Test of New Master - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Test of New Master

Description:

A third of the world's population does not have access to essential medicines ... Team of international assessors and inspectors review dossiers and visit facilities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: trace48
Category:
Tags: dossiers | master | new | test

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Test of New Master


1

Access to Essential Medicines Overview
Sonali Duggal Harvard Business SchoolSeptember
29, 2006
2
A third of the worlds population does not have
access to essential medicines
Treatment scale-up
Availability of medicines/testing
Health infrastructure
Political will
  • Price of certain drugs is high
  • Available drugs may not have received
    international quality approvals
  • Patent protection may prohibit generic production
  • Funding may be limited
  • Drugs may not be available since there is little
    RD taking place for certain diseases
  • Overall health systems can be weak- access to
    clean water, maternal mortality, nutrition
  • Few health professionals to support treatment
  • Few health centers/clinics to provide treatment
  • Lack of distribution networks
  • Governments may not want to address particular
    diseases due to stigma
  • Even if funding is available, it may not be taken
    advantage of

3
Agenda
  • Background
  • Price
  • Quality
  • Patents

4
40M people are infected with HIV globally
Source AIDS Epidemic Update (WHO/UNAIDS,
December 2005)
5
Only 25 of people that require HIV treatment
globally are receiving it
At best, one in ten Africans and one in seven
Asians in need of antiretroviral treatment were
receiving it in mid-2005.
Source AIDS Epidemic Update (WHO/UNAIDS,
December 2005)
6
Countries vary widely in the percentage of
patients on treatment
Source AIDS Epidemic Update (WHO/UNAIDS,
December 2005)
7
The epidemic in India is concentrated in the
South and Northeast
Source WHO 3 by 5 India Summary (WHO/UNAIDS,
June 2005)
8
Key barriers to scale-up of treatment for India
  • Political will
  • Getting treatment to rural areas
  • Moving from tertiary to secondary and primary
    health centers
  • Building procurement system required to ensure
    consistent supply

9
Agenda
  • Background
  • Price
  • Quality
  • Patents

10
The price of first line medicines has declined
significantly
January 2006
October 2003
562
75
562
384
50
290
221
192
140
140
Branded Best Price1
Generic Actual Price2
Branded Best Price1
Generic Actual Price4
Generic List Price3
Generic List Price5
Best Price
Best Price
  • 1 As reported by the manufacturers and by
    Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) in Untangling the
    Web of Price Reductions
  • 384 was the weighted average price being offered
    to CHAI purchasers in October 2003.
  • MSFs May 2003 guide reported the best prices
    offered by Cipla, Hetero and Ranbaxy as 304,
    281 and 285.
  • Weighted average of price being paid in middle
    and low-income countries, according to World
    Health Organization.
  • Average price, per MSFs June 2005 guide, of
    three suppliers currently WHO prequalified
    (Cipla, Hetero, Ranbaxy).

11
Prices of second line drugs are at least 10 times
those of first-line
Price of 2nd-Line Treatment (Annual cost in US)
  • Key issues re 2nd-Line Treatment
  • Price differential is so high that even small
    volumes can double national treatment budgets
  • 5-10 of patients switch to 2nd-line meds each
    year, so upwards of 0.5 million will be affected
    in 2 years
  • Generic supply today is extremely limited, and
    few generic versions of second line drugs have
    received regulatory approvals
  • Supply of meds in greatest demand by branded
    companies is limited their prices are not
    widely available

40x
6,000
10x
1,400
140
1st Line (Africa)
2nd Line (Africa)
2nd Line (Middle Income)
12
...Resulting in second-line as an increasing
portion of ARV costs (India example)
Note Assumes 10 decrease in per person per year
cost of second-line treatmentSource CHAI
analysis
13
High cost is partially based on a lack of
competition
Formulation
Generic manufacturers eligible under GFATM
Generic manufacturers with commercially
available product
Further generic commercial availability
  • Abacavir 300mg tablets
  • 4
  • 4 (Aurobindo, Cipla, Hetero, Ranbaxy)
  • N/A
  • Didanosine 250mg caps
  • 1 (Cipla)
  • 3 (Cipla, Hetero, Ranbaxy)
  • N/A
  • Didanosine 400mg caps
  • 1 (Cipla)
  • 2 (Cipla, Hetero, Ranbaxy)
  • N/A
  • Lopinavir/Ritonavir 133.33/33.33mg caps
  • 1 (Cipla)
  • 2 (Cipla, Hetero)
  • 6 mo-1year
  • Ritonavir 100mg caps
  • 1 (Cipla)
  • 4 (Aurobindo, Cipla, Hetero, Strides)
  • N/A
  • Saquinavir 200mg caps
  • 1 (Cipla)
  • 2 (Cipla, Hetero)
  • N/A
  • Tenofovir 300mg tabs
  • 0
  • 1 (Cipla)
  • 6 mo
  • Emtricitabine 200mg tabs
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1 year
  • Atazanavir 200mg caps
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1 year

Source Untangling the Web of Price Reductions
(MSF, June 2005) Global Fund Compliance List
(November 9th, 2005) CHAI data
14
Generic competition is critical given the large
volumes of generic products purchased
Source WHO Global Price Reporting Mechanism,
April 2006
15
Pricing for other products, such as ACTs for
malaria, is largely driven be distributor and
retailer margins
TOGO EXAMPLE FOR ARAQ
Clearing and forwarding
Import duty
VAT
Distributor Margins
Retailer
Ex-factory price





  • -
  • 10
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20-30
  • 30-40
  • margin

75-95
  • margin
  • 2.30
  • 0.23
  • 0.12
  • 0.23
  • 0.72
  • 1.26

4.86
Note Clearing forwarding, import duty and VAT
are calculated on ex-factory price distributor
and retailers make a margin on the previous
step Source Supplier interview
16
Agenda
  • Background
  • Price
  • Quality
  • Patents

17
High quality products are critical for generic
supply
  • WHO prequalification process acts as global
    quality assurance mechanism for generics
  • Team of international assessors and inspectors
    review dossiers and visit facilities
  • Prequalification considered one of the most
    stringent processes for quality approval
  • PEPFAR also grants tentative approval for
    generics
  • Most funders require quality approval from
    stringent regulatory authority and/or WHO

18
However, many products still have no suppliers
that are approved by the WHO
Source WHO Prequalification List, April 2006
19
Agenda
  • Background
  • Price
  • Quality
  • Patents

20
Post-TRIPS Shift to Product Patents
  • Indias decision to join to the WTO created an
    obligation to comply with the Agreement on Trade
    Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
    (TRIPS)
  • The most recent amendment was in March of 2005-
    all new drugs are now covered by a product patent
    for a period of 20 years
  • Previously, only process patents were allowed to
    be submitted to the patent office

21
What is being done?
  • Cost reduction
  • UNITAID The French government (with others) is
    using an airline tax to fund essential medicines,
    particularly second-line, pediatric drugs, and
    artemisinin for malaria
  • Quality improvement
  • Gates funding more inspectors/assessors for WHO
    process
  • Patents
  • Efforts by various NGOs to change patent
    situation
  • MSFs Access Campaign
  • Indian civil society groups filing pre-grant
    oppositions
  • Various patent-holding companies are offering
    voluntary licenses for key second line
    products- but efficacy is questionable?
  • BMS for Atazanavir
  • Gilead for Tenofovir

22
Summary
  • Access to essential medicines is currently at key
    crossroads, particularly for second line products
  • While initiatives are underway to reduce costs
    and improve quality, next year to two years will
    determine patent situation in India for generic
    production
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com