LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS RESPECTING TOXIC MOULD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS RESPECTING TOXIC MOULD

Description:

Over 20,000 varieties. Written history of mould contamination ... Drains. Behind walls. Under floors. Where ... Keep water drains in good shape. Cut down ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: graemes7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS RESPECTING TOXIC MOULD


1
  • LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS RESPECTING TOXIC MOULD
  • Michael Peerless
  • Matthew Baer

2
Toxic Mould Areas of Interest
  • Mould Overview
  • Types of Mould Litigation
  • U.S. Mould Litigation
  • Canadian Mould Litigation
  • Canadian Mould Headlines
  • Who is Most at Risk
  • Theories of Mould Liability
  • Legal Costs of Mould Litigation
  • Risk Management

3
What are Moulds?
4
What are Moulds?
  • Microscopic fungi
  • Over 20,000 varieties
  • Written history of mould contamination dates back
    to Bible
  • Priest instructed to tear out contaminated stones
    from a building and throw them into an unclean
    place outside of town (Leviticus)

5

What Makes Moulds Grow?
  • Moulds reproduce by making spores
  • Moulds require
  • Moisture
  • Heat (temperature between 35 and 104 degrees F)
  • Nutrients (i.e. building materials)
  • Moulds do not require light

6
Where Does Mould Grow?
7
Where Does Mould Grow?
  • Drywall
  • Carpeting
  • Panelling
  • Ceiling tiles
  • Insulation
  • Paint
  • Wallpaper
  • Doors
  • Drains
  • Behind walls
  • Under floors

8
Why are Moulds a Concern?
  • Some moulds release chemicals and spores which
    may effect health
  • Possible Symptoms of mould exposure
  • Breathing difficulties (strong link to asthma)
  • Memory loss
  • Hearing loss
  • Dizziness
  • Flu-like symptoms
  • Chronic fatigue
  • Irritability
  • Head aches

9
Signs of Mould
  • Discolouration of walls and ceilings
  • Smell / Odour

10
Preventing Mould
  • Reduce indoor humidity
  • Find and fix water leaks
  • Discard clutter/excess stored materials
  • Clean and maintain regularly
  • Regularly replace furnace filters
  • Keep water drains in good shape
  • Cut down on potted plants
  • Prevent condensation by adding insulation
  • Ensure good ventilation
  • Respond promptly when a leak or spill occurs

11
Types of Mould Litigation
  • PERSONAL INJURY
  • Plaintiff claims to have been injured by toxic
    mould
  • PROPERTY DAMAGE
  • Plaintiff seeks costs of repairs as well as costs
    associated with preventing further mould
  • (not mutually exclusive)

12
U.S. Mould Litigation
  • Mould claims against insurers have increased
    dramatically over the past few years in the
    United States
  • Year No. of Claims
  • 1999 12
  • 2000 499
  • 2001 10,000

13
Notable U.S Cases
  • Ballard v. Fire Insurance Exchange (2001)
  • A homeowner was awarded 32 million against an
    insurer on a property damage bad faith claim
  • Involved a multi-million dollar mansion in which
    the homeowner experienced a plumbing leak in the
    bathroom which was not properly fixed
  • The insurer was warned that dangerous moulds
    could grow in the sub-floor and that the flooring
    needed to be pulled out to avoid such a problem
  • The insurer did not follow the advice and
    disregarded the warning
  • The homeowner recovered for direct damages,
    punitive damages, emotional distress and costs,
    but personal injury claims were dismissed before
    trial for lack of scientific support

14
Notable U.S. Cases (Cont)
  • Stroot v. New Haverford Partnership
  • A Delaware jury awarded a former tenant in a
    residential building over 1 million in personal
    injury damages which she allegedly suffered as a
    result of her exposure to various mould toxins
    while living in the defendants complex
  • Anderson v. Allstate Insurance Company
  • A California jury awarded a policyholder 18
    million in punitive damages arising out of a
    mould coverage action (award was later reduced to
    2.5 million by the judge)

15
U.S. Mould Class Actions
  • Mould Class Actions are difficult to certify
  • In Michigan, homeowners sought class
    certification where a contractor allegedly
    installed a defective ventilation system that led
    to mould infestation
  • In Washington, students and teachers sought class
    certification alleging that mould spores in the
    school affected the indoor air quality and caused
    illness
  • In Davis v. Henry Phipps Plaza, 490 residents of
    a residential apartment building in New York City
    accepted a settlement of 1.17 million

16
U.S. Mould Class Actions (Cont)
  • Jana Andrejevic, et al. v. Board of Education et
    al.
  • In this June 4, 2003 decision from Illinois,
    certification was sought on behalf of a group of
    school children allegedly exposed to mould
    causing respiratory conditions and other injuries
  • Certification was denied because it was found
    that individual questions predominate over every
    aspect of a mould exposure case
  • Examples of individual issues
  • Amount of exposure
  • Duration of exposure
  • Date of exposure
  • Location of exposure

17
Canadian Mould Litigation
  • First significant decision in Canada dealing with
    mould occurred in 1989, when a tribunal in Quebec
    found that significant growth of toxic mould in
    the work place was a violation of Quebec health
    and safety legislation
  • Many Canadian mould cases have failed for the
    following types of reasons
  • Failure to show economic loss
  • Failure to prove presence of mould
  • Failure to prove illness
  • Damage caused by mould not covered by insurance
    policy

18
Canadian Mould Class Actions
  • In Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance (1998),
    certification was sought on behalf of residents
    of an apartment building where mould was
    allegedly present. Certification was denied as
    there was not deemed to be enough of an
    evidentiary basis to grant a certification order
  • In McDonald v. Dufferin_Peel (2000),
    certification was sought on behalf of 22,000
    children allegedly exposed to toxic mould in
    school portables causing illness. Given the
    number of individual issues involved, it was
    found that a class proceeding was not preferable.

19
McDonald v. Dufferin Peel (2000)
  • Plaintiff, on behalf of a proposed Class of
    Plaintiffs, claimed that she became ill upon
    being moved from a permanent school building into
    a portable classroom due to exposure to
    Stachybotrys atra and other noxious mould and
    other harmful and dangerous toxins and substances

20
Stachybotrys atra
21
Stachybotrys atra
22
McDonald v. Dufferin Peel (2000)
  • Since the claim of illness was very general in
    nature, the Board collected the attendance data
    for the Plaintiffs school for the period she
    claimed in the class action and the worlds
    largest retrospective study of the effects of
    mould exposure on health was undertaken
  • A review of the attendance data indicates that in
    fact students are absent from school due to
    illness less often if they are housed in a
    portable or Relocatable Classroom Structure (RCS)
    than if they are housed in the main school
    building

23
Mean Number of Absent Days by Location
24
Mean Number of Absent Days by Location
25
Recent Canadian Mould Headlines
  • Aging portables blamed for fertility problems
  • Two doctors claim to have developed leukemia from
    exposure to toxic mould due to poor building
    ventilation
  • Litigation due to mould caused by leaky
    condominiums
  • Courthouses closed to remove mould
  • Toxic moulds have been found in schools all
    across Canada causing closures while cleaning
    takes place and in other circumstances, closure
    of the buildings all together
  • A medical officer ordered all 186 portables in
    Halton region be inspected for mould
  • In 2000, Ontario paid 40 million in grants to
    school boards to correct mould contamination
    problems in schools

26
Who Is Most At Risk?
  • Insurance companies
  • Landlords
  • School Boards
  • Contractors
  • Suppliers
  • Architects

27
Theories of Mould Liability
  • Negligence
  • Breach of duty to warn
  • Risk of future illness
  • Emotional Distress
  • Economic Loss
  • Breach of contract

28
Legal Costs of Mould Litigation
  • Microbiologists
  • Environmental engineers
  • Chemist
  • Mould experts
  • Architects
  • Construction experts
  • Air quality specialists
  • Ventilation experts
  • Industrial hygienists
  • Medical experts in neurology and immunology

29
Risk Management
  • Specific insurance agreements
  • Contract clauses with contractors/suppliers

30
  • Contact
  • Michael Peerless
  • Matthew Baer
  •  
  • SISKINDS THE LAW FIRM
  • 680 Waterloo Street
  • London Ontario N6A 3V8
  •  
  • Telephone 519-672-2251
  •  
  • Michael ext. 369 E-Mail
    mike.peerless_at_siskinds.com
  • Matthew ext 405 E-Mail
    matt.baer_at_siskinds.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com