RISK, CRISIS, REPUTATION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

RISK, CRISIS, REPUTATION

Description:

shareholders, commentators, regulators. will lay blame. Responsibility - Who to Blame ... Final Comment. KPMG Survey: More than two-thirds of 160 NEDs from ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: institute7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RISK, CRISIS, REPUTATION


1
RISK, CRISIS, REPUTATION THE BOARD
2
Some Historic Corporate Disasters
  • Early 1980s BCCI
  • Late 1980s - Mirror Group early
    1990s Guinness Polly
    Peck Lloyds of London
  • 1994 Barings
  • mid 1990s Pensions mis-selling
  • 1996 Deutsche Morgan Grenfell
  • 1997 Natwest Markets

3
Some of Todays Corporate Disasters
  • Equitable Life
  • Railtrack
  • Independent Insurance
  • Marconi

4
What are Todays Greatest Risk Issues?
  • Financial Risk Fraud
  • Health Safety Risk
  • Regulatory Risk
  • Reputation Risk

5
Newtons First Law as Applied to Business
  • Every action is followed by an equal and
    opposite reaction.
  • In our business world we could define action as
    the things that go wrong and reaction as
  • share price will fall
  • shareholders, commentators, regulators will
    lay blame

6
Responsibility - Who to Blame
  • Always lies with the Board
  • The directors represent the mind and will
    of the company (Common Law)
  • All corporate power derives from the Board

7
Why? No-one else has the Power
  • Business to be Managed by the Directors
  • The business and affairs of the Company shall be
    managed by the Directors who . . . may exercise
    all the power of the Company.

Delegation of Powers to Individual Directors The
Directors may entrust to, and confer upon, any
Director any of the powers, authorities and
discretions exercisable by them . . . and may
from time to time revoke, withdraw, alter or vary
all or any of such powers . . .
(Extracts from the Articles of Association of
the Independent Insurance Group plc)
8
Investors may Sue
  • The shareholders . . . are looking at the
    possibility of legal action against
    Independents directors including the
    non-executives.

(FT - 25 June 2001)
Equitable Life is to sue 15 former directors
for 3 billion
9
Social Change
  • Shareholder attitudes Hermes, NAPF, ABI,
    PIRC
  • Governance Remuneration Performance
  • Litigation, Court awards, Human Rights
  • Intelligent organised crime

10
Performance - Reputation
  • Never before have directors been more exposed
    to criticism, pressure and the risks of civil
    or criminal action.
  • BUT
  • good and effective governance is increasingly
    recognised and valued

11
Investor Opinion Survey
  • Three-quarters of investors say board practices
    are at least as important to them as
    financial performance
  • Over 80 of investors say they would pay more
    for the shares of a well-governed company
    than for those of a poorly-governed company
    with comparable financial performance
  • The actual premium investors say they would be
    willing to pay for a well-governed company
    differs by country They would pay 18 more
    for the shares of a well- governed UK
    company...

(McKinsey and Company - June 2000)
12
Measures that Matter
  • Our findings supported the US perspective
    that non-financial performance drives at least
    35 of investors portfolio allocation
    decisions.

(Ernst Young - 2000)
13
Post-Crisis Shareholder Value
  • Recovery of shareholder value appears to be
    directly related to the perceived ability of
    the management team in dealing with the
    crisis.
  • Recoverers find that shareholder value rises
    for some months or so following this event.
    Non-recoverers shareholder value continues
    to decline for many months and remains
    depressed.

(Dr. Deborah Pretty, Oxford Metrica 2001)
14
How to Reduce the Risks of a Crisis
  • Knowledge
  • Understanding
  • Control
  • Preparation

15
Knowledge
  • A directors care and diligence will be judged
    on what the director knew or should have
    ascertained

(Insolvency Act 1986)
16
Understanding
  • To improve performance, you have to
    understand how better to manage risk

(Turnbull Committee Report September 1999)
17
Control
  • The maelstrom of mergers, restructuring,
    downsizing and business reorganisations within
    (the) industry has diluted management control
    and eroded employee loyalty.

(Dr Oonagh McDonald and Viv. Pyne The Competent
Company
18
Preparation
  • The boy scouts motto
  • Be Prepared
  • Define, develop and test a structure to manage
    any conceivable crisis.

19
Communication
  • Good corporate communications are a vital weapon
    in protecting a companys reputation
  • -----------
  • but they must be founded on an effective board

20
An Effective Board
  • Essential to Managing Risk Protecting
    Rewards
  • There is no board or governing body in the
    world which, if the members think about it,
    cannot improve its effectiveness.

(IoD Standards for the Board)
  • The questions to be asked are
  • are we competent?
  • are we knowledgeable and aware?
  • are we learning?
  • do we evaluate our own performance?

21
Final Comment
  • KPMG Survey
  • More than two-thirds of 160 NEDs from
    FTSE 350 companies believed they would
    benefit from a formal appraisal. Fewer than
    25 received one.
  • 70 did not receive guidance in areas such
    as crisis management . . .

(FT 5 November 2002)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com