Statistical Moderation Decoded - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Statistical Moderation Decoded

Description:

Statistical Moderation. Decoded. Andrew Shortell. 8th April 2006. Why are we here? Want the best outcomes for our students. Want to understand what is being done to us ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: andrews72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Statistical Moderation Decoded


1
Statistical ModerationDecoded
  • Andrew Shortell
  • 8th April 2006

2
Why are we here?
  • Want the best outcomes for our students
  • Want to understand what is being done to us

3
How Study score works
  • Long line
  • Fill from start
  • Bell curve
  • Certain number at each point
  • French 1500 ? likely gt 1 at each point
  • Italian 850 ? gaps at top end
  • Very small LOTEs treated individually
  • Why the line? Click

4
The line
  • Uni Entrance ? ENTER
  • Ranking
  • Comparison
  • Different position each year
  • Why Bother?
  • Isnt absolute better? Click

5
Absolute
  • Do teachers know what they are doing?
  • Can teachers be trusted?
  • Yes, but
  • State-wide comparison
  • Nation-wide
  • International? Note Bologna style University
    degrees

6
Your Job
  • Rank students
  • Based on subject content
  • Prepare for the filter of the exam
  • Based on subject content
  • Maybe teach??

7
Rank students
  • Exam already does that
  • Curriculum driven or exam driven ?
  • Oral does that
  • On the day problems
  • Stage fright
  • Etc
  • Can VCAA really do it? click

8
Who really knows students?
  • Parents ?
  • ROFL
  • Teachers?
  • IYD In your dreams
  • INMJ
  • Care factor

9
Objective .. Subjective
  • Evidence Based reporting
  • More than just a gut feeling
  • Many other factors
  • Priorities (ours, theirs, parents, clients.)
  • Repeatable
  • Between school comparison

10
SACs
  • Internal
  • Trust the teacher??
  • Variable ?
  • On the day etc
  • Cross marked??
  • With whom (multiple classes ?? ROFL again)

11
What to do?
  • Old CAT days
  • Called in,
  • marked independently
  • marked from across state
  • Get a reasonable idea of state standard for this
    year
  • Expensive
  • Have to pay people .. (OMG)
  • Alternative?? click

12
Statistical Moderation
  • Easy to do
  • Computerised
  • Easy to design
  • Easy to implement
  • Easy to repeat
  • Teacher factor removed (more or less)
  • Cheaper (Is that really important?)

13
Who?
  • Professor Tim Brown
  • Uni Melb Statn
  • Loves his job
  • Understands stats

14
Reliable
  • Statistics are reliable
  • When there are no other issues
  • Other statisticians can understand them
  • Thus Unis rely on their statns
  • They believe them
  • Thus Do we have a choice?

15
What this means for us
16
Understand what is being done to you so that you
can work the system to your best advantage
17
Quick Explanation
  • Exam reference score
  • Adds all exam results for each student
  • Creates a ranking
  • GAT reference score
  • Yes it is used (sometimes) (If it helps statl
    reliability means?)
  • SAC scores (treated as a single item)

18
Then
  • Zero on the exam removed
  • Special provision (C.O.D.) removed
  • Statistically anomalous removed
  • E.g. outliers at the low end (2 SDs )
  • N removed
  • These are all put back afterwards

19
BUT..
  • What if that takes your class to
  • (Shock, Horror) Less than five
  • Oh Dear, Oh Dear
  • Unreliable
  • Trouble

20
Detour
  • Need five to be absolutely reliable
  • Four is ok but not so reliable in every
    circumstance
  • Remember stats work best with large groups
  • ? Partner class
  • More problems (I have them in Systems)
  • Do I need to tell you ? (rhetorical Q) RQ

21
Then
  • Statistically equated
  • AS A GROUP-- more later
  • Added together
  • Thus the long line for the study score

22
Detail
  • Top SAC score is changed to equal top exam ref
    score
  • Does not matter who it is
  • Upper quartiles made equal
  • Mean
  • Lower quartile
  • But not the bottom

23
In between
  • Attempt a line of best fit
  • Else try a quadratic (Do you care?)

24
Consequences

25
E. g.
After removing CoD, zero etc
26
3 equal SAC at the top
27
3 equal exam
  • Alternatively
  • So this shows that separation is not
    disadvantageous
  • This type of thing happened for me

28
Fair?
  • It is your job to separate.
  • In this scenario what is right?
  • Who can we blame?

29
How it occurs
  • Teacher sets work for SAC
  • T teaches to SAC
  • T marks it
  • Students do well
  • ? Parents happy
  • ? School happy

30
Value.
  • Everyone is happy
  • Until the results come out
  • Nothing worse than despondent students in class
    who think the teacher is too harsh
  • Easily fixed in above scenario
  • After the exam they are gone so no problem
  • ??

31
Perhaps
  • Need to review SAC results
  • Review SAC ranking after each SAC
  • Need to educate students about expectations
  • Tell them about these scenarios (or similar)
  • Build in idea that no-one gets full marks
  • Ensure by putting in higher order questions
  • Dont teach entirely to the SAC

32
Implications
  • Student expectations are very high in some
    schools
  • Big fish, small pond etc
  • State-wide is bigger pond
  • Remember the long line

33
Consider
Student expectations of top 3 here (And parents)
34
Consider
  • Alternate scenario
  • NB Same result
  • Different start
  • Expectations are very different
  • Would you have got this from despondent students?

35
Add understanding
  • Students need to be educated empowered
  • Get them to understand the rank order is the
    important thing

36
Bigger example (smaller font)
  • This is not quite precise (mathematically)
  • Top end lowered
  • Bottom end raised
  • Mean, SD, UQ, LQ not precise in this e.g.)
  • Rank order is Preserved

37
Practical consequences
  • Students to fight to climb rank order
  • Students co-operate to raise exam results, Oral
    results
  • Share exam prep
  • Secretive SAC prep

38
Reality
  • Many will share SAC prep too
  • Ensure work is different
  • Set SACs that are slightly different for each
    student
  • Authentication interviews

39
Practical
  • Check rank order before last two SACs
  • Set Questions that are harder Higher order
  • Separate

40
VCAA believes
  • that you know your students
  • that you can accurately set rank order
  • That if you make two students equal then they are
  • That you do not have a state-wide picture

41
Partner Class
  • VCAA believes
  • Partner class teachers agree on every mark
  • Can register disagreement on VASS
  • Can unpartner struggle but can do
  • Partner class teachers work together
  • You need to
  • That the rank order is across all of the group
  • So you need to

42
What if
  • Every student in your class obtained 100 in exam
    and oral
  • 50 problem
  • Teacher of the year material
  • You make a mistake
  • Fix it before exam results are published
  • Or..

43
Questions
  • Scenarios
  • Copyleft

44
Thanks
  • VCAA
  • Sean Fitzmaurice
  • Professor Tim Brown
  • For creating this stat modn model
  • Teachers for surviving
  • To you for listening

45
  • Andrew Shortell
  • a.shortell_at_braemar.vic.edu.au
  • VFTA
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com