CANARIE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CANARIE

Description:

Mission: To facilitate the development of Canada's communications ... Standard CLI or TL1 interface. Customer A and sub- partition. Customer B. Customer C ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: bill426
Category:
Tags: canarie | cli

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CANARIE


1
CANARIE CAnet 4Customer Empowered
Networking
  • http//www.canarie.ca
  • http//www.canet3.net

Bill.St.Arnaud_at_canarie.ca Tel 1.613.785.0426
2
CANARIE Inc
  • Mission To facilitate the development of
    Canadas communications infrastructure and
    stimulate next generation products, applications
    and services
  • Canadian equivalent to Internet 2 and NGI
  • private-sector led, not-for-profit consortium
  • consortium formed 1993
  • federal funding of 300m (1993-99)
  • total project costs estimated over 600 M
  • currently over 140 members 21 Board members

3
The Context
  • Telecom market trapped in a nuclear winter with
    no end in sight
  • Bankrupt CLECs
  • Failed wireless companies
  • Troubled ILECs
  • Huge over capacity and financial bubble
  • The promise of de-regulation and competition are
    fading
  • Return to a healthy and profitable industry is a
    long way off
  • But despite all the gloom - there is a glimmer
    of hope in a new business model that may return
    the industry to profitability..

4
Customer Owned Networks
  • The customer owns the infrastructure (dark fiber,
    switches and wavelengths) while the carrier
    provides the service and network management
  • Relieves the carrier of huge capital cost of
    infrastructure and gives customer greater
    flexibility in choice of service provider and
    control of the network
  • Very similar parallel to evolution of computer
    industry from the centrally managed time share of
    the 1960s to the customer owned mini-computer of
    the 70s and the PC of the 80s
  • Today telecom is largely a service industry much
    like time share computing of the 60s
  • Asset based telecom puts customer in control and
    ownership of the network
  • Asset based telecom started with the same people
    who brought you the Internet our universities
    and research centers

5
Customer owned networks
  • Most Canadian universities and research centers
    own and control local loop dark fiber
  • Many regional networks also have their own fiber
    networks
  • BCnet, Netera, RISQ, ORION, ACORN
  • On a national basis CAnet 4 in Atlantic Canada
  • CANARIE will own the fiber and equipment and
    operate infrastructure as a condominium
  • Other organizations can buy into condominium
  • Group Telecom (Chapter 11 CLEC) will operate and
    manage the equipment under contract to the
    condominium association
  • CANARIE gets 16 wavelengths, carrier gets 16
    wavelengths to sell managed services or to other
    condominium owners
  • If GT goes bankrupt, condominium association can
    find another company to manage the network

6
RISQ Fiber Network
Network
450 Km
OC-12
MAN
Scale 100 Km
250 Km
Dark fiber
Leased bandw.
7
Level 3 provides dark fiber for California
Research Network
8
BOEING BUILDS PRIVATE NATIONWIDE OPTICAL NETWORK
  • Boeing awarded an estimated US20 million
    contract to Nortel Networks to build a private
    nationwide optical network based on DWDM and next
    generation SONET. Plans call for the deployment
    of OPTera Long Haul 1600 Optical Line Systems and
    OPTera Metro 3500 Multiservice Platform in
    multiple cities across the country.
    http//www.nortelnetworks.com/corporate/news/newsr
    eleases/2002c/07_23_02_boeing.html

9
Circuit Switched Networks!!
  • Recent research from Dr. Malathi Veeraraghavan
    NY Polytechnic
  • With hardware signaling, even at low RT
    propagation delay and long-path environments,
    Circuit Switched does better
  • 3.5 times lower delay at a 50ms prop. delay at
    1Gbps for a 20MB file
  • Zing a transport protocol that uses an
    end-to-end circuit in conjunction with TCP/IP
    path
  • Circuit switching not inherently bad
  • The telco business/engineering model has given CS
    a bad name
  • Can we take attributes and benefits of
    connectionless network like Internet,
    particularly end 2 end principle, and apply to CS
    networks?

10
The Problem with CS
  • Current optical switched circuits are edge to
    edge within a single carrier cloud
  • Any changes to circuit in terms of bandwidth or
    topology requires release of current circuit and
    establishment of new circuit
  • Customer cannot make autonomous topology or
    bandwidth changes or cross connect to another
    circuit within the carrier cloud
  • No inter-domain optical routing protocol
  • Customer cannot set up an end to end wavelength
    across multiple domains
  • No optical services for end2end light path across
    the campus/enterprise and across the carrier
    cloud
  • All current optical services are based on a
    client server model
  • No ability to exchange wavelengths and services
    on a peer to peer basis

11
Approaches to Circuit Switching
  • Two solutions
  • Flow switching (e.g Ipsilon, ATM)
  • Application switching
  • Flow switching has major limitations
  • Out of packet sequence problems on initiation of
    flow
  • Detecting beginning and ending of long flows
    requires a lot of packet sniffing, timers and
    state
  • Difficult to setup across interdomain networks
  • Application switching
  • Allows application to direct flow to dedicated
    channel e.g GridFTP
  • Allows OS bypass and large MTU and non TCP for
    greater efficiency
  • Allows web service interface for signal and setup
    of dedicated path

12
The Future -CAnet 4?
  • Funded by Govt of Canada for 110m now fully
    operational
  • A network of point to point condominium
    wavelengths
  • Universities and researcher own and control their
    own lightpaths or wavelengths and associated
    cross connects on each switch
  • All lightpaths terminate at switches where
    condominium owner can manage their own portion of
    the switch
  • add/drop STS channel or lightpaths
  • cross connect to another condominium owners STS
    channels or wavelengths
  • Web service architecture for management of
    optical networks
  • Plan to use OGSA for optical management
  • Owners of wavelengths determine topology and
    routing of their particular light paths
  • Condominium owner can recursively sub partition
    their wavelengths and give ownership to other
    entities
  • Wavelengths become objects complete with
    polymorphism, inheritance, classes, etc Object
    Oriented Networking

13
CAnet 4 Architecture
CANARIE
GigaPOP
ORAN DWDM
Carrier DWDM
Edmonton
Saskatoon
St. Johns
Calgary
Regina
Quebec
Winnipeg
Charlottetown
Thunder Bay
Montreal
Victoria
Ottawa
Vancouver
Fredericton
Halifax
Boston
Chicago
Seattle
New York
CAnet 4 node)
Toronto
Possible future CAnet 4 node
Windsor
14
Initial Version of Mini-IXExternal Proxy Server
15
Example
Local Border Router
AS2
AS3
AS1
AS4
x.x.x.1
2
1
Destination
LPO I/F
End2End Lightpath Creation Agent
LOS Server
4
LPO
LPO
LPO
LPO
LPO
LPO
LPO
3
5
LPO I/F
LPO I/F
LOS Server
AS5
Registry
LPO
WSIL pointers, UDDI or IRR
Advertises LPO between AS2 and AS4
16
Campus VLAN to OBGP
Campus Border Router
End user
VLAN
1
3
802.1 p/q VLAN Server
LPO I/F
LPO I/F
End2End Lightpath Creation Agent
LOS Server
LPO
LPO
4
2
Inspection.wsil
2
1.Border Router advertises VLAN lightpath and
external lightpath to GigaPOP 2. End user creates
lightpath object linking 2 objects 3. End user
(may) advertise newly created lightpath to other
entities
17
OBGP
  • Proposed new protocol to allow customer owned
    wavelengths to interconnect to each other at an
    optical switch
  • Optical switch is in effect a mini-IX
  • Use establishment of BGP or peers for process to
    establish light path cross connects
  • Allows network admin to maintain routing policy
    on cross connect even though there may be a cut
    through path
  • Traditional BGP gives no indication of route
    congestion or QoS, but with DWDM wave lengths
    edge router will have a simple QoS path of
    guaranteed bandwidth
  • OBGP can use optical AS path to concatenate
    wavelengths across multiple AS to have continuous
    QoS path

18
The future?Self Organizing Networks- RPON
Aggregator
Switch
ISP
Passive Optical Splitter
Neighborhood Node
Active laser at customer premises
Customer Controlled or Owned Fiber
19
Conclusion
  • The customer owns the infrastructure (dark fiber,
    switches and wavelengths) while the carrier
    provides the service and network management
  • Relieves the carrier of huge capital cost of
    infrastructure and gives customer greater
    flexibility in choice of service provider and
    control of the network
  • Universities and research networks are leading
    the way
  • Significant opportunity for Taiwan telecom and
    optical industry to develop the technologies
    required for customer owned network
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com