Intoxication and violence: a cultural perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

Intoxication and violence: a cultural perspective

Description:

... to their harmful conduct and should be held criminally accountable for it ... care generally recognized in Canadian society and is thereby criminally at ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: robin190
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intoxication and violence: a cultural perspective


1
Intoxication and violence a cultural perspective
  • Robin Room
  • robin.room_at_sorad.su.se
  • Regulation of lifestyles course
  • Sociology, University of Helsinki
  • 21 September 2004

2
Intoxication ? violence?
  • There is a strong association between alcohol
    consumption and criminal violence
  • What is the causal significance of this?
  • Arguments against interpreting as cause
  • cause should be reserved for human agency
  • cause should only be used when relation is both
    necessary and sufficient
  • only when there is a main effect through
    phrmacology

3
Intoxication ? violence? (continued)
  • But public opinion
  • 87 agree A lot of the violence in society
    could be eliminated if people didnt get drunk
    (Ontario, CA)
  • 45 agree Anyone might become violent if they
    drink too much (Finland)
  • In between Epidemiological definitions of
    causation
  • The relation need not be necessary, need not be
    sufficient probability rather than
    all-or-nothing
  • Conditional causation in combination with other
    factors
  • Relationship may operate through cultural beliefs
    about intoxication or the circumstances of
    drinking

4
(No Transcript)
5
Expectations about intoxication cognition,
intention, control, action (Ontario, CA 1998)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Differences in drinking patterns in western Europe
  • Frequency of drinking greater in southern Europe
  • Per-capita consumption converging
  • What about binge drinking?
  • Problematic term, but increasingly established
  • Defined in ECAS survey a bottle or wine or
    equivalent about 70 gm. ethanol
  • Binge drinking vs. Intoxication?

10
Drinking by male adults
11
Drinking by female adults
12
Patterns in binge drinking
  • Males gt females in each country on
  • Number of drinking occasions
  • Number of binge drinking occasions
  • Rate of binges per 100 drinking occasions than
    females in each country
  • Drinking most frequent in Italy, France, UK
  • France, Italy, Germany have fewest binges/100
    occasions
  • Highest number of binges in UK, Ireland, Italy
  • Same patterns by culture for men and for women

13
Besides the amount of drinking on the occasion ...
  • Drunken comportment (MacAndrew and Edgerton)
  • The Nordic dream of a better society (Olsson)
  • Wet vs. Dry sociesties
  • wet society drinking integrated in everyday
    life, consumed by families at meals, behavioural
    norms while drinking should be the same as when
    sober
  • dry society drinking sporadic and often to
    intoxication, separated from daily life,
    ostensive drunken behaviour
  • An attempt to test in western Europe

14
(No Transcript)
15
Hypothesis 1 behaviour while drinking is
controlled in southern Europe, ostensive in
northern
16
Hypothesis 2 the limits for within limits
behaviour are stricter in southern Europe
17
Hypothesis 3 expectation of violence from
drinking greater in northern Europe
18
Hypothesis 3 expectation of violence from
drinking greater in northern Europe (continued)
19
Hypothesis 4 intoxication more of an excuse in
northern Europe
20
The score-card pretty bad
  • Hypothesis 1 behaviour while drinking is
    controlled in southern Europe, ostensive in
    northern
  • No clear difference
  • Hypothesis 2 the limits for within limits
    behaviour are stricter in southern Europe
  • No clear difference latitude greatest in middle
    Europe
  • Hypothesis 3 expectation of violence from
    drinking greater in northern Europe
  • Opposite patterns actually greater in southern
    Europe
  • Hypothesis 4 intoxication more of an excuse in
    northern Europe
  • No clear difference Italy ?, France ? on excuse
    value of intoxication

21
Pondering where we stand
  • other expectancy studies also give unexpected
    results
  • problems with the dry/wet dichotomy
  • combining too many dimensions historical,
    drinking patterns, drunken comportment
  • what happens beyond Europe?
  • dry cultures as culturally constructing the
    link between alcohol and violence, or
  • wet cultures as suppressing the link?
  • reflexivity about intoxication and violence
    attitudes are expressed in the presence of
    cultural construction of knowledge

22
The problem of responsibility for the foreseeable
  • If intoxication is known to cause violence,
    people should be forewarned
  • A major agenda of temperance education
  • If forewarned, one should not become intoxicated
  • But if one becomes intoxicated anyway, is it an
    excuse?

23
The within limits clause and culturally
acceptable excuses
  • Is there a single set of norms for intoxicated
    behaviour, or is there a gradient, or
    situationally-specific norms?
  • Judges decisions in British common law
    jurisdictions
  • Intoxication allowed precisely when the behaviour
    is outside any conceivable rational limit
  • Daviault case in Canada 72-year-old man sexually
    assaulting a 65-year-old woman confined to a
    wheelchair
  • Behaviour akin to automatism intoxication as
    possession?
  • The post-enlightenment fascination with the
    automaton, with actions outside conscious control
  • Alcohol as a secularized spirit which can
    possess? (Demon Rum)
  • A gradient of expectancies about comportment, but
    also extreme drunkenness as an accepted account
    of behaviour outside any expectations?

24
At the official level, no excuse Canadian
legislation, 1995
  • Whereas the Parliament of Canada shares with
    Canadians the moral view that people who, while
    in a state of self-induced intoxication, violate
    the physical integrity of others are blameworthy
    in relation to their harmful conduct and should
    be held criminally accountable for it ...
  • It is not a defence to an assault or any other
    interference or threat of interference by a
    person with the bodily integrity of another
    person that the accused, by reason of
    self-induced intoxication, lacked the general
    intent or the voluntariness required to commit
    the offence, where the accused departed markedly
    from the following standard of care ...
  • A person departs markedly from the standard of
    reasonable care generally recognized in Canadian
    society and is thereby criminally at fault where
    the person, while in a state of self-induced
    intoxication that renders a person unaware of, or
    incapable of consciously controlling, their
    behaviour, voluntarily or involuntarily
    interferes or threatens to interfere with the
    bodily integrity of another person.

25
On the record public opinion alcohol causes
violence, a drunk person cant tell right from
wrong ... (Ontario, 1995)
26
but the expectancies are mainly not all --
about effects on someone else (Ontario, 1992)
  • How likely would it be that having a few drinks
    (enough to feel the effects) on an occasion/every
    day would ... make you/someone else aggressive
    and possible violent? (somewhat and very likely)
  • Effects on someone else
  • 83 for a few drinks on an occasion
  • 91 for a few drinks every day
  • Effects on self
  • 12 for a few drinks on an occasion
  • 41 for a few drinks every day

27
However, a drunken person is still responsible
no excuse (Ontario 1998)
  • If someone is drunk, they are still responsible
    for their actions
  • Strongly agree 85 somewhat agree 12
  • Only 3 disagree
  • If someone is very drunk when they commit a crime
    so drunk that theyt are slurring their words
    should they receive more or less punishment
    than someone who is sober and commits the same
    crime?
  • 16 more punishment
  • 81 same punishment
  • 3 less punishment

28
Why a drunk person is responsible (open ended
responses, Ontario)
29
But at an informal level, the excuse value is
still there
30
... although it is usually not a very good excuse
31
Although its usually not a very good excuse
(continued)
32
How to deal with intoxication remains in many
places a problem in law
  • The triangle the judges dilemma
  • Guilt requires a guilty mind
  • Intoxication removes the ability to make moral
    choices (i.e., to have a guilty mind)
  • But allowing an intoxication defense opens the
    floodgates

33
At the level of international law The Rome
Statute establishing the International Criminal
Court, 1998
34
Can drunken comportment in a culture be changed?
  • not readily
  • cases cited by MacAndrew Edgerton
  • Papago in Arizona
  • Tahitian islands
  • Bantu in South Africa
  • all cultures which underwent a major social
    transition, including subordination to a dominant
    European culture
  • expectancy challenges literature
  • efforts to challenge and thus change
    expectancies of university students not very
    successful
  • (Jones et al., Addiction 9657-72, 2001)
  • changes in behaviour around drinking-driving as a
    model?
  • A sustained campaign would pull against the
    cultural utilities of drinking as time out

35
Where to look further?
36
Where to look further? (continued)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com