Survey Research Methods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Survey Research Methods

Description:

Refers to the extent to which the measurement procedure actually measures the ... Ambiguous, lengthy, double-barrelled questions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: roberta65
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Survey Research Methods


1
Survey Research Methods
Week 1. Designing Questionnaires
Steve Fisher, Robert Andersen Anthony Heath
Department of Sociology UNIVERSITY
of OXFORD
2
The Logic of Sampling Measurement
3
General Problem of MeasurementReliability
Validity
  • Reliability
  • Refers to the replicability of the measurement
    procedure to yield consistent results
  • Validity
  • Refers to the extent to which the measurement
    procedure actually measures the concept that it
    is intended to measure

4
Reliability ValidityQuestionnaire related
problems
  • Wording effectsword choice, loaded questions
  • Respondent recall
  • Social desirability, knowledge questions,
    threatening questions
  • Question order effects
  • Response format differences, recency effects in
    closed-ended questions
  • Dont know responses
  • Middle position in polar alternatives

5
Question wording problemsAssociated factors
  • Word selection
  • Seemingly trivial changes in wording can affect
    response distributions (e.g., forbid versus not
    allow)
  • Ambiguous, lengthy, double-barrelled questions
  • Unless you need to establish context, short
    questions are best
  • Have only one thought per question
  • Bad Could you please tell me how many children
    you have, and what year each of them was born?
  • Good What are the ages of your children?
  • Biased, leading or loaded questions
  • Avoid questions that make the respondent feel
    they should respond a certain way

6
Question wordingExperimental evidence
7
Respondent RecallSituational framing
decomposition
  • Telescopingbringing distant events closer to the
    present than they actually occurred
  • Limited by Situational framingi.e., placing the
    event in the context of other events, especially
    well known events
  • e.g., How many times have you been to the doctor
    since last Christmas?
  • Inaccurate calculation of a large number of
    events during a long time period
  • Limited by Decompositioni.e., breaking time into
    smaller periods
  • e.g., If you want to determine how much alcohol
    people drink in a year, ask them how much they
    drink each week and calculate the year value
    yourself

8
Social desirability, threatening questionsUsing
lead-in statements
  • People generally have a desire to present a
    positive image which can override the norm to
    tell the truth
  • Errors associated with this can be limited by
    adding lead-in statements
  • e.g. 1 Voter turnout
  • Did you vote in the last election?
  • Many people were not able to vote last election.
    Were you able to vote?
  • e.g. 2 Theft
  • Did you ever steal as a child?
  • Most people have stolen something when they were
    children. Did you ever steal as a child?

9
Question OrderingContext effects
  • Question responses can be affected by the context
    in which the question appears
  • Question order-effects usually involve a group of
    questions dealing with the same issue
  • Replication problem
  • Difficult to compare results of different surveys
    over time since it is seldom possible to
    replicate an entire questionnaire.
  • This is seldom taken into consideration in trend
    studies, however.
  • No real solution other than carrying out
    experiments within the questionnaire to assess
    the impact of context

10
Closed-ended questionsPros cons
  • Advantages
  • Quick easy for respondents
  • Less articulate are not at a disadvantage
  • Response choices can clarify alternatives
  • Fewer irrelevant answers
  • Easy to code and analyse
  • Disadvantages
  • Responses suggest ideas (e.g., No
    opinion/knowledge still give opinion)
  • Frustrates respondents if categories are not
    exhaustive
  • Misinterpretation goes unnoticed
  • Complex issues forced into simple categories
  • Recency effects

11
Open-ended questionsPros cons
  • Advantages
  • Permits detail, clarification
  • Unanticipated answers
  • Reveals the logic behind a respondents response
  • Disadvantages
  • Generalization or comparison difficult
  • Coding and statistical analysis difficult
  • Irrelevant answers possible
  • Bias towards educated

12
Recency effectsExperimental evidence
13
Dont know Responses Missing data or important
meaning?
  • Missing data approach
  • Standard question does not include DK category
  • Interviewers probe in order to force an opinion
  • Important meaning approach
  • DKs may represent a lack of knowledge, in which
    case they are acceptable responsesprobing
    invents data
  • Converse suggests that much of survey errors
    result from random responses by people have no
    real opinion
  • Filter questions can be used to determine
    interest and knowledge in a topic before asking
    opinions
  • see Converse, P.E. (1970) Attitudes and
    non-attitudes Continuation of a dialogue, The
    Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems.
    Reading, Mass. Addison-Wesley.

14
DK Responses Experimental Evidence
15
Measuring a middle positionShould it be built
into the question?
  • e.g., Do you think that state funding for
    universities should be increased or decreased?
  • Debate over whether the middle alternative should
    be asked explicitly or simply accepted when
    offered
  • Two rationales for omitting the middle category
    are
  • Largely people who lean to one side but with
    little intensity
  • It attracts those who have no opinion (would
    rather choose it than dont know)
  • On the other hand, explicitly offering a middle
    position makes good theoretical sense since those
    who do opt for it may actually favour the middle
    and thus should not be forced into another
    category.

16
Measuring the middle position Experimental
evidence
17
Selective approach to midpoint and DK Rob Johns
  • Never have a midpoint without a DK response
  • Familiar items should have both, unfamiliar
    should have neither
  • Minority is overestimated if indifference is
    common but there is no midpoint, so keep both
  • Majority is overestimate if there is strong
    social desirability pressures and a midpoint, so
    omit both
  • Familiarity and social desirability can be
    determined from pre-tests.
  • Okay to use different formats in the same
    questionnaire

18
Comparative Survey Research
  • Difficult to know whether the same question means
    the same thing in different countries
  • E.g. Chinese report being more politically
    efficacious than the Mexicans
  • King et al (2004) use the following vignettes to
    anchor the question
  • Alison lacks clean drinking water. She and her
    neighbors are supporting an opposition candidate
    in the forthcoming elections that has promised to
    address the issue. It appears that so many people
    in her area feel the same way that the opposition
    candidate will defeat the incumbent
    representative.
  • Imelda lacks clean drinking water. She and her
    neighbors are drawing attention to the issue by
    collecting signatures on a petition. They plan to
    present the petition to each of the political
    parties before the upcoming election.
  • Jane lacks clean drinking water because the
    government is pursuing an industrial development
    plan. In the campaign for an upcoming election,
    an opposition party has promised to address the
    issue, but she feels it would be futile to vote
    for the opposition since the government is
    certain to win.
  • Toshiro lacks clean drinking water. There is a
    group of local leaders who could do something
    about the problem, but they have said that
    industrial development is the most important
    policy right now instead of clean water.
  • Moses lacks clean drinking water. He would like
    to change this, but he cant vote, and feels that
    no one in the government cares about this issue.
    So he suffers in silence, hoping something will
    be done in the future.

19
Constructing a good questionnaireGeneral advice
  • Use social conversation as a guide to both
    question construction and questionnaire design
  • Questions should be straight to the point
  • One thing per question
  • Avoid jargon, slang, abbreviations
  • Avoid asking about vague future intentions or
    hypothetical questions
  • Avoid wording that is influential or offensive
  • If little is known use open questions otherwise
    closed-ended questions with exhaustive and
    mutually exclusive response categories are
    typically better
  • Borrow questions from existing literature
  • Pre-test

20
Next week
  • Please do the readings for your group and for the
    lecture material BEFORE coming to class
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com