Current Status and Future Prospects of High-Degree Ridge Fitting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Current Status and Future Prospects of High-Degree Ridge Fitting

Description:

The current version uses wide leakage matrices corrected for latitudinal differential rotation ... Differential Rotation Correction Requires Input of Rate Coefficients ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Lloy8
Learn more at: http://hmi.stanford.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Current Status and Future Prospects of High-Degree Ridge Fitting


1
Current Status and Future Prospects of
High-Degree Ridge Fitting
  • Johann Reiter, Edward Rhodes, and Jesper Schou
  • HMI Science Team Meeting
  • Monterey, CA
  • February 16, 2006

2
Recent Progress in Ridge-Fitting
  • We have Made Progress in the Fitting of both
    un-averaged and m-averaged power spectra.
  • Un-averaged spectra can now be fit for degrees
    between 45 and 1000.
  • Averaged spectra now include n-leaks in fitted
    profile and have been fit up to degrees of 1467.
  • Frequency errors have been greatly diminished in
    the fitting of un-averaged spectra.

3
Overview of Current Ridge-Fitting Methods
  • The method which fits m-averaged spectra is our
    Windowed, Multiple-Peak, Averaged-Spectrum
    (WMLTP) Method
  • This method requires that splitting coefficients
    be specified in the generation of the m-averaged
    spectra
  • This method employs m-averaged leakage matrices
  • The current version uses wide leakage matrices
    corrected for latitudinal differential rotation
  • This method can use symmetric or asymmetric
    profiles
  • This method produces frequencies, widths,
    amplitudes, asymmetries and their associated
    errors

4
Differential Rotation Correction Requires Input
of Rate Coefficients
5
Overview of Current Ridge-Fitting Methods (cont.)
  • The method which fits un-averaged spectra is our
    Multiple-Peak, Tesseral-Spectrum (MPTS) Method
  • This method employs zonal, sectoral, and tesseral
    power spectra rather than Fourier Transforms
  • This method employs wide, unaveraged leakage
    matrices which are also corrected for latitudinal
    differential rotation
  • This method can also employ symmetric or
    asymmetric profiles
  • This method produces frequencies, widths,
    amplitudes, asymmetries and their associated
    errors
  • This method also produces rotational
    frequency-splitting coefficients and their
    associated errors

6
Problems which Affect Both WMLTP and MPTS Methods
7
Recent Improvements in WMLTP Fitted Profiles
8
Examples of WMLTP Method Fits for Modes and Ridges
9
Set of WMLTP Frequencies from 5.7-Day MDI Time
Series Using Nigam and Kosovichev Asymmetric
Profile for April 7-12, 2002
10
Chronological History of Multiple-Peak
Tesseral-Spectrum Method Production Runs
Using JPL SGI Origin 2000 Supercomputers
11
Recent Comparison of Frequencies Computed from
m-averaged and Un-averaged Power Spectra Using
WMLTP and MPTS Methods
12
Recent Improvements in Rotational Splitting
Coefficients Computed Using MPTS Method
13
Rotational Inversion of High-Degree P-Mode
Splitting Coefficients for Degrees up to 500
Computed Using Multiple-Peak Tesseral-Spectrum
Fitting Method (Dec. 2004 run)
Inner Turning-Point Radius Dependence of Newer
Set Of P-Mode Splitting Coefficients Computed
Using Multiple-Peak Tesseral-Spectrum Method
for Degrees up to 1000 (July 2005 run)
14
Improvements in MPTS Frequencies Between 2001
and 2005
Reduction in MPTS Frequency Errors Between 2001
and 2005
15
Improvements Currently Underway in
WMLTP Code
  • Non-linear expansions of amplitude and widths of
    sidelobes versus degree must be completed
  • Inclusion of n-leaks in theoretical profiles must
    be completed
  • Code needs to be ported to Stanford pipeline

16
Improvements Currently Underway
in MPTS Code
  • Non-linear expansions of frequency, amplitude,
    and width of sidelobes versus degree must be
    implemented
  • N-leaks must be included in theoretical profiles
  • Theoretical Profiles Must be Convolved with
    Temporal Window Functions
  • Adjustment of input values must be automated
  • Code needs to be ported to Stanford pipeline

17
Future Issues for Both WMLTP and MPTS
Methods
  • Un-averaged power spectra must be re-computed
    with corrections for 1) improved model of MDI
    instrumental distortion, 2) a fixed error in MDI
    position angle, and 3) possible errors in the
    Carrington rotation elements
  • Un-averaged leakage matrices need to have
    corrections included for instrumental
    point-spread function and finite pixel size
  • Woodards 1989 theory for distortion from
    differential rotation needs to be refined
  • An improved asymmetric profile formula is
    essential

18
Conclusions
  • High-degree modes are fundamental to improving
    our knowledge of the solar interior
  • Current local helioseismic techniques are not
    valid substitutes for fits of spherical harmonic
    power spectra
  • We have demonstrated two fitting methods which
    can fit both narrow modal peaks and broad power
    ridges
  • We will soon be able to test MDI and GONG Fits
  • Both of these methods hold great promise for use
    in the HMI Software Pipeline

19
Manual Selection is Currently Required in Choice
of Input Parameters
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com