Lightning and Radar Applications Using WDSSII - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Lightning and Radar Applications Using WDSSII

Description:

Warning Decision Support System Integrated Information (WDSS-II) Introduction and Description ... diagnosing hail, lightning and precipitation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:54
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Sco761
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lightning and Radar Applications Using WDSSII


1
Lightning and Radar Applications Using WDSS-II
  • Scott D. Rudlosky
  • Ph.D. Candidate, Florida State University
  • Henry E. Fuelberg
  • Professor of Meteorology, Florida State University

2
Outline
  • Warning Decision Support System Integrated
    Information (WDSS-II)
  • Introduction and Description
  • Data Sources
  • Lightning, Model-derived, and WSR-88D
  • Early WDSS-II research
  • Positive lightning research
  • Current Techniques
  • Storm Type Identification (NSSL)
  • Incorporation of Lightning Data
  • Future Work
  • Total Lightning and GOES-R GLM
  • Severe vs. Non-Severe Storms

3
WDSS-II
  • WDSS-II has three components
  • Suite of multi-sensor weather algorithms for
  • combining and interrogating radar data
  • diagnosing hail, lightning and precipitation
  • A 3-D display for viewing
    multi-sensor data and algorithm
    outputs.
  • Application programming interface
    (API) library in C.

WDSS-II related information obtained from
http//www.wdssii.org/
4
WDSS-II
  • Real-time Algorithms
  • Research system at NSSL/OU
  • Several agencies and private companies license
    WDSS-II to run in real-time.
  • Algorithm Communication
  • Real-time or archived cases
  • Algorithm Creator
  • Allows users to modify existing, or to create new
    algorithms.

Schematic obtained from http//www.wdssii.org/
5
WDSS-II
  • Very complex software
  • Steep learning curve
  • Provides an extremely advanced starting point
  • NSSL discussion forum
  • Archived solutions to problems
  • Facilitates user feedback
  • Becoming more user friendly
  • Training modules now available
  • Merging of multiple data sources
  • Radar, lightning, model-derived, and satellite
    data
  • Allows for differing formats to be combined

6
Data
  • Radar Data
  • WSR-88D Level II data
  • Melbourne, Florida
  • Cloud-to-ground lightning data
  • National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN)
  • Rapid Update Cycle (RUC) Model Data
  • 20 km resolution
  • Lighting Detection and Ranging (LDAR)
  • Total Lightning Data
  • Kennedy Space Center

7
LDAR Data
  • Lightning flashes are derived with a spark
    consolidation algorithm
  • Murphy et al. (2000), Nelson (2002), and McNamara
    (2002)
  • Examined in many different forms
  • Volume or density of sources
  • Initiation points
  • Counts and/or densities
  • Additional Forms
  • Flash extent densities
  • GOES-R GLM proxy data

Algorithm Derived Flash
15 min LDAR Source Density
8
Previous Approach
  • Linking Individual Cells with Lightning
  • Storm Cell Identification and Tracking (SCIT)
  • Common linking methods
  • Predefined radii
  • Visual inspection
  • Some combination
  • No approach is perfect
  • Accuracy is time consuming
  • Necessitates case study mode
  • Our Early Approach
  • Define grid or designate box
  • Count flashes

SCIT Cells
Default grid Grid boxes are used individually or
in combination to track cells and lightning.
9
Previous Approach
Individual Cell
Individual Cell
Group of Cells
Group of Cells
10
WDSS-II Techniques
  • SCIT Algorithm
  • Intermittent tracking
  • Temporally dependent
  • Limited storm characteristics
  • WDSS-II Algorithms
  • Merging of Radar and RUC data
  • Near-storm environment information
  • Additional radar parameters
  • e.g., Reflectivity at various isotherm levels

3 May 2007 Left Vertically Integrated Liquid
(VIL) Below Precipitation Rate
Reflectivity 0 C
Reflectivity -10 C
Reflectivity -20 C
11
WDSS-II Techniques
  • w2segmotion Algorithm
  • Hierarchical K-Means clustering method
    (Lakshmanan et al. 2007)
  • Identification of storm cells
  • Motion estimates
  • Create forecasts
  • K-Means Clusters
  • Features on the scale of 10 km2
  • Any gridded field
  • e.g., Reflectivity, VIL, LMA, etc.
  • Advection of fields
  • Improved temporal resolution
  • Provides forecasts

Reflectivity 0.5 Scan
KMeans Cluster of Composite Reflectivity over
Reflectivity 0.5
12
WDSS-II Techniques
  • NSSL Storm Type Identification
  • Clusters are defined by 30 dBZ mean composite
    reflectivity
  • Clusters track additional fields
  • i.e., VIL, MESH, POSH, SHI, echo top, and low
    level shear
  • Algorithm computes statistics
  • i.e., maximum, minimum, average, count, standard
    deviation, and change with time
  • Decision tree determines type

13
WDSS-II Techniques
  • Storm Type Example (NSSL)
  • Determined using the
  • Size, speed, aspect ratio, low-level shear, max
    VIL, MESH, mean reflectivity, and orientation
  • Storm types include
  • Isolated supercell, line, pulse, and
    non-severe

14
WDSS-II Techniques
  • FSU Algorithm Modification
  • Storm type algorithm
  • Storm type is dependent on season and geography
  • Algorithm can be trained
  • User created algorithms
  • Clusters can be based on other fields
  • Incorporation of lightning data

10 June 2007 Cross-section of Composite
Reflectivity, LDAR sparks during corresponding
1 min period.
15
WDSS-II Techniques
  • Temporal Resolution
  • Segmotion attempts to fill the gaps
  • Lightning data are more frequent
  • We are creating new algorithms
  • FSU Algorithm Development
  • With clusters based on LDAR
  • 1-min resolution
  • Modification of storm type algorithm
  • Consider lightning parameters
  • Short-term forecasts
  • Total and cloud-to-ground
  • Combination of above
  • Severe vs. Non-severe
    determination

10 June 2007
Cross-section of Composite Reflectivity, 1 min of
LDAR sparks between 3 and 4 min after the
volume scan.
16
Continuing Research
  • Optimizing the Use of Lightning Data in Severe
    Storm Warning Assessment
  • Research Objectives
  • Total lightning data
  • LDAR/LMAs are regional networks
  • Few NWS WFOs have access to data
  • Determine relationship between total lightning
    and radar
  • GOES-R Global lightning mapper (GLM)
  • Goodman et al. (2008)
  • Total lightning for all NWS WFOs
  • Apply LMA relationships to GLM
  • Sterling, VA Lightning mapping array (LMA)
  • Examination and/or development of proxy data
  • Can data be used similarly?
  • Develop algorithms for risk-reduction

17
Continuing Research
  • Optimizing the Use of Lightning Data in Severe
    Storm Warning Assessment
  • Approach
  • Automate dataset preparation
  • Minimize manual inspection
  • Maximize accuracy
  • Examine many cases
  • Transition out of case study mode
  • Statistical Software
  • Determine relationships
  • Probabilistic scheme to determine severity
  • WDSS-II Algorithm
  • Consider parameters and trends
  • Utilize motion estimates
  • Probabilistic forecast of severity

18
Summary
  • WDSS-II
  • Capabilities
  • FSU Algorithm Modification
  • Transition away from case studies
  • Total Lightning Approach
  • Relate total lightning to radar parameters
  • CG (NLDN) and IC (LMA/LDAR)
  • GOES-R GLM
  • Development/Evaluation of proxy data
  • Can data be used in a similar fashion to LMA
  • Severe vs. Non-Severe
  • Develop algorithms
  • Statistical software packages for relationships
  • WDSS-II for real-time determination
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com