DIAHORI'ppt - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

DIAHORI'ppt

Description:

Smallest detectable change or difference (measurement error) ... Distribution based measures dont give a good sense of the clinical relevance of the change ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: peter203
Category:
Tags: diahori | dont | ppt

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DIAHORI'ppt


1
(No Transcript)
2
  • Two measures to determine Minimal Clinically
    Important Change (MCIC)
  • Riekie de Vet

Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine VU
University Medical Center Amsterdam
3
Minimal clinically important change
  • Change instead of difference
  • Clinically meaningful change
  • Smallest detectable change or difference
    (measurement error)

4
Minimal clinically important change
  • Anchor based versus distribution based
    approach Crosby presents 7 different methods for
    each approach
  • Distribution based measures dont give a good
    sense of the clinical relevance of the change
  • Anchor based approach uses a reference of a
    clinically relevant change

5
Group level versus individual level
  • Group level comparisons of means and standard
    deviations in a trial
  • Individual level comparison of percentages of
    patients who have a change larger than MCIC.
  • Beaton et al. distinguish group level and
    individual level in methods to determine MCIC
  • MDC group level ROC individual level

6
Two measures to determine MCIC
  • Minimal detectable change and
  • Optimal cut off point based on a ROC curve
  • Both are anchor based methods with global
    perceived effect (GPE) as external criterion of
    clinically relevant change

7
Results of MCIC from a study on back pain
acute LBP chronic LBP MDC ROC MDC ROC
QBPDS 32.9 17.5 24.6 8.5 Pain (NRS) 4.7
3.5 4.5 2.5 Euroqol 0.58 0.09
0.28 0.09 Nicole van der Roer, Raymond
Ostelo, Maurits van Tulder, Riekie de Vet
8
Not one single MCIC value
  • It depends on
  • The method used
  • (Sub)acute or chronic low back pain
  • Influence of the initial scores
  • Influence of length of interval of
    change-assessment
  • Cut off point on GPE

9
Dependence on the method
  • MDC cut off point based on the distribution of
    the unchanged persons (on GPE) 95 of unchanged
    persons show no change on the measurement
    instrument under study
  • ROC optimal cut off point for a minimal number
    of misclassifications based on changed and
    unchanged persons

10
Distribution of change in NRS-pain in changed
and unchanged persons based on GPE
11
DIAGNOSTIC PARAMETERS Receiver operator Curve
(ROC)
  • Area under the curve (AUC) surface under the
    curve a measure for the discriminating ability
    of the test

12
Discussion
  • Not one single MCIC value
  • Choice depends on acute and chronic back pain,
    initial values and length of the interval of
    change assessment

13
Discussion
  • Which method do we prefer?
  • - ROC-based value for MCIC is smaller.
  • - It has the smallest number of
    misclassification.
  • - However, it is smaller than the measurement
    error
  • Has MCIC a meaning on group level?

14
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com