Title: Digging for new AstroPhysics in the old CMB
1Digging for new (Astro-)Physics in the old CMB
- Niayesh Afshordi
- Institute for Theory and Computation
- Harvard College Observatory
2Outline
- 1-Tracing dark forces on large scales
- Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect
- 2-Tracing pressure profile in galaxy clusters
- Thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect
3Tracing Dark Forces on Large Scales
- Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) Effect
- ISW in cross-correlation
- Constraining Dark Energy with ISW
- Incompressible Dark Energy
- Conclusions I
4Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect
- Domination of dark energy/ spatial curvature
- decay of linear gravitational
potential -
-
- Important at large angles, as it traces the
potential - Causes a bump in CMB power spectrum at low ls
Spergel, et al. 06
5Detecting ISW in cross-correlation
- ISW induces positive CMB correlation with
mass/galaxy overdensities, which has been
detected by different groups
SDSS LRGs Scranton, et al. 06, Cabre et al. 06
(3.5?) Padmanabhan, et al. 05 (2.5?)
2MASS XSC Afshordi, et al. 04 (2.5?)
Boughn Crittenden 04 Nolta, et al. 04
HEAO-A1 (2.5?)
NVSS (2?)
and others
6Pitfalls in Estimating Error Covariance
- Jack-Knife Errors
- They can underestimate errors on large scales
- Small errors in off-diagonal components add up
- Monte-Carlos are good
- CGT hGTi (?CGT)2 ' hG1G2i hT1T2i
- if applied properly
- e.g. using observed correlations to estimate
errors may lead to an overestimate of S/N and
even a singular covariance matrix
7Cosmological Constraints of ISW detections
- Gaztanaga, et al. 05
- Why are all the points above the model
prediction?!
8ISW effect and Dark Energy (slide borrowed
from my 2004 talk)
Spergel et al. 2003
- ISW effect
- Not the best probe of Dark Energy
- A good probe of Large Scale Physics
- ISW effect
- Not the best probe of Dark Energy
- (disclaimer depends on the DE model, 2006)
- A good probe of Large Scale Physics
SDSS 2dF
Perfect ISW, zlt 3
Afshordi 2005
9Incompressible Dark Energy
With
- Take the scalar field action
- In the field comoving frame,
- ??? 0 but ?P? ? 0 ? cs 1
- Field equation becomes a constraint equation that
uniquely determines as a function of metric
Ghazal Geshnizjani
Daniel Chung University of Wisconsin-Madison
10FRW Cosmology with IDE (temporary name)
- Field Equation
- Friedmann equation
11More cosmology with IDE
- IDE is a minimal theory for evolving dark energy,
as it has no internal dynamics - Examples
- Quadratic Potential
- Evolves exactly as ?CDM
- Only differs when fluctuations cross horizon
- Exponential Potential
- Evolves exactly as DGP cosmology
12ISW in quadratic IDE
- Evolution of perturbations on sub-horizon and
super-horizon scales only depends on H(z), and so
is indistinguishable from ?CDM - Perturbations decay as they enter the horizon
- Non-trivial effects on llt100 primary CMB
ISWSW, arbitrary units
?m0.1, ?IDEon0.2
?m0.3, ?IDEon0
13ISW in exponential IDE
- Fixing the distance to the last-scattering
surface, DGP-like IDE produces a far greater ISW
signal than standard ?CDM
ISWSW, arbitrary units
DGP-like cosmology
?m0.3, ?IDEon0
14IDE as Modified Gravity
- Since IDE has no internal dynamics, it can be
viewed as a (non-local) modification to gravity
15Conclusions (Part I)
- ISW effect can be used to trace the evolution of
gravitational potential - ISW can be detected in cross-correlation, and
constrain DE models, but beware of pitfalls in
error estimates - IDE is a minimal theory of evolving dark energy,
and can be tested by its ISW signature
16Tracing the Thermal Energy of the Universe
- Thermal Sunyev-Zeldovich (SZ) effect
- Intracluster Medium (ICM) gas fraction
- Reconstructing the ICM pressure profile
- Missing ICM baryons
- The Moral
17My Collaborators
- Yen-Ting Lin
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
- Princeton
- Alastair Sanderson
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
- University of Birmingham
- Daisuke Nagai
- CalTech
- Afshordi, Lin, Sanderson 2005 (1st yr)
- Afshordi, Lin, Nagai, Sanderson 2006 (3 yrs)
in preparation
18Thermal Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) Effectand
Intra-Cluster Medium (ICM)
- Probes the thermal energy distribution of
electrons in the Intra-Cluster Medium - Dominates CMB at angles lt 0.1o
- Generates an anti-correlation between WMAP and
galaxy/cluster distribution
WMAP sees here
19Can SZ surveys sustain the CMB dominance?
- SZ clusters can be
- Detected up to high redshifts
- Their number counts probe Dark Energy/Cosmology
- Many SZ surveys are underway APEX, SZA, ACT,
SPT, Planck, - Can they deliver? Calibration of SZ-Mass
relation, Gastrophysics,
Courtesy of John Carlstrom
20In the mean time
21SZ detections in Cross-Correlationwith
Galaxy/Cluster Surveys
- Bennett et al. 2003 (XBACs clusters 2.5?)
- Fosalba, Gaztanaga, Castander 2003 Fosalba
Gaztanaga 2004 (SDSS, APM 2.7?) - Myers et al. 2004 (APMACO 2?)
- Afshordi, Loh, Strauss 2004 (2MASS 3.7?)
22tSZ in 2MASSxWMAP Correlation
- Afshordi, Loh, Strauss (2MASS Deepest magnitude
bin) - data best fit model
- ISW SZ
Point Sources
- Cluster physics is mixed with cosmology,
- and non-linear bias ?
- Does not employ the non-Gaussianity of the
signal ?
23How to get the most physics out?
- Most Galaxies are NOT in clusters
- Most SZ signal comes from clusters
- thus
- The SZ detection is more significant if we just
look around clusters ? Make an SZ template - The S/N is maximized if the template matches the
actual SZ profile ? Constraint on the SZ profile
Template
Observed Sky
24WMAP SZ clusters
- Three close-by clusters in the 3yr cleaned map
(Tegmark et al)
Abell 133
Abell 1656
Abell 2319
25Match-filter SZ detection in an X-ray cluster
catalog
- Compile a catalog of 116 low-z X-ray clusters
with measured temperatures - Compile the X-ray estimated gas mass for most of
them - ICM/ Point Source template
- NFW gravitational potential
- Hydrostatic equilibrium
- Polytropic equation of state Pgas / (?gas)?eff
?eff 1.2 - Point sources follow DM profile
26Gas Fraction vs. Temperature (WMAP 1yr)
Afshordi, et al. 2005
- The mean gas fraction of ICM is 20-40 less
than cosmic budget - ltfgas hgt 0.08 0.01(ran) 0.01(sys)
- Comparable S/N to higher resolution
interferometers (e.g. OVRO/BIMA Grego et al.
2001) - X-ray gas mass estimates consistent with SZ
estimates - Both X-ray and SZ gas mass estimates show an
increasing trend with Tx
- SZ observation
- X-ray Observation
fgas Mgas/Mtot , H0 100 h km/s/Mpc
27Gas Fraction vs. Temperature (WMAP 1yr)
Afshordi, et al. 2005
28New Analysis (WMAP 3 years)
- WMAP 3 years
- Temperature Q,V,W
- Nres 9 (pixel size ' 0.1 deg)
- 417 clusters
- meaured X-ray temperature
29Dangers of model-dependent analysis
- X-ray ?-model overpredicts SZ on large angles by
a factor of 4
WMAP
Lieu, et al. 05
ROSAT ?-model fits
30Methodology
- Find R200 for each cluster using M200-TX relation
- Constrain pressure within spherical radial bins
centered at 0.25,0.5,1,2,4,8 x R200 a central
radio source - Only consider pixels close to each cluster, with
resolution degrading with distance - ? Makes covariance matrix tractable
Degraded Abell 2319 in Q-band
Abell 2319 in Q-band
31Temperature-Weighted Gas Fraction
Q-band V-band W-band Hydro-Simulations
All Clusters
TX gt 5 keV 144 Clusters
No significant frequency dependence ? No
significant point source contamination
32Universal Pressure Profile
- __ ?CDM/?crit
- __ Hydro-Simulations
- WMAP best fit
- __ Random Realizations of WMAP best fit
TX gt 5 keV 144 Clusters
Prior ?gas gt 0
??2 ' 110 for the simulated profiles ? 10.5?
detection
33Total ICM gas fraction
- __ Hydro-Simulations
- __ Random realization of WMAP best fit
- WMAP best fit
Cosmic Concordance ?b/?M 0.18 0.01 WMAP SZ
clusters fgas 0.09 0.007 Hydro-Simulations
fgas 0.095 0.01 fgas 0.11 0.01
CHANDRA X-ray clusters
OVRO/BIMA
13? model independent measurement of SZ
3440 of Baryons are missing from the ICM!
- Where are the rest of baryons?
- stars are only 15
- Intracluster stars
- cold starless clouds
- warm gas (105-106 K)? soft X-ray excess?!
- Something wrong with simulations?
- may be Te ? Ti
35The Moral
- In the run-up to high resolution SZ surveys,
there is much more that can and should be learnt
about ICM - Higher Resolution CMB/SZ surveys (Planck, SZA,
APEX, SPT, ) will be able to significantly lower
their effective cluster detection mass threshold
thru combination with wide-angle X-ray cluster
surveys (e.g., DUO) - X-ray and SZ surveys must be combined in a model-
independent way to provide reliable tests for
models of Dark Energy or Cluster Physics