Title: Alternate Assessment 20092010
1Alternate Assessment2009-2010
- Presented by
- Sue Bitsko, Pam Bullock and Deborah McGraw
- SST 13
2Assembling the Binder
3The Manual
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Chapter 2 Guidelines for Participation
- Chapter 3 Overview of Ohios AASWD
- Chapter 4 Preparing to Administer Ohios AASWD
- Chapter 5 Administration of Ohios AASWD
- Chapter 6 Scoring the COEs
4The Appendices
- Appendix 1 Common forms for Grades 3 - 8 and
OGT - Appendix 2 Specific Information and Forms -
Grades 3 - 8 - Appendix 3 Applications and Entry Sheets -
Grade 3 - Appendix 4 Applications and Entry Sheets -
Grade 4 - Appendix 5 Applications and Entry Sheets -
Grade 5 - Appendix 6 Applications and Entry Sheets -
Grade 6 - Appendix 7 Applications and Entry Sheets -
Grade 7 - Appendix 8 Applications and Entry Sheets -
Grade 8 - Appendix 9 Specific Information and Forms - OGT
- Appendix 10 Applications and Entry Sheets - OGT
- Appendix 11 Sources of Law
- Appendix 12 Glossary
5Chapter 1 Introduction
6Introduction
Chapter 1
- ALL children enrolled in any public school
district are required to participate in state
assessments
References IDEIA, NCLB and Ohio Law
Page 1
7In Ohio, there are three ways to assess student
achievement of academic content standards
- participation in the general assessment without
accommodations - participation in the general assessment with
allowable accommodations - participation in an alternate assessment
Page 1
Further information Ohio Statewide Testing
Program Rules Book or the Office for Exceptional
Children
8Frequently Asked Questions
9Which students should take an alternate
assessment?
- Ohios Alternate Assessment was developed for
students with significant cognitive disabilities. - Participation decisions are made by the students
IEP team - Follow Ohio Guidelines for Participation in
Alternate Assessment (chapter 2)
Page 2
10Is there a cap on how many children may
participate in alternate assessment?
- The IEP team decides how a student will
participate in statewide assessment. - Federal rules limit the number of alternate
assessments scores a district may count as
proficient in district accountability - This limit is set at 1 of tested population
- Annual appeal process for states and districts to
seek waiver of impact of 1 cap - Waivers are granted for one year only
Page 3
11Should students who are not expected to do well
on the general assessments participate in
alternate assessments?
- No. The decision about a students participation
in the alternate assessment must not be made on
the basis of the students perceived
probability of poor achievement on the general
assessments. As many students as possible should
participate in the general assessments.
Page 3
12Can students participate in the general
assessment in one content area (e.g.,
mathematics) and participate in the alternate
assessment in another content area (e.g.,
reading)?
- No. If a student can participate in any part of
the general assessment, then he or she should
take the entire general assessment with
accommodations as needed.
Page 3
13What grades and subjects are in the alternate
assessment?
- The same grades and subjects as are tested in the
general assessment. - It is critical that the EMIS grade level
assignment corresponds to the Alternate
Assessment Collection of Evidence that is
submitted for a student. - The district of residence and the district of
service must reconcile the specific grade level
for each student prior to completing the AASWD.
Page 4
14What grades and subjects are tested?
15Who assembles the Collection of Evidence (COE)?
- The COE is collected and assembled by the
educators who work with the student - In most cases, the district of residence is
responsible for administrative functions and the
district of service is responsible for collecting
the evidence. However, this is not always the
case, so there must be a collaborative effort
between the district of service and the district
of residence to identify where the students
scores will be reported.
Pages 4 5
16Who scores the Alternate Assessment (AASWD)?
- The AASWD is scored by trained scorers in a
central location. - Different scorers for Grades 3 - 8 and OGT
Page 5
17Who receives the results of the AASWD?
- The achievement level of AASWD are combined with
those of general assessment - Raw scores are submitted to the district recorded
for the student in TIDE within 60 days of test
submission. - The district which receives the scores should
share them all relevant parties including
parents/guardians.
Page 5
18What about the new 2 Modified Assessment?
- Final federal regulations have now been issued on
what has come to be known as the 2 assessment. - Field tests will take place in March 2010.
Districts interested in participating in these
field tests should contact Wendy Stoica in the
office of assessment at 614-466-0223. - The population for whom such assessments would be
appropriate is NOT the same as the current AASWD.
Page 5
19Chapter 2 Guidelines for Participation
20Guidelines for Participation
Chapter 2
- AASWD is appropriate for students with the most
significant cognitive disabilities. - How a student with disabilities will participate
in statewide assessment is determined by the IEP
team at least annually. - Test taking status will be documented in
appropriate sections of the IEP and should be
recorded through EMIS.
Page 7
21Ohio AASWD Decision Making Framework for
Participation
Page 8
22Meet Taylor
- Taylor is a sixteen-year old high school student
who has Down Syndrome. She is very personable and
likes to socialize with her age peers. She is on
the high school junior varsity swim team, plays
summer softball and is active in her church
choir. Taylor participates in a modified
curriculum in a resource room setting. The
primary focus of her instructional program is
acquisition of essential life skills and
functional independence. Her IEP goals address
basic reading comprehension and writing skills,
counting money, communication, selecting foods,
and doing laundry. She enjoys working in the
cookie shop at her high school, where she is
able to socialize with other students who come to
buy cookies during the lunch hour.
Page 9
23Meet Mike
- Mike is twelve years old. He has a high degree of
spasticity, poor head control and difficulty
using his arms and legs. Mike uses a wheelchair
for mobility and function. He is visually
impaired and has seizures. Mike must rely on
caregivers for his basic needs. Although he
receives primary nourishment from tube feeding,
he enjoys several soft foods that he can eat by
mouth, and is learning to drink liquids. Mike
demonstrates a refusal response for actions and
sounds that he does not like. He laughs in
response to movement and activities that give him
a chance to socially interact with other children
his age. His educational staff has been working
on switch activations to access modified
curriculum in English Language Arts and
Mathematics.
Page 9
24Chapter 3 Overview of AASWD
25Overview of Ohios Alternate Assessment (AASWD)
Chapter 3
- Is a statewide assessment process designed for
students with the most significant cognitive
disabilities who are unable to participate in
regular assessment. - Ensures that all students can participate in the
assessment systems.
Page 10
26What is an Alternate Assessment?
- Must be aligned with the States content and
student achievement standards. - Must report student achievement in the same way
as the States regular assessment. - advanced, accelerated, proficient, basic, limited
- Must serve the same purpose as the assessment for
which it is an alternate. - i.e., Reading, Writing, Mathematics, Science,
Social Studies
27What is Ohios AASWD?
- The Alternate Assessment consists of a Collection
of Evidence (COE) of a students achievement
aligned to a grade level of Ohios Academic
Content Standards. - The collection of evidence documents access to
grade level content but reflects an alternate
level of achievement of that content.
28What is a Collection of Evidence (COE)?
- A COE includes four entries reflecting four
different academic standards as defined by the
students grade level. - Each entry consists of multiple types of
evidence. - Evidence is gathered throughout the school year.
29AASWD Administration Flowchart(With Typical Time
Frames)
Page 10
30Roles and Responsibilities for the Alternate
Assessment
- District Test Coordinator
- Contact between the school district and the Ohio
Department of Education - Orders materials for Alternate Assessment
- Submits COEs to contractors
- Coordinates with other administrators to
distribute and collect materials - Special Education Administrators
- Building Administrators
- School/Building Test Coordinators
Pages 11 12
31Roles and Responsibilities for the Alternate
Assessment
- Teachers
- Coordinate the collection of evidence within the
instructional process - Related Service Personnel
- Paraprofessionals
- Parents/guardians
- Community members
Pages 11 12
32Chapter 4 Preparing to Administer Ohios AASWD
33Preparing to administer Ohios AASWD
Chapter 4
- Locate and review the Ohio Academic Content
Standards, Benchmarks and Grade-Level Indicators - Appendices 3 - 8 and 10 in this manual
- Ohio Department of Education http//education.ohio
.gov - Standards and Instruction/Academic Content
Standards - Available from the school administrative office.
- May also be ordered for FREE. Contact Karen
Paschal at ODE at karen.paschal_at_ode.state.oh.us
or (614) 387-0146.
Page 13
34Ohio Academic Content Standards
Benchmarks at the Student Grade Level
Applications
35Applications of Standards-based Knowledge/Skills
- Aligned to content standards and benchmarks
- Reduced in scope or complexity for students with
significant disabilities - Relevant to the needs and abilities of students
with significant disabilities - Reflect the critical function of the standards
Page 14
36Measurement Standard
- Students estimate and measure to a required
degree of accuracy and precision by selecting and
using appropriate units, tools and technologies.
The overarching theme of the standard as it
applies to grades K - 12
Refer to Appendices 3 - 8 and 10 for grade level
standards, benchmarks and standards-based
applications.
37Indicators are specific to the grade level
Benchmarks are listed in grade level bands
Example Grade 5 Mathematics
Page 5-6
38Standards-based Applications
Example Grade 5 Mathematics
The applications in this column are applicable
to students with the most significant
disabilities.
(Note Alignment with benchmarks for this
standard are shown in parenthesis.)
Page 5-7
39AASWD Applications of Standards-based
Knowledge/Skills
- Teacher-developed applications are not an option
- 100 - 207 Reading
- 262 278 Writing
- 300 - 405 Math
- 500 - 570 Science
- 647 674 Social Studies
- Applications must be selected from the lists
provided. Benchmark letters must also match from
the lists. Evidence that is not aligned will not
be scored.
Page 14
40A Collection of Evidence contains four Entries
- Each Entry includes
- One Standard
- designated for each grade level
- One Benchmark
- One Application
- 2 - 3 Tasks
- All related to the standard, benchmark and
application - 2 - 3 Types of Evidence
- One type for each task
Page 27
41Relationship of AASWD and the IEP
Standards-based Instructional Activities
Alternate Assessment Demonstration of
performance areas
IEP Goals Progress in skill areas
(progress monitoring)
(snapshot of achievement)
Page 15
42Relationship of Standards-based Applications and
Student Tasks
Standards-based Application 325 Select and use
appropriate measurement units and/or tools in
daily living activities
Task 1 Using a recipe, Andy will use a 1 cup and
1/2 cup measure to add flour and sugar to make
brownies.
Task 2 Using a ruler, Andy will measure and cut
6 inch pieces of ribbon for a Christmas craft
project.
Task 3 (optional) Andy will use a 1/2 cup
measure to put fruit salad in bowls for the
classroom lunch.
Page 15
43Whats New in 2009-2010
44Whats new for the 2009-2010 AASWD?
- OAA - Writing and Social Studies tests suspended
(pg. 17)
Page 2
45Standards assessed at each grade level2009-2010
Standards in red are new additions. They replace
the standards of the suspended tests. Entries in
yellow are not new, but their position has moved
from entries 2 and 3 to entries 3 and 4.
46Whats new for the 2009-2010 AASWD?
Page 2
47Whats new for the 2009-2010 AASWD?
- CoED software information (pg. 4)
Page 2
48Whats new for the 2009-2010 AASWD?
- Students and their results (pg. 5)
Page 2
49Whats new for the 2009-2010 AASWD?
Page 2
50Whats new for the 2009-2010 AASWD?
- Testing Ethics and Security (pg. 47)
Page 2
51Whats new for the 2009-2010 AASWD?
Page 2
52Whats new for the 2009-2010 AASWD?
- Entry Sheets and Dividers (pgs. 2, 16, 1-8)
Page 2
53Chapter 5 Administration of Ohios AASWD
54Administration of Ohios AASWD
Chapter 5
- The AASWD is a collection of evidence (COE) that
contains - Four entries each reflecting a unique content
standard - Four Entry Dividers
- Four entries - one for each content standard
- Evidence that demonstrates the students
achievement of each content standard assessed - Administrators Authorization Form
- Collection of Evidence Student Answer Document
(COESAD) - Standards are designated for each entry in a
specific grade level
Page 16
55Page 17
56Collection of Evidence 2009-10
Maximum TWO standards/entries per subject
Maximum FOUR entries per grade, 8-12 total pieces
of evidence. (2 or 3 pieces of evidence per
Entry)Grade 3 Example
1
2
3
Page 18
57Grade 4 Example
Visual Representation of COE 2009-10
1
2
3
Page 18
58Grade 5 Example
Visual Representation of COE 2009-10
1
2
3
Page 19
59Grade 6 Example
Visual Representation of COE 2009-10
1
2
3
Page 19
60Grade 7 Example
Visual Representation of COE 2009-10
1
2
3
Page 20
61Grade 8 Example
Visual Representation of COE 2009-10
1
2
3
Page 20
62OGT
Visual Representation of COE 2009-10
1
2
3
3
Page 21
63Student List (optional planning form, Appendix 1)
Page 1-4
64Steps to Compile a Collection of Evidence
- Master Planner for Ohios Alternate Assessment
Administration - A tool to aid the educational team in planning
for administration of the alternate assessment - Located in Appendix 1
This is an optional form. Do not send this form
in with your Alternate Assessments.
Page 22
65Page 1-6
66Page 1-7
67Steps to Compile a Collection of Evidence
Chapter 5
Step 1 Given the required academic content
standards to be addressed at each students grade
level, select benchmarks and applications within
the identified content standards.
- Based on the students grade level, determine the
standards that are to be addressed for the
Alternate Assessment. - Refer to the chart on page 17 in the manual.
- Each collection of evidence will consist of four
entries reflecting four different standards. - Grade specific Entry Sheets are found in the
Appendices 3 - 8 and 10 at the end of each
appendix. - Select a benchmark for each entry.
- Select an application for each entry.
Page 22
Instructions for Completing the Entry Sheet are
in Appendix 1-8 1-9
68Organize benchmark and standards-based
application on the Entry Sheet
ODE Determined
You Pick
Sample Entry Sheet for Grade 8
Use the exact wording from the grade level
benchmark and application.
69Tips for Step 1
- Select one benchmark per content standard
- Select from the students identified grade level,
even if the student appears to be achieving at a
lower grade level. - Select and write an application that aligns with
the benchmark. - Benchmark letters that align are written after
the application statements. - If multiple benchmark letters are shown, select
the one that mostly closely aligns with your
tasks.
70Complexity of Standards-based Applications
- Applications are grouped in three columns based
on their complexity. - It is anticipated that many students will be able
to perform tasks related to applications with
high or moderate complexity. - Only a small number of students with the most
significant disabilities will require low
complexity applications.
Page 22
71Low Complexity Applications
Low complexity applications focus on a
recognizable signal in response to stimuli.
This may include a body movement, smile, or
facial expression that is identified as a
selection. Further information and examples on
page 25 in the manual.
Page 25
72Standards Based Benchmarks Applications
Appendix 3 (Pg. 3-2 3-3)
Grade 3 Language Arts- Reading Phonemic
Awareness
Low complexity applications for SW most
significant disabilities -links with Kathy
Stauglers handout (tasks)
(Note Alignment with benchmarks for this
standard are shown in parenthesis.)
73Active Responses from Students with Limited
Response Modes
- A differentiated response is
- A response that can be recognized by others
- Has a defined reason for producing this response
- Examples of differentiated responses
- A body movement, a smile, a facial expression
Page 25
74Differentiated Response Selections
- Single Selection option
- Student selects a single option choice in
response to a question - Errorless choices
- Student selects between two equal choice
options in response to a question - Single switch messages
- Student activates a switch/talking switch in
response to a question/natural prompt
Pages 25-26
75Assistive Technology and Augmentative
Communication
- It is reasonable and expected that students use
assistive technology and AAC devices during
Alternate Assessment - Alternate modes for verbal expression, written
expression and motor performance - Clearly specify the accommodations used by the
student
Page 26
76Steps to Compile a Collection of Evidence
Step 2 Select tasks that allow the student to
show skills related to the selected standards,
benchmarks and applications.
- Select two to three tasks that will showcase the
students skills, and document them on each entry
sheet. - The task description should not be the same as
the application statement. - Each task selected for an entry should be
different and unique - Multiple pieces of evidence that represent the
same task/activity will be judged non-scorable. - A minimum of two tasks must be selected for each
entry. However ODE recommends selecting three
tasks.
Page 23
77Selecting Tasks
- Select tasks that reflect real-world activities.
- Real-world activities are tasks performed in
meaningful ways for purposeful outcomes. - Ask Will the outcome of this activity apply to
daily life? - Select materials that are age-appropriate.
- Age-appropriate materials reflect the
chronological age of the student rather than the
developmental level. - Plan tasks that present a realistic challenge for
the student. - AASWD evidence should capture student achievement
at a time when the student can perform these
tasks with consistent skill. - Choose tasks that will elicit active student
responses. - An active response should be observable,
measurable, purposeful, and voluntary.
Page 23
78Organize tasks/activities on the Entry Sheet
79Low Complexity Applications
Task
Application
In Kathy Stauglers Handout
80Pg.4
Pg.6-7
Pg. 13
Pg.16
Linking Students with the Most Significant
Disabilities
Pg.9
Pg. 18
Pg.17
Pg.5
Pg.8
Pg.15
Pg.20
Pg.6
Page from document linked to standards
Pg.9
Pg.5
Pg. 13-14
Pg.17
Pg.8
Pg.18
Pg.15
Pg.5
Pg.16
Pg.19
Pg.6
Pg.9
Pg.8
Pg.17
Pg.21
Pg.24
81Are You Smarter Then You Were????
82Steps to Compile a Collection of Evidence
Step 3 Collect assessment evidence.
- Decide the best way to demonstrate the students
performance. - Use a different type of evidence (e.g., data
chart, checklist) for each task within each
Entry. - Clearly note on the evidence provided, the
students performance (i.e., provide an answer
key or grade the students work). - Collect evidence for all content areas assessed
in the COE. - On each piece of evidence, indicate
- the level and type of prompting,
- the setting in which the task occurred,
- the individuals with whom the student interacted,
and - the way the student interacted with the
individuals - Remember Do not wait until binders and
materials are - received from contractor to begin collecting
evidence.
Pages 23 - 24
83Organize type of Evidence on the Entry Sheet
Different types of evidence
84Tips for Step 3
- Do not include the same worksheet given to the
student on three different dates. - Do not include the same task recorded on three
different types of evidence. - Clearly define the criteria for success simply
stating 80 may not clearly define what is
expected. - On each piece of evidence indicate Entry and
Evidence .
85Tips for Step 3
- Do not confuse natural cues with prompting.
- Natural cues are normally occurring directions,
reminders or signals that indicate to a student
that a response is required or requested. - Prompting is a verbal, physical or gestural
stimulus that directs a student toward a correct
answer. - If the student performs task independently,
indicate this on the evidence. - Be cautious when indicating continuous
prompting does continuous prompting indicate
that the student was not able to perform the task
with an active response? - Indicate with who and how the student interacted
in relation to the task.
86Entry Evidence
- An entry should be a reflection of the students
best work performance during the 2009-10 school
year - NOT simply a collection of worksheets or
unidentifiable photos. - Each type of data collected and submitted is
considered a type of evidence. - Essential to use 2 or 3 different types of
evidence to show performance. - The purpose is to demonstrate the students
generalization of the skill. - A students score for an entry equals the sum of
the pieces of evidence divided by the number of
pieces.
Page 27
872 versus 3 pieces of Evidence
New
Page 54
88Entry Evidence
- 1 Entry
- 1 standard, 1 benchmark and 1 application
- 2 to 3 tasks aligned to the standard, benchmark
and application using a different type of
evidence for each task.
Evidence 1
Evidence 2
Evidence 3 (optional)
Chapter 5
89Types of Evidence
- Examples of completed evidence forms are on pages
27-46 - Work samples (actual work or photographs of
work) - Data charts
- Event Recording Using Trial Format
- Event Recording Using Tally Format
- Event Recording Using Trial Format with item
details - Checklists
- Series of captioned photographs
- Observations
- Interviews with teachers, parents/guardians and
employers - Peer reviews
- Videos with scripts,
- Audio with scripts.
- Blank Evidence forms are in Appendix 1
- Electronic versions are at education.ohio.gov
key word search alternate assessments
Page 27
90Guidelines for Work Samples
- A work sample is the permanent product of a
task/activity requiring the student to write a
response, assemble materials, or create
something. - A cover page may be included to record
information - Describe the task exactly as the student was
instructed to perform it and state the criteria
for success - Indicate how well the student performed
- be sure to score a worksheet, indicating which
items are correct and which are incorrect
Consider real-world applications when collecting
each piece of evidence and note age-appropriate
materials, level of prompting, settings and with
whom/how the student interacted on each piece of
evidence.
Page 28
Blank form Appendix 1- 11
91Example of Work Sample
Pgs. 29 - 30
92Page 29
93Page 30
94Guidelines for Data Charts
- Data charts may be used to record performance on
specific tasks demonstrated by the student. - Data charts are useful when documenting multiple
occasions of student performance of tasks - Although three samples of data charts are
included in the manual, use only one data chart
per entry. - Describe the task exactly as the student was
instructed to perform it and state the criteria
for success - Describe through notations or symbols how well
the student performed based on the set criteria
for success for the task. - Include a key to indicate what the notations and
symbols represent.
Consider real-world applications when collecting
each piece of evidence and note age-appropriate
materials, level of prompting, settings and with
whom the student interacted on each piece of
evidence.
Page 31
95Data Charts
- Although three samples of data charts are
included in this manual, use only one data chart
per entry. - Event Recording Using Tally Format
- Event Recording Using Trial Format
- Event Recording Using Trial Format with Item
Details -
- Indicate (circle) sections of the data chart that
represent assessment. -
Blank forms Appendix 1- 12 to 1-14
96Example of Data Charts
Pgs. 32-34
97Page 32
98Page 33
99Page 34
100Guidelines for Checklists
- A checklist is a listing of the steps or
components of a task and a recording of the
students performance of each step or component. - Each step must relate directly to the task and
must be an actual part of the task. - The checklist should include as many steps or
components as necessary but at least three. - The checklist is only one day or occurrence of
the task.
Consider real-world applications when collecting
each piece of evidence and note age-appropriate
materials, level of prompting, settings and with
whom the student interacted on each piece of
evidence.
Page 35
Blank form Appendix 1-15
101Example of a Checklist
page 36
102Page 36
103Guidelines for a Series of Captioned Photographs
- Photographs provide evidence of student
performance on a specific task and in a
particular setting without being overly intrusive
or disruptive. - Follow your districts policies and procedures
regarding permission and usage of photographs. - A cover page may be included to record
information about the evidence. - Include multiple photographs in a series that
show the student performing the task. - Provide a written description (detailed caption)
of exactly what the photographs show. - Indicate how well the student performed based on
the set criteria for success for the task.
Consider real-world applications when collecting
each piece of evidence and note age-appropriate
materials, level of prompting, settings and with
whom the student interacted on each piece of
evidence.
Page 37
Blank form Appendix 1-16
104Example of Captioned Photos
page 38
105Page 38
106Guidelines for Observations
- Observations may be completed by teachers,
parents/guardians, related service providers or
other adults in the school, home or community
settings. - The teacher should describe the task exactly as
the student was instructed to perform it and
state the criteria for success. - Observations may be completed by teachers,
parents/guardians, related service providers or
other adults. - Instruct the observer to indicate how well the
student performed based on the set criteria for
success for the task.
Consider real-world applications when collecting
each piece of evidence and note age-appropriate
materials, level of prompting, settings and with
whom the student interacted on each piece of
evidence.
Page 39
Blank form Appendix 1-17
107Example of an Observation
page 40
108Page 40
109Guidelines for an Interview
- The teacher may interview a parent, teacher,
employer or other individual who is in a position
to describe the students real-world performance. - Typically, this method is used when the
performance occurs in a setting in which the
teacher is not present. - The teacher should describe the task exactly as
the student was instructed to perform it and
state the criteria.
Consider real-world applications when collecting
each piece of evidence and note age-appropriate
materials, level of prompting, settings and with
whom the student interacted on each piece of
evidence.
Page 41
Blank forms Appendix 1-18
110Example of an Interview
page 42
111Page 42
112Guidelines for a Peer Review
- A Peer Review is completed by another student who
has had the opportunity to view the assessed
student performing the task and can report on the
interactions and performance. - The peer should be a student without a disability
who is within two years of age of the assessed
student. - The teacher should describe the task exactly as
the student was instructed to perform it and
state the criteria for success. - The teacher presents the peer with a structured
set of questions to ensure that the students
performance of the task is documented.
Consider real-world applications when collecting
each piece of evidence and note age-appropriate
materials, level of prompting, settings and with
whom the student interacted on each piece of
evidence.
Page 43
Blank form Appendix 1-19
113Example of a Peer Review
page 44
114Page 44
115Guidelines for Video with Script
- Videos provide evidence of student performance on
a specific task and in a particular setting
without being overly intrusive or disruptive. - Follow your districts policies and procedures
regarding permission and usage of videotapes. - Videos submitted as evidence for the alternate
assessment must adhere to the guidelines/formats
listed on page 45 - Videos must be dedicated to the performance of
one student only. - Video activities should not exceed two minutes in
length per task.
Page 45
116Guidelines for Video with Script
- Start each video piece of evidence by stating or
listing on a sign in large print, the following
information - the students name,
- the date of the videotape,
- the content area, standard, benchmark and
application, - the task exactly as the student was instructed to
perform it and the criteria for success. - A cover page may be included to record
information about the evidence. - Include a script with each videotape.
Consider real-world applications when collecting
each piece of evidence and note age-appropriate
materials, level of prompting, settings and with
whom the student interacted on each piece of
evidence.
Page 45
117Guidelines for Audio with Script
- An audio recording may be used to document
student performance. - Follow the same procedures used for video
entries. - Include a written script with the audio.
- Use a standard audio cassette tape or CD for
audio recordings. Scorers will not have access to
the equipment required to listen to other types
of recordings.
Consider real-world applications when collecting
each piece of evidence and note age-appropriate
materials, level of prompting, settings and with
whom the student interacted on each piece of
evidence.
Page 45
Blank cover page Appendix 1-20
118Example of an Audio or Video
page 46
119Page 46
120Steps to Compile a Collection of Evidence
Step 4 Compile and submit the collection of
evidence.
- Assemble evidence and forms in the required
order. - grades 3-8 (Appendix 2) use the black binder
- OGT (Appendix 9) use the white binder
- Complete the teacher checklist in Appendix 1 to
reduce or prevent errors that may disqualify the
COE from being scored. - Use the entry sheets or master planner from the
COE to properly fill out the Collection of
Evidence Student Answer Document (COESAD). - NOTE Entry Sheets are an optional form for
planning purposes only. DO NOT submit entry
sheets as part of the COE. Entry Sheets will not
be considered for scoring. - Have someone else review the collection for
completeness. - Have your building administrator review your COE
and sign the Administrators Authorization Form. - Submit the COE to your school test coordinator.
Pages 24 - 25
121What is in the completed Collection of Evidence?
- The collection of evidence consists of
- Collection of Evidence Student Answer
Document (COESAD), - Administrators Authorization form,
- Four entry dividers for each academic content
standard assessed, and - Evidence that demonstrates the students
- achievement of each standard assessed
- all organized within a binder.
Chapter 5
122The COESAD
- Use a No. 2 Pencil only
- SSID is REQUIRED
- Use the District and School/Building IRN s where
the scores reports will be sent. - Pre-ID label
- Different COESAD forms for each grade.
- COESAD form, labels and binders will be sent in
January. - Sample Grade 3 COESAD 2-17 2-22
- Sample OGT COESAD 9-9 9-13
123The COESAD
- Binders and COESAD will be sent to the District
Test Coordinator of the district that enrolled
the student. - Must write all sections of the COESAD including
the descriptions of the tasks in No. 2 pencil
only - This is the LAST thing to do before submitting
- Have a peer review the COESAD against the
evidence
124Administrators Authorization Form
125Key Dates 2009-2010AASWD - OAA and OGT
126Timelines
127Electronic Entry Sheet and Evidence forms
- Electronic versions of the Entry Sheets and blank
forms may be downloaded in Microsoft Word formats
from ODE - http//education.ohio.gov
- Follow the links to Alternate Assessment
- Save as a separate document for each student.
Further information Appendix 1
128Testing Ethics and Security Considerations
- The AASWD is subject to the same consideration in
terms of test security and ethical practice. - Teachers ARE allowed and encouraged to retain
copies of the COESAD and the entry sheets---these
are NOT considered secure - Teachers are NOT allowed to retain copies of the
entry evidence---these are considered secure test
responses - It is a violation of Ohio Administrative and
Revised Code test security policies to
misrepresent evidence submitted in the COE. - The AASWD is an assessment of academic, NOT life
skills
Chapter 5
Page 47
129Are You Smarter Then You Were????
130Chapter 6 Scoring the COEs
131Scoring the AASWD
Chapter 6
The AASWD is scored on the following criteria
- Performance
- Instructional Context
- Independence
- Settings and Interactions
Refer to the Glossary in Appendix 12 for further
clarification of terms
Pages 48 - 56
132Student Achievement Measures
- Performance and Instructional Context
- Reflect the overall student performance
- Multiplied together to determine the Total Raw
Score for each entry, then summed to provide the
Overall Total Score - Performance x Instructional Context Total Raw
Score for entry - Total Raw Scores for all entries are summed
Overall Total Score - Remember
- If Performance for entry 0, the Total Student
Raw Score for entry 0
Pages 48 - 49
Scoring Rubric on page 52
133System Measures
- Independence and Settings/Interactions
- Reflect best practice for instruction
- Are not used to calculate the total score
- Correlation to Remember
- COEs with high scores on system measures tend to
have high scores on student measures.
Pages 49 - 50
134Performance
- The degree to which the student demonstrates a
skill while completing standard-based tasks that
require an active response. - Each entry is scored on a 0 3 point scale.
Page 52
135PerformanceCOE Development Considerations
- Showcase your students best performance
- Be sure that all the documentation is clear to
others - Each piece of evidence should
- Reflect one task with a specific outcome
- Specify exactly what the student was asked to do
- Provide rich, detailed descriptions of the tasks
- Show how well the student performed the task
- Performance is based highly on the criteria for
success
136Instructional Context
- The degree to which the tasks
- Contain age-appropriate materials
- Reflect real-world applications/activities
- Each entry is scored on a 1 4 point scale.
Page 52
137Instructional Context ElementsAge-appropriate
Materials
- Age-appropriate materials reflect the
chronological age of the student. They reflect
illustrations, content, language and format that
are used in general education for students of the
same age. - Consider materials in general ed. for same age
- illustrations
- language
- format of materials
- Modifications are expected, but should reflect
age-appropriate context - Boardmaker symbols are appropriate when
supporting learning - Commercial products (e.g. Edmark and News-2-You)
are appropriate if the context is age appropriate
Pages 48 - 49
138Instructional Context ElementsReal-world
Activities
- Real-world applications Situations in which
students perform tasks for purposeful outcomes.
Performing skills in real-world applications
presents students with optimal conditions to
generalize and transfer skills. Real world
applications are generally associated with the
highest levels of complexity in a students
learning.
- Simulated real-world applications A controlled
activity designed to allow students to
demonstrate skills that will lead to
generalization in activities of daily life.
Page 49
139Instructional ContextDevelopment Considerations
- Showcase your students best performance
- Materials should reflect the students age
- Real-world applications leading to generalization
- Be sure that all the documentation is clear to
others - Clearly document the Instructional Context for
each piece of evidence - It is not expected that all activities in a COE
must be completed in the community or real world
environment. There are numerous activities that
can be considered real world within the school
and classroom.
140Independence
- The degree to which assistance, or prompting is
provided to a student during the completion of
standards-based tasks. - Each entry is scored on a 1 4 point scale.
Page 52
141IndependenceWhat is Prompting?
- Prompting
- Verbal, physical or gestural stimulus that
directs a student toward a correct response. - Examples
- Asking, Are you sure about your answer?
(causing the student to alter his/her response). - Tapping or pointing toward a graphic in the
classroom that results in the students correct
response. - Saying, Check it again. after the student
provided the wrong change in a cash machine
simulation (causing the student to alter his/her
response).
Pages 49 - 50
142IndependenceWhat are Natural Cues?
- Natural cues
- Normally occurring directions, reminders or
signals that indicate to a student that a
response is required or requested. Natural cues
do not lead a student to the correct outcome and
are not considered prompts. - Necessary and acceptable during assessment
- Examples
- Asking a student to do something unrelated
- Providing directions multiple times
- Reminders to stay focused on the task at hand
- Physical supports
Pages 49 - 50
143IndependenceDevelopment Considerations
- Showcase your students best performance
- Natural cues are OK
- Introducing the activity is not prompting
- Dont make the scorers guess
- Document the prompting required for each piece of
evidence - Note the level of independence on each piece of
evidence - Avoid confusing statements e.g.Student
completed the task independently with limited
verbal prompts.
144Settings and Interactions
- Scoring
- Scored from 1 to 4 across the entire Collection
of Evidence. - Scorers will count the settings and interactions
across all of the evidence.
Page 52
145Settings and Interactions
- Settings Observed environments (including the
physical setting and the social interactions) in
which tasks are administered or performed. - Interactions A reciprocal action that occurs
while the targeted student is completing the
task. It involves joint activity and
communication between the targeted student and
one or more individuals who have either an
instructional role or a non-instructional role. - A variety of settings and social interactions
offer students the opportunity to generalize
skills.
Pages 50 - 51
146Settings and Interactions Settings
- Broadly classified types of settings
- Specialized settings
- Self contained classroom, resource room, therapy
room - General education classroom
- Typical grade level classroom
- Other school settings
- Library, cafeteria, gym, playground, bus
- Residence and community settings
- Home, residence, recreation center, restaurant,
sporting event facility, store
Page 50
147Settings and Interactions Interactions
- Broadly classified types of interactions
- Classroom personnel
- Teachers, teacher of record, related service
providers, para-pros - Peers with disabilities
- SWD within 2 years of age from targeted student
- Family
- Parent, guardian, siblings, other care-givers
- Peers without disabilities
- Within 2 years of the age of the targeted
student. Older students may have peers who are
adult co-workers. - Community members
- Individuals outside of the classroom or school
setting who interact with the student in a
non-instructional role.
Page 50
148Settings and InteractionsDevelopment
Considerations
- Showcase your students best performance.
- Select multiple settings/interactions in the COE.
- Strive for interactions with non-disabled peers
or community members (includes non-instructional
school personnel). - Clearly document the Setting/Interactions for
each task. - Describe HOW the interaction is in relation to
the task. - Important COEs cannot receive a score higher
than a 2 on Settings and Interactions unless
there is evidence of interactions with
non-disabled peers or community members. - If not specified, it is assumed that a peer is
a peer with another disability.
149Non-scorables
150Non-scorable Assessments (NSA)
- Avoid NSAs (nonscorable assessments)
- specific non-scorable codes will be assigned
- Missing Entry (ME)
- The entry was not included in the COE.
- COESAD
- The COESAD is not completed correctly.
- Not to Standard (NTS)
- The entry is not linked to an appropriate Ohio
Academic Content Standard, benchmark or
application of standards-based knowledge/skill. - Insufficient Evidence (IE)
- The entry contains insufficient evidence or the
evidence does not demonstrate that the student
performed a specified task or activity. - Disqualified Entry (DE) grades 3-8 only
- If an entry receives ME, the other entry in the
same subject area is scored DE.
Page 56-57
151NSA Condition Codes
These are the same codes that appear on the
school and district reports. The students paper
report does not specify which NSA was assigned.
Teachers must get this information from the
school or district reports or the DTC.
Page 57
152Did Not Attempt test (DNA)
- DNA Did Not Attempt test
- DNA assigned when an empty COE binder is
submitted for a student. - DNA should be interpreted at the individual level
as no attempt was made to assess the child. - DNA cannot be counted as a valid test
participant. - Any attempt to assess a student is better than no
attempt. - Avoid Non-Scorables by having a stranger check
and compare all sections of the COESAD and the
evidence.
Page 56
153Student Assessment Results
- The achievement level of AASWD are combined with
those of the general assessment - Score reports will be sent to the District and
School/Building whose IRN numbers are recorded in
the students record in TIDE within 60 days of
submission. - The score reports are not sent necessarily to the
same place where the students scores will count
for accountability purposes. It is up to
districts, with the help of their EMIS
coordinators and DTCs, to determine where the
scores will be sent and where the scores will
count. Where students scores count are the
domain of the office of accountability, NOT
assessment.
154http//www.ohiodocs.org/AASWD_2008_2009.htm
Parent and District Reports
155Interpretive Guide Family Report
156Interpretive Guide Educator Report
157Interpretive Guide Educator Report
158Interpretive Guide Educator Report
159Electronic Supports
- ODEs website http//education.ohio.gov
download - Entry Sheets for specific grades
- Evidence Forms common to all grades
- Informative information/Powerpoint
- CoED software www.sst5.k12.oh.us or
www.ocali.org
160ODEs Page http//education.ohio.gov
Click on Testing Then Alternate Assessment
161ODE Alternate Assessment
Click on AASWD
162Alternate Assessment (AASWD)
Evidence and Entry sheets
1631. Downloadable Electronic Entry Sheet and
Evidence Forms
Appendix 1 (Pg. 11-20) Evidence Entry sheets by
grade level
- Electronic versions of the Entry Sheets and blank
evidence forms in Microsoft Word formats from ODE - http//education.ohio.gov Follow the links from
Testing to Alternate Assessment - Save as.. a separate document for each student.
164- Collection of Evidence Developer (CoED)
- Electronic forms in Filemaker Pro format
- Allows teachers to complete paper documentation
electronically. - Reduces teacher time.
- The CoED software was NOT developed by ODE.
- The Office of Assessment does endorse the use of
the CoED software, but is unable to provide
technical support or be held responsible for use
of the program.
Download from SST Region 5 (formerly NEOSERRC)
www.sst5.k12.oh.us
Page 4
1652. CoED 2009 Software- FREE (Collection of
Evidence Developer)
- Filemaker Pro version 9 using Filemaker Run -Time
- MAC or PC
- PC is a zipped file and must be extracted first
before using it - Helps to eliminate repetitive typing -The teacher
only needs to type in information once - Student Name and Grade entered across pages
- Benchmark Letter -complete description will be
automatically entered across pages - Application Number complete description is
automatically entered across pages - Helps to Double check alignment (standard,
benchmark, applications)
166Opening CoED 2009
- Once you download it you will see a zipped folder
- Double click on the folder to extract the files
or (right click to extract all files) - Drag to your desktop (You can also copy
this folder to a flash drive to carry with you) - Open the unzipped folder (CoED Win5)
- Open the CoED 2009 Folder
167CoED Application
- Click on the CoED 2009
- Note there are lots of folders in here DO NOT
delete any
168Starting the CoED 2009
- To Begin Click on the green State of Ohio
- You will come to the Student Roster Page
169Step 1 Student Roster
- A Good Home Page
- The currently selected student is highlighted by
a black vertical bar to the left of the record,
name is top left corner in green - Click Select to choose another student
170Navigation of the CoED
Current Student
Entries
Green tabs To navigate between Students
Purple arrows to individual student screens
Blue arrows to classroom screens
Spell Check
To access the Evidence Forms from the Entry
sheets Master Planner
To Print
171Deleting Records
- From the Student Roster Page, select the student
you want to delete - Press the Garbage Can (Delete)
- Note this is final and can NOT be restored if it
wasnt backed up
172Hiding Records
- From the Student Roster Page, select Hide record
- This hides the record temporarily
- Show All Records returns hidden records
173Sorting Records
- From the Student Roster Page, Choose the Sort
Grade Level button at the top - This allows you to arrange multiple records by
name, grade, etc
174If you get lost..
3rd
1st
- Click in the top left pencil icon to Browse.
- Click the right arrow under Layout to expand the
pages - Navigate back to the Student List in the drop
down menu to get back to Student Roster.
2nd
175Step 2 Add a Student
- Click on the New Record button (top of Student
Roster Page) - Type in the students name
- Note Do NOT use Enter or Return at the end of
the name Instead use TAB - 3. Click in the grade field and choose the grade
- 4. Click red OGT if 10th grade
176If OGT
- Click on the yellow box to choose Reading OR
Writing for Entry 1
choose
177 Optional Form
Step 3 Master Planner
- Is a good planning tool do in early Fall
- 4 Entry sheets
- Predetermined subject area and Academic Content
Standard - Benchmarks and applications can only be entered
from either - the Master Planner
- the entry sheet
- Is an optional form
Access these entry sheets by clicking on the
numbers 1-4
178Master Planner Cont.
Press TAB between fields
- On each of the 4 Entries, Enter
- Type in the Benchmark letter
- Clues blue correct range and red arrow clue .
- Type the Application number which are linked to
the pre-defined content standard. - Type the 2-3 identified tasks and the criteria
for success, materials, interaction/ partners and
setting (You write or use Kathy Stauglers
handout for assistance) - Choose type of evidence from drop down
- Clues red duplicate evidence reminder
1.
2.
3.
4.
179Types of Evidence
- Click in the evidence box
- Choose from drop down
- If you have 2 the same it will prompt you.
- Click on the magnifying glass to get to evidence
sheet
180Master Planner