Title: Mushroom Peat Internet Survey Results
1Mushroom Peat Internet Survey Results
- Report prepared for
- January, 2003
2Table of Contents
- Page
- Overview 2
- Objectives 3
- Approach 4
- Executive Summary 5
- Mushroom Peat Internet Survey Findings 6
- Respondent Profile 16
3Overview
4Objectives
- Research objectives for the online consumer
research are as follows - Gauge consumer perception of mushroom quality and
peat via presenting photo of mushrooms with peat
on them and requesting consumer reaction. - Determine correlation of consumer perception of
peat and mushroom purchase behavior. - Measure perception of mushroom quality and peat
encountered in consumers grocery stores.
5Approach
- In order to deliver against the objectives, the
Perishables Group (PG) - Worked with Mushroom Council to develop a
targeted Internet consumer interview
questionnaire. - Conducted 100 online interviews across the five
regions of the country (20 respondents per
region) - West WA, OR, ID, MT, ND, CA, NV. AZ
- Midsouth SD, WY, UT, CO, NE, KS, NM, OK, TX, LA
- Southeast AR, MS, AL, TN, FL, GA, SC, NC, VA
- Midwest MN, IA, MO, WI, IL, IN, MI, KY, OH, WV
- Northeast ME, NH, VT, NY, PA, MA, CT, RI, NJ,
DE, MD
6Executive Summary
- When compared against previous studies showing
nearly identical quality levels of whole white
mushrooms without peat moss/dirt consumers
appeared not to perceive a decrease in the level
of mushroom quality - Overall quality rating (mushrooms without peat)
1.7 to 2.2 - Overall quality rating (mushrooms with peat)
1.9 - Consumers expressed an intent to purchase
mushrooms with peat moss/dirt consistent with
that of mushrooms with no peat moss/dirt - Overall purchase intent rating (mushrooms without
peat) 1.5 to 2.0 - Overall purchase intent rating (mushrooms with
peat) 1.8 - General appearance and color have a greater
impact on purchase intent than the presence of
peat moss/dirt - 49 of consumers who report mushroom purchase
intent upon entering the store say they have
delayed mushroom purchases due to the presence of
peat moss/dirt - In previous studies 76 of consumers say that in
the past year they have delayed purchases due to
other quality factors - 37.6 cited cleanliness as a reason they WOULD
buy the peat/dirt covered mushrooms - Unlike the previous studies a significantly
smaller group of consumers identified cleanliness
as a purchase trigger when shown mushrooms with
peat moss/dirt - However, as noted above this did not reduce or
negatively impact purchase intent - Compared against the results of the earlier
studies the percentage of consumers saying
definitely/probably would buy mushrooms with peat
moss/dirt was nearly identical to purchase intent
scores from the earlier study - Consistent with earlier studies the findings
reinforced that general appearance and color were
cited as a leading drivers for consumers not to
purchase fresh mushrooms - In the earlier study approximately 4 of
consumers said they would definitely/probably not
buy vs. approximately 3 in this study
All ratings based on a 1 to 5 scale with 1
being the highest possible rating
7Mushroom Peat Internet Survey Findings
8Internet Survey Findings
- White Mushroom Purchase Reasons
- Most consumers (74) surveyed said they buy white
mushrooms for a specific reason, while 26 said
they buy mushrooms to have on hand as the need
arises.
9Internet Survey Findings
- White Mushroom Lost Sales from Peat Moss
- Forty-nine percent of respondents said that on at
least one occasion in the past year, they have
not purchased white mushrooms due to peat moss,
even though they were planning to buy mushrooms
when entering the store. - This is less than the 76 who said they have not
purchased white mushrooms due to poor quality in
the past year (combined quality and purchase
point survey results).
10Internet Survey Findings
- Frequency of Peat Moss Presence
- Most consumers (58 of respondents) said they
occasionally find white mushrooms with peat moss
in their store, while 20 said they often find
peat moss on their stores mushrooms.
11Peat Moss Photo
- The following photo was shown to respondents
periodically throughout the Mushroom Peat Moss
survey
12Internet Survey Findings
- Fresh White Mushroom (with Peat Moss) Purchase
Likelihood - Consumers said they would probably buy the
mushrooms (with peat moss) in the photo, with a
rating of 1.8. In the combined quality and
purchase point survey results, top quality
mushrooms (without peat moss) ranged from 1.5 to
2.0 in average ratings.
How Likely Are You To Purchase These Fresh White
Mushrooms?
13Internet Survey Findings
- Fresh White Mushroom (with Peat Moss) Purchase
Likelihood - Consumers said the mushrooms (with peat moss)
shown in photo were of good quality. In the
combined quality and purchase point survey
results, top quality mushrooms (without peat
moss) ranged from 1.7 to 2.2 in average ratings.
Fresh White Mushroom Quality
14Internet Survey Findings
- Fresh White Mushroom (with Peat Moss) Quality
Comparison - Consumers said that the mushrooms (with peat
moss) shown in photo were better than the quality
of mushrooms they usually find in their grocery
stores. In the combined quality and purchase
point survey results, top quality mushrooms
(without peat moss) ranged from 2.2 to 2.6 in
average ratings.
How Similar is the Quality of These Fresh White
Mushrooms to the Fresh White Mushrooms You
Usually See In Your Grocery Store?
15Internet Survey Findings
- Sliced White Mushroom Purchase Triggers
Probably/Definitely Buy - Of the 85 consumers who said that they would
probably/definitely buy the mushrooms shown in
the photo, most did so primarily because of
general appearance. Other responses included
only ones available and price.
Multiple Responses Allowed
16Internet Survey Findings
- Sliced White Mushroom Purchase Triggers
Probably/Definitely Not Buy - Of the 3 consumers who said that they would
probably/definitely not buy the mushrooms shown
in the photo, most did so primarily because of
general appearance. Other responses included
color/blemishes and usually buy sliced.
Multiple Responses Allowed
17Internet Survey Respondent Profile
18Internet Respondent Profile
- PG completed 100 total consumer intercepts
- Typical Respondent Overall
- Age 45-54 Years Old
- Household Size Two adults with no children
- Household Income 25,001 - 50,000
- Ethnicity Caucasian
- Gender Female
19Internet Respondent Profile
While the majority of respondents had no
children, 39 had between 1 and 2 children in the
household.
20Internet Respondent Profile
Respondents represented a wide range of ages with
the largest group (29) being 45-54 years old.
21Internet Respondent Profile
Respondents represented a wide range of income
groups with the largest group (43) earning
25,001 - 50,000.
22Internet Respondent Profile
Respondents represented a range of ethnic groups
with the largest group (79) being Caucasian.
23Internet Respondent Profile
Respondents represented both gender groups with
the largest group (85) being female.
24Internet Respondent Profile
Respondents represented a range of marital status
with the largest group (56) being married.