Seth M' Noar, Ph'D' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Seth M' Noar, Ph'D'

Description:

When you run multiple tests you get a greater error rate than originally ... Bonferroni procedure: corrects familywise error rate back to original chosen ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: sethmich
Category:
Tags: corrects | noar | seth

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Seth M' Noar, Ph'D'


1
Factorial (Multiple Factor) ANOVA
  • Seth M. Noar, Ph.D.
  • Department of Communication
  • University of Kentucky

2
Familywise error rate
  • When you run multiple tests you get a greater
    error rate than originally proposed (.05 x 5
    .25)
  • This is referred to as familywise error rate
  • Bonferroni procedure corrects familywise error
    rate back to original chosen rate (.05 / 5
    .01)
  • Also, Tukey follow-up test controls for
    familywise error rate

3
Factorial ANOVA
  • Single factor (one-way) ANOVA only allows for 1
    IV
  • Factorial ANOVA allows for multiple IVs
    (factors)
  • When one would apply it
  • 2 or more IVs 2 or more nominal levels
  • 1 DV continuous (must be interval)

4
Example
  • IVs medication and gender
  • DV measure of health
  • 2 x 2 factorial ANOVA
  • (2-way ANOVA)

Med
No Med
Male
Female
5
Factorial ANOVA Effects
  • Main effects and interactions
  • Examine
  • Main effect of each IV
  • Interaction between IVs
  • Example
  • Main effect of gender
  • Main effect of medication
  • Interaction between gender and medication

6
2 x 2 ANOVA
IV 2
Main Effect 1
IV 1
Main Effect 2
7
Med
No Med
15
Male
Female
15
10
20
8
Med
No Med
20
Male
Female
10
15
15
9
Med
No Med
15
Male
Female
15
15
15
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Logic of Factorial ANOVA
  • MS effect (between)
  • MS error (within)
  • Logic is same as single-factor ANOVA
  • Calculate between group variance
  • Calculate within group variance
  • Divide to get an F value
  • We always expect within group variability
  • However, we would only expect between group
    variability if the groups were different

13
Logic of Factorial ANOVA
  • Each main effect examines the significance of
    that particular IV (essentially ignoring the
    other potential effects)
  • The interaction examines if there are any
    special effects due to the combination of IVs.
  • Is there any systematic variability that is not
    due to other sources?

14
F tests
  • F tests accompany all main effects and all
    interactions
  • If interaction is significant, you cannot
    interpret the main effects
  • You must look at the interaction for the more
    complex picture
  • Interaction effects of one IV depend on the
    level of another IV

15
Main Effects and Interactions
  • The more IVs one has, the more main effects and
    interactions
  • 2 x 2 x 3 (A, B, C)
  • 3 way ANOVA
  • 3 main effects
  • A, B, and C
  • 4 Interactions
  • A x B, A x C, B x C, A x B x C

16
Correlation
17
Correlation
  • Allows us to examine relationships / associations
    between variables
  • It is a co-relation between 2 variables (Karl
    Pearson, 1895)
  • There are various types of correlation
    coefficients

18
Correlation (contd)
  • Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient
    (r)
  • Standard measure of the linear relationship
    between two variables
  • Most common correlation coefficient
  • When one would apply Pearsons r
  • 2 continuous variables (must be interval)

19
Correlation (contd)
  • Correlations vary both in magnitude and direction
  • Magnitude strength of relationship
  • Direction positive or negative
  • Correlations fall between -1 and 1

20
Correlation (contd)
  • Positive correlation High values of one
    variable are associated with high values of
    another variable
  • Attitude-Behavior, r .40
  • Negative correlation High values of one
    variable are associated with low values of
    another variable
  • Stress-Immune, r -.35

21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
Correlation (contd)
  • Correlation is NOT causation. Why?
  • Causation has much more to do with research
    design than with statistics

27
Causation
  • 3 necessary conditions for demonstrating
    causation
  • Association between variables
  • Temporal (time) ordering
  • Isolation of effect (ruling out of other
    variables)

28
Logic of Correlation
  • Examines linear relationship between 2 variables
  • Formula examines how much score deviation two
    distributions have in common
  • We can also examine significance of r using the t
    distribution
  • Null hypothesis is r 0
  • What are the chances of our correlation being
    significantly different from zero?

29
Logic of Correlation (contd)
  • A squared correlation is an effect size
  • r .40, r2 .16
  • 16 of variance is shared between these variables
  • Also, correlation itself is not an interval scale
  • .20 squared .04
  • .40 squared .16

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
Partial Correlation
  • Standard correlations do not consider influence
    of other variables
  • However, we can partial out variance if we wish
  • Partial correlation correlation between 2
    variables with other variance partialed out

33
Regression Analysis
34
Regression Analysis
  • A tool for prediction
  • If we know variable X, what does it tell us about
    variable Y?
  • When one would apply linear regression
  • 2 continuous variables (must be interval)
  • Look familiar?

35
Questions
  • If we know X about a person, what are the chances
    that they will be successful
  • In graduate school
  • At a certain job
  • Whats the single best predictor of
  • Health behavior
  • Political affiliation
  • Success in therapy

36
Standard Error of the estimate
  • A tool for prediction

37
Regression Line
  • A tool for prediction

38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com