TURF Breathing new life into an old technique - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

TURF Breathing new life into an old technique

Description:

In a typical store they sell 8 flavours and they have lots of ... Multiple ranges, e.g. in chilled food the best ranges of Indian, Chinese, Mexican, and Italian ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: thefuturep
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: TURF Breathing new life into an old technique


1
TURFBreathing new life into an old technique
  • Ray Poynter
  • Director, Virtual Surveys

2
A typical research problem
  • Gelati Sons make ice cream
  • In a typical store they sell 8 flavours and they
    have lots of data about how well they sell
  • They have a new contract to supply a national
    supermarket
  • But they are only allowed to offer 4 flavours
  • Which flavours?
  • The simple answer?
  • The best selling 4
  • The research answer
  • TURF Total Unduplicated Reach and Frequency

3
TURF a bit of background
  • Dates back to the late 80s
  • Many research companies offer it in their
    toolkit
  • Only a handful of papers over the last 20 years
  • Rarely used these days
  • BUT
  • With a dusting of Internet-based data collection
  • And exposure to Excel-based modelling
  • A powerful tool for portfolio management

4
Why TURF?
  • Consider the matrix below, with 3 flavours
  • The data shows whether a flavour is bought by
    each respondent

Coffee
Banana
Almond
1
1
1
R1
1
0
0
R5
2
3
5
Gelati Sons
Almond Banana Coffee Damson Elder Fig Grape Hazel
R1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
R2 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0
R3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
               
Rn-1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
Rn 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
There are 70 different ways to choose 4 flavours
from these 8, which 4 maximise the reach?
6
Solver
  • Excel Add-in
  • Check you have the Solver Add-In enabled
  • Choose a cell to maximise
  • The Reach value in our case
  • Create constraints
  • Each flavour is either in or out (integer values
    in the range 0 to 1)
  • The number of flavours must equal the number
    requested
  • Solver will then search for the best solution

7
Solver example 1
Number of flavours Number of flavours 4
Reach Reach 95
  1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 4
  Almond Banana Coffee Damson Elder Fig Grape Hazel Reached
R1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1
R2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

R20 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
Total 5 13 3 2 4 3 8 6 19
8
Different scenarios
Flavours Unduplicated Reach Flavours
1 65 Banana
2 80 Almond Banana
3 90 Elder, Almond Banana
4 95 Grape, Elder, Almond Banana
5 100 Hazel, Grape, Elder, Almond Banana
Sub-samples can easily be set up Either as
sample selections Or, as separate Excel pages,
one per key sub-sample
9
Simple to Collect
  • Each respondent sees all the scenarios, randomised

If definitely or probably buy
10
Frequency, thats why its not TUR
  • Only people who are going to buy the product have
    a frequency greater than 0
  • Definitely buys have a frequency
  • Probably buys have a frequency only if you are
    counting probably buy as people who are buying
  • Frequencies need converting to a common base
  • In our example we might use the values as
    purchases per year
  • Frequencies may need re-scaling
  • Ideally using calibration data or norms
  • Rough rule of thumb
  • Square root of definite buy frequencies
  • Cube root of probably buy frequencies

11
Choice and Frequency
  • The questions were monadic
  • So, what do we do if we have a respondent who
    says
  • If Almond is offered I will buy 4 per year
  • If Banana is offered I will buy 12 per year
  • If we offer him Almond and Banana?
  • If the products are comparable?
  • As in this example
  • Usually safe to assume he/she will buy 12
    products
  • Some unknown mixture of Almond and Banana
  • If necessary, keep the ratios, e.g. Almond 3,
    Banana 9
  • If the products are not substitutable?
  • e.g. some last longer, or are twice as big
  • Then more complex assumptions have to be used

12
Simple example, re-visited
  • Almond has more people who would buy, but they
    would buy less
  • Almond Coffee meets everyones needs, but with
    the lowest frequency
  • Banana Coffee has the highest predicted
    frequency

13
Solving for Frequency
of flavours of flavours 4
Avg Frequency Avg Frequency 7.1
  1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 4
  Alm-ond Ban-ana Cof-fee Dam-son Elder Fig Grape Hazel Frequ-ency
R1 8 8 0 0 4 0 2 2 8
R2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

R20 0 8 0 0 2 0 10 0 10
Total 27 87 12 17 15 16 50 18 142
The system can be set up to report reach as well
as frequency, along with sub-groups etc.
14
Frequency solutions
Flavours Average Frequency Flavours
1 4.4 Banana
2 5.8 Grape Banana
3 6.6 Damson, Grape Banana
4 7.1 Almond, Damson, Grape Banana
5 7.4 Elder, Almond, Damson, Grape Banana
15
Improving the interface
  • By using customised VBA and Solver a more
    complete solution includes
  • Selection of sub-groups
  • Dynamically switching between Definite Buys only
    and Definite plus Probably Buy
  • Stepwise solution of 1 to N products, reporting
    reach, frequency, cumulative reach and cumulative
    frequency
  • Dynamically switching between Reach and Frequency
  • Ability to temporarily exclude products
  • Ability to force specific products
  • Ability to weight key sub-groups, e.g. to make it
    much more likely that longstanding customers will
    have a product they definitely like

16
The client experience
  • Whilst traditional TURF approaches provide useful
    insight, it has often been static and dull
  • What-if modelling allows the client to really
    understand the dynamics
  • Extensions include
  • Adding Value weights to the products
  • Forcing specific items to be selected
  • Asking for the next best solution
  • Identifying the disenfranchised
  • Modifying the rules so a solution that finds 2
    products for each respondent
  • Multiple ranges, e.g. in chilled food the best
    ranges of Indian, Chinese, Mexican, and Italian

17
Definites versus Probables
  • Should the analysis be based on Probably Buy or
    on both Probably and Definitely Buy?
  • Cases vary but
  • Which option is closest to sales data?
  • Try it both ways, see what the difference is
  • If you are getting enough definites use these
  • If you are using frequency then either use only
    definites or down weight the probably frequencies

18
Key TURF Questions
  • Why isnt TURF used more?
  • Perhaps because it is a specific tool for a
    specific problem and is not readily converted
    into a general tool
  • How might technology impact TURF?
  • HB might remove the need for each respondent to
    evaluate all the scenarios
  • When is TURF applicable?
  • Flavours
  • Products in a vending machine
  • Travel and ticket options
  • Pack and size variants (with care)
  • Courses (including conferences)
  • Menus and bundles

19
Thank you
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com