Development of Multi-tiered Wetland Assessment Methods for Monitoring Wetland Condition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Development of Multi-tiered Wetland Assessment Methods for Monitoring Wetland Condition

Description:

Development of Multi-tiered Wetland Assessment Methods for Monitoring ... Most of loss due to ditching. and channelization and. direct conversion to ag of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: set93
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Development of Multi-tiered Wetland Assessment Methods for Monitoring Wetland Condition


1
Development of Multi-tiered Wetland Assessment
Methods for Monitoring Wetland Condition
  • Amy Deller Jacobs
  • DE Department of Natural Resources and
    Environmental Control

2
Delaware Wetland Status and Trends
  • 54 lost since 1780s
  • Most of loss due to ditching
  • and channelization and
  • direct conversion to ag of
  • nontidal wetlands

3
Delaware Wetland Status and Trends
  • From 1986-1997 there was an 80 reduction in loss
    from previous decade
  • From 1982-1992
  • Delaware lost
  • 2000 acres

4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
Why Monitor Condition?
  • Evaluate what functions are being
  • performed and at what level
  • Determine stressors
  • Gain information to guide
  • restoration and enhancement
  • Meet requirements of TMDL
  • lawsuit/ Required under Clean
  • Water Act

7
Multiple Levels of Assessment
LEVEL 1 GIS Platform No Fieldwork LEVEL 2 Rapid
Assessment Some Fieldwork LEVEL 3 Intensive
Field Sampling
Level of Effort Increases
Level of Detail Decreases
8
Nanticoke Wetland Study
9
(No Transcript)
10
Overall Success RatePermission for Access
TNC
STATE
No Contact
No Contact
45
38
44
38
Granted
Granted
17
18
Denied
Denied
N 446
N 321
11
Success Rate with Contact Excluding Public Lands
N 227
67
Percent
33
12
(No Transcript)
13
Hydrogeomorphic Models
Data
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
Variable
Function
Function
14
HGM Function Wildlife Habitat
(Vdisturb ((Vtba Vtden)/2) Vshrub Vsnag)/4
Results are between 0 and 1
15
Total Effort
24 man-hours
16
(No Transcript)
17
Rapid Assessment (Level II)
  • Development of a Rapid Assessment Method
  • Evaluates condition and can distinguish various
    levels
  • Requires a site visit
  • No detailed data collected

18
Rapid Assessment (Level II)
  • Based on HGM models and field experience
  • Evaluates stressors present at a site
  • Weights stressors according to their impact on 4
    categories (hydrology, habitat, biogeo cycling,
    and landscape)
  • Provides one overall score of the condition of
    the wetland

19


Mowing -3
Farmed -9
Grazing -3
Forest harvesting (gt50 of stand) Forest harvesting (gt50 of stand)
Recovered 0
Recovering -5
Recent -7
Cleared not recovering -7
Excessive herbivory
Presense of invasive spp. Presense of invasive spp.
Dominate the site -7
Do NOT dominate the site -2
Chemical defoliation -3
Managed or converted to pine -5
Burned -3
Trails -1
Garbage/ isolated dumping -1
Other
Subtotal Habitat Community 10 sum of above, if score lt0 record 0
Habitat Category


20
Rapid Assessment (Level II)
Total Score (Hydrology/10) (Hydrology/10)(Biog
eo/10)) (Habitat/10) ((Habitat/10)(Landscape/
10))
21
Rapid Assessment (Level II)
  • Current projects
  • Validating with HGM (level III)
  • Determining sensitivity of methods
  • Evaluating transferability to other areas of the
    state

22
Comparison of Effort to sample 50 sites
Level III
Level II
  • 4 hours/ site
  • 4 person crew
  • 25 days(2 sites/day)
  • 100 person-days
  • Several hours office work
  • 2 hours/ site
  • 2 person crew
  • 12.5 days (4 sites/ day)
  • 25 person-days
  • Minimal office work

23
(No Transcript)
24
Multiple Levels of Assessment
LEVEL 1 GIS Platform No Fieldwork LEVEL 2 Rapid
Assessment Some Fieldwork LEVEL 3 Intensive
Field Sampling
Level of Effort Increases
Level of Detail Decreases
25
Landscape Level Assessment (I)
  • Inventory status and trends
  • Updated wetland maps
  • Including HGM modifiers
  • Provide additional information
  • Landscape analysis
  • Inferring condition based on indicators in
    surrounding landscape

26
Stepwise multiple regression results for flat HGM
functions
Variables
Function No. Names r2
Biogeochemistry 5 ex100 ex500 FOREVER100 GRASS1000 FOREST1000 0.44
Habitat 5 nat100 nimpound1000 FOREVER 100 GRASS1000 FOREST1000 0.35
Hydrology 3 -ex100 nat1000 FORDEC1000 0.43
Plant 2 -ex1000 FORDEC100 0.17
n89, plt0.0001 for all models
27
Stepwise multiple regression results for riverine
HGM functions
Variables
Function No. Names r2
Biogeochemistry 3 -ex100 nat1000 DEVTOT100 0.51
Habitat 2 -ex100 nat1000 0.42
Hydrology 5 -ex100 nat1000 FOREST100 FOREST1000 -FORDEC1000 0.70
Landscape 6 -ex100 ex1000 nat1000 CROP100 DEVTOT1000 FOREVER1000 0.70
Plant 2 -ex500 DEVTOT100 0.31
n54, plt0.0001 for all models
28
(No Transcript)
29
Determine Stressors
Monitor to Determine Progress and Reassess
Priorities
30
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com