Our suggestions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Our suggestions

Description:

Continuous improvements of systems through scientific ... Working groups should be formed and disbanded according to demand & progress. Working groups ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: kirstenwi
Learn more at: http://www.godae.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Our suggestions


1
Post GODAE Content
  • Our suggestions
  • Our ambitions
  • What we should keep from GODAE
  • Core activities
  • Working groups
  • Relationship with ET-OOFS
  • Terms of reference
  • Leadership
  • Refresh of Members
  • Ownership
  • Duration
  • Project Office funding

2
Our ambitions
  • Transition to operational systems from the
    demonstration of valuable services to the
    provision of operational services with high
    availability and reliability.
  • Continuous improvements of systems through
    scientific technological advances extend
    existing capabilities to the coastal zone and
    ecosystems. Coupled ocean/atmosphere. Climate.
  • Develop operational services and further links
    with applications
  • Ensure a suitable sustained ocean observing
    system through the demonstration of the value of
    observations.

3
What we should keep
  • Characteristics of IGST team
  • focus on scientific advances for operational
    application
  • Clear and ambitious but achievable objectives
  • its global international scope
  • it is for technical specialist discussion
  • refreshing, constructive nature
  • pity not to continue
  • GODAE name
  • E could be Experimentation as in WGNE
  • Could be Global Operational Oceanography Data
    Assimilation Expert (GODAE)
  • - the GODAE Team or Working Group
  • - Global refers to scope of membership

4
Initial Core Activities
  • Improvement of high-resolution, basin scale,
    physical ocean analyses forecasts
  • Observation Impact Assessments
  • Intercomparisons
  • forms a coherent core and springboard
  • recognises importance of global observing system
  • Extensions building on core capabilities

5
Working groups
  • Most activities will require collaboration with
    other groups and should be pursued through
    dedicated working groups
  • observation impact assessments (OSE etc)
  • coastal shelf seas
  • ecosystems (with IMBER)
  • Re-analyses (with WGSIP and GSOP)
  • coupled ocean-wave-atmosphere f/cs (with WGNE?)
  • Working groups should be formed and disbanded
    according to demand progress

6
Relationship with ET-OOFS
  • JCOMM provides an inter-governmental vehicle to
    make definitive statements on standards, working
    practices, nomenclature etc.
  • ET-OOFS will enable us to use this vehicle it
    is an important opportunity
  • JCOMM does not have a science mandate (unlike
    IPCC)
  • ET-OOFS and GODAE have different roles and
    probably require different types of people
  • Gary Brassington is a safe pair of hands for
    coordination between ET-OOFS and GODAE
  • From the GODAE point of view ET-OOFS could appear
    to be one of the GODAE working groups

7
Leadership
  • Co-chair arrangement works well. We suggest
  • one from research one from operational teams
  • one should have data assimilation background
  • taken from two continents
  • Co-chairs need to be able to commit at least 10
    of their time to the task
  • Two good options are
  • Andreas Schiller / Eric Chassignet
  • Jim Cummings / Eric Dombrowsky

8
Refresh of members
  • There are relatively few recent new members
  • Possibilities for new members include
  • Peter Oke
  • Pierre Brasseur
  • Anthony Weaver
  • Laurent Bertino
  • Srdjan Dobricic
  • NOAA/NCEP expert
  • One of Japanese attendees at Paris OSE meeting

9
Ownership
  • Important to have owners for
  • legitimacy (other groups could claim it if we
    dont)
  • visibility
  • Best not to put all eggs in one basket apply for
    2-4 owners (IOC, OOPC, WCRP, GOOS, CEOS, JCOMM)

10
Duration
  • Options on duration
  • 5 years to 2013 (end of Clivar so poor choice)
  • 10 years (a long time to plan no obvious
    rationale)
  • For forseeable future (cf WGNE)
  • On-going working group seems best
  • Transition GODAE from an experiment to a
    permanent body for international coordination
    of the development (and operation?) of
    operational oceanography systems

11
Project Office funding from 2010
  • Up to new co-chairs where to put Project Office
  • Kirsten is very effective Project Office
    staying at Met Office is an option to be
    considered
  • Options for funding
  • Sponsors NOAA, EUMETSAT etc.
  • Subscription fee
  • Owners (e.g. IOC has small fund)
  • Recommend sponsors invited to meetings (GODAE
    Patrons)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com