Coase-rent/sell - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Coase-rent/sell

Description:

Ass: Consumers have rational expectations. Time line ---- p1 ,Q1 - p2 , Q2. Solve backwards! ... But not perfect solution. Coase's conjecture ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:12
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: christia158
Category:
Tags: ass | coase | perfect | rent | sell

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Coase-rent/sell


1
Coase-rent/sell
  • Industriøkonomi, uge 6
  • Christian Schultz
  • 3 Ã¥r, 2004

2
No commitment
  • 2 periods, good lasts these 2 periods
  • Zero interest rate, no cost
  • Competitive resale market. (p pm)
  • In each period, demand for service of good (for
    instance light, cooling, transport) is
  • Q(R) 20 R

3
If monopolist rents
  • In each period max R RQ(R)
  • max R R(20-R)
  • Foc 20 2R 0 so R 10, Q 20-10 10
  • Profit per period 10(20-10) 100
  • For two periods 2 100 200

4
If mon. sells at start of period 1
  • If he can commit not to lower price in period 2.
  • Set price 20 sell 10 units earn 200.
  • In period 2, everybody with reservation price
    above 10 has bought, so demand in period 2 is
  • 10 p

5
If mon cannot commit and sells
  • Ass Consumers have rational expectations
  • Time line
  • ---- p1 ,Q1 ------ p2 , Q2
  • Solve backwards!
  • Look at period 2, Q1 given
  • Residual demand Q2 (p2) 20 - Q1 p2

6
Selling no commitment, II
  • Max p2 p2 (20 - Q1 p2) ?
  • p2 (20 - Q1)/2 , Q2 (20 - Q1)/2 ,
  • ?2 (20 - Q1)2/4
  • Notice, second period profit depends on how much
    was sold in first period!

7
Period 1
  • Rat exp consumers know they can buy (or sell if
    they wish) in next period for p2. ?
  • If consumer pays p1 in the first period, she is
    really paying R1 (p1 - p2 ) for 1st period use
    and R2 p2 for 2nd period use.
  • So equivalent to renting for R1 (p1 - p2 ) in
    first period and for R2 p2 in second period.
  • So we can analyze period 1 as if the monopolist
    sets rent R1

8
Period 1 ,II
  • 1st period demand is therefore
  • Q1 20 - R1 ? Q1 20 - (p1 - p2 )
  • Remember p2 (20 - Q1)/2
  • So Q1 20 - p1 (20 - Q1)/2
  • Q1 20 - (2/3) p1
  • Total profit Q1p1 ?2 Q1p1 (20 - Q1)2/4
  • (20- (2/3) p1) p1 (20 -(20- (2/3) p1))2/4

9
Period 1, III
  • (20- (2/3) p1) p1 (20 -(20- (2/3)p1))2/4
  • Maximize wrt p1 . Foc yields
  • p1 18, Q1 20- (2/3) p1 20-(2/3)18 8
  • p2 (20 - Q1)/2 (20-8)/2 6
  • Q2 (20 - 8)/2 6
  • Total profit 188 66 180
  • lt 200!!!!!

10
Example end
  • Profit lower when monopolist sells than when he
    rents.
  • Problem he is his own competitor.
  • Notice he seeks to mitigate the problem by
    setting p1 high. But not perfect solution.
  • Coases conjecture
  • When number of periods go to infinity and there
    is no discounting (like in ex), then price ? MC
  • This has been verified in subsequent research
  • Examples Store Danske Encyklopædi !

11
How to solve problem for mon
  • Commit not to lower price . DSDE
  • Make good non-durable
  • Fads, fashion
  • Make capacity constraints so expanding output
    costly
  • Most favored costumer clause (NB)
  • Buy back guarantee
  • Reputation (de Beers)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com