Drug Testing in Schools - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Drug Testing in Schools

Description:

Does drug testing students in public schools violate their 4th Amendment rights? ... The concern for deterring drug use by the nation's school children is important ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: lcur3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Drug Testing in Schools


1
Drug Testing in Schools
  • Pat McCloskey
  • School Law
  • April 10, 2006

2
Issues
  • Does drug testing students in public schools
    violate their 4th Amendment rights?
  • Are student-athletes subject to more strict
    testing protocols than other students?
  • What must schools prove in order to drug test
    students in middle and high schools?

3
Reasons for Testing
  • Observed increase in student drug use and
    disciplinary problems.
  • Increased risk of sport-related injuries.
  • Athletes and those engaging in extracurricular
    activities are seen as the leaders in the
    student culture. Thus, are usually at the head of
    any drug use in schools.

4
Reasons not to test
  • Violation of 4th Amendment rights.
  • Singles-out athletes and those participating in
    extracurricular activities (choir, band, clubs)
    from the rest of the population.
  • Is there a current visible problem in the schools?

5
Fourth Amendment
  • The right of the people to be secure in their
    persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
    unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
    violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon
    probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,
    and particularly describing the place to be
    searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

6
Vernonia S.D. vs. Wayne ActonSupreme Court of
the U.S. June 26, 1995
  • Decision
  • The drug testing policy did not violate the
    students 4th amend. right.
  • Student drug problems, especially with
    student-athletes, was severe enough cause to
    address the problem with testing.
  • This type of search was relatively unobtrusive
    and the severity of the need was met by the
    search.

7
Board of Education of Pottawatomie Cty. vs.
EarlsSupreme Court June 27, 2002
  • Decision
  • The drug testing policy reasonably served the
    school districts interest in detecting and
    preventing drug use.
  • Does not violate 4th amend. Because
  • The students affected had a limited expectation
    of privacy, as they volunteer for those
    activities.
  • Non intrusive testing procedure, the invasion of
    privacy was not significant.
  • School district provided evidence of the need.

8
Conclusion
  • Drug testing in schools does not violate 4th
    amendment rights because
  • The concern for deterring drug use by the
    nation's school children is important and perhaps
    compelling.
  • School years are a time when the physical,
    psychological, and addictive effects of drugs are
    most severe.
  • The effects of a drug-infested school are visited
    upon the entire student body and faculty, as the
    educational process is disrupted.
  • The state has taken a special responsibility of
    care and direction, and the risk of immediate
    physical harm to a drug-using athlete or to those
    with whom the athlete is playing the athlete's
    sport is particularly high.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com