Title: TURF Breathing new life into an old technique
1TURFBreathing new life into an old technique
- Ray Poynter
- Director, Virtual Surveys
2A typical research problem
- Gelati Sons make ice cream
- In a typical store they sell 8 flavours and they
have lots of data about how well they sell - They have a new contract to supply a national
supermarket - But they are only allowed to offer 4 flavours
- Which flavours?
- The simple answer?
- The best selling 4
- The research answer
- TURF Total Unduplicated Reach and Frequency
3TURF a bit of background
- Dates back to the late 80s
- Many research companies offer it in their
toolkit - Only a handful of papers over the last 20 years
- Rarely used these days
- BUT
- With a dusting of Internet-based data collection
- And exposure to Excel-based modelling
- A powerful tool for portfolio management
4Why TURF?
- Consider the matrix below, with 3 flavours
- The data shows whether a flavour is bought by
each respondent
Coffee
Banana
Almond
1
1
1
R1
1
0
0
R5
2
3
5Gelati Sons
Almond Banana Coffee Damson Elder Fig Grape Hazel
R1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
R2 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0
R3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
       Â
Rn-1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
Rn 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
There are 70 different ways to choose 4 flavours
from these 8, which 4 maximise the reach?
6Solver
- Excel Add-in
- Check you have the Solver Add-In enabled
- Choose a cell to maximise
- The Reach value in our case
- Create constraints
- Each flavour is either in or out (integer values
in the range 0 to 1) - The number of flavours must equal the number
requested - Solver will then search for the best solution
7Solver example 1
Number of flavours Number of flavours 4
Reach Reach 95
 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 4
 Almond Banana Coffee Damson Elder Fig Grape Hazel Reached
R1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
R2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
R20 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
Total 5 13 3 2 4 3 8 6 19
8Different scenarios
Flavours Unduplicated Reach Flavours
1 65 Banana
2 80 Almond Banana
3 90 Elder, Almond Banana
4 95 Grape, Elder, Almond Banana
5 100 Hazel, Grape, Elder, Almond Banana
Sub-samples can easily be set up Either as
sample selections Or, as separate Excel pages,
one per key sub-sample
9Simple to Collect
- Each respondent sees all the scenarios, randomised
If definitely or probably buy
10Frequency, thats why its not TUR
- Only people who are going to buy the product have
a frequency greater than 0 - Definitely buys have a frequency
- Probably buys have a frequency only if you are
counting probably buy as people who are buying - Frequencies need converting to a common base
- In our example we might use the values as
purchases per year - Frequencies may need re-scaling
- Ideally using calibration data or norms
- Rough rule of thumb
- Square root of definite buy frequencies
- Cube root of probably buy frequencies
11Choice and Frequency
- The questions were monadic
- So, what do we do if we have a respondent who
says - If Almond is offered I will buy 4 per year
- If Banana is offered I will buy 12 per year
- If we offer him Almond and Banana?
- If the products are comparable?
- As in this example
- Usually safe to assume he/she will buy 12
products - Some unknown mixture of Almond and Banana
- If necessary, keep the ratios, e.g. Almond 3,
Banana 9 - If the products are not substitutable?
- e.g. some last longer, or are twice as big
- Then more complex assumptions have to be used
12Simple example, re-visited
- Almond has more people who would buy, but they
would buy less - Almond Coffee meets everyones needs, but with
the lowest frequency - Banana Coffee has the highest predicted
frequency
13Solving for Frequency
of flavours of flavours 4
Avg Frequency Avg Frequency 7.1
 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 4
 Alm-ond Ban-ana Cof-fee Dam-son Elder Fig Grape Hazel Frequ-ency
R1 8 8 0 0 4 0 2 2 8
R2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
R20 0 8 0 0 2 0 10 0 10
Total 27 87 12 17 15 16 50 18 142
The system can be set up to report reach as well
as frequency, along with sub-groups etc.
14Frequency solutions
Flavours Average Frequency Flavours
1 4.4 Banana
2 5.8 Grape Banana
3 6.6 Damson, Grape Banana
4 7.1 Almond, Damson, Grape Banana
5 7.4 Elder, Almond, Damson, Grape Banana
15Improving the interface
- By using customised VBA and Solver a more
complete solution includes - Selection of sub-groups
- Dynamically switching between Definite Buys only
and Definite plus Probably Buy - Stepwise solution of 1 to N products, reporting
reach, frequency, cumulative reach and cumulative
frequency - Dynamically switching between Reach and Frequency
- Ability to temporarily exclude products
- Ability to force specific products
- Ability to weight key sub-groups, e.g. to make it
much more likely that longstanding customers will
have a product they definitely like
16The client experience
- Whilst traditional TURF approaches provide useful
insight, it has often been static and dull - What-if modelling allows the client to really
understand the dynamics - Extensions include
- Adding Value weights to the products
- Forcing specific items to be selected
- Asking for the next best solution
- Identifying the disenfranchised
- Modifying the rules so a solution that finds 2
products for each respondent - Multiple ranges, e.g. in chilled food the best
ranges of Indian, Chinese, Mexican, and Italian
17Definites versus Probables
- Should the analysis be based on Probably Buy or
on both Probably and Definitely Buy? - Cases vary but
- Which option is closest to sales data?
- Try it both ways, see what the difference is
- If you are getting enough definites use these
- If you are using frequency then either use only
definites or down weight the probably frequencies
18Key TURF Questions
- Why isnt TURF used more?
- Perhaps because it is a specific tool for a
specific problem and is not readily converted
into a general tool - How might technology impact TURF?
- HB might remove the need for each respondent to
evaluate all the scenarios - When is TURF applicable?
- Flavours
- Products in a vending machine
- Travel and ticket options
- Pack and size variants (with care)
- Courses (including conferences)
- Menus and bundles
19Thank you