    Outside the School

14
Demonstration of Integration Skills
FHSU Performance Assessment Standard 4
  • Educational Purposes
  • The candidate demonstrates the ability to
    integrate across and within content fields to
    enrich the curriculum, develop thinking skills,
    and facilitate all students abilities to
    understand relationships between subject areas.
  • (KSDE Standard 11)
  • Measurement Purpose
  • Encourage candidates to teach thinking skills
    and avoid using simple knowledge across the
    fields unless appropriate
  • Aid in interpretation of gain scores (i.e.,
    what kind of learning does the gain score
    represent, type and concentration)

15
Standard 4 Demonstration of Integration Skills
  • Integrated Instruction Across and Within Subject
    Matter Fields
  • Develops Thinking Skills Through Integration

16
Analysis of Classroom Learning Environment
FHSU Performance Assessment Standard 5
  • Educational Purposes
  • The candidate uses an understanding of
    individual and group motivation and behavior
    including effective verbal and non-verbal
    communication techniques, to create a positive
    learning environment that fosters active inquiry,
    supportive interaction and self-motivation in the
    classroom.
  • (KSDE Standards 5 and 6)
  • Measurement Purpose
  • Provide information about candidates awareness
    of group motivation and behavior and ultimately
    data to examine their ability to function as a
    professional in a classroom setting.

17
Standard 5 Analysis of Classroom Learning
Environment
  • Classroom Environmental Factors that Affect
    Learning
  • Individual Student Motivation
  • Group Motivation
  • Verbal Communication Among Students
  • Non-Verbal Communication Among Students
  • Effective Classroom Management Skills
  • Understands How to Motivate Students
  • Encourages Effective Communication Among Students
  • Creates Learning Environment that Encourages
    Active Inquiry
  • Provides an Environment Supportive of Student
    Interaction in Learning Activities

18
Analysis of Assessment Procedures
FHSU Performance Assessment Standard 6
  • Educational Purposes
  • Promote analysis and synthesis of all
    activities
  • Promote professional development
  • (KSDE Standard 8)
  • Measurement Purpose
  • Estimate the degree to which the sample has
    promoted learning for candidates
  • Ensure candidates provide accurate gain scores
    for project data management
  • Reduce gain score error (by requiring congruent
    pre-post assessments)

19
Standard 6 Analysis of Assessment Procedures
  • Assessment Plan Table - Type of Assessments,
    Learning Objectives, Format of Assessment
    including information on Pre Assessments,
    Formative Assessment(s), and Post Assessments
  • Describes the Level of Student Performance on
    Knowledge, Skills, and Reasoning Objectives
  • Evidence of Disaggregation of Data for at Least
    Two Subgroups
  • Formative Assessment is Utilized for Instruction
    and Evaluation
  • Assessment Includes Multiple Measures
  • Alignment Among Goals, Instruction and Assessment
  • Assessment Criteria Measurable/Comprehensive/Cri
    teria Level

20
Reflection and Self-Evaluation
FHSU Performance Assessment Standard 7
  • Educational Purposes
  • The candidate is a reflective practitioner who
    continually evaluates the effects of his or her
    choices and actions on others (students, parents,
    and other professionals in the learning
    community), actively seeks out opportunities to
    grow professionally and participates in the
    school improvement process (Kansas Quality
    Performance Accreditation).
  • (KSDE Standards 9 and 10)
  • Measurement Purpose
  • Estimate the degree to which the sample has
    promoted learning for candidates

21
Standard 7 Reflection Self-Evaluation
  • Learning Goal Where Your Students Were Most
    Successful
  • Learning Goal Where Your Students Were Least
    Successful
  • Communications With Students, Parents, and Other
    Professionals
  • Knowledge Of Your Students Performance In The
    State Assessments
  • Effects of Decisions on Students Learning
  • Effects of Decisions on Instruction and
    Assessment
  • Implications For Future Teaching Of This Unit
  • Information From QPA Process
  • Implications For Professional Development/Continuo
    us Learning

22
Resources Support Systems
  • Blackboard Electronic Resources
  • Faculty Support - Supervisor
  • Elementary School Course Instructional Support
    Dr. Nixon
  • Peer Support
  • Cooperative Teacher Support

23
  •  COURSES  gt THE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (FALL 2004)
     gt ASSIGNMENTS  gt TASK 3 - FHSU PERFORMANCE
    ASSESSMENT FOLDER EDIT VIEW FHSU Performance
    Assessment ElSch_KPA___FHSUPA_Guide_8.18.04.doc
    ( 168448 Bytes )This is the KSDE Kansas
    Performance Guideline for each Standard. Print
    this document for review as you write your
    narrative.
  • FHSU Performance Assessment Rubric
    ElSch_FHSUPA_Rubric_7.26.04 ( 5236 Bytes )This
    is the rubric that the FHSU raters of the KPA
    will use when grading your narrative.
  • FHSUPA Template ElSch_KPA_Template_F04.doc (
    47616 Bytes )Use this FHSUPA template when you
    type your narrative report. Do not skip over any
    sections listed on the template in your writing.
    The exclusion of an section will affect your
    final grade.
  • KSDE Kansas Performance Assessment Flow Chart -
    Understanding the Process (Standard 1 - 7)
    ElSch_KSDE_KPA_Flow_Chart.5.19.04.doc ( 26624
    Bytes )Print and review this flow chart as you
    design your own timeline for completion of this
    project.
  • KSDE Sample KPA for Review ElSch_KPA_KSDE_Exampl
    e5.19.04.doc ( 107520 Bytes )This KPA is for
    review and evaluation. Read the attached KPA and
    use the KPA Assessment Rubric to evaluate this
    sample. Identify things you like in this KPA and
    additions/corrections/deletions you would make to
    improve this narrative.
  • FHSUPA Peer Model 1 ElSch_KPA_Peer_Model_by_Pau
    l_Erickson.doc ( 109568 Bytes )Review this peer
    FHSUPA model during the beginning of the
    semester.
  • FHSUPA Peer Model 2 ElSch_Brenda_Prevo_KPA_Exam
    ple.doc ( 109568 Bytes )Review this peer FHSUPA
    model narrative during the beginning of the
    semester.

24
  • FHSU Kansas Performance Assessment Powerpoint
    Presentation ElSch_KPA_Powerpoint_Presentation.pp
    t ( 165888 Bytes )
  • FHSUPA Standard 1 Contextual Information
    Learning Environment ElSch_KPA_Standard_1_Context
    ual_Info.5.19.04.doc ( 26112 Bytes )Review this
    document before you begin writing FHSUPA Standard
    1.
  • FHSUPA Standard 2 3 - Considerations when
    Selecting your FHSUPA Unit Topic
    ElSch_Sellecting._Topics_for_Unit_or__KPA.doc (
    20480 Bytes )Review this document as you
    brainstorm a topic(s) for your FHSUPA unit.
  • FHSUPA Standard 2 - Tips for Writing Clear
    Objectives and Goals ElSch_Writing_Clear_Objectiv
    es.doc ( 55296 Bytes ) FHSUPA Standard 2
    Teaching to Standards ElSch_KPA_St2_Teaching_to_a
    _Standard.5.19.04.doc ( 50176 Bytes )Review this
    document before you begin writing Standard 2 of
    your FHSUPA.
  • FHSUPA Standard 2 Writing Clear Objectives and
    Goals ElSch_Writing_Clear_Objectives.doc ( 55296
    Bytes ) FHSUPA Standard 2 - Definitiona - Goals,
    Benchmarks, Objectives, Outcomes
    ElSch_Terminology_of_Goals_Benchmarks_Obj_Outcome
    s.doc ( 23552 Bytes ) FHSUPA Standard 2 -
    Teaching to a Standard ElSch_KPA_Standard_2_Teach
    ing_to_a_Standard.doc ( 50176 Bytes )
  • FHSUPA Standards 1, 3, 7 - Tips on Working with
    Diverse Learners ElSch_Diverse_Learners_Modificat
    ions.doc ( 31744 Bytes )

25
  • FHSUPA Standards 1, 3, 7 - Modifications
    Adaptions in Classroom Instruction Examples
    ElSch__Modification__Adaptions.doc ( 54784 Bytes
    ) FHSUPA Standards 1, 3, 7 - Test Modifications
    ElSch_Test_Modifications.doc ( 27136 Bytes )
    FHSUPA Standard 1, 3, 7 - ESOL Kit for FHSU
    Student Teachers ElSch_ESOL_Kit.doc ( 101888
    Bytes ) FHSUPA Standart 6 - Information
    Examples ElSch_KPA_St6_Info.5.19.04.doc ( 183808
    Bytes )Please review this information before you
    begin writing FHSUPA Standard 6.
  • FHSUPA Standard 6 - Gain Scores Information
    ElSch__KPA_Gain_Scores_Ex._5.19.04.doc ( 44032
    Bytes )Please review this information before you
    begin writing FHSUPA Standard 6.
  • FHSUPA Standard 6 - Information Examples
    ElSch_KPA_Standard_6_Information.doc ( 183808
    Bytes )

26
Planning and Writing
  • Planning and writing are guided by the
    principles
  • No Child Left Behind
  • One size does NOT fit all
  • The greatest injustice of all is the equal
    treatment of the unequal
  • Learner centered instruction is valued
  • Activities/assignments are developmentally
    appropriate

27
Candidate Perception Survey Results
  • Top Responses
  • The most important thing(s) I gained doing the
    KPA is (are)
  • Determining gain scores/student progress
  • Being accountable for individual student learning
  • Planning/using/pacing a unit
  • Being aware of my teaching/how to improve
  • Learning how to present/analyze data
  • Improving time management/organization
  • Increased knowledge of students competency level

28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
For Additional Information
  • Kansas State Department of Education
  • http//www.ksde.org/cert/FHSU/PA.doc
  • Teacher Education and Licensure
  • Licensure Information
  • Licensure Power Point Presentation
  • The Renaissance Group
  • http//www.emporia.edu/rengroup/index.htm
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com