Lecture 1011 Polynomial Time Hierarchy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 1011 Polynomial Time Hierarchy

Description:

cell-free method of DNA cloning. Advantages. much faster than cell based method ... DNA library: a collection of cloned DNA fragments. usually from a specific organism ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: utda
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 1011 Polynomial Time Hierarchy


1
Lecture 10-11Polynomial Time Hierarchy
2
Nonunique Probe Selection and Group Testing
3
DNA Hybridization
4
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
  • cell-free method of DNA cloning
  • Advantages
  • much faster than cell based method
  • need very small amount of target DNA
  • Disadvantages
  • need to synthesize primers
  • applies only to short DNA fragments(lt5kb)

5
Preparation of a DNA Library
  • DNA library a collection of cloned DNA fragments
  • usually from a specific organism

6
DNA Library Screening
7
Problem
  • If a probe doesnt uniquely determine a virus,
    i.e., a probe determine a group of viruses, how
    to select a subset of probes from a given set of
    probes, in order to be able to find up to d
    viruses in a blood sample.

8
Binary Matrix
  • viruses
  • c1 c2 c3 cj cn
  • p1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    p2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • p3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • probes 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • .
  • .
  • pi 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
  • .
  • .
  • pt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • The cell (i, j) contains 1 iff the ith probe
    hybridizes the jth virus.

9
Binary Matrix of Example
  • virus
  • c1 c2 c3 cj
  • p1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
    p2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0
  • p3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
  • probes 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
  • 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
  • 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
  • Observation All columns are distinct.
  • To identify up to d viruses, all unions of up to
    d columns should be distinct!

10
d-Separable Matrix
_
  • viruses
  • c1 c2 c3 cj cn
  • p1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • p2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0
  • p3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • probes 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • .
  • .
  • pi 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
  • .
  • .
  • pt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • All unions of up to d columns are distinct.
  • Decoding O(nd)

11
d-Disjunct Matrix
  • viruses
  • c1 c2 c3 cj cn
  • p1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    p2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • p3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • probes 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • .
  • .
  • pi 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
  • .
  • .
  • pt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
  • 0 0 0
  • Each column is different from the union of every
    d other columns
  • Decoding O(n)
  • Remove all clones in negative pools. Remaining
    clones are all
  • positive.

12
Nonunique Probe Selection
_
  • Given a binary matrix, find a d-separable
    submatrix with the same number of columns and the
    minimum number of rows.
  • Given a binary matrix, find a d-disjunct
    submatrix with the same number of columns and the
    minimum number of rows.
  • Given a binary matrix, find a d-separable
    submatrix with the same number of columns and the
    minimum number of rows

13
Problem
14
Complexity?
  • All three problems may not be in NP, why?
  • Guess a t x n matrix M, verify if M is
    d-separable (d-separable, d-disjunct).

-
15
d-Separability Test
  • Given a matrix M and d, is M d-separable?
  • It is co-NP-complete.

16
d-Separability Test
-
-
  • Given a matrix M and d, is M d-separable?
  • This is co-NP-complete.
  • (a) It is in co-NP.
  • Guess two samples from space S(n,d).
    Check if M gives the same test outcome on the two
    samples.

-
17
(b) Reduction from vertex-cover
  • Given a graph G and h gt 0, does G have a vertex
    cover of size at most h?

18
d-Separability Test Reduces to d-Separability Test
-
  • Put a zero column to M to form a new matrix M
  • Then M is d-separable if and only if M is
    d-separable.

-
19
d-Disjunct Test
  • Given a matrix M and d, is M d-disjunct?
  • This is co-NP-complete.

20
Minimum d-Separable Submatrix
  • Given a binary matrix, find a d-separable
    submatrix with minimum number of rows and the
    same number of columns.
  • For any fixed d gt0, the problem is NP-hard.
  • In general, the problem is conjectured to be S2
    complete.

p
21
(No Transcript)
22
Oracle TM
Query tape
yes
Query state
no
Remark
23
A lt T B
p
  • A is polynomial-time Turing-reducible to B if
    there exists a polynomial-time DTM with oracle B,
    accepting A.
  • A e P
  • A lt M B gt A lt T B

B
p
p
24
Example
25
Definition
26
Definition
27
Definition
Remark
28
Theorem
Proof
29
PSPACE
P
30
Characterization
THEOREM
PROOF by induction on k
31
Induction Step on kgt1
32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
Characterization
THEOREM
PROOF by induction on k
37
Induction Step on kgt1
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com