The History of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

The History of

Description:

... schizophrenia, self-esteem, autism, attitudes, motivation, emotion, dyslexia, ... Sodium Chloride, DNA) outside of human culture and society, psychological ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: jeff167
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The History of


1
  • The History of
  • Psychological Concepts
  • Dr. Geoff Bunn

2
  • Learning Outcomes
  • To understand
  • the difference between a natural kind of thing
    and a psychological kind of thing.
  • why psychological objects have to be understood
    historically and culturally.

3
  • Natural objects (the things studied by the
    natural and biological sciences, e.g. Sodium
    Chloride)
  • are not the same as
  • Psychological objects things studied by
    psychology, e.g. Intelligence.

4
  • Lets try to illustrate the difference between a
    natural kind of thing and a psychological kind of
    thing.
  • Consider this question
  • Whats the difference between a broken bone and
    a broken heart?
  • Write down as many differences as you can think
    of.

5
Broken Bones, Broken Hearts
  • Broken bone a natural object, appropriately
    studied by anatomy, physiology, medicine and
    physiotherapy.
  • Broken heart a psychological object that can
    only be understood in terms of experience (One
    of the worst things that happened to me. I
    know what youre going through) and meaning (It
    turns your world upside down.)

6
Broken Bones, Broken Hearts
  • A broken bone is real!
  • A broken heart is also realbut not in the sense
    that a broken bone is real.
  • A lot of Psychology has laboured under the
    mistaken impression that it is studying natural
    objects (broken bones) when in fact it is in
    fact studying psychological objects (broken
    hearts). This is a category error!

7
Whereas in orthodox sciences there is always
some external object of enquiry rocks,
electrons, DNA, stars, - existing as essentially
unchanging in the non-human world this is not so
for Psychology. (Richards, 2002, p.7)
8
picture of A natural object Adenosine
triphosphate
9
diagram of Krebs Cycle
10
  • There are no theories of equivalent complexity
    in psychology!
  • because psychology has no natural objects.
  • Natural objects have stable, predictable and
    controllable properties.
  • Psychology possesses no objects with these
    properties.

11
Draw up a list of
  • Natural objects
  • Psychological objects

12
Natural Objects, Psychological Objects
  • Natural objects rocks, atoms, electrons,
    chemicals, cells, stars, genes, electricity,
    weather, hormones, viruses, bones, trees,
    dinosaurs, gravity.
  • Psychological objects depression, love,
    melancholy, intelligence, schizophrenia,
    self-esteem, autism, attitudes, motivation,
    emotion, dyslexia, cognition, behaviour,
    nostalgia, mind, soul, ADHD, shell shock,
    sexuality, race, personality, development,
    introversion, feeblemindedness, hysteria,
    temperament.

13
The Tragic Case of Clark Hull
  • American behaviourist psychologist (1884-1952).
  • Devoted his life to finding a Global Theory of
    Behavior to explain all human action.

photograph of Clark Hull
14
Stimulus Response chains account for all
behaviour
Pictures of Skinner box and behaviorist mazes
15
sEr (sHr x D x K x V) - (sIr Ir) /- sOr
  • Where
  • sEr, Reaction potential
  • sHr, Habit strength, is determined by the number
    of reinforces.
  • D, Drive strength, is measured by the hours of
    deprivation of a need.
  • K is the incentive value of a stimulus
  • V is a measure of the connectiveness.
  • sIr, Inhibitory strength, is the number of non
    reinforcers.
  • Ir, Reactive inhibition, is when the organism has
    to work hard for a reward and becomes fatigued.
  • sOr accounts for random error

16
The Strange Case of William McDougall (1871-1938)
  • ..the most celebrated British psychologist of
    the first half of the century. (Thomson, 2006,
    p.55)
  • Hugely influential hormic psychology,
    1910-1950s.
  • His Introduction to Social Psychology (1908)
    marked an epoch in the history of psychology.
    (Hearnshaw, 1964, p.188)

photograph of McDougall
17
The Strange Case of William McDougall (1871-1938)
  • But McDougall is studied by no-one today and he
    left no intellectual or practical legacy.
  • Hull and McDougalls psychological objects have
    vanished.

18
Psychological Objects
  • are not mythical they do exist (if
    temporarily!)
  • exist within networks of other linguistic
    categories (discourses).
  • make possible human experiences, identities,
    capacities, feelings and qualities.
  • It does matter which word you choose to describe
    the experience in question it does change the
    nature of the experience!

19
Unlike natural objects
  • which can exist in an isolated pure state (e.g.
    pure Oxygen, Sodium Chloride, DNA) outside of
    human culture and society, psychological objects
    are made possible by a network of related
    discursive terms - which is itself a reflection
    of a particular human society and culture.

20
Psychological Objects
  • Are not reducible to more fundamental or basic
    units (unlike e.g. molecules).
  • Cannot be described in mathematical terms (unlike
    e.g. electricity).
  • Do not produce stable phenomena across time and
    place (unlike e.g. gravitation).
  • Do not have predictable qualities (unlike e.g.
    light).
  • Cannot be integrated into complex theories (e.g.
    genes into evolutionary theory, or ATP into the
    Krebs Cycle).

21
Questioning the Historical Continuity of
Psychological Objects
  • Much of contemporary psychology believes that
    the objects of current psychological discourse
    are the real, natural objects and that past
    discourse necessarily referred to the same
    objects in its own quaint and subscientific way
  • (Danziger, 1990, p.336, emphasis added.)

22
Questioning the Historical Continuity of
Psychological Objects
  • Much of contemporary psychology believes that
    the objects of current psychological discourse
    are the real, natural objects and that past
    discourse necessarily referred to the same
    objects in its own quaint and subscientific way.
    What this organization of historical material
    overlooks is the possibility that the very
    objects of psychological discourse, and not just
    opinions about them, have changed radically in
    the course of history.
  • (Danziger, 1990, p.336, emphasis added.)

23
Natural Objects, Psychological Objects
  • Natural objects rocks, atoms, electrons,
    chemicals, cells, stars, genes, electricity,
    weather, hormones, viruses, bones, trees,
    dinosaurs, gravity.
  • Psychological objects depression, love,
    melancholy, intelligence, schizophrenia,
    self-esteem, autism, attitudes, motivation,
    emotion, dyslexia, cognition, behaviour,
    nostalgia, mind, soul, ADHD, shell shock,
    sexuality, race, personality, development,
    introversion, feeblemindedness, hysteria,
    temperament.

24
Natural Objects
  • have always existed (they have no history).
  • retain their properties in different historical
    and geographical contexts.
  • are universal.
  • can be purified.
  • can be isolated and studied in the laboratory
    without altering the object.
  • exist independently of our descriptions of them.
  • exist outside of human culture they are not
    embedded in particular forms of human life.
  • are uncontested and not controversial.

25
Psychological Objects
  • have not always existed (they have a history).
  • change between historical and geographical
    contexts.
  • are not universal.
  • cannot be purified.
  • can be isolated and studied in the laboratory
    only if violence is done to the object (i.e if
    the object is changed in the process).
  • do not exist independently of our descriptions of
    them.
  • do not exist outside of human culture they are
    embedded in different forms of human life.
  • are contested and controversial.

26
Natural Objects, Psychological Objects
  • The proper way to study natural objects is in the
    laboratory, using the tried and tested methods of
    science.
  • The proper way to study psychological objects is
    through an analysis of the meanings and
    descriptions of human experiences in their
    particular contexts.
  • The proper way to study psychological objects is
    through historical and conceptual analysis.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com