Reconciling Nationalist Loyalties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Reconciling Nationalist Loyalties

Description:

Commitment, allegiance, faithfulness, devotion, fidelity (holds true to its ... to meet with them until they disbanded the roadblock and camp and they refused ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:147
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: NAIT
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reconciling Nationalist Loyalties


1
Chapter 3
  • Reconciling Nationalist Loyalties

2
Chapter Issue
  • To what extent should people reconcile their
    contending nationalist loyalties?
  • What is this issue asking?
  • Break the issue down ? What are some of the
    different understandings of nationalism again?
    What does contending mean?

3
Loyalty
  • What is it?
  • Commitment, allegiance, faithfulness, devotion,
    fidelity (holds true to its cause), steadfastness
    (not a deserter), attachment.
  • These are all synonyms to describe an idea that
    you support something.

4
Loyalty and Patriotism
  • Like love, patriotism is a feeling.
  • Loyalty is a behaviour that can stem from
    patriotism.
  • For example, if someone felt that it was their
    patriotic duty to defend the country in a time of
    crisis then joining the military during this time
    would be a way to show their loyalty.

5
Contending Loyalties
  • Sometimes people have to choose between loyalties
    that compete with/go against each other and this
    can be very difficult.
  • Another name for these competing loyalties is
    contending loyalties.
  • For example, if I was born in one country and I
    live in another, which one might I cheer for if
    they play each other in the Olympics?

6
Affirming Loyalties
  • Depending on what choices we make, many of us
    wish to demonstrate our loyalties. This can be
    done through symbols like maple leaf pins or
    through symbolic actions like rising to sing the
    national anthem.
  • These affirmations of loyalty to ones country
    can be done individually or as a collective
    (group).

7
Affirming First Nations Loyalties
  • In 1982 the First Nations reorganized their
    leadership and renamed their governing body ?
    from the National Indian Brotherhood to the
    Assembly of First Nations (AFN).
  • This assembly represents leaders from all of the
    first nations individual governments.
  • The first nations each retain their nation status
    so that they can each deal with the Canadian
    government on a nation-to-nation basis which is
    important when dealing with Treaty rights and
    agreements.

8
Making a Difference
  • Read the making a difference section on page 71
    and discuss the exploration questions as a class.

9
Pluralism and Multiculturalism
  • Many people from around the world are attracted
    to Canada because it allows, and even, encourages
    distinct groups to retain and practice their
    cultural heritage.
  • How far should we go with this though?
  • Some like George Jonas say we have gone to far at
    the expense of the host country while other, like
    John Ibbitson, argue that this multiculturalism
    is what finally gives us, as Canadians, a sense
    of identity and patriotism. What do you think?

10
Reasonable Accommodation
  • A legal and constitutional concept that requires
    Canadian public institutions to adapt to the
    religious and cultural practices of minorities as
    long as these practices do not violate other
    rights and freedoms.
  • Page 73 ? 2 examples of reasonable accommodation
    cases/challenges. Discuss as a class.
  • Do reasonable accommodations create national
    loyalties or divide us a Canadians?

11
Nationalist Loyalties
  • Many times we can have multiple loyalties coexist
    such as being proudly Canadian while keeping up
    to date and supporting your country of origin.
  • Other times, however, loyalties can conflict. If,
    for example, you were a proud francophone from
    Montreal and a proud Canadian what would you do
    if Quebec became independent?
  • Are there loyalties worth fighting for?
  • Ties to the land seems to lead to conflict
  • treaty rights in Canada
  • Jewish Israelis against Palestinians in the
    middle east

12
July 1st in Newfoundland
  • Read about the Battle of Beaumont-Hamel on page
    75
  • How many of you have ever heard of this battle
    before or knew that some Canadians might have
    conflicting feelings on Canada Day?

13
Taking Turns
  • Three readers for page 76 and discuss.

14
Québec Sovereignty Debate
  • Sovereignists people who feel that Québec
    should be a nation-state of its own.
  • Federalists Québécois who oppose sovereignty.
    (who might these people be?)
  • Look at the numbers for the 1995 Referendum on
    page 77.

15
The Oka crisis
  • In 1990 a group of Mohawks set up a roadblock and
    camp to stop the expansion of a golf course onto
    land that they considered sacred.
  • The Quebec government refused to meet with them
    until they disbanded the roadblock and camp and
    they refused to do this until they met with the
    government.

16
Oka Continued
  • This went on for four months until the Quebec
    provincial police were brought in. As the
    conflict was trying to be resolved a police
    officer was shot and killed.
  • Other First Nations set up their own roadblocks
    in support and as the crisis deepened the
    military was brought in (look at the picture on
    page 82)

17
Oka continued
  • The protest finally ended after almost 7 months
    with many protestors facing criminal charges.
    Almost all were found not guilty.
  • The federal government bought the land and
    transferred the rights to the Mohawks but, even
    so, this dispute left a bitter legacy for many
    First Nations.

18
Royal Commission on Aboriginal People
  • The Oka crisis caused the federal government to
    set up a new commission to review the
    relationship between First Nations people and the
    rest of Canada.
  • The key finding of the commission was that the
    First Nations have been mistreated throughout the
    history of Canada and that they need to be
    treated respectfully as nations with the rights
    to govern themselves in partnership with Canada.

19
Statement of Reconciliation
  • In 1998, Canada issued a statement to aboriginal
    people and nations basically apologizing for how
    First Nations people have been treated throughout
    Canadas past (pg. 83)
  • Some were happy and saw this as a step forward
    while others saw this as empty words.
  • How do you feel? Is this helpful or hurtful to
    the process?

20
Land Claims
  • The source of the most intense conflicts between
    aboriginal and non-aboriginal people.
  • Over 800 remain unsettled while only a few have
    been successfully settled in Canadian history.
  • Many, including the leader of the AFN, agree that
    many aboriginal communities are fed up with the
    slow pace and are reaching their breaking points.

21
Chapter Review
  • Do the think, participate, research and
    communicate questions on pages 86 and 87.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com