Deposit Insurance and Bank Insolvency Regime Reform - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Deposit Insurance and Bank Insolvency Regime Reform

Description:

Current system of both preventing bank failures and resolving them, which ... bankruptcy code, is frequently inefficient, uncertain, and excessively costly ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Mark447
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Deposit Insurance and Bank Insolvency Regime Reform


1
Deposit Insurance and Bank Insolvency Regime
Reform
  • George G. Kaufman
  • (Loyola University Chicago)
  • Cass Business School (London)
  • April 7, 2008

2
Why Need Reform?
  • Current system of both preventing bank failures
    and resolving them, which focuses on explicit or
    implicit deposit insurance and the existing
    corporate bankruptcy code, is frequently
    inefficient, uncertain, and excessively costly

3
U.K. Focus
  • Official recommendations based on failure and
    temporary nationalization of Northern Rock Bank
    and ongoing turmoil in financial markets. Focus
    on
  • Deposit insurance reform
  • Insolvency resolution reform (Special Resolution
    Regime SRR)

4
Basic Purpose of Current Deposit Insurance Systems
  • Stop bank runs by insured parties by eliminating
    threat of credit losses (if credible)
  • Limit bank fire-sale losses from runs and threat
    of technical insolvency
  • Limit contagion

5
Problems with Current Deposit Insurance
  • Two potential losses in bank failures
  • Credit losses (PVgtRV K lt 0)
  • Liquidity losses (limited access / freezing due
    to delayed sales / interruption in banking
    services)
  • Shifts not eliminates depositor credit losses
  • Does not address customer liquidity losses
  • Encourages bank moral hazard risk-taking
  • Greater portfolio risk
  • Lower capital
  • Encourages regulatory forbearance
  • Funding not withdrawn, bank can stay open
  • Thus, increases probability and cost of bank
    insolvencies in long run

6
Solution to Deposit Insurance Problem
  • Eliminate not shift credit losses
  • Eliminate not neglect liquidity losses
  • Focus on prompt legal closure at low but positive
    capital (no credit loss) and prompt customer
    access to accounts (no liquidity loss or
    interruption in services)
  • Make deposit insurance redundant (but not
    unnecessary)
  • Need special bank bankruptcy regime in most
    countries

7
Four-Point Efficient Bank Insolvency Resolution
Program(Eisenbeis-Kaufman)
  • PCA to prevent insolvencies, but with prompt
    legal closure at K gt 0 (minimize credit losses /
    least cost resolution)
  • Prompt estimation and allocation of credit losses
    to uninsured claimants (enhance market
    discipline)
  • Prompt sale / bridging of insolvent bank
    (minimize liquidity losses)
  • Pay insured depositors par (transfer to new bank)
  • Pay uninsured depositors advance dividends of
    estimated recovery amounts (transfer to new bank)
  • Provide performing loan customers ongoing access
    to credit lines
  • 4. Prompt reprivatization at above minimum capital

8
U.S. PCA
9
Four-Step Program Requires
  • Fund or borrowing authority by insurer to make
    payments to depositors before final sale
  • Credible PCA framework to minimize bank
    insolvencies and buy time for appropriate
    regulatory actions
  • Prompt and efficient bank bankruptcy regime

10
Keep Deposit Insurance on Retail Deposits
  • Full and immediate protection for retail
    depositors
  • Redundancy / back up
  • Get small depositors off the street and at home /
    political

11
Prompt and Efficient Bank Bankruptcy Regime
  • Banks special / different (not bank holding
    companies)
  • Even brief interruption of many activities, e.g.,
    deposit and credit access, credit cards, payments
    clearing / settlement, can have major adverse
    externality
  • Avoiding adverse externalities trumps
    resurrecting bank as firm
  • Prompt legal closure (minimize credit loss) and
    continuity of service with certainty (minimize
    liquidity loss) prime importance
  • Corporate bankruptcy regime generally cannot
    provide above results not prompt, not
    efficient, not certain

12
Case for Bank RegimeU.S. Bank and Corporate
Bankruptcy Codes
13
Case for Bank RegimeU.S. Bank and Corporate
Bankruptcy Codes
14
Case for Bank RegimeU.S. Bank and Corporate
Bankruptcy Codes
15
Issues Regarding Regulatory Insolvency in PCA
  • Legal closure at positive capital
  • Taking of private property
  • Rationale (bank charter, insurance)
  • Residual value
  • Leverage vs. risk-weighted (Basel) capital ratios
  • Off-balance sheet activities
  • Explicit
  • Implicit

16
Issues Regarding Regulatory Insolvency in PCA
(continued)
  • Numerical (quantitative) value for legal closure
  • High probability of economic insolvency
  • Minimize credit loss
  • Cost of timely and accurate monitoring
  • Other (qualitative / judgment) measures of
    regulatory insolvency
  • Unsafe and unsound banking
  • Pending default

17
Issues Regarding Regulatory Insolvency in PCA
(continued)
  • Numerical trigger value (in U.S. 2
    equity/assets) mandatory floor value to limit
    forbearance
  • How handle large number of concurrent
    insolvencies or near-insolvencies
  • Too Big To Fail (TBTF)
  • Systemic Risk Exemption (SRE)
  • Noncommercial banks (e.g., investment banks)

18
Why Review Past Problems and Make Case for Reform?
  • Optimist Avoid repeating errors
  • George Santayana (1863-1952)
  • Those who cannot remember the past are
    condemned to repeat it
  • Pessimist Most do remember the past George
    Kaufman (alive)
  • Those who can remember the past are condemned
    to agonize first and then repeat it

19
Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com