Using RFT to Create - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Using RFT to Create

Description:

Drowning. CAUSAL. RELATION. Struggle. with anxiety. Panic attack ... ACTUAL drowning. CAUSAL. RELATION. CAUSAL. RELATION. Arbitrary Crel for Co-ordination ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: psyc105
Category:
Tags: rft | create | drowning | using

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Using RFT to Create


1
Using RFT to Create Powerful Therapeutic
Metaphors
Yvonne Barnes-Holmes, Dermot Barnes-Holmes,
Ian Stewart
2
Workshop Overview
  • The current workshop consists of three parts
  • Overview of the RFT account of analogy and
    metaphor
  • De-construction of examples of ACT metaphors
  • Construction of novel metaphors for clinical
    practice

3
Understanding Analogy Metaphor
  • Relational frame theorists have employed the
    concept of relating relations, as the basic
    process underlying the verbal abilities for
    understanding and constructing analogies and
    metaphors
  • At its most basic, Barnes, Hegarty, and Smeets
    (1997) proposed a model of analogical reasoning
    that involved responding in accordance with
    equivalence-equivalence relations (i.e. the
    relating together of derived equivalence
    relations)

4
APPLE
DOG
Equivalence-Equivalence
Equivalent
Equivalent
SHEEP
PEACH
5
Is that it?
  • The previous example involved the derivation of
    arbitrary stimulus relations
  • But analogies and metaphors also appear to
    abstract out non-arbitrary relations among events
  • Consider the analogy Apple is to Peach as Dog is
    to Sheep
  • This abstracts out specific non-arbitrary
    properties that pertain to each of the two sets
    of relations

6
Crels Round, juicy, edible
Crels Hairy, four legs,
lives in groups
The analogy then also allows two sets of
non-arbitrary properties to function as Crels for
the two equivalence relations
7
Understanding Analogy Metaphor
  • So, two of the central features of the RFT
    theoretical and empirical model of analogy and
    metaphor are
  • Relations between derived arbitrary relations
  • Relating based on the abstraction of
    non-arbitrary properties

8
Understanding Analogy Metaphor
  • Because the relating of the derived relations
    most often involves a relation of coordination,
    it is common that individuals experience this as
    a novel insight or Aha!
  • And this of course, may be based on the fact
    that the two related events give rise to similar
    somatic outcomes, such as the same feeling

9
Understanding Analogy Metaphor
  • However, it is errroneous to think of
    analogies/metaphors as simply the compounding of
    one or two relations of coordination, especially
    when the metaphors in question are used for
    clinical purposes
  • Instead, these are substantive relational
    networks, that require sophisticated verbal
    histories of shared knowledge and experience
  • Take a look at this . . .

10
(No Transcript)
11
Understanding Analogy Metaphor
  • Of course, metaphors are practically useless for
    clinical purposes if they fail to facilitate
    behaviour change
  • And thus some specific transformations of
    function must be targeted with the relational
    networks and in such a way that they make the
    behaviour change seem feasible

12
(No Transcript)
13
Secrets for Constructing Good Clinical Metaphors
  • Try to unhinge yourself from the verbal traps
    and frustration if you are finding a metaphor for
    a problem that you have been struggling with for
    some time
  • You could maybe even think of a metaphor that
    would describe yourself in this situation!

14
Secrets for Constructing Good Clinical Metaphors
  • Try to think in precise and simplistic terms
    about the clients
  • existing relational network (think of this as the
    target)
  • the types of relations contained therein
  • the transformations of functions that currently
    occur
  • If it helps, even draw them out in order to try
    to illucidate target non-arbitrary properties
  • The closer your vehicle (i.e. the other network
    you construct with the metaphor) matches the
    target relationally, the better will be your
    metaphor

15
Secrets for Constructing Good Clinical Metaphors
  • Once you have the target network in mind, try to
    think through the non-arbitrary features of this
  • And then identify what happens to the client when
    she experiences these properties
  • Often, the properties are coordinated with
    evaluations like stupid, disgusting, hopeless and
    these participate in self-relations (and thats
    why she feels so bad about herself) and she
    desperately wants you to share in these (i.e.
    co-ordination relations in the perspective-taking
    frames)

16
Trying to Find Solutions is Like Digging in a
Hole
Feelings generated by target network Repetitive
Feels painful Overwhelming
Feelings generated by the vehicle Getting
deeper Dark Helpless . . .???
Finding solutions
Dig in hole
SAME
Getting confused
Sinking
In this case, the vehicle enhances aspects of the
properties associated with the target
17
Secrets for Constructing Good Clinical Metaphors
  • Networks
  • Specific relations
  • Non-arbitrary properties
  • Behaviour change
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com