Harvard Town Sewer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Harvard Town Sewer

Description:

... units with 3 bedrooms, 1 sewer unit per dwelling for units with 3 bedrooms ... Number of bedrooms. Usage estimate. Square footage (commercial) or seats (church) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: carrie98
Category:
Tags: bedrooms | harvard | sewer | town

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Harvard Town Sewer


1
Harvard Town Sewer
  • Public Information Session
  • March 19, 2009
  • (with costs updated as of March 9, 2009
  • Changes are in red throughout)

2
Summary of changes from data presented on March
3rd
  • If you went to the March 3rd meeting, your paper
    slides will have different numbers than this
    version
  • Change summary
  • In response to property owner concerns regarding
    ownership for the plant upgrade, we approximated
    an appropriate cost for the town to carry
    (2/3rds, or 390,667). This reduced the average
    private betterment by 20
  • We also added increased some property GPD
    projections based on feedback. We also increased
    municipal property GPD projections to address
    potential future uses. These changes together
    increased total projected usage to 87 of
    capacity and raised average private annual sewer
    costs a bit

3
Background
  • Town Center Sewer Action Group was asked to
    consider possible town center septic/sewer
    solutions by the selectmen
  • Options considered
  • No action
  • Municipal only solution
  • Combined municipal/private district
  • Investigation included analysis of
  • Engineering design
  • Capital costs and their distribution between
    town/taxpayers and private owners
  • Ongoing operational costs and sewer fees

4
Decision Process
  • Review initial proposal with BOS for approval
    (completed 1/20/09)
  • Review and finalize proposal with district
    property owners and acquire feedback (early
    March)
  • Review final proposal, principles, circuit
    breakers and articles with BOS (late March)
  • Based on above, modify and prepare final proposal
    for town vote in May
  • Article to create sewer district
  • Article to finance capital expenditure
  • (if needed) Article to pursue muni-only plant
    improvements

5
Max. town benefit
Max. efficiency
Taxpayer savings
Max. efficiency
6
Details Funding
  • A municipal bond in the amount of about 1.9 M
    for 20 years at 2
  • About 75 of funding to come from betterments
    assessed to private properties that are served by
    the new sewer system and are improved in value
  • About 25 of funding to come from taxpayers for
    the municipal improvements (adding municipal
    properties and upgrading nitrification system in
    the plant), to be offset by sharing of
    already-in-place operating costs that are today
    fully borne by taxpayers

7
Capital Cost Sharing
8
"Win/Win Slide added 03/09/09
One-time connection cost
End of capital debt for Taxpayers and Private
betterments
Taxpayer break-even in 7th year assuming 80
connection rate
Taxpayer savings of 16 As usage fees
generate Revenue against plant operation
9
Details - Construction
  • Changes to the existing treatment facility on
    Mass Ave to accommodate additional load
  • Replacement of the existing pump station at
    Harvard Elementary School
  • Sewer connections and service to four municipal
    buildings and 70 private property units,
    including single family homes, multi-family
    dwellings, commercial properties, and churches
  • A low pressure sewer system comprised of
    underground pipes through which septic output
    would flow from property connections

10
Betterment Calculations
  • Betterment is apportioned across properties
    fairly by assigning shares in the sewer called
    sewer units. One sewer unit is normalized to one
    single family home. All properties within a
    class (single family home, church, commercial,
    multi-family, municipal) have their sewer units
    calculated the same way. Then the total cost of
    the project to build the sewer is divided by the
    number of sewer units to get a cost per sewer
    unit. Multiplying this by the number of sewer
    units for a property gives the betterment.
  • In order to provide each property an estimation
    of their betterment, the sewer unit calculations
    for each property class were
  • single family home 1 sewer unit
  • church building with seating 3GPD times number
    of church seats divided by average Harvard
    single family home GPD Title V usage
  • commercial greater of 1 sewer unit, or square
    footage/4000
  • multi-family .67 sewer unit per dwelling for
    units with lt 3 bedrooms, 1 sewer unit per
    dwelling for units with 3 bedrooms
  • municipal square footage/5173.3 (divisor
    reflects title V usage ratio between commercial
    use and office use)

11
Details (1) Costs to Private Property Owners
  • Betterment Costs incurred by all properties that
    are bettered by the sewer infrastructure passing
    by their property. The betterment may be paid up
    front or billed over a number of years with
    additional interest. Current financing
    assumptions are 20 years at 2 interest rate
  • Connection Costs These costs will only be
    incurred if you connect. It is comprised of the
    cost of the grinder pump (see below) and its
    installation as well as a connection fee that
    goes into a fund for repairs and maintenance of
    the sewer going forward. Each property is
    treated the same at this point in the model
    5500 for the installed grinder pump cost and
    1500 for a connection fee.

12
Details (2) Costs to Private Property Owners
  • Annual Sewer Costs These costs will only be
    incurred if you connect. The sewer rates are
    estimated by making an assumption about the
    portion the town will carry and how many people
    will connect. The maximum rates in our model are
    capped so that sewer district residents do not
    need to worry about who else is connecting or not
    connecting. Each resident will experience a rate
    that is no greater than the rate they would
    experience if everyone connected. The sewer rate
    is calculated for each property by multiplying
    the cost per gallon per day times current water
    usage from town records. For multi-family
    properties sharing one water connection the flow
    was apportioned equally across the dwelling
    units.
  • Grinder pump cost An electric-powered grinder
    pump is needed to grind and pump septic contents
    into a low pressure sewer system. The pump is
    installed on each individual private property.
    The cost of the initial pump and installation is
    included in the connection cost estimates below.
    The pump requires electricity, maintenance, and
    has the potential to be replaced every 20 years.
    The pump and system have reserve so they are able
    to handle flushing for a time in the event of
    power failure.

13
Principles System Design Assumptions
  • A low pressure force main design for collection
    infrastructure will be used.
  • The existing treatment plant with upgrades will
    be used and the district's capacity is limited to
    80 of the maximum plant capacity per DEP
    mandate, or 18,400 GPD.
  • Total capacity of plant 23,000 GPD
  • Allowable use by DEP 18,400 GPD (80)
  • Current use by schools and library about 6,000
    GPD
  • Available capacity available for use by proposed
    sewer district 12,400 GPD
  • Each property connecting will need to install and
    own a grinder pump to delivers pressurized and
    macerated effluent into the collection system

14
Principles - Connections
15
Principles - Betterment
16
Principles - Costs
17
Principles Governance and Decisions
18
Request to Proposed District Property Owners
  • Familiarize yourselves with costs and ask
    questions
  • Review detailed property statement
  • Validate assumptions
  • Address/owner
  • Number of bedrooms
  • Usage estimate
  • Square footage (commercial) or seats (church)
  • Review cost projections
  • Est. Betterment Costs
  • Est. Connection costs (grinder pump connection
    fee)
  • Est. Annual Sewer Fees (usage fees cost to run
    and maintain grinder pump)
  • Provide feedback via online survey at
    http//www.ratepoint.com/survey/62d89d56dcf4fdcb1f
    0314b6ae4cd5f6

19
Request to Town Voters
  • Understand benefits of the proposal
  • Cost sharing reduces future tax burden
  • Town center vitality
  • Protect value and usability of municipal
    buildings
  • Evolving church needs
  • Support for existing commercial needs
  • Avoids future mounded systems
  • Watershed and wellhead protection
  • Understand tax implications of proposal
  • Modest (15/household) tax increase in years 1-6
  • Break-even on project by Year 7 and tax-neutral
    until year 20
  • Tax savings of 16 starting in Year 20
  • All Materials can be found online at Harvard Town
    Web site
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com