Title: LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS RESPECTING TOXIC MOULD
1- LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS RESPECTING TOXIC MOULD
-
- Michael Peerless
- Matthew Baer
2Toxic Mould Areas of Interest
- Mould Overview
- Types of Mould Litigation
- U.S. Mould Litigation
- Canadian Mould Litigation
- Canadian Mould Headlines
- Who is Most at Risk
- Theories of Mould Liability
- Legal Costs of Mould Litigation
- Risk Management
3What are Moulds?
4What are Moulds?
- Microscopic fungi
- Over 20,000 varieties
- Written history of mould contamination dates back
to Bible - Priest instructed to tear out contaminated stones
from a building and throw them into an unclean
place outside of town (Leviticus)
5 What Makes Moulds Grow?
- Moulds reproduce by making spores
- Moulds require
- Moisture
- Heat (temperature between 35 and 104 degrees F)
- Nutrients (i.e. building materials)
- Moulds do not require light
6Where Does Mould Grow?
7Where Does Mould Grow?
- Drywall
- Carpeting
- Panelling
- Ceiling tiles
- Insulation
- Paint
- Wallpaper
- Doors
- Drains
- Behind walls
- Under floors
8Why are Moulds a Concern?
- Some moulds release chemicals and spores which
may effect health - Possible Symptoms of mould exposure
- Breathing difficulties (strong link to asthma)
- Memory loss
- Hearing loss
- Dizziness
- Flu-like symptoms
- Chronic fatigue
- Irritability
- Head aches
9Signs of Mould
- Discolouration of walls and ceilings
- Smell / Odour
10Preventing Mould
- Reduce indoor humidity
- Find and fix water leaks
- Discard clutter/excess stored materials
- Clean and maintain regularly
- Regularly replace furnace filters
- Keep water drains in good shape
- Cut down on potted plants
- Prevent condensation by adding insulation
- Ensure good ventilation
- Respond promptly when a leak or spill occurs
11Types of Mould Litigation
- PERSONAL INJURY
- Plaintiff claims to have been injured by toxic
mould - PROPERTY DAMAGE
- Plaintiff seeks costs of repairs as well as costs
associated with preventing further mould - (not mutually exclusive)
12U.S. Mould Litigation
- Mould claims against insurers have increased
dramatically over the past few years in the
United States - Year No. of Claims
- 1999 12
-
- 2000 499
- 2001 10,000
13Notable U.S Cases
- Ballard v. Fire Insurance Exchange (2001)
- A homeowner was awarded 32 million against an
insurer on a property damage bad faith claim - Involved a multi-million dollar mansion in which
the homeowner experienced a plumbing leak in the
bathroom which was not properly fixed - The insurer was warned that dangerous moulds
could grow in the sub-floor and that the flooring
needed to be pulled out to avoid such a problem - The insurer did not follow the advice and
disregarded the warning - The homeowner recovered for direct damages,
punitive damages, emotional distress and costs,
but personal injury claims were dismissed before
trial for lack of scientific support
14Notable U.S. Cases (Cont)
- Stroot v. New Haverford Partnership
- A Delaware jury awarded a former tenant in a
residential building over 1 million in personal
injury damages which she allegedly suffered as a
result of her exposure to various mould toxins
while living in the defendants complex - Anderson v. Allstate Insurance Company
- A California jury awarded a policyholder 18
million in punitive damages arising out of a
mould coverage action (award was later reduced to
2.5 million by the judge)
15U.S. Mould Class Actions
- Mould Class Actions are difficult to certify
- In Michigan, homeowners sought class
certification where a contractor allegedly
installed a defective ventilation system that led
to mould infestation - In Washington, students and teachers sought class
certification alleging that mould spores in the
school affected the indoor air quality and caused
illness - In Davis v. Henry Phipps Plaza, 490 residents of
a residential apartment building in New York City
accepted a settlement of 1.17 million
16U.S. Mould Class Actions (Cont)
- Jana Andrejevic, et al. v. Board of Education et
al. - In this June 4, 2003 decision from Illinois,
certification was sought on behalf of a group of
school children allegedly exposed to mould
causing respiratory conditions and other injuries - Certification was denied because it was found
that individual questions predominate over every
aspect of a mould exposure case - Examples of individual issues
- Amount of exposure
- Duration of exposure
- Date of exposure
- Location of exposure
17Canadian Mould Litigation
- First significant decision in Canada dealing with
mould occurred in 1989, when a tribunal in Quebec
found that significant growth of toxic mould in
the work place was a violation of Quebec health
and safety legislation - Many Canadian mould cases have failed for the
following types of reasons - Failure to show economic loss
- Failure to prove presence of mould
- Failure to prove illness
- Damage caused by mould not covered by insurance
policy
18Canadian Mould Class Actions
- In Taub v. Manufacturers Life Insurance (1998),
certification was sought on behalf of residents
of an apartment building where mould was
allegedly present. Certification was denied as
there was not deemed to be enough of an
evidentiary basis to grant a certification order - In McDonald v. Dufferin_Peel (2000),
certification was sought on behalf of 22,000
children allegedly exposed to toxic mould in
school portables causing illness. Given the
number of individual issues involved, it was
found that a class proceeding was not preferable.
19McDonald v. Dufferin Peel (2000)
- Plaintiff, on behalf of a proposed Class of
Plaintiffs, claimed that she became ill upon
being moved from a permanent school building into
a portable classroom due to exposure to
Stachybotrys atra and other noxious mould and
other harmful and dangerous toxins and substances
20Stachybotrys atra
21Stachybotrys atra
22McDonald v. Dufferin Peel (2000)
- Since the claim of illness was very general in
nature, the Board collected the attendance data
for the Plaintiffs school for the period she
claimed in the class action and the worlds
largest retrospective study of the effects of
mould exposure on health was undertaken - A review of the attendance data indicates that in
fact students are absent from school due to
illness less often if they are housed in a
portable or Relocatable Classroom Structure (RCS)
than if they are housed in the main school
building
23Mean Number of Absent Days by Location
24Mean Number of Absent Days by Location
25Recent Canadian Mould Headlines
- Aging portables blamed for fertility problems
- Two doctors claim to have developed leukemia from
exposure to toxic mould due to poor building
ventilation - Litigation due to mould caused by leaky
condominiums - Courthouses closed to remove mould
- Toxic moulds have been found in schools all
across Canada causing closures while cleaning
takes place and in other circumstances, closure
of the buildings all together - A medical officer ordered all 186 portables in
Halton region be inspected for mould - In 2000, Ontario paid 40 million in grants to
school boards to correct mould contamination
problems in schools
26Who Is Most At Risk?
- Insurance companies
- Landlords
- School Boards
- Contractors
- Suppliers
- Architects
27Theories of Mould Liability
- Negligence
- Breach of duty to warn
- Risk of future illness
- Emotional Distress
- Economic Loss
- Breach of contract
28Legal Costs of Mould Litigation
- Microbiologists
- Environmental engineers
- Chemist
- Mould experts
- Architects
- Construction experts
- Air quality specialists
- Ventilation experts
- Industrial hygienists
- Medical experts in neurology and immunology
29Risk Management
- Specific insurance agreements
- Contract clauses with contractors/suppliers
30- Contact
- Michael Peerless
- Matthew Baer
-
- SISKINDS THE LAW FIRM
- 680 Waterloo Street
- London Ontario N6A 3V8
-
- Telephone 519-672-2251
-
- Michael ext. 369 E-Mail
mike.peerless_at_siskinds.com - Matthew ext 405 E-Mail
matt.baer_at_siskinds.com -