INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY

1
INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY BRIEFING
TO Deputy Garrison Commanders Conference COMMON
LEVELS OF SUPPORT (CLS) OVERVIEW 25 APRIL
2005 Mr. Philip E. Sakowitz, Jr. Principal
Deputy Director, IMA
Our Mission - provide equitable, effective and
efficient management of Army installations
worldwide to support mission readiness and
execution, enable the Well-being of Soldiers,
civilians and family members, improve the Armys
aging infrastructure and preserve our
environment. Leading Change for Installation
Excellence
2
INTENT OF CLS

• Method for ensuring the delivery of high quality
  base operations support services within the funds
  available to the army yielding
• Consistency and predictability in service
  delivery across Army installations worldwide
• Equitable funding distribution to Army garrisons
• Visibility of affordable and non-affordable
  support programs
• Performance metrics for each service support
  program to consistently measure every garrison

3

INITIAL DEVELOPMENT PHASES
PHASE 1 SERVICE ANALYSIS TEAMS (SATs) PHASE
2 VALIDATION OF SAT RESULTS PHASE
3 VALIDATION OF COMMON LEVELS OF SUPPORT
DECISION SUPPORT TOOL
Completed Phases 1-3 for 54 Services Developed
by stakeholders and functional experts
4
SERVICE ANALYSIS TEAM (SAT) PROCESS
SERVICE ANALYSIS TEAM MEMBERS HQDA PROPONENTS,
IMA FUNCTIONALS, GARRISONS, MACOMs/ICs,
CONSTITUENTS

• SERVICE ANALYSIS TEAMS

IDENTIFIED SERVICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS
Community Information Services
Installation Volunteer Management
PRIORITIZED SERVICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS
Army Family Action Plan
Family Advocacy Program
IDENTIFIED OF SERVICE COST
Mobilization Deployment Support
Army Family Team Building
DEVELOPED PERFORMANCE MEASURE TARGETS
1
Financial Readiness
Spouse Employment
Exceptional Family Member Program
Relocation Readiness
Army Community Services
SERVICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS(SSPs)
5
DECISION SUPPORT TOOL
Army Community Services
6
ESTABLISHING SSP PRIORITIES

• SSPs IDENTIFIED AS
• MUST FUND
• Required by law
• Providing foundation functions and skill sets for
  minimum level of service management (i.e.,open
  the doors)
• Yielding service failure if not provided (i.e.,
  the breakpoint)
• OR
• DISCRETIONARY
• Prioritized according to impact on Projecting
  Power, Readiness, and Well Being
• Direct Impact on Mission
• Indirect Impact on Mission
• Peripheral Impact on Mission

7
ADAPTABILITY
Basic Standard Predictable Efficient
GERMANY
MAINE
7/24
ADAPTABLE
8
COMMON LEVELS OF SUPPORT RESULTS
54 services 373 service
support programs (SSPs) 246 SSPs identified as
must fund 127 discretionary SSPs scored
prioritized
CLS provides the detail to articulate funding
shortfalls
9
FUNDING IMPACTS
IMA FLEX - LIMITED TO MOVING FACILITIES/INFRASTRUC
TURE SUSTAINMENT FUNDING TO FUND SERVICES
SRM Sustainment, Restoration Modernization
(Facilities Infrastructure) BOS Base
Operations Support
10
REPROGRAMMING IMPACTS ON FACILITIES
RATE OF FACILITY DEGRADATION WITH SRM FUNDED AT
94
RATE OF FACILITY DEGRADATION WITH SRM FUNDED AT
74
RATE OF FACILITY DEGRADATION WITH SRM FUNDED AT
61
RATE OF FACILITY DEGRADATION WITH SRM FUNDED AT
40
Point Current underfunding leads to C4
Facilities
11
THE WAY AHEAD

• Phase 1 FY05 is a Planning Year
• Phase 2 FY06 - Initial Implementation
• Phase 3 FY07 - Full Implementation

12
THE WAY AHEADFY05 PLANNING YEAR

• We will adjust the CLS Model to Version 2.0 in
  preparation for FY06 funding decision using this
  approach
• Step I Analyze Implementation Plans
• Analyze Garrison CLS implementation plans for
  adjustments to SSP cost, definitions
• Incorporate some SMC-identified exceptions into
  CLS Model
• Step II Conduct SATs
• Refine performance measures
• Re-look selected services
• Analyze selected deferred services
• Step III Complete CLS Model/Review Exceptions
• IMA Senior Executive Leadership (SEL) will score
  SSPs result is CLS "Version 2.0"
• EXCOM Working Group recommends disposition of
  (non-incorporated) exceptions

13
THE WAY AHEADFY05 PLANNING YEAR (cont.)

• Aug 05
• Sep 05
• Jul 05 - Sep 05

• Conduct CLS Decisions for FY 06
• IMBOD notified of FY06/07 outcomes
• Deliberate strategic communication on CLS to
  stakeholders

14
THE WAY AHEADFY06 INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION

• Garrisons provided with
• Revised FY 06/07 funding targets
• Initial implementation guidance by Service, by
  SSP
• Garrisons execute funded SSPs
• Migrate away from delivering non-funded SSPs

15
THE WAY AHEADFY07 FULL IMPLEMENTATION

• People moved in coordination with Standard
  Garrison Organization and CLS
• Dollars aligned with Service and SSP
• Measure evaluate performance through
• Activity Based Costing
• Performance Management Review

16
INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY Sustain,
Support and Defend