The Freeze is Over: Rate Caps and Rate Implications How the Maryland Market Is Working - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

The Freeze is Over: Rate Caps and Rate Implications How the Maryland Market Is Working

Description:

Benchmarking / Cost cutting /Efficiency improvements. 45. Econometric Model ... Real cost of electricity (per kWh) as a function of the NERC region, an ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: bge1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Freeze is Over: Rate Caps and Rate Implications How the Maryland Market Is Working


1
The Freeze is Over Rate Caps and Rate
Implications How the Maryland Market Is Working
National Low Income Energy Conference June 14,
2005 Sheldon Switzer Director Electric Pricing
and Tariffs
2
Cartoon From The Carroll County TimesFebruary 1,
2001
3
(No Transcript)
4
I usually take a two hour nap from 1 to 4.

5
(No Transcript)
6
When you come to a fork in the road, take it
  • Regulation or Competition
  • Competitive market for generation supply
  • Other political objectives
  • Competitive Metering
  • Universal Service
  • Conservation
  • Price Protection
  • Did we take the right fork in the road?

7
Youve got to be very careful if you dont know
where you are going because you might not get
there
  • The Electric Customer Choice and Competition Act
    of 1999
  • Orderly transition to competitive supply market
  • Maintain electric system reliability
  • Compliance with environmental regulations
  • Fair to customers and investors
  • Provide economic benefits to all customer classes

8
Provide economic benefits to all customer classes
  • Customer group driving Deregulation Large,
    Industrial Customers
  • What about?
  • Residential Customers
  • Low-Income Customers

9
Universal Service Fund
  • The Commission shall establish a Universal
    Service Program to assist electric customers with
    annual incomes at or below 150 of the Federal
    Poverty Level.
  • The components of the Universal Service Program
  • Bill assistance, at a minimum of 50 of the
    determined need
  • Low-income weatherization
  • A one-time retirement of arrearages

10
Universal Service Fund
  • The total amount of funds to be collected for the
    Universal Service Program (first 3 years.)
  • 24.4 Million shall be collected from the
    Industrial and Commercial Classes
  • 9.6 Million shall be collected from the
    Residential Class.
  • In any year when there are unexpended funds,
    those funds shall be returned to the customer
    classes proportionate to how the Customer Classes
    paid into the fund.
  • The Commission shall recommend a total amount of
    funds to be used thereafter.
  • All Customers will contribute to the funding of
    the Universal Service Program through a charge
    collected by each Electric Company.

11
Universal Service Fund
  • The Commission shall determine a fair and
    equitable allocation for collecting the charges
    among all Customer Classes.
  • An Electric Company shall recover Universal
    Service Program costs.
  • The Commission may not assess the Universal
    Service Surcharge on a per kilowatt-hour basis.

12
Universal Service Fund
  • The Department of Human Resources, with oversight
    by the Commission, shall disburse the funds.
  • The Department of Human Resources shall be
    responsible for administering the Universal
    Service Program.
  • The Commission shall have oversight
    responsibility for the Universal Service Program.

13
(No Transcript)
14
Source Electric Power Supply Association
Assessing the Good Old Days of Cost-Plus
Regulation July 23,2001
15
Maryland Electric Choice History and Update
16
Electric Choice History
  • Marylands Electric Utility Industry was
    deregulated through a combination of events
  • Electric Customer Choice and Competition Act of
    1999
  • Maryland Public Service Commission Orders
  • Individual utility restructuring cases and
    settlements
  • Roundtable meetings consisting of utility,
    regulatory, industry and customer representatives
    outlining detailed implementation rules

17
It was impossible to get a conversation going,
everybody was talking too much.
  • The Settlement Processes
  • Roundtables -- competitive billing, universal
    service, customer education, demand-side
    management, supplier tariffs, technical
    implementation
  • The big issues -- Case Nos. 8794/8804
  • Stranded Cost Quantification
  • Price protection
  • Unbundled rates

18
Electric Choice History
  • In the past, a customers entire electric service
    was provided by the local electric utility
    (Vertically integrated electric utility)
  • As a result of electric deregulation, on July 1,
    2000 all BGE customers were able to choose their
    electricity supplier

19
Electric Choice History
  • What was deregulated?
  • In a deregulated market, generation, transmission
    and distribution are separated
  • Now, customers can choose the company that they
    contract with for electricity supply (generation
    and transmission)

20
What Is Purchased From a Supplier
  • Generation (non-regulated) consists of
  • Energy
  • Capacity
  • Transmission (regulated)

21
What Continues To Be Regulated?
  • Transmission is still regulated by the Federal
    Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and included
    when generation is purchased
  • Role of PJM as an RTO
  • Distribution services, that is, the delivery of
    the electricity to a customers facility, are
    still provided by the local utility - BGE

22
What is Competitive
23
A Competitive Electric Market Takes Time to
Develop
  • As part of the transition, Price Freeze Service
    (PFS) was put in place to allow time for the
    market to develop
  • PFS Price protection / smooth transition --
    but limited the development of a competitive
    market by stabilizing prices at low levels for a
    fixed period
  • PFS does not reflect current market prices
    because they were based on the last rate case
    held in 1993
  • In BGEs service territory, the majority of
    electric Choice activity has started with the
    larger businesses and government entities.

24
Key Steps In The Developing MarketEnd Of BGE
Price Freeze Service
  • PFS ended for Schedule P accounts on 6/30/02
  • 99 of Schedule P accounts enrolled with a third
    party
  • PFS ended for remaining non-residential accounts
    on 6/30/04
  • 114,000 accounts
  • PFS ends for residential accounts on 6/30/06

25
I knew I was going to take the wrong train, so I
left early
  • We have a transition to a competitive generation
    supply market -- limited ability for competitive
    market to develop in the short term

26
Benefits of Deregulation
  • Competitive Wholesale Generation Market
  • Retail Choice
  • Customers are able to select an electricity
    supplier that offers service which best meets
    their needs
  • For example, customers can shop for a supplier
    that offers the best prices for their energy load
    profile and energy efficiency services including
    energy management

27
The PJM Power Pool
  • PJM Interconnection is a regional transmission
    organization (RTO)
  • PJM ensures the reliability of the largest
    centrally dispatched control area in North
    America
  • PJM, acting neutrally and independently, operates
    the largest competitive wholesale electricity
    market in the world. (Independent System Operator
    (ISO))
  • PJM manages a sophisticated regional planning
    process for generation and transmission expansion
    to assure future electric reliability.
  • PJM facilitates a collaborative stakeholder
    process. Stakeholders include participants that
    produce, buy, sell, move and regulate
    electricity.

28
Gas Customer Choice
  • A much simpler process!
  • Commodity vs. Pipes
  • Fuel Rate / Market-based Rates
  • Interstate Pipelines
  • Distribution inside the city gate
  • Retail choice significant for Industrial and
    Commercial Customers

29
Provider of Last Resort

30
  • Baseball is 90 mental -- the other half is
    physical

31
Provider Of Last Resort (Case 8908)
  • Settlement reached November 15, 2002 which
    established Provider of Last Resort (POLR) for
    all utilities in Maryland
  • POLR Phase I
  • The Maryland Public Service Commission approved
    the settlement on April 29, 2003

32
Provider of Last Resort (POLR)
  • The Provider of Last Resort is the local
    distribution company (LDC) - e.g., BGE, PEPCO,
    etc.
  • POLR provides new fixed price market based
    Standard Offer Service (SOS) for customers whose
    Price Freeze Service has ended and no supplier
    has been selected
  • This is being done
  • To continue the smooth transition to electric
    Choice
  • To provide customers with protection against the
    volatile Default Service rate

33
Key Term Capacity PLC
  • Peak Load Contribution (PLC) is a measure of the
    peak amount of electricity a customer uses
  • Along with other aspects of the service, PLC is
    used by suppliers to determine their prices
  • The PLC is set annually unlike billing demand
  • Capacity PLC is
  • Share of PJMs peak in the summer period (6/1 -
    9/30)
  • Based on the 5 peak hours occurring on 5
    different days
  • Used to determine the POLR service for which
    non-residential customers are eligible

34
Summary of POLR Market Based Rate Plans

35
Summary of POLR Market-Based Rate Plans For
Accounts of 600 kW PLC

36
PFS Doesnt Reflect Current Market Prices

37
Since 1999 Cost of Fuels Rose While BGE
Residential Electric Prices Declined

38
POLR Phase II
  • Separate settlement reach by most of the same
    parties and filed with PSC on 6/30/03
  • PSC hearings to be held at end of August
  • Addresses details on wholesale supply bidding
    process including
  • Model Request for Proposal
  • Credit requirements and application
  • Contracts
  • Schedule
  • Reporting requirements

39
(No Transcript)
40
Residential Customers
  • Pepco
  • July 1, 2004 May 31, 2005
  • Total annual bill - 16
  • Total annual supply bill 26
  • July 1, 2005 June 30, 2005
  • Total annual bill 4.5
  • Total annual supply bill 6.6

41
Small Commercial Customers
  • Pepco
  • July 1, 2004 May 31, 2005
  • Total annual bill - 16
  • Total annual supply bill 31
  • July 1, 2005 June 30, 2005
  • Total annual bill 4.5
  • Total annual supply bill 7.1

42
Small Commercial Customers
  • BGE
  • July 1, 2004 May 31, 2005
  • Total annual bill - 17
  • Total annual supply bill 27
  • July 1, 2005 June 30, 2005
  • Total annual bill 4.1
  • Total annual supply bill 6.5

43
Why the large increases in retail generation
supply prices under market-based SOS rates?
  • Some would say --
  • Electric Industry Restructuring is a Failure
  • If it wasnt broke, we shouldnt have changed it
  • Bring Back the Good Old Days
  • Are they correct?????
  • Last price change in 1993 for BGE
  • Fuel price increases which are largely exogenous
    to the structure of the electric utility industry

44
What changed?
  • Industry Structure
  • Wholesale Competitive Markets
  • Open Access Transmission
  • Utility Mindset
  • No longer a Next Base Rate Case Focus
  • Profitability no longer dependent on prudent
    management and a good regulatory environment
  • Change in the conduct of business
  • Not just generation
  • Not just transmission
  • BUT distribution as well
  • Benchmarking / Cost cutting /Efficiency
    improvements

45
Econometric Model
  • (/CPI) / kWht a0 S ß1i NERCi ß2CPI (fuel)t
    ß3 Dummy93t S ß4i NERCi Dummy93t et
  • Ln((/CPI)/kWht)a0S ß1i NERCi
    ß2Ln(CPI(fuel))tß3Dummy93t Sß4iNERCiDummy93t
    et
  • Real cost of electricity (per kWh) as a function
    of the NERC region, an inflation index for fuel
    costs, a dummy variable that is one for the years
    1993 through 2002, zero otherwise, and an
    interaction term between the NERC region and the
    dummy variable.

46
(No Transcript)
47
Results
48
Conclusion
  • Benefits of competition are substantial
  • Threat of competition as a precursor to actual
    industry transformation had an impact
  • Competitive Wholesale generation
  • More efficient utilities and improved business
    practices for distribution
  • Residential customers gain, but less than others
  • Fundamental gain derives from the need to
    operate and plan generation supply efficiently to
    maximize profits

49
Conclusion
  • Retail choice
  • Large customers have unique load profiles and
    ability to respond to price signals and
    participate in load response programs
  • Smaller customers benefits are less clear plus
    need to have a POLR service for those who choose
    not to shop
  • Avoid imposing complicated market rules, policies
    that restrict the availability of optional
    value-added utility services, and policies that
    would impose uneconomic costs (e.g. interval
    meters for small customers)
  • Consider Incentive Ratemaking

50
Where Can I Get More Information?
  • Maryland Public Service Commission
    www.psc.state.md.us/psc
  • BGE website www.bge.com

51
Questions?

52
It aint over till its over -- Yogi
  • NY Yankees 1946 - 1963
  • 3 time American league MVP
  • 14 Pennants
  • 10 World Series Championships
  • 15 successive All-Star Games
  • Elected to Baseball Hall of Fame -1972

53
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com