Title: The Freeze is Over: Rate Caps and Rate Implications How the Maryland Market Is Working
1The Freeze is Over Rate Caps and Rate
Implications How the Maryland Market Is Working
National Low Income Energy Conference June 14,
2005 Sheldon Switzer Director Electric Pricing
and Tariffs
2Cartoon From The Carroll County TimesFebruary 1,
2001
3(No Transcript)
4I usually take a two hour nap from 1 to 4.
5(No Transcript)
6When you come to a fork in the road, take it
- Regulation or Competition
- Competitive market for generation supply
- Other political objectives
- Competitive Metering
- Universal Service
- Conservation
- Price Protection
- Did we take the right fork in the road?
7Youve got to be very careful if you dont know
where you are going because you might not get
there
- The Electric Customer Choice and Competition Act
of 1999 - Orderly transition to competitive supply market
- Maintain electric system reliability
- Compliance with environmental regulations
- Fair to customers and investors
- Provide economic benefits to all customer classes
8Provide economic benefits to all customer classes
- Customer group driving Deregulation Large,
Industrial Customers - What about?
- Residential Customers
- Low-Income Customers
9Universal Service Fund
- The Commission shall establish a Universal
Service Program to assist electric customers with
annual incomes at or below 150 of the Federal
Poverty Level. - The components of the Universal Service Program
- Bill assistance, at a minimum of 50 of the
determined need - Low-income weatherization
- A one-time retirement of arrearages
10Universal Service Fund
- The total amount of funds to be collected for the
Universal Service Program (first 3 years.) - 24.4 Million shall be collected from the
Industrial and Commercial Classes - 9.6 Million shall be collected from the
Residential Class. - In any year when there are unexpended funds,
those funds shall be returned to the customer
classes proportionate to how the Customer Classes
paid into the fund. - The Commission shall recommend a total amount of
funds to be used thereafter. - All Customers will contribute to the funding of
the Universal Service Program through a charge
collected by each Electric Company.
11Universal Service Fund
- The Commission shall determine a fair and
equitable allocation for collecting the charges
among all Customer Classes. - An Electric Company shall recover Universal
Service Program costs. - The Commission may not assess the Universal
Service Surcharge on a per kilowatt-hour basis.
12Universal Service Fund
- The Department of Human Resources, with oversight
by the Commission, shall disburse the funds. - The Department of Human Resources shall be
responsible for administering the Universal
Service Program. - The Commission shall have oversight
responsibility for the Universal Service Program.
13(No Transcript)
14Source Electric Power Supply Association
Assessing the Good Old Days of Cost-Plus
Regulation July 23,2001
15Maryland Electric Choice History and Update
16Electric Choice History
- Marylands Electric Utility Industry was
deregulated through a combination of events - Electric Customer Choice and Competition Act of
1999 - Maryland Public Service Commission Orders
- Individual utility restructuring cases and
settlements - Roundtable meetings consisting of utility,
regulatory, industry and customer representatives
outlining detailed implementation rules
17It was impossible to get a conversation going,
everybody was talking too much.
- The Settlement Processes
- Roundtables -- competitive billing, universal
service, customer education, demand-side
management, supplier tariffs, technical
implementation - The big issues -- Case Nos. 8794/8804
- Stranded Cost Quantification
- Price protection
- Unbundled rates
18Electric Choice History
- In the past, a customers entire electric service
was provided by the local electric utility
(Vertically integrated electric utility) - As a result of electric deregulation, on July 1,
2000 all BGE customers were able to choose their
electricity supplier
19Electric Choice History
- What was deregulated?
- In a deregulated market, generation, transmission
and distribution are separated - Now, customers can choose the company that they
contract with for electricity supply (generation
and transmission)
20What Is Purchased From a Supplier
- Generation (non-regulated) consists of
- Energy
- Capacity
- Transmission (regulated)
21What Continues To Be Regulated?
- Transmission is still regulated by the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and included
when generation is purchased - Role of PJM as an RTO
- Distribution services, that is, the delivery of
the electricity to a customers facility, are
still provided by the local utility - BGE
22What is Competitive
23A Competitive Electric Market Takes Time to
Develop
- As part of the transition, Price Freeze Service
(PFS) was put in place to allow time for the
market to develop - PFS Price protection / smooth transition --
but limited the development of a competitive
market by stabilizing prices at low levels for a
fixed period - PFS does not reflect current market prices
because they were based on the last rate case
held in 1993 - In BGEs service territory, the majority of
electric Choice activity has started with the
larger businesses and government entities.
24Key Steps In The Developing MarketEnd Of BGE
Price Freeze Service
- PFS ended for Schedule P accounts on 6/30/02
- 99 of Schedule P accounts enrolled with a third
party - PFS ended for remaining non-residential accounts
on 6/30/04 - 114,000 accounts
- PFS ends for residential accounts on 6/30/06
25I knew I was going to take the wrong train, so I
left early
- We have a transition to a competitive generation
supply market -- limited ability for competitive
market to develop in the short term
26Benefits of Deregulation
- Competitive Wholesale Generation Market
- Retail Choice
- Customers are able to select an electricity
supplier that offers service which best meets
their needs - For example, customers can shop for a supplier
that offers the best prices for their energy load
profile and energy efficiency services including
energy management
27The PJM Power Pool
- PJM Interconnection is a regional transmission
organization (RTO) - PJM ensures the reliability of the largest
centrally dispatched control area in North
America - PJM, acting neutrally and independently, operates
the largest competitive wholesale electricity
market in the world. (Independent System Operator
(ISO)) - PJM manages a sophisticated regional planning
process for generation and transmission expansion
to assure future electric reliability. - PJM facilitates a collaborative stakeholder
process. Stakeholders include participants that
produce, buy, sell, move and regulate
electricity.
28Gas Customer Choice
- A much simpler process!
- Commodity vs. Pipes
- Fuel Rate / Market-based Rates
- Interstate Pipelines
- Distribution inside the city gate
- Retail choice significant for Industrial and
Commercial Customers
29Provider of Last Resort
30 - Baseball is 90 mental -- the other half is
physical
31Provider Of Last Resort (Case 8908)
- Settlement reached November 15, 2002 which
established Provider of Last Resort (POLR) for
all utilities in Maryland - POLR Phase I
- The Maryland Public Service Commission approved
the settlement on April 29, 2003
32Provider of Last Resort (POLR)
- The Provider of Last Resort is the local
distribution company (LDC) - e.g., BGE, PEPCO,
etc. - POLR provides new fixed price market based
Standard Offer Service (SOS) for customers whose
Price Freeze Service has ended and no supplier
has been selected - This is being done
- To continue the smooth transition to electric
Choice - To provide customers with protection against the
volatile Default Service rate
33Key Term Capacity PLC
- Peak Load Contribution (PLC) is a measure of the
peak amount of electricity a customer uses - Along with other aspects of the service, PLC is
used by suppliers to determine their prices - The PLC is set annually unlike billing demand
- Capacity PLC is
- Share of PJMs peak in the summer period (6/1 -
9/30) - Based on the 5 peak hours occurring on 5
different days - Used to determine the POLR service for which
non-residential customers are eligible
34Summary of POLR Market Based Rate Plans
35Summary of POLR Market-Based Rate Plans For
Accounts of 600 kW PLC
36PFS Doesnt Reflect Current Market Prices
37Since 1999 Cost of Fuels Rose While BGE
Residential Electric Prices Declined
38POLR Phase II
- Separate settlement reach by most of the same
parties and filed with PSC on 6/30/03 - PSC hearings to be held at end of August
- Addresses details on wholesale supply bidding
process including - Model Request for Proposal
- Credit requirements and application
- Contracts
- Schedule
- Reporting requirements
39(No Transcript)
40Residential Customers
- Pepco
- July 1, 2004 May 31, 2005
- Total annual bill - 16
- Total annual supply bill 26
- July 1, 2005 June 30, 2005
- Total annual bill 4.5
- Total annual supply bill 6.6
41Small Commercial Customers
- Pepco
- July 1, 2004 May 31, 2005
- Total annual bill - 16
- Total annual supply bill 31
- July 1, 2005 June 30, 2005
- Total annual bill 4.5
- Total annual supply bill 7.1
42Small Commercial Customers
- BGE
- July 1, 2004 May 31, 2005
- Total annual bill - 17
- Total annual supply bill 27
- July 1, 2005 June 30, 2005
- Total annual bill 4.1
- Total annual supply bill 6.5
43Why the large increases in retail generation
supply prices under market-based SOS rates?
- Some would say --
- Electric Industry Restructuring is a Failure
- If it wasnt broke, we shouldnt have changed it
- Bring Back the Good Old Days
- Are they correct?????
- Last price change in 1993 for BGE
- Fuel price increases which are largely exogenous
to the structure of the electric utility industry
44What changed?
- Industry Structure
- Wholesale Competitive Markets
- Open Access Transmission
- Utility Mindset
- No longer a Next Base Rate Case Focus
- Profitability no longer dependent on prudent
management and a good regulatory environment - Change in the conduct of business
- Not just generation
- Not just transmission
- BUT distribution as well
- Benchmarking / Cost cutting /Efficiency
improvements
45Econometric Model
-
- (/CPI) / kWht a0 S ß1i NERCi ß2CPI (fuel)t
ß3 Dummy93t S ß4i NERCi Dummy93t et - Ln((/CPI)/kWht)a0S ß1i NERCi
ß2Ln(CPI(fuel))tß3Dummy93t Sß4iNERCiDummy93t
et - Real cost of electricity (per kWh) as a function
of the NERC region, an inflation index for fuel
costs, a dummy variable that is one for the years
1993 through 2002, zero otherwise, and an
interaction term between the NERC region and the
dummy variable. -
46(No Transcript)
47Results
48Conclusion
- Benefits of competition are substantial
- Threat of competition as a precursor to actual
industry transformation had an impact - Competitive Wholesale generation
- More efficient utilities and improved business
practices for distribution - Residential customers gain, but less than others
- Fundamental gain derives from the need to
operate and plan generation supply efficiently to
maximize profits
49Conclusion
- Retail choice
- Large customers have unique load profiles and
ability to respond to price signals and
participate in load response programs - Smaller customers benefits are less clear plus
need to have a POLR service for those who choose
not to shop - Avoid imposing complicated market rules, policies
that restrict the availability of optional
value-added utility services, and policies that
would impose uneconomic costs (e.g. interval
meters for small customers) - Consider Incentive Ratemaking
50Where Can I Get More Information?
- Maryland Public Service Commission
www.psc.state.md.us/psc - BGE website www.bge.com
51Questions?
52It aint over till its over -- Yogi
- NY Yankees 1946 - 1963
- 3 time American league MVP
- 14 Pennants
- 10 World Series Championships
- 15 successive All-Star Games
- Elected to Baseball Hall of Fame -1972
53(No Transcript)