Title: Town of Chelmsford Five Year Financial Forecast
1Town of ChelmsfordFive Year Financial Forecast
- Kerry A. Speidel
- Acting Town Manager
- October 19, 2006
2Overview
- Bylaw Requirement
- Evaluating Financial Condition
- Review of Assumptions
- Financial Forecast
- Conclusions
3Bylaw RequirementsSection 6-4 of Charter
- Annuallyprepare a 5-year financial forecast of
town revenue, expenditures and general financial
condition of the town. - New bylaw (Article 23) requires presentation, to
Town Meeting, of the same material that has
traditionally only been presented to BOS, FC
SC.
4Evaluating Financial Condition-What is Financial
Condition?
- Cash Solvency ability to generate enough cash
over 30 to 60 days to pay bills. - Budgetary Solvency ability to generate enough
revenues over a normal budgetary period to meet
expenditures and not incur a deficit.
5Evaluating Financial Condition-What is Financial
Condition?
- Long-Run Solvency ability over time to pay all
the costs of doing business, annual expenditures
deferred liabilities (pension, etc.) - Service-Level Solvency ability to provide
services at the level and quality that are
required for the health, safety, welfare of the
community.
6Evaluating Financial Condition-Obstacles to
measuring financial condition
- The nature of a public entity
- Profit isnt a motive
- The state of municipal financial analysis
- Lack of normative standards multiple peer
groups - The character of municipal accounting practices
- Regulations stress legal compliance, auditability
tracking current activity
7Evaluating Financial Condition-What is the
Trends Monitoring System?
- Model Evaluating Financial Condition, ICMA, 1994
- 36 indicators, arranged to facilitate analysis
measurement - A management tool to pull information together
from a variety of sources to monitor change over
time, with the purpose of providing early warning
of emerging problems, trends, or issues of
concern.
8Evaluating Financial Condition-Chelmsfords
Analysis
- FY2000 2005
- Financial Data taken from annual audits
Schedule A - CPI-U, US Cities Average, month of January
- 6 Revenue Indicators, 5 Expenditure Indicators
1 Operating Position Indicator
9Evaluating Financial Condition-Chelmsfords
Analysis
- Revenue Indicators determine capacity of local
government to provide services - Consider flexibility, dependability, diversity,
administration elasticity - Analyzing revenue structure helps identify
problems, such as - Deteriorating revenue base
- Practices or policies that affect yield
- Poor revenue estimating techniques
- Inefficiencies in collection and/ or
administration
10Evaluating Financial Condition-Chelmsfords
Analysis
- Revenue Indicators- 6
- Revenues per capita
- State Aid
- Elastic Operating Revenues
- Property Tax Revenue
- Uncollected Property Tax Revenue
- Revenue Surplus/ Shortfall- of concern
11Revenue Surplus/ Shortfall
12Evaluating Financial Condition-Chelmsfords
Analysis
- Expenditure Indicators
- A rough measure of service output
- Expenditure flexibility
- Seems unlikely that expenditure growth would
exceed revenue growth, but consider - Use of one-time funds
- Borrowing to fund operating capital
- Use of reserves
- Deferral of current maintenance
- Unfunded liability of pension other post
employment benefits
13Evaluating Financial Condition-Chelmsfords
Analysis
- Expenditure Indicators
- Expenditures per capita
- Non-school Expenditures
- School Expenditures
- Employee Benefits Expenditures- of concern
- Debt service Expenditures
- Operating Position
- Fund Balance- of concern
14Employee Benefits Expenditures
15Fund Balance
16Evaluating Financial Condition-Chelmsfords
Analysis
- Areas of concern are
- Revenue Surplus/ Shortfall- decline
- Employee Benefits- continues to rise
- Fund Balance- decline
17State of Free Cash
- What is Free Cash?
- Combination of
- Revenues received in excess of budgeted estimates
- Actual Expenditures lower than appropriations
- Less reservations for encumbrances
- Certified each year by the Department of Revenue,
as of July 1st - Becomes an Available Fund to be re-appropriated
18State of Free Cash
19State of Free Cash-Certified Free Cash 07/01/06
20State of Stabilization Fund-Current Plan
21State of Stabilization Fund
22State of Stabilization Fund
- Current plan called for 2M transfer back into
Stabilization Fund - Predicated upon
- Sale of Town-owned property- 1M
- Completion of SBA Audit- 300K
- Free Cash- 700K
- Full transfer isnt possible, requiring
adjustment to Plan
23State of Stabilization Fund-Adjusted Plan
24State of Stabilization Fund
- Effect on Bond Rating
- Current SP Rating is AA w/ negative outlook
- Will need to update rating in Spring 2007
- Downgrade to AA is likely
- No ability to postpone update
- Downgrade will result in increased interest costs
- 25 bbp (1/4) 800K over 20 years
25Financial Forecast- FY2008 - 2012
- Revenue
- Taxes
- State Aid
- Local Receipts
- Available Funds
- Sewer Enterprise Revenue
26Financial Forecast- FY2008 - 2012
- Revenue Assumptions
- New Growth 1M
- Ch. 70 increase of 50/ student
- 4 increase in Lottery
- 0 to 2 increase in all other aid
- 7 decrease in (building) permit fees
- 2.5 increase in MVX
- 2 increase in all other Local Receipts
- 1M, rather than 1.7M from Stabilization Fund
- Sewer Enterprise continues to be self-supporting
27Financial Forecast- FY2008 - 2012
- Expenditures
- Fixed Costs
- Undistributed (Employee Benefits)
- Debt Service
- Regional School Municipal Facilities
- Non-Appropriated
- State Assessments, Overlay Account
- All Other
28Financial Forecast- FY2008 - 2012
- Expenditure Assumptions- Undistributed Debt
Service - MRS Assessment 10 increase per year, plus 300K
for ERI - Health Insurance 13 per year
- Medicare Tax 4 per year
- General Liability WC 3 per year
- Inclusion of 150K for OPEB
- Debt Service in accordance with existing schedules
29Financial Forecast- FY2008 - 2012
- Expenditure Assumptions- Non-Appropriated
- 10 increase in Charter School Assessment based
upon enrollment trends - OPEB valuation every other year
- Increase Overlay Account 100K in Revaluation
years
30Financial Forecast- FY2008 - 2012
- Two Scenarios for all other expenditures
- Department Requests each department submitted a
5-year request - Acting Town Managers Recommendation
- Non-School Personnel Costs increased by 3
- Non-School Expenditures increased by 2
- School Personnel Expenditures increased by 3
31Financial Forecast- FY2008 - 2012
- Exceptions to Expenditure Assumptions
- 3 increase in legal budget
- 5 increase in Snow Ice budget
- 4 increase in Solid Waste (existing contract)
- Addition of 3 new positions in Municipal
Facilities Department per Agreement (should have
been implemented in FY2007)
32Financial Forecast- FY2008 - 2012
33All Department Requests
34ATM Recommendation
35Conclusions
- Projected deficit of 1,257,581 minimum
- Reserve levels at lowest point since 1995
- No obvious places to make reductions
- Programs and services will need to be eliminated
- School/ Non-School consolidation needs to be
re-evaluated - No additional consolidation possible on
Non-School side without significant investment in
infrastructure - Management needs to continue to address Health
Insurance costs with unions IAC - We have our work cut out for us!