The Agricultural Ontology Service AOS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Agricultural Ontology Service AOS

Description:

FAO's main goal is to reduce the number of hungry people by 50 ... Web crawlers and harvesters do good jobs only on already structured information sources. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:30
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: FAO2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Agricultural Ontology Service AOS


1
  • The Agricultural Ontology Service(AOS)
  • Effort for Content Standardization in Agriculture
  • Frehiwot Fisseha (UNFAO)
  • Frehiwot.Fisseha_at_fao.org

2
Outline
  • FAOs mandate in agricultural information
    management
  • Problems we want to solve
  • The current situation
  • Proposed solution
  • The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS)
  • AOS prototype (The Fishery Ontology Service)

3
FAOs mandate
  • FAOs main goal is to reduce the number of hungry
    people by 50 within the year 2015.
  • WAICENT (World Agricultural Information Center)
    is FAOs approach to fight hunger with
    information.
  • FAO produces a huge amount of data/information in
    agriculture and related disciplines.
  • It is also within FAOs mandate to make available
    agriculture related information from other
    information providers.
  • FAO collaborates in information networks which
    are dedicated to the dissemination of
    agricultural domain.

4
Problems we want to solve
The Information Organization problem faced by
Information Managers At present most
information management tasks are performed
manually. ... consider the cataloging and
indexing task. Manual cataloging and indexing
are labor-intensive processes, requiring special
training. Tools for automating or
semi-automating these processes are much in
demand.
5
Problems we want to solve
The Information Retrieval problem faced by
Information Users
  • Both parameters are ranking low today!

6
Problems we want to solve
  • Topic Trees from categorization schemes and
    thesauri are rigid and not very expressive
  • Machine produced clusters are flexible, but
    imprecise and at times out of context

7
Knowledge Organizations Systems Metadata Schema
  • The subject categorization schemes are not
    adequately developed to be of use for semantic
    description for web resources
  • The metadata schemas are closely attached to
    traditional description of bibliographical
    records
  • The Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI) is a
    step forward to define core metadata to describe
    information objects
  • Effort is underway to develop Agricultural
    metadata standards

8
Knowledge Organization Systems Vocabularies
  • Insufficient subject language coverage

Existing Thesauri and Knowledge Organization
Systems (KOSs)
Dedicated KOSs
e.g., ASFA thesaurus
e.g., the Multilingual Forestry Thesaurus
  • Only very simple encoding of semantic relations

e.g., the Sustainable Development website
classification
  • Common concepts are not declared

e.g., biological taxonomies such as NCBI and ITIS
  • No or very limited interoperability

Other thematic thesauri
Non-dedicated KOSs
  • Very limited machine readability

CABI Thesaurus
AGROVOC
NAL Thesaurus
  • Severe maintenance problems

GEMET
9
Some observations
  • No cross navigation between applications
  • Full text search engines based on statistical
    text analysis are imprecise
  • Systems based only on machine intelligence do
    not show too promising results
  • Web crawlers and harvesters do good jobs only on
    already structured information sources.
  • Recognition of meaning (semantic analysis) by
    machines is only possible by using using
    structured meta-information and formal knowledge
    description
  • Agreed metadata schemas
  • Controlled vocabularies, Taxonomies

10
The solution we propose- Domain Ontology
  • An ontology is a formal knowledge organization
    system
  • A formal description of the application knowledge
  • It contains concepts and their definitions
  • Relations between concepts
  • Possibility for machine processing

11
What benefits do we expect from Ontology?
  • Semantic Organization of websites
  • Knowledge maps
  • Guided discovery of knowledge
  • Easy retrievability of information without using
    complicated Boolean logic
  • Text processing by machines
  • Text Mining on the Web (meaning-oriented
    access)
  • Automatic indexing and text annotation tools
  • Full text search engines that create meaningful
    classification (FAO-Schwartz not related to FAO)
    (semantic clustering)
  • Intelligent search of the Web
  • Building dynamical catalogues from machine
    readable meta data
  • Cross Domain Search
  • Natural Language processing
  • Better machine translation
  • Queries using natural language

12
Guided Browse and Search Facilities
13
Context Sensitive Knowledge Access
Agricultural Web Page
Use your right mouse button to learn more about
an italicized word on the page.
Biosecurity management of all biological and
environmental risks associated with food and
agriculture, including forestry and
fisheries See also Biosafety Food Safety Risk
Management Or are you interested in... Food
Security Biological Diversity
Conservation agriculture Farmers like it because
it gives them a means of conserving, improving
and making more efficient use of their natural
resources About camels and llamas Descendants of
the same rabbit-sized mammal, they have become
two of humanity's most versatile domestic animals
Agribusiness and small farmers Well managed
contract farming contributes to both increased
income for producers and higher profits for
investors Toward biosecurity Biological and
environmental risks associated with food and
agriculture have intensified with economic
globalization Urban food marketing In the
century of cities, a major challenge will be
providing adequate quantities of nutritional and
affordable food for urban inhabitants Crop
science and ethics In order to continue their
contribution to human development, crop
scientists must regain credibility
14
The Collaborative Approach We Want to Adopt
  • Only agreed semantic standards guarantee
    knowledge discovery between different
    applications.
  • Developing Knowledge Organization Systems is
    resource intensive and requires stakeholders
    agreement and participation.
  • Hence, FAO started initiatives to bring
    interested partners together
  • The AGStandards initiative was launched in
    October, 2000 to agree on agricultural metadata
    standards
  • The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) concept
    paper was publicized in July 2001.

15
What does Agricultural Ontology Service mean?
  • The Agricultural Ontology Service is an approach
    to organize knowledge organization systems that
    is
  • International
  • The Internet must become multilingual
  • Multidisciplinary
  • The field of agriculture is broad and
    multidisciplinary.
  • Cooperative
  • Stakeholders can contribute different expert
    knowledge
  • Distributed
  • No central ownership
  • Coordinated
  • Coordination must ensure reusability and
    standardization

16
AOS Iterative Knowledge Registration
Components terms, definitions, relationships
KOS uses components to build an application
Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) Federated
storage and description facility
Components terms, definitions, relationships
Discussions and choices for amendments to
components
17
Activities to date
  • The first AOS workshop took place in Rome,
    November 2001
  • A launch group was established with participation
    of
  • Content providers (FAO, CABI)
  • Solution providers in the Agricultural Area (ATO
    -Wageningen, University of Florida)
  • Ontology development Groups (AIFB Karlsruhe, CNR
    Italy)
  • Ontology experts
  • The second AOS workshop (January 2002 in Oxford)
  • Decision to develop prototypes as proof of
    concept.
  • The Fishery Ontology Service (FOS) is one of the
    prototypes
  • The third AOS workshop took (May 2002 Florida)
  • Decision to setup the AOS consortium

18
AOS a business model
  • A consortium of Information Providers
  • A clearinghouse for semantic standards in
    agriculture and related discipline.
  • One stop access to agreed standards (Ontologies,
    Metadata schemas, Vocabularies).
  • Participation as a consortium in semantic web
    activities (Ontoweb).
  • Organization of seminars and workshops to further
    develop and promote the use of semantic
    standards.

19
AOS Prototype-The Fishery Ontology Service (FOS)
  • Goal to integrate the multilingual fishery and
    aquatic resources terminology
  • the oneFish Community Directory,
  • ASFA,
  • FIGIS,
  • AGROVOC
  • Objective
  • to have a better tool for document indexing and
    information retrieval,
  • to promote interaction and knowledge sharing
    within the fishery community
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com