THE AMERICAN TIME USE SURVEY: Activity Coding in Dress Rehearsal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

THE AMERICAN TIME USE SURVEY: Activity Coding in Dress Rehearsal

Description:

Familiarized interviewers/coders with lexicon and coding rules. How to use coding instrument ... Adjudicators as inexperienced as coders/verifiers. BLS solutions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: kristina64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE AMERICAN TIME USE SURVEY: Activity Coding in Dress Rehearsal


1
THE AMERICAN TIME USE SURVEY Activity Coding in
Dress Rehearsal
  • Kristina Shelley
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • International Association for Time Use Research
  • October 17, 2002

2
ATUS Coding Background
  • FY 2001 3 Census Bureau coding tests 1 Westat
    coding test
  • --tests evaluated coding lexicon, coding
    instrument, coding rules

3
ATUS Dress Rehearsal interviewing training
  • How to use conversational interviewing techniques
  • How and when to probe
  • How to use collection instrument
  • Conducted practice interviews

4
ATUS Dress Rehearsal coding training
  • Familiarized interviewers/coders with lexicon and
    coding rules
  • How to use coding instrument
  • Conducted mock coding exercises
  • Coding operations used Census Bureau
    interviewers, live interviews
  • Coding of interviews (not their own) began
    shortly after time diary collection

5
ATUS Dress Rehearsal verification and
adjudication process
  • Interviewer (coder) coded a case
  • 2nd interviewer (verifier) coded same case
  • If difference in activity codes, supervisor
    (adjudicator) assigned correct code and assigned
    error to coder, verifier, or both

6
Coding training results
  • Conversational interviewing and probing concepts
    still not clear
  • Exposed inconsistencies/problems with lexicon and
    coding rules
  • Confirmed usability of coding instrument
  • Coding efficiency increased over the survey period

7
Verification and adjudication results
  • Cumulative difference rate (April-August)
    12.81
  • Rate improved from 14.25 in April to 12.54 in
    July (very few cases coded in August)
  • Individual rates ranged from 23 to 10
  • Major flaw in the process lack of interviewing
    feedback

8
BLS review of adjudication reports
  • Interviewer errors
  • Lexicon problems
  • Additional coding rules
  • Adjudicators as inexperienced as coders/verifiers

9
BLS solutions
  • Developed interviewer error codes
  • Corrected errors in lexicon
  • Restructured lexicon categories

10
BLS solutions
  • Added lexicon categories and examples
  • Clarified and added to coding rules
  • Developed new desk aids and coding exercises

11
Desk aid example
12
Whats Next?
  • Refine conceptual definitions
  • --adult care
  • --recreation vs. entertainment
  • --hobbies vs. unpaid work
  • --work activities vs. income-generating
    activities

13
whats next
  • Change lexicon to maximize international
    comparability
  • --volunteer activities
  • organization vs. activity-based
  • type of organization (for children,
    religion-based)
  • --religious spiritual activities
  • religious services and practices
  • weddings, funerals, wakes
  • --helping and caring for adults
  • break out types of help and assistance

14
whats next
  • Revise coding rules
  • --accompanying someone
  • --doing favors
  • --pet and animal care
  • --lawn and garden care
  • --travel as one of two simultaneous activities
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com